/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/01/27/#ubuntu-release.txt

-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swami [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-2] (no packageset)01:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swami [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-2] (no packageset)01:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swami [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-2] (no packageset)01:15
mwhudsoninfinity: so fwiw, my "trailing space in d/changelog" is a vs A not i vs A fwiw :)01:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swami [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-2] (no packageset)01:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swami [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-2] (no packageset)01:16
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swami [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.2.0-2]01:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swami [armhf] (focal-proposed) [2.2.0-2]01:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swami [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.2.0-2]01:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swami [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.2.0-2]01:35
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swami [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [2.2.0-2]01:35
infinitymwhudson: A-ha.  (a-ha?)04:45
Eickmeyer[m]infinity: *80s music intensifies*05:33
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: v-sim [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.7.2-8] (no packageset)11:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: v-sim [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.7.2-8] (no packageset)11:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: v-sim [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.7.2-8] (no packageset)11:19
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: v-sim [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.7.2-8] (no packageset)11:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: v-sim [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.7.2-8] (no packageset)11:25
ddstreethi sil2100, i know you're busy with point release work, but any chance you might have time to review the systemd uploads for b/e?  And also util-linux in x/b/e if possible...and we also have qemu in b/e...12:06
ddstreetthe systemd upload is actually a re-upload to address some of vor-lon's comments, and to add more bugfixes...it was originally uploaded a week or two ago12:07
LocutusOfBorgplease somebody remove sfcgal on armhf12:45
LocutusOfBorgmissing build on armhf: libsfcgal-dev, libsfcgal1 (from 1.3.7-2ubuntu1)12:45
LocutusOfBorghttps://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=94626112:45
ubot5Debian bug 946261 in ftp.debian.org "RM: sfcgal [armhf] -- ROM; Architecture specific issue" [Normal,Open]12:45
jibelxnox, re bug 1860559 could you add the dependency on finalrd to casper on bionic?13:07
ubot5bug 1860559 in linux (Ubuntu Bionic) "[18.04.4] System fails to reboot after installation" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186055913:07
jibelfinalrd has been promoted to main last friday13:08
sil2100ddstreet: util-linux is on my TODO list, I'll try also looking at systemd though o/13:59
ddstreetmuch thanks!13:59
ddstreetand qemu should be a really easy one, very small patch, if you have time13:59
ddstreethowever qemu is still waiting on the focal merge so it can wait14:00
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.34-0.1ubuntu2.2]14:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.5]14:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.27.1-6ubuntu3.10]14:21
mfosil2100, thanks ^14:27
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:4.0+dfsg-0ubuntu9.3]14:43
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.22]14:46
sforsheedoko: we're seeing cross-toolchain-base test failures with the focal-proposed kernel. They don't look kernel related though, can you confirm? https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/c/cross-toolchain-base/20200122_153118_a4418@/log.gz16:09
bdmurraysil2100: What sort of verification should I do for u-r-u in bionic-proposed?16:30
sil2100bdmurray: we usually don't do any verification, but guess checking if one can successfully run u-r-u would be enough I'd say16:32
sil2100(any verification for mirror-bumps on point-release SRUs that is)16:34
bdmurraysil2100: Okay, I'll do an X to B upgrade just in case16:39
sil2100bdmurray: thank you!16:58
bdmurrayjibel: Are we doing any automatic upgrade testing to 18.04?17:13
gQuigswas just going to ping to have SRU of python-ldap for disco removed, but could all the SRUs just be dropped for disco (and trusty..)17:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dbus-cpp [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0.1-1] (no packageset)17:31
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dbus-cpp [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0.1-1] (no packageset)17:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wordpress (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.2.2+dfsg1-1 => 5.2.2+dfsg1-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)17:54
infinitygQuigs: I'll be tidying up and closing disco today.  trusty's a weirder case.17:59
gQuigsinfinity: thanks!  why is trusty so weird?18:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dmidecode (eoan-proposed/main) [3.2-2 => 3.2-2ubuntu0.1] (core)18:13
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dmidecode (bionic-proposed/main) [3.1-1 => 3.1-1ubuntu0.1] (core)18:14
dokosforshee: please give it back18:34
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dmidecode (xenial-proposed/main) [3.0-2ubuntu0.1 => 3.0-2ubuntu0.2] (core)18:42
=== jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand
sforsheedoko: come again?19:03
dokosforshee: ?19:04
sforsheedoko: I don't understand what you meant by "please give it back"19:05
dokosforshee: you're testing against 2.33.1-6ubuntu3, which isn't in the archive anymore19:05
sforsheedoko: ok I'll retry, thanks19:09
bdmurraysil2100: The release upgrade went well.20:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed x11-utils from i386-whitelist in focal20:40
infinitysforshee: "give-back" is a command in the Debian buildd/wanna-build stack that amounts to a buildd releasing a build back to the queue, so when old farts like doko say "give it back", they mean "hit the retry button".21:05
cjwatsonI was about to say that it never made sense in Ubuntu because Launchpad's builders don't work that way, but I guess it actually did in 2004/2005 when we ran dak21:06
cjwatsonLanguage is really sticky though21:06
cjwatsonTrying to explain why rmadison is called that to new Launchpad developers recently involved several layers of backing up and explaining another layer21:07
dokosforshee: btw, what are these "No change, rebuild to use new binutils" kernel uploads?22:50

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!