[10:46] <JackFrost> teward: You're the xca maintainer in Debian.  Since xca has a new DB format, mightn't it be useful to upload that to backports?
[12:15] <teward> JackFrost: on my list of things to do but its wayyyyy lower on the priority list.
[12:17] <teward> Since I can do the backport at $INSERT_TIME_HERE I am focusing on higher priority things at the moment - Studio needs some things poked and theres other higher priority things I keep an eye on for the dev cycle that I need to keep an eye on from now until featurefreeze
[12:29] <teward> JackFrost: however how old are you thinking for the backport?  Any xca >= 2 i believe uses the new DB format.  Theres some other deps I think might not exist in older versions as well - and for EOL Releases I am hesitant to really backport to those (so 16.04 is the oldest I may keep an eye on)
[12:30] <teward> But for now E:EXHAUSTION from 72h+ of hell from this week and a major infra outage at work so I am heading back to sleep for another 5 hours :P
[12:30] <JackFrost> Well considering Ubuntu backports aren't really a thing,  I was thinking buster here.
[12:30] <teward> Ahhhh in Debian.
[12:31] <teward> Context next time since this is #ubuntu-motu ;)
[12:31] <teward> E:LackOfContext :P
[12:31] <teward> On my list of things
[12:31] <teward> But again not ultra critical since right now I need sleep more
[12:31] <teward> (Also Ubuntu does have backports ;) )
[12:32] <JackFrost> Sure, but functioning*
[14:44] <Darkchaos> I don't understand one thing: In the .dsc (debian/control), there is a specific g++ version pinned (g++-9), whereas in the debian/rules, the GCC Version varies based on what is available for that distribution. What is the background there?
[14:44] <Darkchaos> I just patched the dsc to accept g++8 for now, as the rules file would pick g++8 on buster anyway