sahid | jamespage, coreycb, o/ anychance you provide repo for sqlalchemy-utils, cinder is needing the version 0.31.1? | 08:38 |
---|---|---|
seb128 | vorlon, should http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/b/budgie-desktop/focal/i386 be flagged as badtest? | 09:09 |
RikMills | tjaalton: ran test against PPA package with all-proposed, and yes that workaround did reduce autotest fails from ~800 to 14 | 09:10 |
RikMills | still meh though :( | 09:10 |
tjaalton | yep | 09:18 |
tjaalton | the bad mesa commit is found, but no fix yet | 09:18 |
RikMills | tjaalton: this? https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/issues/2472 | 09:25 |
tjaalton | yep | 09:25 |
cpaelzer | jamespage: you said you expected masakari could pass without the need for security review | 10:17 |
cpaelzer | jamespage: but from my look at it while generally ok and well hadnled I think it needs one | 10:17 |
cpaelzer | jamespage: https://git.launchpad.net/~paelzer/+git/MIR/tree/MIR-1815991-masakari-and-masakari-monitors.txt#n37 | 10:17 |
cpaelzer | would you mind explaining why you tinhk it would not need one before I post my answer to the MIR bug? | 10:18 |
jamespage | cpaelzer: mainly because it's patterned to every other openstack service in terms of API | 10:19 |
jamespage | that might make it an easy MIR review for the security team | 10:19 |
cpaelzer | yeah I agree that is will most likely be a very fast check as it follows the same patterns that were reviewed plenty of times already | 10:19 |
cpaelzer | but to have the checker tools run once to be sure I'd still mark it as needs-security now | 10:20 |
jamespage | ack - no problem with that approach :) | 10:20 |
cpaelzer | thanks jamespage | 10:20 |
cpaelzer | jamespage: wit hthat MIR review done, you might satrt to bother seucrity team to get it done in time | 10:21 |
cpaelzer | oO characters shift around again :-/ | 10:21 |
jamespage | I'll ping joe | 10:22 |
Laney | tjaalton: ok, so if we hint it, can you track that it gets fixed for the release? | 10:42 |
tjaalton | Laney: this one yes, but bisecting mesa test failures on sparc I've noticed that there's always a bunch of big-endian-looking things that have failed at least since 19.0 | 10:43 |
tjaalton | going further back results in build issues | 10:44 |
tjaalton | so I'm just assuming that these tests at least have always been broken on big-endian | 10:44 |
jamespage | sahid: doing that noe | 11:30 |
jamespage | sahid: er - python-sqlalchemy-utils | 11:33 |
jamespage | already exists lp:~ubuntu-server-dev/ubuntu/+source/python-sqlalchemy-utils | 11:34 |
jamespage | seems to be up-to-date | 11:34 |
jamespage | in distro as well | 11:34 |
juliank | Laney: Are we hopeful that mesa will migrate with the hint in place? It depends on libglvnd which is stuck in Valid Candidate phase | 11:40 |
juliank | And I can't read update_output.txt to figure out why it's in there, rather than migrating | 11:40 |
sahid | jamespage: thanks for the nova merge | 11:40 |
sahid | jamespage: hum... sorry about sqlachemy-utils, let me double check | 11:40 |
Laney | juliank: Not sure, I didn't look beyond mesa itself atm, let's see | 11:43 |
Laney | Looks like it may have something to do with qt / autopilot somehow | 11:49 |
sahid | jamespage: ok thanks we still need to bump th version to 0.31.1 I'm doing that and will ping you shortly | 11:49 |
Laney | actually it should work: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/4p4pgV3F2j/ | 11:59 |
Laney | if it doesn't find that hint by itself we can add it manually | 11:59 |
doko | if it's autopilot, then it's the qt4 removal | 12:01 |
jamespage | sahid: er its already 0.36.0 | 12:02 |
juliank | Laney: ack | 12:08 |
sahid | jamespage: we want 0.36.*1* | 12:24 |
juliank | tjaalton: I'm on proposed kernel now, I did not see it earlier because I was looking at linux source package, and it is in linux-5.4 now | 12:31 |
juliank | Should probably remove linux source package from focal? | 12:32 |
juliank | Anyway happy to be on 5.4 again | 12:33 |
juliank | Being able to go to 95°C instead of 80°C makes stuff compile faster :) | 12:34 |
tjaalton | juliank: ah | 12:40 |
tjaalton | Laney: did libglvnd move as well? | 12:40 |
tjaalton | I assume it did | 12:41 |
juliank | Now I just need to get a usable s-tui again | 12:41 |
juliank | It started showing information per core, when previously it showed aggregate info | 12:41 |
juliank | It's basically useless now | 12:41 |
guysoft42 | hey all, I am the creator of CustomPiOS, which lets you build custom distros using a base image. I can see the raspberrypi image of ubuntu is creating the ubuntu user and password on boot, with the password expried. And I want to change that. However, I get: chage: user 'ubuntu' does not exist in /etc/passwd . How do I find someone who knows how this works and how to edit settings for the ubuntu user before creation? | 12:43 |
seb128 | tjaalton, looks like libglvnd did migrate as well yes | 12:43 |
guysoft42 | Also it seems like #ubuntu-arm is not responding. And I am not sure who to even ask about this | 12:43 |
tjaalton | seb128: right, it was synced so I didn't get an email about it | 12:50 |
juliank | guysoft42: lookup cloud-init | 13:05 |
juliank | guysoft42: The user is configured on images at first boot by cloud-init, also sets up mirrors and stuff | 13:05 |
sahid | jamespage, coreycb, when you have a moment to look at https://code.launchpad.net/~sahid-ferdjaoui/ubuntu/+source/python-sqlalchemy-utils/+git/python-sqlalchemy-utils | 13:08 |
cpaelzer | hiho, yesterday I asked why https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.html is updating to slow (seems only at 9pm GMT once a day) | 13:08 |
cpaelzer | today I realized the report closes with "Over time" - not sure, it might indicate a timeut of some sort? | 13:09 |
guysoft42 | juliank, Ok let me have a look, I added wpa-supplicant to my builds so didn't take a long glance there. | 13:09 |
cjwatson | "Over time" there refers to a graph of activity over time and does not refer to a timeout | 13:17 |
coreycb | sahid: seems like something changed in focal so gbp is failing for sqlalchemy-utils | 13:30 |
sahid | coreycb: what is the error? | 13:31 |
sahid | https://launchpad.net/~sahid-ferdjaoui/+archive/ubuntu/focal-ussuri/+build/18661474 | 13:31 |
coreycb | sahid: may just be me fiddling with python3 on my machine | 13:31 |
sahid | coreycb: can i help in any ways or i just have to wait? | 13:32 |
coreycb | sahid: it's all good, I've uploaded that. thanks. | 13:35 |
sahid | coreycb: great thanks, i think after that we will be good for cinder | 13:36 |
coreycb | sahid: can you take a look at openstacksdk? it failed to build. | 13:36 |
coreycb | sahid: great :) | 13:36 |
sahid | coreycb: is that related to a timeout? | 13:36 |
sahid | i had that when i was testing the buld in my PPA, i just pushed retry | 13:36 |
coreycb | sahid: yes | 13:37 |
sahid | coreycb: is that possible for you to make a retry? | 13:37 |
coreycb | sahid: seems to be a test failure - https://launchpadlibrarian.net/463528237/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-amd64.python-openstacksdk_0.39.0-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz | 13:39 |
sahid | coreycb: yes, as mentioned i had similar issue - https://launchpad.net/~sahid-ferdjaoui/+archive/ubuntu/focal-ussuri/+build/18623945 | 13:41 |
sahid | coreycb: i still could disable the test | 13:42 |
Laney | tjaalton: yeh, looks like one required the other or something | 13:46 |
Laney | auto hinter figured it out | 13:46 |
coreycb | sahid: if it's an intermittent failure, we should get a bug open upstream with some details and we could skip it, or if time permits fix it and submit upstream | 13:47 |
sahid | coreycb: yes we could probbly open a bug upstream saying that the test is not passing on "slow" machines - i imagine upstream is running those tests each time a patch is submitted | 13:52 |
coreycb | sahid: let me retry it again. the one failure is a timeout but the other isn't so maybe the 2nd is a timeout in disguise. | 13:57 |
sahid | coreycb: sure that makes sense, please keep me posted | 14:01 |
guysoft42 | juliank, ok got it, under /boot/firmware/user-data there is a cloud config file with the line chpasswd expire: true. Thanks! | 14:04 |
=== ricab is now known as ricab|lunch | ||
seb128 | bdmurray, hey, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/automake-1.16/1:1.16.1-4ubuntu4 seems to be a wrong statement, see most recent log on http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/automake-1.16/focal/armhf (and the one for ubuntu4) | 14:28 |
seb128 | bdmurray, I'm reverting that change for now because the tests depend on 'python' and now fail due to that which I want to get fixed in focal | 14:34 |
=== Wryhder is now known as Lucas_Gray | ||
=== ricab|lunch is now known as ricab | ||
juliank | Ugh I forgot to dump GPU state | 15:36 |
joelkraehemann | hi all | 15:44 |
joelkraehemann | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gsequencer/3.0.13-1/+build/18653318 | 15:44 |
joelkraehemann | ^^ could someone trigger a rebuild? | 15:44 |
cjwatson | joelkraehemann: done | 15:47 |
Laney | bdmurray: can you point me to the scripts that generate http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-incoming-bug-tasks.html etc please? | 16:04 |
vorlon | seb128: budgie-desktop> yes, hinted now | 16:04 |
seb128 | vorlon, thx | 16:05 |
Laney | I'm in lp:ubuntu-reports but it doesn't appear to be any of those | 16:05 |
joelkraehemann | cjwatson: thank you | 16:08 |
smoser | cpaelzer: tych0 asks is there a ppa for newer qemus somewhere? | 16:37 |
smoser | hallyn: interested also ^ | 16:44 |
hallyn | true story | 16:46 |
* hallyn awaits the reasonable "do it yourself" answer | 16:46 | |
ahasenack | smoser: focal-proposed just got 4.2: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#qemu | 16:56 |
ahasenack | well,almost :) | 16:56 |
smoser | ahasenack: thanks. | 16:59 |
smoser | oh... and the cloud archive too for older releases. | 16:59 |
ricotz | not so funny when running "requestsync" results in this https://paste.debian.net/plain/1129296 | 17:11 |
Darkchaos | So building the same package on debian buster produces correct binaries where on Ubuntu (bionic, but also using disco with pbuilder), I get missing elf header parts. The code should be the same | 17:37 |
Darkchaos | can someone guide me there? | 17:37 |
tkamppeter | Any known problem with the buildds for ppv64el? I have uploaded/synced Ghostscript and it seems so slow that the build does not finish in 150 minutes: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/9.50~dfsg-5/+build/18661407 | 17:51 |
tkamppeter | On my laptop it builds in 150 seconds ... | 17:51 |
cjwatson | Wouldn't it be more likely to be something to do with the architecture than something to do with the builders? | 17:53 |
cjwatson | Assuming your laptop isn't ppc64el, anyway :) | 17:53 |
cjwatson | Other packages seem to be building fine on ppc64el, in reasonable time | 17:53 |
blackboxsw | I | 17:55 |
blackboxsw | I'm seeing very sluggish ppa build queues for any architecture except powerpc as well for smallish projects. | 17:55 |
blackboxsw | ppa package build pages saying "in 2 hours (estimated)" for most platforms, i386 and amd64 a bit sooner, but those builds haven't happened yet. So I'm guessing the package build host machines are over subscribed at the moment | 17:57 |
cjwatson | blackboxsw: That'll be unrelated to tkamppeter's issue | 18:00 |
cjwatson | Only the arm* queues are particularly long at the moment | 18:01 |
* blackboxsw misread ppcv64el and build delay question and jumped on a band wagon :). thx cjwatson righto. | 18:02 | |
blackboxsw | BTW cjwatson for my own info. is there a public site for viewing ppa build queues, or is that internal? | 18:02 |
cjwatson | https://launchpad.net/builders/ | 18:02 |
cjwatson | Much better overview than looking at the (often terrible) estimates on a particular build page | 18:02 |
blackboxsw | excellent. that helps a lot thanks cjwatson | 18:03 |
blackboxsw | coincidental to this discussion all my current ppa builder jobs just dropped from 2 hrs estimate to to about 30 mins. confirming that build estimates on the PPA build pages are 'wild' | 18:05 |
tkamppeter | cjwatson, are there ppc64el laptops? Or is that a server-only architecture like s390x? | 18:06 |
cjwatson | I don't know of any | 18:06 |
cjwatson | Which is not to say there aren't | 18:06 |
cjwatson | blackboxsw: Well, I did do a few quick repairs in passing | 18:06 |
blackboxsw | repair: if user == blackboxsw: "make his builders happy" | 18:07 |
blackboxsw | heh | 18:07 |
tkamppeter | cjwatson, the strange thing of my isue is that there are some files compiled, without any errors or warnings and then suddenly the kill-after-15-min happens. | 18:07 |
cjwatson | tkamppeter: OK ... but it doesn't look like an infrastructure problem at present | 18:08 |
cjwatson | It looks more like the compiler just taking forever on a particular translation unit | 18:08 |
tkamppeter | cjwatson, would this mean that the compiler has a bug? | 18:09 |
cjwatson | Since as I say other packages are building fine on ppc64el, so it doesn't look like slow builders in general | 18:09 |
cjwatson | Well, only if my guess is correct | 18:09 |
cjwatson | All I can say is that I don't see an infrastructure problem here | 18:09 |
cjwatson | Have you even tried this more than once as yet? | 18:10 |
cjwatson | Or tried any debugging in a PPA? | 18:10 |
tkamppeter | cjwatson, I only did a retry of the build and got the same result. | 18:34 |
tkamppeter | cjwatson, if a compiler gets stuck (or extremely slow at least) without giving any error message then there must be a bug in the compiler. If there would be something not allowed on ppc64el in the code, there would be an error message. | 18:35 |
cjwatson | Well, I would presume so but I'm not a compiler engineer so I can't make any pronouncements about that | 18:36 |
tkamppeter | Perhaps best to report a bug on gcc then. | 18:36 |
tkamppeter | cjwatson, I reported bug 1862053 now. Thanks anyway. | 18:43 |
ubottu | bug 1862053 in gcc (Ubuntu) "Compiler gets stuck (or extremely slow) on ppc64el" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1862053 | 18:43 |
cpaelzer | smoser: hallyn: for now either focal-proposed or https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3883/+packages | 19:48 |
cpaelzer | smoser: hallyn: we had https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-virt/+archive/ubuntu/virt-daily-upstream but it was absolutely ignored and a waste of time | 19:49 |
cpaelzer | so we abandoned it | 19:49 |
hallyn | haha, yes | 19:55 |
ricotz | LocutusOfBorg, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exiv2/+bug/1715931/comments/12 | 21:02 |
ubottu | Launchpad bug 1715931 in exiv2 (Ubuntu Focal) "Update to exiv2 version 0.27" [Wishlist,Fix committed] | 21:02 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!