=== JanC_ is now known as JanC | ||
didrocks | good morning | 07:02 |
---|---|---|
duflu | Morning didrocks | 07:04 |
didrocks | hey duflu | 07:06 |
oSoMoN | good morning desktoppers | 07:29 |
duflu | Hi oSoMoN | 07:29 |
ricotz | good morning everyone | 07:32 |
didrocks | salut oSoMoN, hey ricotz | 07:33 |
duflu | Hi ricotz | 07:35 |
seb128 | gooood morning desktoppers and happy friday! | 08:08 |
didrocks | hey seb128, happy Friday | 08:10 |
seb128 | hey didrocks :-) | 08:12 |
ricotz | marcustomlinson, ping, please see pm | 08:25 |
ricotz | hey seb128 didrocks duflu | 08:25 |
seb128 | hey ricotz, how are you? | 08:26 |
seb128 | ricotz, do you need Marcus for a libreoffice issue? can someone else maybe help if he's not around? | 08:26 |
ricotz | seb128, hi, I am fine, how are you? | 08:26 |
seb128 | I'm good, it's fosdem's friday! | 08:27 |
ricotz | seb128, he pushed a build to deal for diskspace issue, which seems insufficient | 08:27 |
duflu | Morning seb128. Happy... Brussels? | 08:27 |
ricotz | seb128, I have another solution, hopefully better | 08:27 |
ricotz | seb128, in progress here https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-prereleases/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=focal | 08:28 |
seb128 | hey duflu, how is your friday going? getting some success of your gjs improvements? ready for the w.e? | 08:28 |
ricotz | seb128, oh fosdem :) | 08:28 |
duflu | seb128, Friday is going well but today upstream has been silent. So that's at least not bad news. | 08:28 |
seb128 | ricotz, ah, good ... I've not followed the details, but why are builds hitting enospace now? toolchain changes? | 08:28 |
ricotz | seb128, likely, that is a downside of merging the l10n build | 08:29 |
ricotz | https://git.launchpad.net/~libreoffice/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/log/?h=wip/ricotz-focal-6.4 | 08:29 |
seb128 | ricotz, Bjoern is still around or did you resurect some old patch? ;) | 08:31 |
ricotz | seb128, cherry-picked it | 08:31 |
ricotz | marcustomlinson, ping | 08:31 |
seb128 | I see, cool | 08:31 |
seb128 | ricotz, it's a bit early for him I think | 08:31 |
seb128 | or rather I think he's around earlier but then step out and come back a bit later | 08:32 |
ricotz | seb128, https://launchpad.net/~marcustomlinson/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=&field.series_filter=focal | 08:32 |
seb128 | duflu, I wonder if we regressed grub, it's not supposed to apply the purple screen/do anything if it's not displaying the menu | 08:36 |
seb128 | duflu, by 'ACPI BGRT changes in the kernel' you mean FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE_DEFERRED_TAKEOVER=y ? | 08:37 |
duflu | seb128, I've never seen it not apply the purple screen. Assuming it's the only thing that ever displays a blank purple screen | 08:37 |
duflu | Yes I mentioned that in the same bug :) | 08:37 |
seb128 | it's not applying the purple bg on my xps | 08:37 |
seb128 | well, assuming you use the spinner theme? | 08:37 |
duflu | seb128, I mean without the flickerfreeboot package installed. Sorry I used the same tag just because it is related | 08:38 |
duflu | So no, I do not mean the spinner theme | 08:38 |
seb128 | ah ok | 08:38 |
seb128 | that makes more sense now | 08:38 |
duflu | Just a plain focal install, and one reboot | 08:39 |
seb128 | btw we decided to switch to spinner by default for focal, at least to evaluate it | 08:39 |
duflu | That sounds good and would at least solve that new bug :) | 08:39 |
seb128 | it's not fully flicker free but we still believe it's an improvement | 08:39 |
seb128 | :) | 08:39 |
duflu | seb128, however it is telling grub to not display a splash screen should probably be done independently in grub though. So the bug does not return in the absence of the plymouth theme | 08:40 |
seb128 | yes, well that's the intend, unsure what's the issue there | 08:41 |
duflu | seb128, completely separately I think Ubuntu needs a little logo on top of the BGRT | 08:41 |
duflu | otherwise it looks like a hung BIOS | 08:42 |
seb128 | yes | 08:42 |
seb128 | x_nox was suggesting added the 'ubuntu' logo at the same position than in gdm | 08:42 |
seb128 | adding | 08:42 |
seb128 | bottom of the screen centered | 08:43 |
duflu | I can't remember but we can debate the perfect position once something is visible | 08:43 |
seb128 | right | 08:43 |
duflu | It's a slow graphics path though. So we either want zero animation or a small one | 08:44 |
duflu | Actually, zero. Because it's during kernel boot | 08:44 |
duflu | Animation is probably not possible at that time | 08:44 |
seb128 | duflu, the grub patch we are using that I though should avoid the colored background is the most recent commit on https://github.com/jwrdegoede/grub2/commits/for-upstream | 08:45 |
seb128 | anyway, bugs that we should probalby polish before the LTS | 08:45 |
duflu | 👍 | 08:46 |
seb128 | duflu, I created https://trello.com/c/aa3X88QY/118-plymouth-boot-improvements | 08:49 |
duflu | seb128, maybe deduplicate with https://trello.com/c/FiGczlI0 | 08:50 |
seb128 | duflu, fair point, let me add the reference/checklist to that one | 08:51 |
seb128 | duflu, k, updated | 08:52 |
marcustomlinson | morning desktoppers | 09:11 |
duflu | Morning marcustomlinson | 09:11 |
marcustomlinson | question (to whoever sees it first): can a package in main recommend a package in universe? Or is that still too strict a dependancy? | 09:12 |
seb128 | hey marcustomlinson, how are you? | 09:12 |
seb128 | marcustomlinson, you should lower to a suggest iirc | 09:13 |
duflu | Yeah I guess, because recommendations get automatically installed | 09:14 |
duflu | ? | 09:14 |
marcustomlinson | I'm doing ok seb128 thanks. Still recovering, but at least it's friday | 09:14 |
seb128 | duflu, right, they don't fail installation if they are missing but that would give inconsistent behaviour depending of your activated sources | 09:15 |
marcustomlinson | hmm, so if the package doesn't have to be installed but does help significantly, it can be from universe? | 09:17 |
marcustomlinson | to be clear here, I'm wondering if LibreOffice can recommend fonts from universe | 09:18 |
seb128 | marcustomlinson, no | 09:19 |
seb128 | main package need to have their recommends in main | 09:19 |
seb128 | so either you need to MIR those or to lower the recommends to a suggests | 09:19 |
marcustomlinson | ok that's a clearer answer :) | 09:20 |
marcustomlinson | thanks seb128 | 09:20 |
seb128 | np | 09:20 |
seb128 | if the fonts are specifics to a locale you might be able to make the languages-selector support pull them in when enabling the said language | 09:21 |
marcustomlinson | ricotz: I was working outside of IRC hours ;) | 09:31 |
hellsworth | good morning desktopers | 15:21 |
marcustomlinson | hey hellsworth | 15:22 |
hellsworth | o/ marcustomlinson ! | 15:22 |
diddledan | who knows mesa? I'm onto a new crash when using Indirect GLX, which seems specific to the client application I'm running - glxgears runs fine without causing this issue, as does supertuxkart (albeit with graphical abberations in STK's case because it expects newer opengl): https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/cqrqq4FZWD/ | 17:07 |
diddledan | the application code I'm experimenting with can be gathered from https://github.com/irixxxx/igl.git | 17:09 |
diddledan | specifically any of the examples | 17:09 |
diddledan | make sure you don't have anything important open/unsaved if you attempt this, because it WILL kill your Xorg :-p (you also need Xorg compiled from the debdiffs in LP #1776447 | 17:11 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1776447 in xorg-server (Ubuntu) "Xorg's Indirect GLX broken from upstream regression" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1776447 | 17:11 |
diddledan | this doesn't appear to be a regression from those debdiffs, just an unmasking | 17:11 |
tjaalton | try #dri-devel | 18:01 |
diddledan | thanks :-) | 18:05 |
kenvandine | diddledan: good news, soon we'll have gtk2-common-themes for arm64 and armhf :) | 20:01 |
kenvandine | diddledan: and i'm submitting a PR that fixes the gtk theme if you set it to use the system theme | 20:02 |
kenvandine | gimp that is | 20:02 |
diddledan | \o/ | 20:02 |
diddledan | tjaalton, it might be a stack overflow somehow runaway recursion | 20:18 |
kenvandine | diddledan: getting a weird issue trying to build gimp | 20:49 |
kenvandine | Issues while validating properties: Specified icon 'gimp.png' does not exist | 20:50 |
kenvandine | that line in the yaml hasn't changed in nearly 2 years | 20:50 |
diddledan | is the icon there? | 20:50 |
kenvandine | it's in the top level dir | 20:51 |
diddledan | should be in the root of the repo, yeah | 20:51 |
kenvandine | hmm | 20:52 |
kenvandine | a second run and it is working | 20:52 |
diddledan | odd | 20:55 |
kenvandine | diddledan: https://github.com/snapcrafters/gimp/pull/97 | 21:09 |
gitbot | snapcrafters issue (Pull request) 97 in gimp "Set necessary env for system gtk themes to work and clean up content interfaces" [Open] | 21:09 |
kenvandine | diddledan: this does revert one of your commits, but we should have gtk2-common-themes for all supported arches by early next week | 21:09 |
kenvandine | we can wait for that before merging this, but comments would be appreciated | 21:10 |
kenvandine | diddledan: once this PR is merged, we'll get all the arches https://gitlab.gnome.org/Community/Ubuntu/gtk2-common-themes/merge_requests/1 | 21:39 |
gitbot | Ubuntu issue (Merge request) 1 in gtk2-common-themes "Updated to build with bionic" [Opened] | 21:39 |
kenvandine | diddledan: what's gtk3 in gimp? | 21:57 |
diddledan | nothing directly, but there might be plugins that want to use GTK3. also if I were to add darktable that definitely is GTK3 | 21:58 |
kenvandine | gtk2 and gtk3 use different env variables | 21:59 |
kenvandine | so shouldn't clobber each other | 21:59 |
diddledan | I could only find GTK_PATH applied to both | 21:59 |
kenvandine | how can i verify that i didn't break gtk3 in gimp? | 21:59 |
diddledan | GTK_EXE_PREFIX allows both to coexist without setting GTK_PATH | 21:59 |
diddledan | GTK_EXE_PREFIX simply requires that gtk-2.0 and gtk-3.0 exist at /usr/lib instead of /usr/lib/$SNAPCRAFT_ARCH_TRIPLET | 22:01 |
kenvandine | ok, i'll look at this some more later on | 22:01 |
kenvandine | at least glimpse-editor looks much better now :) | 22:02 |
kenvandine | https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/bvJt1cPG/Screenshot%20from%202020-01-31%2013-23-37.png | 22:02 |
diddledan | lines 167 thru 171 do the moving about - as we're now using gtk-engines we might need a bit more than a simple symlink - maybe a dir with symlinks inside | 22:02 |
diddledan | nice :-) | 22:03 |
kenvandine | i look more carefully at gimp and make sure my fix doesn't break gtk3 | 22:03 |
kenvandine | none of the gtk3 stuff is in the glimpse snap, so simpler case | 22:03 |
diddledan | aye | 22:03 |
kenvandine | gimp does looks great with my branch though :) | 22:04 |
kenvandine | but i probably busted something else | 22:04 |
diddledan | I'm not currently using gtk3 but I was mulling adding darktable into it because people keep moaning they can't use darktable and gimp snap together :-) | 22:04 |
kenvandine | diddledan: actually, if we move the GTK_PATH to environment under the app it wouldn't effect darktable | 22:10 |
kenvandine | right now it snap global | 22:10 |
kenvandine | but if we move it to the apps section, gimp and darktable could have separate env | 22:11 |
diddledan | good point | 22:11 |
diddledan | although, I don't know if they can launch each other in addition to talking to eachother? | 22:12 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!