[01:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swami [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[01:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swami [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[01:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swami [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[01:15] <mwhudson> infinity: so fwiw, my "trailing space in d/changelog" is a vs A not i vs A fwiw :)
[01:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swami [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[01:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: swami [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[01:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swami [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.2.0-2]
[01:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swami [armhf] (focal-proposed) [2.2.0-2]
[01:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swami [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.2.0-2]
[01:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swami [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.2.0-2]
[01:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted swami [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [2.2.0-2]
[04:45] <infinity> mwhudson: A-ha.  (a-ha?)
[05:33] <Eickmeyer[m]> infinity: *80s music intensifies*
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: v-sim [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.7.2-8] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: v-sim [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.7.2-8] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: v-sim [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.7.2-8] (no packageset)
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: v-sim [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.7.2-8] (no packageset)
[11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: v-sim [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.7.2-8] (no packageset)
[12:06] <ddstreet> hi sil2100, i know you're busy with point release work, but any chance you might have time to review the systemd uploads for b/e?  And also util-linux in x/b/e if possible...and we also have qemu in b/e...
[12:07] <ddstreet> the systemd upload is actually a re-upload to address some of vor-lon's comments, and to add more bugfixes...it was originally uploaded a week or two ago
[12:45] <LocutusOfBorg> please somebody remove sfcgal on armhf
[12:45] <LocutusOfBorg> missing build on armhf: libsfcgal-dev, libsfcgal1 (from 1.3.7-2ubuntu1)
[12:45] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946261
[13:07] <jibel> xnox, re bug 1860559 could you add the dependency on finalrd to casper on bionic?
[13:08] <jibel> finalrd has been promoted to main last friday
[13:59] <sil2100> ddstreet: util-linux is on my TODO list, I'll try also looking at systemd though o/
[13:59] <ddstreet> much thanks!
[13:59] <ddstreet> and qemu should be a really easy one, very small patch, if you have time
[14:00] <ddstreet> however qemu is still waiting on the focal merge so it can wait
[14:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.34-0.1ubuntu2.2]
[14:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.5]
[14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.27.1-6ubuntu3.10]
[14:27] <mfo> sil2100, thanks ^
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:4.0+dfsg-0ubuntu9.3]
[14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.22]
[16:09] <sforshee> doko: we're seeing cross-toolchain-base test failures with the focal-proposed kernel. They don't look kernel related though, can you confirm? https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/c/cross-toolchain-base/20200122_153118_a4418@/log.gz
[16:30] <bdmurray> sil2100: What sort of verification should I do for u-r-u in bionic-proposed?
[16:32] <sil2100> bdmurray: we usually don't do any verification, but guess checking if one can successfully run u-r-u would be enough I'd say
[16:34] <sil2100> (any verification for mirror-bumps on point-release SRUs that is)
[16:39] <bdmurray> sil2100: Okay, I'll do an X to B upgrade just in case
[16:58] <sil2100> bdmurray: thank you!
[17:13] <bdmurray> jibel: Are we doing any automatic upgrade testing to 18.04?
[17:18] <gQuigs> was just going to ping to have SRU of python-ldap for disco removed, but could all the SRUs just be dropped for disco (and trusty..)
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dbus-cpp [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dbus-cpp [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wordpress (eoan-proposed/universe) [5.2.2+dfsg1-1 => 5.2.2+dfsg1-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[17:59] <infinity> gQuigs: I'll be tidying up and closing disco today.  trusty's a weirder case.
[18:03] <gQuigs> infinity: thanks!  why is trusty so weird?
[18:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dmidecode (eoan-proposed/main) [3.2-2 => 3.2-2ubuntu0.1] (core)
[18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dmidecode (bionic-proposed/main) [3.1-1 => 3.1-1ubuntu0.1] (core)
[18:34] <doko> sforshee: please give it back
[18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dmidecode (xenial-proposed/main) [3.0-2ubuntu0.1 => 3.0-2ubuntu0.2] (core)
[19:03] <sforshee> doko: come again?
[19:04] <doko> sforshee: ?
[19:05] <sforshee> doko: I don't understand what you meant by "please give it back"
[19:05] <doko> sforshee: you're testing against 2.33.1-6ubuntu3, which isn't in the archive anymore
[19:09] <sforshee> doko: ok I'll retry, thanks
[20:14] <bdmurray> sil2100: The release upgrade went well.
[20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed x11-utils from i386-whitelist in focal
[21:05] <infinity> sforshee: "give-back" is a command in the Debian buildd/wanna-build stack that amounts to a buildd releasing a build back to the queue, so when old farts like doko say "give it back", they mean "hit the retry button".
[21:06] <cjwatson> I was about to say that it never made sense in Ubuntu because Launchpad's builders don't work that way, but I guess it actually did in 2004/2005 when we ran dak
[21:06] <cjwatson> Language is really sticky though
[21:07] <cjwatson> Trying to explain why rmadison is called that to new Launchpad developers recently involved several layers of backing up and explaining another layer
[22:50] <doko> sforshee: btw, what are these "No change, rebuild to use new binutils" kernel uploads?