jamesh | popey: for that snap mpris question you closed on the forum, you probably just want "name: ncspot" in the slot definition | 03:39 |
---|---|---|
didrocks | good morning | 07:02 |
duflu | Morning didrocks | 07:09 |
didrocks | hey duflu | 07:16 |
oSoMoN | good morning desktoppers | 07:21 |
oSoMoN | happy Friday! | 07:21 |
didrocks | hey oSoMoN | 07:32 |
oSoMoN | salut didrocks | 07:35 |
duflu | Morning oSoMoN | 07:50 |
* duflu goes for an afternoon coffee to power through the remains of the week | 07:50 | |
marcustomlinson | morning didrocks duflu oSoMoN | 08:31 |
duflu | Morning marcustomlinson | 08:33 |
popey | jamesh: tried that, it doesn't work. you have to specify unity7 | 08:39 |
jamesh | popey: the "invalid name element" error is specifically because you included a full bus name rather than just the part after "org.mpris.MediaPlayer2." | 08:41 |
popey | jamesh: that may be the case, but i definitely tried using just the short name | 08:42 |
* popey re-opens the topic in case people want to discuss there :D | 08:42 | |
popey | https://github.com/popey/ncspot-snap/blob/master/snap/snapcraft.yaml | 08:43 |
jamesh | popey: I don't see any mpris related rules in the unity7 interface though, so it is quite possible the app needed something else | 08:43 |
popey | that's the working yaml | 08:43 |
popey | that's possible, for sure. | 08:43 |
popey | i debugged this for a couple of hours last night with Wimpress | 08:43 |
jamesh | popey: the fact you're staging libxcb-* makes me think the app wants to talk to the X server | 08:44 |
jamesh | so it probably needs desktop and/or x11. I'd lean towards those rather than unity7 if possible | 08:44 |
popey | desktop doesn't work | 08:45 |
popey | i tried desktop and unity7 which worked, then removed desktop to prove it only needed unity7 | 08:45 |
jamesh | popey: desktop doesn't imply x11 access, while unity7 does | 08:46 |
jamesh | one of the reasons why unity7 is deprecated | 08:46 |
popey | ok, I'll try removing unity7 and add x11 instead, thanks | 08:46 |
jamesh | x11 or x11+desktop would probably be better, yeah | 08:46 |
jamesh | you'll probably need to provide a desktop file to keep the store happy when you publish too | 08:48 |
jamesh | a NoDisplay=true one should suffice | 08:48 |
didrocks | hey marcustomlinson | 08:48 |
popey | ooh, i could do a desktop file which uses the terminal=true thing | 08:48 |
jamesh | that'd be fine too, yeah | 08:49 |
popey | thanks for the help jamesh | 08:49 |
Laney | hullo | 09:03 |
marcustomlinson | yo Laney | 09:04 |
popey | jamesh: nope, x11 isn't enough, it only works with unity7 | 09:07 |
jamesh | popey: did you try desktop+x11? | 09:08 |
jamesh | and what denial are you getting? | 09:08 |
popey | ah, no. doing now | 09:08 |
popey | no denials | 09:08 |
jamesh | ideally we could delete the unity7 interface at some point | 09:08 |
popey | jamesh: nope, fails with x11+desktop | 09:10 |
jamesh | I wonder what it is doing? | 09:10 |
popey | 🤷♂️ | 09:14 |
duflu | Hi popey, Laney, and jamesh | 09:17 |
popey | hello! | 09:17 |
jamesh | hi duflu | 09:19 |
Laney | hey marcustomlinson hey duflu | 09:34 |
didrocks | hey hey Laney | 09:50 |
dan01 | Hi, sort of did this experiment before but... anyways | 09:53 |
dan01 | Can anyone here using Ubuntu on a 1080p laptop give me a screenshot of their desktop. Regardless of Gnome or Kde, wayland or X. Ubuntu or Fedora. Linux looks a bit to small on my Ideapad screen, while Windows looks just fine | 09:54 |
dan01 | I've tried everything, fractional scaling, increase font size in gnome-tweak | 09:54 |
dan01 | I don't know what to do anymore | 09:54 |
dan01 | And I can't understand how come none else seems to have this problem | 09:55 |
Laney | hey didrocks | 09:55 |
dan01 | I'm using a 14' 1080p lenovo ideapad s540 iwl | 09:55 |
dan01 | hmm, mabybe I'll try #ubuntu | 10:00 |
Laney | dan01: only got 2× hidpi here, sorry | 10:00 |
Laney | not really heard this specific complaint before tbh | 10:00 |
dan01 | Laney: sure, np | 10:00 |
Laney | have seen some odd people deliberately running at less than 2× | 10:00 |
dan01 | Laney: yeah, everyone seems to be doing fine, but I've asked other people as well and they notice the difference | 10:00 |
Laney | hmm | 10:01 |
Laney | changing the subject (sorry) | 10:01 |
Laney | desktop iso failed to build | 10:01 |
Laney | The following packages have unmet dependencies: libpoppler90 : Depends: libopenjp2-7 (>= 2.0.0) but it is not installable | 10:01 |
Laney | wwwwwwat is dat | 10:02 |
Laney | can't tell, guess I will retry a build | 10:13 |
Laney | yup, that worked | 10:47 |
Laney | happy iso-with-new-yaru day | 10:48 |
marcustomlinson | \o/ | 11:04 |
RikMills | tkamppeter: hi, do you have a fix for ghostscript ppc64el FTBFS before the weekend? | 14:25 |
tkamppeter | RikMills, I am working with doko on it. It is bug 1862053 | 15:11 |
ubot5 | bug 1862053 in gcc (Ubuntu) "Compiler gets stuck (or extremely slow) on ppc64el" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1862053 | 15:11 |
RikMills | ouch! | 15:13 |
hellsworth | good morning desktopers! | 15:58 |
oSoMoN | good morning hellsworth | 15:58 |
marcustomlinson | hey hellsworth | 15:58 |
hellsworth | hi oSoMoN and marcustomlinson | 16:00 |
Laney | pkill -f mutt is a bad idea | 16:30 |
Laney | 506664 /usr/bin/Xwayland :0 -rootless -noreset -accessx -core -auth /run/user/1000/.mutter-Xwaylandauth.OACNF0 -listen 4 -listen 5 -displayfd 6 | 16:30 |
mdeslaur | hehe | 16:33 |
hellsworth | fyi, i'll be afk for the rest of the day while trying to get over a nasty cold | 16:43 |
oSoMoN | hellsworth, get better soon! | 16:58 |
gQuigs | any thoughts on Flash for 20.04 - I think would drop it before release? https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/ubuntu-20-04-and-flash/13814 | 16:58 |
* gQuigs tries again - I think it makes sense to drop before 20.04 releases - otherwise after 6 months we have dead packages in both multiverse and the Canonical archive | 17:00 | |
oSoMoN | gQuigs, chrisccoulson probably has thoughts on this | 17:07 |
=== ginggs_ is now known as ginggs | ||
tkamppeter | RikMills, I have applied a workaround to Ghostscript now, so that it will build on ppc64el, see bug 1862053. | 18:27 |
ubot5 | bug 1862053 in gcc (Ubuntu) "Compiler gets stuck (or extremely slow) on ppc64el" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1862053 | 18:27 |
RikMills | tkamppeter: great :) | 18:31 |
marcustomlinson | nie work tkamppeter | 18:33 |
marcustomlinson | *nice | 18:33 |
oSoMoN | have a good week-end everyone! | 18:42 |
doko | tkamppeter, RikMills: as I said to Till, it's not my first priority, I need to fix other things first | 18:51 |
tkamppeter | And now it built on ppc64el: | 18:51 |
tkamppeter | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ghostscript/9.50~dfsg-5ubuntu1 | 18:51 |
RikMills | great. that should let me build a couple of things on ppc64el that broke due to ghostscript. thanks :) | 18:52 |
RikMills | and I think should unbreak libreoffice build.... | 18:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!