| livcd | What is the role of Juju in the age of Kubernetes? | 06:39 |
|---|---|---|
| manadart | livcd: Using Juju, one can deploy and scale Kubernetes itself. Such a deployment can then be used as a substrate by Juju to model and manage solutions on top of Kubernetes. | 06:58 |
| manadart | Deploying K8s with Juju: https://jaas.ai/canonical-kubernetes | 07:00 |
| manadart | It is also easy to play with Juju/K8s using microk8s. | 07:05 |
| livcd | hmmm | 07:24 |
| livcd | So Juju would be a platform to deploy the k8, then manage the apps that sit on K8 | 07:24 |
| manadart | livcd: Yes. | 07:42 |
| livcd | I need to watch some videos to understand this better | 07:45 |
| skatsaounis | hi any ideas? cannot read "/var/lib/juju/agents/unit-xxx-2/state/uniter": invalid operation state: "relation-changed" hook has a remote unit but no application | 11:44 |
| skatsaounis | can I manually rewrite the uniter? If yes what keyvalue should I add? | 11:45 |
| gnuoy | hi there, does anyone know what changed around cross model relations between juju 2.7.0 and 2.7.1 ? | 14:03 |
| gnuoy | I have a test which was passing and no longer is. | 14:04 |
| gnuoy | It looks like the cmr hook isn't firing but digging into it in a bit more detail now | 14:04 |
| stickupkid | gnuoy, there are CMR changes, but it should only be landing in 2.8 (develop), let me know if you find anything | 14:07 |
| gnuoy | stickupkid, is https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/2kJ75VJcmh/ normal ? | 14:09 |
| gnuoy | stickupkid, oh, sorry | 14:10 |
| gnuoy | All the CMR relations are in a 'terminated' state | 14:12 |
| gnuoy | stickupkid, I've raised https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju/+bug/1860992 | 14:49 |
| mup | Bug #1860992: CMR relation goes into terminated state on deploy <juju:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1860992> | 14:49 |
| stickupkid | gnuoy, I'll just have a quick look now to confirm | 15:07 |
| gnuoy | thanks | 15:07 |
| stickupkid | manadart, or anybody know when we updated lxd stuff... | 15:38 |
| stickupkid | I'm getting juju.provider.lxd failed to get instances from LXD: Get https://172.17.0.1:8443/1.0/containers?recursion=1: Unable to connect to: 172.17.0.1:8443 | 15:38 |
| stickupkid | the url is available to access | 15:38 |
| stickupkid | gnuoy, looks confirmed to me, I'll see why we're getting an error in remote application worker for keystone | 15:41 |
| gnuoy | stickupkid, great, thank you | 15:42 |
| stickupkid | gnuoy, is there any chance you can test with edge? | 15:43 |
| gnuoy | stickupkid, sure | 15:43 |
| gnuoy | I'll do it now and update the bug | 15:44 |
| stickupkid | gnuoy, fyi: that's the 2.8 release and thanks | 15:44 |
| gnuoy | stickupkid, 2.8 seems to have the issue too | 16:18 |
| stickupkid | gnuoy, if you need a work around for now, you can remove the saas from swift-sf and then consume the offer again. | 17:10 |
| gnuoy | stickupkid, ack, thanks | 17:10 |
| === timClicks_ is now known as timClicks | ||
| timClicks | some interesting threads in discourse have popped up over the last few days | 21:24 |
| timClicks | https://discourse.jujucharms.com/ | 21:25 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!