[00:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qclib [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[02:03] <sarnold> hello; disco is still promoted in the header on http://releases.ubuntu.com/releases/ -- should it be removed? is there a better place to suggest its removal?
[02:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: walinuxagent (bionic-proposed/main) [2.2.40-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 2.2.45-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (ubuntu-cloud)
[03:44] <vorlon> infinity: ^^ what progress on the EOL checklist?
[05:45] <vorlon> temporarily removing haskell-hledger and haskell-hledger-lib from -proposed, to allow a rebuild of old haskell-hledger against new libffi without blocking on haskell-hledger-lib/s390x
[06:22] <infinity> sarnold, vorlon: I'll clean up cdimage/release first thing tomorrow, sorry, got sidetracked a bit.
[06:23] <infinity> I guess I can remove it from the header now and clean up images when I'm more alive.
[08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qclib [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.0.1-0ubuntu1]
[08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-cachecontrol [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.7-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-cachecontrol [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.11.7-2ubuntu1]
[09:35] <sil2100> tseliot: hey! Looking at nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 right now - you missed a # in front of the bug number and now the .changes file has no bugs mentioned
[09:35] <sil2100> tseliot: could you re-upload?
[09:37] <tseliot> sil2100, oh, the one for eoan. Sure, please reject that and I'll re-upload
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [source] (eoan-proposed) [390.132-0ubuntu0.19.10.1]
[09:45] <sil2100> tseliot: done, thanks o/
[09:50] <tseliot> sil2100, re-uploaded, thanks!
[09:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 (eoan-proposed/restricted) [390.129-0ubuntu2 => 390.132-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] (core)
[10:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [source] (eoan-proposed) [390.132-0ubuntu0.19.10.1]
=== andrewc is now known as Guest88819
[10:29] <ddstreet> sil2100 hi, any chance you could review network-manager in e upload queue?
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: powerpc-utils (bionic-proposed/main) [1.3.4-0ubuntu2 => 1.3.4-0ubuntu2+ppa2.3] (core)
[10:47] <juliank> sil2100: ^ if you have a second, could you reject that
[10:47] <juliank> ?
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected powerpc-utils [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.4-0ubuntu2+ppa2.3]
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: securefs [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [0.9.0+ds-1] (no packageset)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: securefs [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [0.9.0+ds-1] (no packageset)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: securefs [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.9.0+ds-1] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: securefs [armhf] (focal-proposed/none) [0.9.0+ds-1] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: securefs [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.9.0+ds-1] (no packageset)
[11:23] <RikMills> could an AA please action? LP: #1861390
[11:23] <ubot5> Launchpad bug 1861390 in scribus-ng (Ubuntu) "Please remove scribus-ng from focal" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1861390
[11:23] <RikMills> thanks
[11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [source] (bionic-proposed) [390.132-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-settings [source] (eoan-proposed) [440.44-0ubuntu0.19.10.1]
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: setuptools-scm [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.4.3-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[11:39] <sil2100> tseliot: looking at nvidia-settings on bionic and I see that libxnvctrl0 dropped two symbols - just wanted to make sure this won't potentially break any existing users
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted securefs [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.9.0+ds-1]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted securefs [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.9.0+ds-1]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted securefs [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.9.0+ds-1]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted securefs [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.9.0+ds-1]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted setuptools-scm [amd64] (focal-proposed) [3.4.3-1ubuntu1]
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted securefs [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.9.0+ds-1]
[11:43] <sil2100> ddstreet: hey! Will try!
[11:44] <ddstreet> thanks!
[11:45] <sil2100> ddstreet: hm, could you (just for tidiness) re-upload it with -v, so that the previous 2 ADT bugs are also mentioned in the .changes?
[11:45] <sil2100> ddstreet: it's good as it is now as those are only ADT changes, but I guess it would be nice if we would auto-close them
[11:46] <ddstreet> ah ok sure, sorry i didn't realize that was needed since the previous was in -proposed, i'll remember that next time
[11:49] <sil2100> tjaalton: hey! Do you think you could get libclc and the new mesa validated for bionic today?
[11:53] <ddstreet> sil2100 reuploaded n-m
[11:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (eoan-proposed/main) [1.20.4-2ubuntu2.1 => 1.20.4-2ubuntu2.2] (desktop-core)
[11:54] <sil2100> ddstreet: thanks! On it in a moment :)
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flash-kernel (bionic-proposed/main) [3.98ubuntu10~18.04.1 => 3.98ubuntu11~18.04.1] (core)
[11:57] <sil2100> .4 is eating most of my time still, so much fiddling to do
[11:59] <tjaalton> sil2100: I don't have a radeon to test the libclc regression with, but since eoan is fine..
[12:00] <tjaalton> the guy who reported it on bionic upgraded to eoan already
[12:00] <sil2100> Darn
[12:01] <tjaalton> my thinking logic says that it can't be worse than what's in bionic now :)
[12:01] <sil2100> Hard decision, normally I wouldn't do this but yeah, I might jus accept it basing on the fact that it works in eoan
[12:01] <sil2100> Yeah
[12:01] <sil2100> tjaalton: ok, thanks! And what about mesa? Since I guess it would be good to have the latest shiny in -updates for .4
[12:01] <sil2100> I see someone verified it for eoan
[12:02] <sil2100> But not for bionic yet
[12:02] <sil2100> (verified as in used and was happy)
[12:02] <tjaalton> sil2100: right, I'll test that on intel
[12:02] <tjaalton> already running on eoan
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected network-manager [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.20.4-2ubuntu2.2]
[12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.20.4-2ubuntu2.2]
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flash-kernel [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.98ubuntu11~18.04.1]
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (bionic-proposed/main) [10.1ubuntu2.7 => 10.1ubuntu2.8] (core)
[12:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted base-files [source] (bionic-proposed) [10.1ubuntu2.8]
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-174.204] (core, kernel)
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-174.204]
[13:05] <ginggs> vorlon: what's a bfsg? :p
[13:09] <tumbleweed> ginggs: typo fixed
[13:11] <ginggs> tumbleweed: thanks, but version needs to be 1.14.0+dfsg-2
[13:12] <ginggs> tumbleweed: ta!
[13:21] <tseliot> sil2100, I don't think the lack of NV_ID symbol should really break anything
[14:39] <doko> mwhudson: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=team%2Btryton-team%40tracker.debian.org   almost all of tryton is marked for autoremoval in debian, I think we should do the same for focal
=== andrewc is now known as Guest10073
[15:58] <sil2100> tseliot: ok, I'll accept it, but let's keep an eye out for its rdeps - I'll list them in the bug
[15:59] <tseliot> sil2100, sounds good to me, thanks
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-settings [source] (bionic-proposed) [440.44-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[16:02] <tjaalton> sil2100: mesa verified on bionic
[16:39] <ddstreet> sil2100 not sure if you're still around, but if so, any change you could review the systemd uploads for b/e?  vorlon took a look a week-ish ago and i re-uploaded based on his comments, but also included more bugfixes
[16:44] <sil2100> ddstreet: I would love to, but not sure if I'll manage - I'm afraid this one might require a bit more time, while today and tomorrow I might still be busy with getting all the .4 things staged and set-up - it's all the time on my TODO list though!
[16:44] <sil2100> Sorry about that o/
[16:45] <sil2100> tjaalton: thanks!
[16:45] <ddstreet> ack, no problem, thanks :)
[17:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted walinuxagent [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.2.45-0ubuntu1~16.04.1]
[17:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted walinuxagent [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.45-0ubuntu1~18.04.1]
[17:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted walinuxagent [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.2.45-0ubuntu1~19.10.1]
[17:32] <vorlon> doko: you uploaded gobject-introspection, resetting the libffi transition progress?
[17:33] <doko> vorlon: yes, because pygobject was auto-synced
[17:33] <vorlon> k
[17:35] <Laney> why was it auto-synced when it had a delta?
[17:35] <vorlon> pygobject didn't have a delta
[17:35] <Laney> oh sorry I misread
[17:36] <Laney> the new g-i seems bad though
[17:36] <Laney> ubuntu@autopkgtest:~$ g-ir-scanner
[17:36] <Laney> Traceback (most recent call last):
[17:39] <Laney> only built for 3.8 I guess
[18:14] <doko> Laney: looks like the package is missing a b-d on dh-python?
[18:17] <doko> ahh, no, it has dh-sequence-python3
[18:19] <doko> but the generated dependency python3:any seems to be wrong, when you have the extension only for 3.8
[19:15] <sarnold> infinity: thanks :) (re removing disco from header)
[19:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.12.0-0ubuntu1]
[19:25] <vorlon> libglib-object-introspection-perl autosync because of course it is
[19:25] <vorlon> I'm going to shut off autosyncs until I have a chance to get libffi through
[19:25] <vorlon> (which would've been done within an hour of my start of day, if not for these newer syncs)
[19:49] <doko> please communicate that on the ML
[20:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: curtin (xenial-proposed/main) [19.1-7-g37a7a0f4-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 19.3-17-g50ffca46-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (ubuntu-server)
[20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: curtin (bionic-proposed/main) [19.1-7-g37a7a0f4-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 19.3-17-g50ffca46-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: curtin (eoan-proposed/main) [19.2-9-g38ce22b0-0ubuntu1 => 19.3-17-g50ffca46-0ubuntu1~19.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[20:57] <blackboxsw> wwot!