| xnox | doko: thanks! | 00:01 |
|---|---|---|
| doko | gcc-9 builds still running ... | 05:40 |
| doko | RikMills, xnox: ^^^ | 05:40 |
| jibel | doko, okay, I'll have a look at autopilot to remove the dep on qt4 | 07:31 |
| seb128 | hum, a recent file-roller update fails to build on arm64/s390x with that error | 08:09 |
| seb128 | /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s | 08:09 |
| seb128 | does anyone has an idea what than is about (https://launchpadlibrarian.net/463253875/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-arm64.file-roller_3.35.90-1_BUILDING.txt.gz) | 08:09 |
| seb128 | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neon27/0.30.2-4 has the same problem | 08:10 |
| seb128 | I guess toolchain problem in focal-proposed? | 08:10 |
| seb128 | doko, ^ do you know about that? | 08:10 |
| ricotz | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-9/9.2.1-26ubuntu3 | 08:10 |
| seb128 | hey ricotz | 08:11 |
| ricotz | seb128, hi | 08:11 |
| seb128 | ricotz, is that the version that breaks it or fix it? :) | 08:11 |
| seb128 | well it failed to build on those archs as well | 08:11 |
| ricotz | seb128, I am sure he is aware, seems -26 is borked | 08:13 |
| seb128 | we should maybe just delete that version from proposed meanwhile? | 08:14 |
| seb128 | well, let's wait to see if doko is around and he prefer to try to fix it | 08:14 |
| ricotz | not my call, but that would be reasonable | 08:14 |
| ricotz | seb128, could you retry https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#vala | 08:14 |
| seb128 | ricotz, retry isn't really working, see http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/automake-1.16/focal/armhf | 08:15 |
| seb128 | but the issue is not due to vala, it failed its own trigger, so I think we should just ask to ubuntu-release to skip the automake-1.16/arhmf result to let vala be a candidate | 08:16 |
| ricotz | seb128, I see, that would be nice | 08:17 |
| RikMills | seb128: dok0 said last night he was building a fixed gcc, which I suspect is here: https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/bootstrap/+packages | 08:53 |
| seb128 | RikMills, ah, good to know, thx | 08:58 |
| xnox | seb128: read the overnight backlog | 10:04 |
| doko | xnox, RikMills: fixed gcc-9 published. I would appreciate it if you could give back failed builds on arm64/s390x in proposed. currently at a workshop | 10:39 |
| xnox | doko: i did give back mine. they look ok now! thank you =) | 10:40 |
| doko | that was not my question | 10:41 |
| gpiccoli | o/ sil2100 - guess what I'm gonna talk? mdadm, of course ! heheh | 10:45 |
| gpiccoli | The pkg is on -proposed for 2 weeks almost, and was tested/verified by me | 10:46 |
| gpiccoli | Any chance we get that promoted to -updates? Tnx in advance | 10:46 |
| sil2100 | gpiccoli: hey! hm, I'm worried that comment #11 from LP: #1850540 is still valid? .4 is still in the works | 11:13 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1850540 in linux (Ubuntu Focal) "multi-zone raid0 corruption" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1850540 | 11:13 |
| gpiccoli | sil2100, this was dropped! heheh | 11:25 |
| gpiccoli | We discussed with dannf, no work from his LP is in -proposed now | 11:25 |
| cjwatson | xnox: One finishes the u-a-t porting work instead of asking passive-aggressive questions? ;-) | 11:25 |
| cjwatson | It shouldn't be miles away | 11:26 |
| gpiccoli | That was a factor of delaying in fact - because of regressions in that layout patches, it got my LP delayed hehe | 11:26 |
| gpiccoli | So, dannf agreed we get mine released and then he'd re-add his work on mdadm, on top of mine =) | 11:26 |
| xnox | cjwatson: u-a-t? =) | 11:27 |
| xnox | ah | 11:27 |
| xnox | nice =) | 11:27 |
| xnox | true | 11:27 |
| xnox | i think the one script that I needed "just worked" wich a change of a shebang ;-) | 11:28 |
| cjwatson | Some years back I did a bunch of anticipatory porting work but deliberately held off from changing the #! because at the time a lot of its users were on Ubuntu releases that didn't have a sufficiently py3-capable launchpadlib | 11:28 |
| sil2100 | gpiccoli: crap, so it's this darn bug again | 11:47 |
| sil2100 | gpiccoli: you are right, but the pending-sru page still displays the bug as being part of the upload - that's a bug that's happening from time to time there | 11:47 |
| sil2100 | And confusing everyone, eh | 11:47 |
| gpiccoli | haha ok sil2100, no problem! Tnx for your attention | 11:48 |
| sil2100 | gpiccoli: ok, let me take a look then now! | 11:48 |
| gpiccoli | Awesome =] | 11:48 |
| gpiccoli | And I think the kernel part was reworked in the last cycle, so dannf likely will have the mdadm part soon to be merged, and finally get that LP resolved too | 11:48 |
| ahasenack | hi, any idea why this package from debian isn't in ubuntu yet? https://launchpad.net/debian/+source/vmem | 12:18 |
| Laney | ahasenack: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/auto-sync/current.log | 12:20 |
| Laney | vmem_1.8-1 is trying to override modified binary libvmem1_1.7-1ubuntu1. OK (y/N)? n | 12:21 |
| ahasenack | ah | 12:21 |
| ahasenack | ok, I'm about to update pmdk (where that libvmem 1.7 comes from) | 12:21 |
| ahasenack | then autosync will work I guess? | 12:21 |
| ahasenack | pmdk 1.8 doesn't have vmem anymore | 12:21 |
| Laney | looks like it indeed | 12:22 |
| ahasenack | ok, thanks | 12:22 |
| gpiccoli | Thanks a lot sil2100 =) | 12:39 |
| === ricab is now known as ricab|lunch | ||
| sil2100 | gpiccoli: yw! Sorry it took longer than expected, I blame the tooling for that! | 13:15 |
| gpiccoli | hahaha no need to be sorry, you were quite helpful sil2100, appreciate a lot! | 13:16 |
| gpiccoli | Tnx dannf also for letting me release my stuff before the layout work! | 13:16 |
| === ricab|lunch is now known as ricab | ||
| jamespage | Laney: afternoon | 14:42 |
| jamespage | Laney: I have a new upload of vaultlocker in bionic-backports/unapproved to fixup an SRU related issue | 14:42 |
| jamespage | any chance that could be accepted? i got the bug reporter to validate the package backport via PPA as well | 14:43 |
| Laney | jamespage: yup | 14:45 |
| jamespage | Laney: ta | 14:47 |
| sahid | coreycb: o/ python-ironic-lib needs a version bump of python3-zeroconf, could you clone the repo? | 14:47 |
| jamespage | sahid: yep | 14:48 |
| jamespage | although I'm not coreycb maybe he's already doing it :) | 14:48 |
| sahid | :) | 14:48 |
| sahid | jamespage, coreycb: it's python-zeroconf | 14:54 |
| coreycb | sahid: that's pushed now | 15:03 |
| sahid | thank you | 15:03 |
| ahasenack | if I use sudo in a dep8 script, do I need to set the requirement root-required? I didn't want to run the test as root, though, it's just one setup command that has to | 17:29 |
| joelkraehemann | hi all | 17:36 |
| joelkraehemann | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gsequencer | 17:36 |
| joelkraehemann | ^^ do I need to fill a sync-request? | 17:36 |
| cjwatson | joelkraehemann: Not as far as I can see. Why do you think you might need to file one? | 17:40 |
| cjwatson | (Maybe explain what problem you're trying to solve) | 17:43 |
| joelkraehemann | version 3.0.3 is still proposed after 3 weeks | 17:45 |
| joelkraehemann | ... version 3.0.0 introduced additional packages providing GObject-Introspection | 17:46 |
| joelkraehemann | cjwatson: do you think it is going to focal? | 17:46 |
| cjwatson | joelkraehemann: It's blocked due to test regressions. See https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#gsequencer | 17:47 |
| cjwatson | (I know nothing more than that) | 17:47 |
| joelkraehemann | But I do ... | 17:47 |
| cjwatson | Sync requests are for copying source packages from Debian to focal-proposed; they would achieve nothing here | 17:47 |
| joelkraehemann | https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/arm64/g/gsequencer/20200118_155728_62a6c@/log.gz | 17:48 |
| joelkraehemann | ^^ the test-bed provided wrong configure flags, I think | 17:48 |
| joelkraehemann | https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/ppc64el/g/gsequencer/20200116_193425_57c30@/log.gz | 17:49 |
| joelkraehemann | ^^ the same here | 17:49 |
| cjwatson | Configure flags are up to the package, not the testbed, I'm pretty sure | 17:49 |
| cjwatson | The testbed doesn't concern itself with that sort of detail | 17:49 |
| joelkraehemann | https://ci.debian.net/packages/g/gsequencer/ | 17:49 |
| joelkraehemann | cjwatson: I am thinking debhelper flags passed to autopkgtest | 17:51 |
| joelkraehemann | ^^ of | 17:51 |
| cjwatson | That's not very plausible | 17:51 |
| cjwatson | I'm pretty certain that's not a thing | 17:51 |
| cjwatson | I'd suggest diffing test logs to try to narrow things down, perhaps | 17:52 |
| joelkraehemann | configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-maintainer-mode | 17:52 |
| joelkraehemann | xvfb-run: error: Xvfb failed to start | 17:52 |
| joelkraehemann | you are right, xvfb-run failed ... | 17:52 |
| joelkraehemann | can you trigger autopkgtest to run again? | 17:52 |
| cjwatson | xvfb-run is implicated in the ags-integration-functional-test failure (which is labelled "FLAKY"), but that doesn't explain the ags-integration-unit-test failure | 17:53 |
| cjwatson | Have you investigated that part of the log at all? | 17:53 |
| joelkraehemann | ags-integration-unit-test FAIL timed out | 17:54 |
| joelkraehemann | ^^ this is not flaky | 17:54 |
| joelkraehemann | there are 2 different tests | 17:54 |
| cjwatson | I didn't say it was flaky :) | 17:55 |
| cjwatson | I said that ags-integration-functional-test is the one that's flaky and is the one where xvfb-run failed. Do you have an explanation for the ags-integration-unit-test failure? | 17:55 |
| joelkraehemann | booth tests relay on xvfb-run | 17:55 |
| joelkraehemann | ags-integration-unit-test FAIL timed out | 17:57 |
| joelkraehemann | ^^ the build host didn't have enough computing power ... | 17:57 |
| joelkraehemann | you are right we should update to latest version | 17:57 |
| cjwatson | http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/gsequencer/focal/arm64 shows a failure only 20 minutes ago | 17:58 |
| cjwatson | So I'm reluctant to just bang retry on it | 17:58 |
| joelkraehemann | ok | 17:58 |
| joelkraehemann | it is fixed as of latest upstream | 17:58 |
| joelkraehemann | ... it is really a unit-test problem | 17:58 |
| cjwatson | But honestly I'm just giving pointers here, this is mostly not a thing I work with very much | 17:59 |
| joelkraehemann | I have investigated the issue, the unit-tests timeout because the build host doesn't provide enough CPU power while doing realtime threads ... | 18:00 |
| Darkchaos | doko: I'd love to fix two issues for openjdk-lts. One seems to be rather complicated but the other one is just a symlink to src.zip, which seems to be important, because IDEs rely on that to have javadoc for system classes. | 18:42 |
| Darkchaos | Could you guide me through the process/have a look at these? (There also is 1826455) which can be marked as solved by now | 18:43 |
| Darkchaos | okay, judging by https://git.launchpad.net/~openjdk/ubuntu/+source/openjdk/+git/openjdk/commit/?h=openjdk-11&id=3c36564cf4e6f17e1418332d4b977c8bad69cfa0 the symlink issues are already resolved, so we'd just need to close those two bugs | 18:56 |
| === ben_r_ is now known as ben_r | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!