[01:52] OvenWerks: The good news is that Ardour will be heading back to the repos. teward and I fixed it. [01:53] I'll try to figure out if idjc can be salvaged. [02:43] Yeah, that's way over my head. I don't think I can get that one to patch properly. [03:47] @Eickmeyer orrrrrrrrrr not [03:47] Rejected: … File ardour_5.12.0-3ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz already exists in Primary Archive for Ubuntu, but uploaded version has different contents. See more information about this error in https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/UploadErrors. … Files specified in DSC are broken or missing, skipping package unpack verification. [03:47] sorry my mail died because my residential network exploded, I had to switch over to my business connection [03:47] but yeah, I'm assuming you didn't version bump it [03:47] so I'm going to version bump it [03:50] which i'd have to do anyways thanks to doko's failures [03:54] @Eickmeyer I've pushed the version change to the repo, can you tag it? [03:54] assuming you do version tagging [03:56] Yeah, I can. [03:56] okay THAT looks better [03:56] ```ardour (1:5.12.0-3ubuntu2) focal; urgency=medium … * This upload does NOT include the changes introduced in 1:5.12.0-3ubuntu1 … which is in focal-proposed due to those changes FTBFSing entirely and … requiring the changes applied here in -3ubuntu2. … * Update to waf 2.0.19, patch to build with python 3 … * 0010-waf.pa [03:56] tch updated by Erich Eickmeyer … * 0020-fix-wscripts.patch by Erich Eickmeyer, … code by David Runge (Ardour Developer) … * 0025-point-to-custom-autowaf.patch by Erich Eickmeyer … code by Robin Gareus (Ardour Developer) … * 0028-Patch-waf-to-actually-build-install-properly.patch … by Erich Eickmeyer, code by Robin Gare [03:56] us (Ardour Developer) … * Patch to build against fluidsynth 2 … * 0027-fluidsynth2.patch by Andreas Müller … * Drop wiimote support as recommended from upstream Ardour … Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:36:23 -0800 … Changed-By: Erich Eickmeyer … Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers … Sig [03:56] ned-By: Thomas Ward … https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ardour/1:5.12.0-3ubuntu2``` [03:57] Accepted [03:57] Probably a result of doko uploading a version that fully FTBFS due to the python 3 thing. #shocker [03:58] Uhhh... you comitted the removal of libs/ardour/config_text.cc and libs/ardour/revision.cc. That might cause problems. [03:58] @teward001 ^ [03:58] 😐 [03:58] okay that's a mistake [03:59] i'll fix that [03:59] git revert [03:59] Yup. [03:59] git revert then nitpick my changelog changes only [03:59] :P [03:59] please :) [03:59] (including the note that it skipped -3ubuntu1 because that's a relevant note) [03:59] (I did the git commit after the source build oops) [03:59] Yeeep, but you're going to have to go 3ubuntu3 because you uploaded 3ubuntu2 and it was accepted. [04:00] ... or we stage the changes for next upload [04:00] -3ubuntu2 the removal of stuff was because of the sbuild run [04:00] debuild run* [04:00] Yeah, I know. I had to discard those changes EVERY time I ran debuild. [04:00] Do you want to do the dirty work or should I? [04:02] i've already reverted. [04:02] Ok. I'll pull. [04:02] just... tag it as -3ubuntu2 if you haven't already. [04:03] then i'll pull and debuild -S it again. The commit of the removal wasn't intentional [04:03] but debuild *does* remove the files during source vuild run so [04:03] Yeah, but we don't want to screw that up. [04:03] or are you saying that removal is 'bad" because debuild removed them and we need -3ubuntu3 anyways? [04:03] E:UNCLEAR [04:03] well, the git revert reverted the removals so 😜 [04:04] the git commit was *after* I did the `debuild -S -sa` call [04:04] sooooo [04:04] that's probably the issue there [04:04] Yeah, I'm not worried about it now, but I would be worried if something got angry about the files not being there to remove. [04:04] You know, unexpected FTBFS and all due to two files not being able to be deleted. [04:06] true, but the `clean` step is called anyways [04:06] and it has `rm -f` [04:06] which means whether it exists or not it won't error [04:07] called during debuild -S and called during build time [04:07] which is why it didn't FTBFS in local testing [04:07] because it was already purged from the source package. [04:08] https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-dev/+git/ardour/tree/debian/rules#n96 [04:08] and line 98 under it [04:08] there's several clean calls it seems [04:08] Ah, I guess I didn't see that. [04:08] yeah it has multiple nasty clean calls in here [04:08] but the clean phase purges the config_text.cc and version.cc files anyways [04:08] i agree committing that change is *bad* [04:08] but sbuild *will* clean those files [04:09] debuild* [04:09] Right, but we shouldn't be modifying the source files directly. I guess that's probably the biggest objection. [04:09] as i said that's why git revert is helpful [04:09] again [04:09] Yeeep. [04:09] this was just a minor misstep which we can fix because we didn't tag anything yet [04:09] Right. [04:09] extract the changelog bits, revise changelog, commit JUST that [04:09] tag after that [04:09] problem solved [04:12] Yep. So, are we uploading 3ubuntu2 or 3 ubuntu 3? I just want to know what we're doing so as to version properly. [04:14] @teward001 ? [04:18] Nevermind. [04:19] @Eickmeyer [Yep. So, are we uploading 3ubuntu2 or 3 ubuntu 3? I just want to know what we're …], 3ubuntu2 [04:19] k [04:19] because the .cc files would be removed anyways [04:19] Right [04:19] That's what occurred to me, hence the nevermind. [18:30] Eickmeyer: did you seed scribus-ng? if so I think you can go back to scribus normal package now so we can get rid of the ng one [18:34] RikMills: It's like you read my mind. I'm updating the seed now. haha [18:35] :) [18:35] Had to get some ardour stuff fixed in the meantime. [18:35] That's all sorted now. [18:35] Just didn't want to update the seed without ardour and raysession. [18:44] all cool. I was poked by the debian maintainer as they thought it was seeded somewhere [18:50] It was, is now not. [19:17] :)