 Yeah. Though in Ubuntu we could choose not to care. ;) Sadly, a beta is not supportable much on a LTS, even if can be made to build.
[00:36] <lisandro> right, that's true
 @mitya57 [Will now push to https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/391 …], It built fine. I will upload that to archive later today.
 Thanks :)
 window-mocker has both a Qt5 and Qt4 plugin, so can't we simply from the Qt4 one to disconnect from python-qt4?
 Ah, I didn't notice that
 I guess I will switch autopilot to python3-window-mocker and then drop the Python 2 and Qt 4 parts.
 That would be perfect
 @mitya57 can I test build projectm in that Qt4 ppa? Seems pointless making another for just that
 I'll assume yes ;)
 ironically, it is to test build it without Qt4 support
 arm* builders are too backlogged to try in a normal ppa
 That worked :)
 @RikMills [@mitya57 can I test build projectm in that Qt4 ppa? Seems pointless making anoth …], No need to ask :)
 👍
 We are discussing logo of this telegram group
 it is wrong on so many levels
 Please fix it
 ^^
 up
 👍👍👍
 I think it was more modern in the very beginning, then someone replaced it with more old school-ish.
 Anyway, any suggestions are welcome :)
 This is not old school-ish xD
 Actually it's the recolored version of the logo of a gas station
 This is not Qt logo a tall
 Lol
 (Photo, 300x300) https://i.imgur.com/WdJDh67.jpg
 This can be used
 (New chat photo, 640x640) https://i.imgur.com/iY9SwxP.jpg
 Transitioning from old version to new version always
 (New chat photo, 640x640) https://i.imgur.com/VaoXDQA.jpg
 This one is even better
 @mitya57 [I think it was more modern in the very beginning, then someone replaced it with …], I seem to remember I proposed that as a joke, and it got applied!
 But one needs to be in the US to understand the joke ;)
 why does debian's qttools still build-depend on qtwebkit?
 For Qt Assistant.
 But it's quite easy to drop that B-D if you want.
 ok i'll do that for ubports then
 There is some code in debian/rules for conditional installation of the qtwebkit preview backend.
 @mitya57 [There is some code in debian/rules for conditional installation of the qtwebkit …], 👍
 Qt5 migration might be this britney run I hope
 Great
[20:14] <lisandro> @mariogrip remember that dropping qtwebkit means horrible api pages in assistant
[20:14] <lisandro> (but that might be ok for you)
 @RikMills [Qt5 migration might be this britney run I hope], Damn. hint that would have made it happen got dropped 😢
 At least Qt4 migrated :D
 😆
 @lisandro [<lisandro> @mariogrip remember that dropping qtwebkit means horrible api pages i …], Can't you use qtwebengine for it?
[21:57] <lisandro> I sincerely don't know. IIRC you can't
[21:57] <lisandro> but I might be wrong