/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/02/05/#ubuntu-devel.txt

sahidjamespage, coreycb, o/ anychance you provide repo for sqlalchemy-utils, cinder is needing the version 0.31.1?08:38
seb128vorlon, should http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/b/budgie-desktop/focal/i386 be flagged as badtest?09:09
RikMillstjaalton: ran test against PPA package with all-proposed, and yes that workaround did reduce autotest fails from ~800 to 1409:10
RikMillsstill meh though :(09:10
tjaaltonyep09:18
tjaaltonthe bad mesa commit is found, but no fix yet09:18
RikMillstjaalton: this? https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/issues/247209:25
tjaaltonyep09:25
cpaelzerjamespage: you said you expected masakari could pass without the need for security review10:17
cpaelzerjamespage: but from my look at it while generally ok and well hadnled I think it needs one10:17
cpaelzerjamespage: https://git.launchpad.net/~paelzer/+git/MIR/tree/MIR-1815991-masakari-and-masakari-monitors.txt#n3710:17
cpaelzerwould you mind explaining why you tinhk it would not need one before I post my answer to the MIR bug?10:18
jamespagecpaelzer: mainly because it's patterned to every other openstack service in terms of API10:19
jamespagethat might make it an easy MIR review for the security team10:19
cpaelzeryeah I agree that is will most likely be a very fast check as it follows the same patterns that were reviewed plenty of times already10:19
cpaelzerbut to have the checker tools run once to be sure I'd still mark it as needs-security now10:20
jamespageack - no problem with that approach :)10:20
cpaelzerthanks jamespage10:20
cpaelzerjamespage: wit hthat MIR review done, you might satrt to bother seucrity team to get it done in time10:21
cpaelzeroO characters shift around again :-/10:21
jamespageI'll ping joe10:22
Laneytjaalton: ok, so if we hint it, can you track that it gets fixed for the release?10:42
tjaaltonLaney: this one yes, but bisecting mesa test failures on sparc I've noticed that there's always a bunch of big-endian-looking things that have failed at least since 19.010:43
tjaaltongoing further back results in build issues10:44
tjaaltonso I'm just assuming that these tests at least have always been broken on big-endian10:44
jamespagesahid: doing that noe11:30
jamespagesahid: er - python-sqlalchemy-utils11:33
jamespagealready exists lp:~ubuntu-server-dev/ubuntu/+source/python-sqlalchemy-utils11:34
jamespageseems to be up-to-date11:34
jamespagein distro as well11:34
juliankLaney: Are we hopeful that mesa will migrate with the hint in place? It depends on libglvnd which is stuck in Valid Candidate phase11:40
juliankAnd I can't read update_output.txt to figure out why it's in there, rather than migrating11:40
sahidjamespage: thanks for the nova merge11:40
sahidjamespage: hum... sorry about sqlachemy-utils, let me double check11:40
Laneyjuliank: Not sure, I didn't look beyond mesa itself atm, let's see11:43
LaneyLooks like it may have something to do with qt / autopilot somehow11:49
sahidjamespage: ok thanks we still need to bump th version to 0.31.1 I'm doing that and will ping you shortly11:49
Laneyactually it should work: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/4p4pgV3F2j/11:59
Laneyif it doesn't find that hint by itself we can add it manually11:59
dokoif it's autopilot, then it's the qt4 removal12:01
jamespagesahid: er its already 0.36.012:02
juliankLaney: ack12:08
sahidjamespage: we want 0.36.*1*12:24
julianktjaalton: I'm on proposed kernel now, I did not see it earlier because I was looking at linux source package, and it is in linux-5.4 now12:31
juliankShould probably remove linux source package from focal?12:32
juliankAnyway happy to be on 5.4 again12:33
juliankBeing able to go to 95°C instead of 80°C makes stuff compile faster :)12:34
tjaaltonjuliank: ah12:40
tjaaltonLaney: did libglvnd move as well?12:40
tjaaltonI assume it did12:41
juliankNow I just need to get a usable s-tui again12:41
juliankIt started showing information per core, when previously it showed aggregate info12:41
juliankIt's basically useless now12:41
guysoft42 hey all, I am the creator of CustomPiOS, which lets you build custom distros using a base image. I can see the raspberrypi image of ubuntu is creating the ubuntu user and password on boot, with the password expried. And I want to change that. However, I get: chage: user 'ubuntu' does not exist in /etc/passwd . How do I find someone who knows how this works and how to edit settings for the ubuntu user before creation?12:43
seb128tjaalton, looks like libglvnd did migrate as well yes12:43
guysoft42Also it seems like #ubuntu-arm is not responding. And I am not sure who to even ask about this12:43
tjaaltonseb128: right, it was synced so I didn't get an email about it12:50
juliankguysoft42: lookup cloud-init13:05
juliankguysoft42: The user is configured on images at first boot by cloud-init, also sets up mirrors and stuff13:05
sahidjamespage, coreycb, when you have a moment to look at https://code.launchpad.net/~sahid-ferdjaoui/ubuntu/+source/python-sqlalchemy-utils/+git/python-sqlalchemy-utils13:08
cpaelzerhiho, yesterday I asked why https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html is updating to slow (seems only at 9pm GMT once a day)13:08
cpaelzertoday I realized the report closes with "Over time" - not sure, it might indicate a timeut of some sort?13:09
guysoft42juliank, Ok let me have a look, I added wpa-supplicant to my builds so didn't take a long glance there.13:09
cjwatson"Over time" there refers to a graph of activity over time and does not refer to a timeout13:17
coreycbsahid: seems like something changed in focal so gbp is failing for sqlalchemy-utils13:30
sahidcoreycb: what is the error?13:31
sahidhttps://launchpad.net/~sahid-ferdjaoui/+archive/ubuntu/focal-ussuri/+build/1866147413:31
coreycbsahid: may just be me fiddling with python3 on my machine13:31
sahidcoreycb: can i help in any ways or i just have to wait?13:32
coreycbsahid: it's all good, I've uploaded that. thanks.13:35
sahidcoreycb: great thanks, i think after that we will be good for cinder13:36
coreycbsahid: can you take a look at openstacksdk? it failed to build.13:36
coreycbsahid: great :)13:36
sahidcoreycb: is that related to a timeout?13:36
sahidi had that when i was testing the buld in my PPA, i just pushed retry13:36
coreycbsahid: yes13:37
sahidcoreycb: is that possible for you to make a retry?13:37
coreycbsahid: seems to be a test failure - https://launchpadlibrarian.net/463528237/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-amd64.python-openstacksdk_0.39.0-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz13:39
sahidcoreycb: yes, as mentioned i had similar issue - https://launchpad.net/~sahid-ferdjaoui/+archive/ubuntu/focal-ussuri/+build/1862394513:41
sahidcoreycb: i still could disable the test13:42
Laneytjaalton: yeh, looks like one required the other or something13:46
Laneyauto hinter figured it out13:46
coreycbsahid: if it's an intermittent failure, we should get a bug open upstream with some details and we could skip it, or if time permits fix it and submit upstream13:47
sahidcoreycb: yes we could probbly open a bug upstream saying that the test is not passing on "slow" machines - i imagine upstream is running those tests each time a patch is submitted13:52
coreycbsahid: let me retry it again. the one failure is a timeout but the other isn't so maybe the 2nd is a timeout in disguise.13:57
sahidcoreycb: sure that makes sense, please keep me posted14:01
guysoft42juliank, ok got it, under /boot/firmware/user-data there is a cloud config file with the line chpasswd expire: true. Thanks!14:04
=== ricab is now known as ricab|lunch
seb128bdmurray, hey, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/automake-1.16/1:1.16.1-4ubuntu4 seems to be a wrong statement, see most recent log on http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/automake-1.16/focal/armhf (and the one for ubuntu4)14:28
seb128bdmurray, I'm reverting that change for now because the tests depend on 'python' and now fail due to that which I want to get fixed in focal14:34
=== Wryhder is now known as Lucas_Gray
=== ricab|lunch is now known as ricab
juliankUgh I forgot to dump GPU state15:36
joelkraehemannhi all15:44
joelkraehemannhttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gsequencer/3.0.13-1/+build/1865331815:44
joelkraehemann^^ could someone trigger a rebuild?15:44
cjwatsonjoelkraehemann: done15:47
Laneybdmurray: can you point me to the scripts that generate http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-incoming-bug-tasks.html etc please?16:04
vorlonseb128: budgie-desktop> yes, hinted now16:04
seb128vorlon, thx16:05
LaneyI'm in lp:ubuntu-reports but it doesn't appear to be any of those16:05
joelkraehemanncjwatson: thank you16:08
smosercpaelzer: tych0 asks is there a ppa for newer qemus somewhere?16:37
smoserhallyn: interested also ^16:44
hallyntrue story16:46
* hallyn awaits the reasonable "do it yourself" answer16:46
ahasenacksmoser: focal-proposed just got 4.2: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#qemu16:56
ahasenackwell,almost :)16:56
smoserahasenack: thanks.16:59
smoseroh... and the cloud archive too for older releases.16:59
ricotznot so funny when running "requestsync" results in this https://paste.debian.net/plain/112929617:11
DarkchaosSo building the same package on debian buster produces correct binaries where on Ubuntu (bionic, but also using disco with pbuilder), I get missing elf header parts. The code should be the same17:37
Darkchaoscan someone guide me there?17:37
tkamppeterAny known problem with the buildds for ppv64el? I have uploaded/synced Ghostscript and it seems so slow that the build does not finish in 150 minutes: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/9.50~dfsg-5/+build/1866140717:51
tkamppeterOn my laptop it builds in 150 seconds ...17:51
cjwatsonWouldn't it be more likely to be something to do with the architecture than something to do with the builders?17:53
cjwatsonAssuming your laptop isn't ppc64el, anyway :)17:53
cjwatsonOther packages seem to be building fine on ppc64el, in reasonable time17:53
blackboxswI17:55
blackboxswI'm seeing very sluggish ppa build queues for any architecture except powerpc as well for smallish projects.17:55
blackboxswppa package build pages saying "in 2 hours (estimated)" for most platforms, i386 and amd64 a bit sooner, but those builds haven't happened yet. So I'm guessing the package build host machines are over subscribed at the moment17:57
cjwatsonblackboxsw: That'll be unrelated to tkamppeter's issue18:00
cjwatsonOnly the arm* queues are particularly long at the moment18:01
* blackboxsw misread ppcv64el and build delay question and jumped on a band wagon :). thx cjwatson righto.18:02
blackboxswBTW cjwatson for my own info. is there a public site for viewing ppa build queues, or is that internal?18:02
cjwatsonhttps://launchpad.net/builders/18:02
cjwatsonMuch better overview than looking at the (often terrible) estimates on a particular build page18:02
blackboxswexcellent. that helps a lot thanks cjwatson18:03
blackboxswcoincidental to this discussion all my current ppa builder jobs just dropped from 2 hrs estimate to to about 30 mins. confirming that build estimates on the PPA build pages are 'wild'18:05
tkamppetercjwatson, are there ppc64el laptops? Or is that a server-only architecture like s390x?18:06
cjwatsonI don't know of any18:06
cjwatsonWhich is not to say there aren't18:06
cjwatsonblackboxsw: Well, I did do a few quick repairs in passing18:06
blackboxswrepair: if user == blackboxsw: "make his builders happy"18:07
blackboxswheh18:07
tkamppetercjwatson, the strange thing of my isue is that there are some files compiled, without any errors or warnings and then suddenly the kill-after-15-min happens.18:07
cjwatsontkamppeter: OK ... but it doesn't look like an infrastructure problem at present18:08
cjwatsonIt looks more like the compiler just taking forever on a particular translation unit18:08
tkamppetercjwatson, would this mean that the compiler has a bug?18:09
cjwatsonSince as I say other packages are building fine on ppc64el, so it doesn't look like slow builders in general18:09
cjwatsonWell, only if my guess is correct18:09
cjwatsonAll I can say is that I don't see an infrastructure problem here18:09
cjwatsonHave you even tried this more than once as yet?18:10
cjwatsonOr tried any debugging in a PPA?18:10
tkamppetercjwatson, I only did a retry of the build and got the same result.18:34
tkamppetercjwatson, if a compiler gets stuck (or extremely slow at least) without giving any error message then there must be a bug in the compiler. If there would be something not allowed on ppc64el in the code, there would be an error message.18:35
cjwatsonWell, I would presume so but I'm not a compiler engineer so I can't make any pronouncements about that18:36
tkamppeterPerhaps best to report a bug on gcc then.18:36
tkamppetercjwatson, I reported bug 1862053 now. Thanks anyway.18:43
ubottubug 1862053 in gcc (Ubuntu) "Compiler gets stuck (or extremely slow) on ppc64el" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186205318:43
cpaelzersmoser: hallyn: for now either focal-proposed or https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3883/+packages19:48
cpaelzersmoser: hallyn: we had https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-virt/+archive/ubuntu/virt-daily-upstream but it was absolutely ignored and a waste of time19:49
cpaelzerso we abandoned it19:49
hallynhaha, yes19:55
ricotzLocutusOfBorg, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exiv2/+bug/1715931/comments/1221:02
ubottuLaunchpad bug 1715931 in exiv2 (Ubuntu Focal) "Update to exiv2 version 0.27" [Wishlist,Fix committed]21:02

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!