[00:01] <lubot> <RikMills> Yeah. Though in Ubuntu we could choose not to care. ;) Sadly, a beta is not supportable much on a LTS, even if can be made to build.
[00:36] <lisandro> right, that's true
[06:42] <lubot> <mitya57> @mitya57 [Will now push to https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/391 …], It built fine. I will upload that to archive later today.
[11:06] <lubot> <RikMills> Thanks :)
[11:19] <lubot> <RikMills> window-mocker has both a Qt5 and Qt4 plugin, so can't we simply from the Qt4 one to disconnect from python-qt4?
[11:20] <lubot> <mitya57> Ah, I didn't notice that
[11:21] <lubot> <mitya57> I guess I will switch autopilot to python3-window-mocker and then drop the Python 2 and Qt 4 parts.
[11:22] <lubot> <RikMills> That would be perfect
[17:29] <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 can I test build projectm in that Qt4 ppa? Seems pointless making another for just that
[17:31] <lubot> <RikMills> I'll assume yes ;)
[17:32] <lubot> <RikMills> ironically, it is to test build it without Qt4 support
[17:35] <lubot> <RikMills> arm* builders are too backlogged to try in a normal ppa
[17:44] <lubot> <RikMills> That worked :)
[17:49] <lubot> <mitya57> @RikMills [@mitya57 can I test build projectm in that Qt4 ppa? Seems pointless making anoth …], No need to ask :)
[17:50] <lubot> <RikMills> 👍
[18:33] <lubot> <bhushanshah> We are discussing logo of this telegram group
[18:33] <lubot> <bhushanshah> it is wrong on so many levels
[18:33] <lubot> <bhushanshah> Please fix it
[18:34] <lubot> <JBBgameich> ^^
[18:34] <lubot> <UniversalSuperBox> up
[18:34] <lubot> <JBBgameich> 👍👍👍
[18:36] <lubot> <mitya57> I think it was more modern in the very beginning, then someone replaced it with more old school-ish.
[18:36] <lubot> <mitya57> Anyway, any suggestions are welcome :)
[18:37] <lubot> <bhushanshah> This is not old school-ish xD
[18:37] <lubot> <JBBgameich> Actually it's the recolored version of the logo of a gas station
[18:37] <lubot> <bhushanshah> This is not Qt logo a tall
[18:37] <lubot> <mitya57> Lol
[18:39] <lubot> <UniversalSuperBox> (Photo, 300x300) https://i.imgur.com/WdJDh67.jpg
[18:39] <lubot> <UniversalSuperBox> This can be used
[18:40] <lubot> <mitya57> (New chat photo, 640x640) https://i.imgur.com/iY9SwxP.jpg
[18:40] <lubot> <UniversalSuperBox> Transitioning from old version to new version always
[18:41] <lubot> <mariogrip> (New chat photo, 640x640) https://i.imgur.com/VaoXDQA.jpg
[18:43] <lubot> <mitya57> This one is even better
[18:45] <lubot> <RikMills> @mitya57 [I think it was more modern in the very beginning, then someone replaced it with …], I seem to remember I proposed that as a joke, and it got applied!
[18:46] <lubot> <mitya57> But one needs to be in the US to understand the joke ;)
[18:48] <lubot> <mariogrip> why does debian's qttools still build-depend on qtwebkit?
[18:48] <lubot> <mitya57> For Qt Assistant.
[18:49] <lubot> <mitya57> But it's quite easy to drop that B-D if you want.
[18:49] <lubot> <mariogrip> ok i'll do that for ubports then
[18:50] <lubot> <mitya57> There is some code in debian/rules for conditional installation of the qtwebkit preview backend.
[18:50] <lubot> <mariogrip> @mitya57 [There is some code in debian/rules for conditional installation of the qtwebkit …], 👍
[20:02] <lubot> <RikMills> Qt5 migration might be this britney run I hope
[20:12] <lubot> <mitya57> Great
[20:14] <lisandro> @mariogrip remember that dropping qtwebkit means horrible api pages in assistant
[20:14] <lisandro> (but that might be ok for you)
[21:19] <lubot> <RikMills> @RikMills [Qt5 migration might be this britney run I hope], Damn. hint that would have made it happen got dropped 😢
[21:20] <lubot> <mitya57> At least Qt4 migrated :D
[21:20] <lubot> <RikMills> 😆
[21:56] <lubot> <mariogrip> @lisandro [<lisandro> @mariogrip remember that dropping qtwebkit means horrible api pages i …], Can't you use qtwebengine for it?
[21:57] <lisandro> I sincerely don't know. IIRC you can't
[21:57] <lisandro> but I might be wrong