=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
[14:52] <slashd> o/
[14:55] <ddstreet> o/ here to support/cheer-on dgadomski
[14:55] <rbasak> o/
[14:56] <sil2100> o/
[14:56] <slashd> cyphermox, still around ?
[14:58] <mfo> o/ dgadomski
[14:58] <dgadomski> o/
[14:59] <slashd> Let's give cyphermox a couple of minutes, I talked to him earlier and he should be able to join.
[14:59] <ivoks> o/
[14:59] <cyphermox> oi
[14:59] <slashd> #startmeeting DMB meeting
[14:59] <meetingology> Meeting started Mon Feb 10 14:59:58 2020 UTC.  The chair is slashd. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[14:59] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | <wxl> be nice | DMB meeting | Current topic:
[15:00] <slashd> #topic Review of previous action items
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | <wxl> be nice | DMB meeting | Current topic: Review of previous action items
[15:00] <slashd> #subtopic slashd handsome_feng Email interview
[15:00] <slashd> rbasak's endorsement re-validation request seemed to have been answers by most (if not by all) endorser. Currently pending on cyphermox and rbasak's votes.
[15:00] <rbasak> tsimonq2 hasn't replied yet
[15:01] <cyphermox> I will vote today
[15:01] <slashd> rbasak, ok so you prefer to wait for tsimonq2 re-endorsement ?
[15:01] <rbasak> I had been waiting.
[15:01] <slashd> rbasak, all good
[15:01] <rbasak> I guess I can continue without, if he doesn't get back to us.
[15:02] <rbasak> Let's give people some reasonable amount of time to respond.
[15:02] <rbasak> Say a week? I'm not sure how long it's been.
[15:02] <rbasak> I'd also like to update the application process page to avoid this situation occurring again.
[15:02] <rbasak> Which I intend to JFDI, if people are fine with that.
[15:02] <slashd> JFDI ?
[15:03] <slashd> I'm bad with acronym
[15:03] <rbasak> Just ... and Do It.
[15:03] <slashd> gotcha
[15:03] <slashd> rbasak, ok let's give it til friday then ?
[15:03] <rbasak> Well, with no and.
[15:03] <sil2100> My vote for handsome_feng is still valid if anything
[15:04] <rbasak> Yes, OK.
[15:04] <slashd> rbasak, good thanks
[15:04] <slashd> #subtopic  re-election
[15:04] <slashd> anything to add on this ?
[15:04] <rbasak> The nomination period ends soon
[15:04] <rbasak> I would like more nominations
[15:05] <rbasak> Please be self-nominating
[15:05] <slashd> if you are a coredev or MOTU ^
[15:06] <slashd> I guess that's all we had in term of items to discussed, unless someone have something to add, we have 1 applicant today, Dariusz Gadomski (dgadomski). He is applying for the SRU Developer application.
[15:06] <slashd> dgadomski, can you introduce yourself ?
[15:07] <dgadomski> sure
[15:07] <slashd> wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/dgadomski/UbuntuSRUDeveloperApplication
[15:07] <dgadomski> Hi. I'm Dariusz. I work for Canonical. I am a member of the Sustaining Engineering team where I mainly work on bugs reported by Ubuntu Advantage customers. I'm applying for SRU developer.
[15:07] <slashd> Do you guys have question for Dariusz ?
[15:09] <cyphermox> I do not
[15:09] <rbasak> dgadomski: how do you find the SRU process? Is there anything you would change?
[15:11] <dgadomski> rbasak: I have seen it working well for years, I haven't noticed problems with the process itself, I'm not sure how that would fit in the process but maybe extending the number of people testing -proposed would bring an improvement
[15:12] <rbasak> OK, thanks!
[15:12] <rbasak> I have no more questions.
[15:13] <sil2100> dgadomski: I have one question:
[15:13] <slashd> I don't have question for Dariusz.
[15:15] <sil2100> dgadomski: actually... looking at the upload history I already got my answer! Nevermind then ;)
[15:15] <sil2100> No questions from me
[15:16] <slashd> sil2100, lol
[15:16] <slashd> seems like we are done with questions
[15:16] <slashd> let's vote
[15:16] <slashd> #vote Please vote on: (dgadomski) SRU Developer
[15:16] <meetingology> Please vote on: Please vote on: (dgadomski) SRU Developer
[15:16] <meetingology> Public votes can be registered by saying +1, +0 or -1 in channel, (for private voting, private message me with 'vote +1/-1/+0 #channelname)
[15:16] <slashd> #voterequired 4
[15:17] <sil2100> (wanted to ask about SRU requirements re: devel work, but then again I see the applicant already demonstrates the required knowledge)
[15:17] <sil2100> ;)
[15:17] <slashd> sil2100, and it's a sru developer application, we don't expect much devel work w/ that application
[15:18] <sil2100> Yeah, but it's important to know what the stage of the package should be in devel for a fix to be SRUed
[15:18] <slashd> right
[15:18] <slashd> +1 been working w/ dgadomski for several years, I've witnessed a lot of his work (MIR w/ pcp package, SRU, and other Ubuntu aspect). dgadomski will be a great asset to the SRU developer team.
[15:18] <meetingology> +1 been working w/ dgadomski for several years, I've witnessed a lot of his work (MIR w/ pcp package, SRU, and other Ubuntu aspect). dgadomski will be a great asset to the SRU developer team. received from slashd
[15:19] <rbasak> +1 track record looks good and there are endorsements from recent sponsors
[15:19] <meetingology> +1 track record looks good and there are endorsements from recent sponsors received from rbasak
[15:20] <cyphermox> +1
[15:20] <meetingology> +1 received from cyphermox
[15:20] <rbasak> FWIW, SRUs to three packages in the past year is on the lower boundary of what I'd accept though.
[15:20] <sil2100> +1 (everything solid from the SRU developer POV - for core-dev I'd still like to see more devel work though!)
[15:20] <meetingology> +1 (everything solid from the SRU developer POV - for core-dev I'd still like to see more devel work though!) received from sil2100
[15:20] <slashd> #endvote
[15:20] <meetingology> Voting ended on: Please vote on: (dgadomski) SRU Developer
[15:20] <meetingology> Votes for:4 Votes against:0 Abstentions:0
[15:20] <meetingology> Motion carried
[15:21] <slashd> Congrats dgadomski !
[15:21] <rbasak> However everything I've seen looks diligently done - thank you!
[15:21] <ivoks> congrats dgadomski \o/ :)
[15:21] <ddstreet> congrats dgadomski!
[15:21] <dgadomski> thank you :)
[15:22] <mfo> dgadomski, congrats! o/
[15:22] <slashd> Thanks everyone for joining the meeting, I guess we are done for today !
[15:22] <slashd> #endmeeting
=== meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | <wxl> be nice
[15:22] <meetingology> Meeting ended Mon Feb 10 15:22:40 2020 UTC.
[15:22] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2020/ubuntu-meeting.2020-02-10-14.59.moin.txt
[15:23] <rbasak> slashd: uh
[15:23] <rbasak> slashd: actions for making that change happen please?
[15:23] <slashd> rbasak, right I'll take care of it
[15:23] <rbasak> Thanks :)
[15:23] <slashd> rbasak, sorry forgot to mention ;)
[15:24] <sil2100> I could take that one if anything
[15:25] <slashd> sil2100, do you want to take care of the announcement ?
[15:25] <slashd> I'll do the LP stuff
[15:25] <slashd> otherwise I can do both, not a big deal
[15:29] <slashd> sil2100, nevermind I'll do the announcement
[15:31] <sil2100> slashd: ok, I'll leave those in your hands then o/