[01:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swami [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-2] (no packageset) [01:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swami [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-2] (no packageset) [01:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swami [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-2] (no packageset) [01:15] infinity: so fwiw, my "trailing space in d/changelog" is a vs A not i vs A fwiw :) [01:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swami [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-2] (no packageset) [01:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swami [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-2] (no packageset) [01:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swami [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.2.0-2] [01:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swami [armhf] (focal-proposed) [2.2.0-2] [01:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swami [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.2.0-2] [01:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swami [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.2.0-2] [01:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swami [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [2.2.0-2] [04:45] mwhudson: A-ha. (a-ha?) [05:33] infinity: *80s music intensifies* [11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: v-sim [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.7.2-8] (no packageset) [11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: v-sim [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.7.2-8] (no packageset) [11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: v-sim [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.7.2-8] (no packageset) [11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: v-sim [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.7.2-8] (no packageset) [11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: v-sim [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.7.2-8] (no packageset) [12:06] hi sil2100, i know you're busy with point release work, but any chance you might have time to review the systemd uploads for b/e? And also util-linux in x/b/e if possible...and we also have qemu in b/e... [12:07] the systemd upload is actually a re-upload to address some of vor-lon's comments, and to add more bugfixes...it was originally uploaded a week or two ago [12:45] please somebody remove sfcgal on armhf [12:45] missing build on armhf: libsfcgal-dev, libsfcgal1 (from 1.3.7-2ubuntu1) [12:45] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946261 [12:45] Debian bug 946261 in ftp.debian.org "RM: sfcgal [armhf] -- ROM; Architecture specific issue" [Normal,Open] [13:07] xnox, re bug 1860559 could you add the dependency on finalrd to casper on bionic? [13:07] bug 1860559 in linux (Ubuntu Bionic) "[18.04.4] System fails to reboot after installation" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1860559 [13:08] finalrd has been promoted to main last friday [13:59] ddstreet: util-linux is on my TODO list, I'll try also looking at systemd though o/ [13:59] much thanks! [13:59] and qemu should be a really easy one, very small patch, if you have time [14:00] however qemu is still waiting on the focal merge so it can wait [14:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.34-0.1ubuntu2.2] [14:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.5] [14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.27.1-6ubuntu3.10] [14:27] sil2100, thanks ^ [14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:4.0+dfsg-0ubuntu9.3] [14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.22] [16:09] doko: we're seeing cross-toolchain-base test failures with the focal-proposed kernel. They don't look kernel related though, can you confirm? https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/c/cross-toolchain-base/20200122_153118_a4418@/log.gz [16:30] sil2100: What sort of verification should I do for u-r-u in bionic-proposed? [16:32] bdmurray: we usually don't do any verification, but guess checking if one can successfully run u-r-u would be enough I'd say [16:34] (any verification for mirror-bumps on point-release SRUs that is) [16:39] sil2100: Okay, I'll do an X to B upgrade just in case [16:58] bdmurray: thank you! [17:13] jibel: Are we doing any automatic upgrade testing to 18.04? [17:18] was just going to ping to have SRU of python-ldap for disco removed, but could all the SRUs just be dropped for disco (and trusty..) [17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dbus-cpp [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0.1-1] (no packageset) [17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dbus-cpp [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0.1-1] (no packageset) [17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wordpress (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.2.2+dfsg1-1 => 5.2.2+dfsg1-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset) [17:59] gQuigs: I'll be tidying up and closing disco today. trusty's a weirder case. [18:03] infinity: thanks! why is trusty so weird? [18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dmidecode (eoan-proposed/main) [3.2-2 => 3.2-2ubuntu0.1] (core) [18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dmidecode (bionic-proposed/main) [3.1-1 => 3.1-1ubuntu0.1] (core) [18:34] sforshee: please give it back [18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dmidecode (xenial-proposed/main) [3.0-2ubuntu0.1 => 3.0-2ubuntu0.2] (core) === jdstrand_ is now known as jdstrand [19:03] doko: come again? [19:04] sforshee: ? [19:05] doko: I don't understand what you meant by "please give it back" [19:05] sforshee: you're testing against 2.33.1-6ubuntu3, which isn't in the archive anymore [19:09] doko: ok I'll retry, thanks [20:14] sil2100: The release upgrade went well. [20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed x11-utils from i386-whitelist in focal [21:05] sforshee: "give-back" is a command in the Debian buildd/wanna-build stack that amounts to a buildd releasing a build back to the queue, so when old farts like doko say "give it back", they mean "hit the retry button". [21:06] I was about to say that it never made sense in Ubuntu because Launchpad's builders don't work that way, but I guess it actually did in 2004/2005 when we ran dak [21:06] Language is really sticky though [21:07] Trying to explain why rmadison is called that to new Launchpad developers recently involved several layers of backing up and explaining another layer [22:50] sforshee: btw, what are these "No change, rebuild to use new binutils" kernel uploads?