=== guiverc2 is now known as guiverc [02:22] i don't suppose anyone who can log into autopkgtest infra is around? [02:26] Hi, ukui-menu 2.0.1-1 is blocked when migrating from -proposed to release because missing build on i386, but the i386 package (ukui-menu=1.1.12-1) is migrate from eoan to focal, how to deal with this situation? Thanks! [02:31] mwhudson: i think i actually have the right permissions to do that. [02:31] mwhudson: but after initial training, it might be a while for me to dig up the right hostnames to ssh into [02:31] mwhudson: what specifically are you after? [02:31] xnox: do you have any way of deriving what is causing https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#pkg-docker.io to hang? [02:31] xnox: it doesn't hang when i run it locally :( [02:33] le sigh [02:33] for that one may need to ssh all the way into the guest os, and i'm not sure i've done that, I only got to the queus and workers. [02:33] it should be all local, cause it is importing a tarball and running it. [02:34] actually i think it's possible you need to launch a job in a special way to allow a human to log into it, i forget [02:34] unless dockerd is dead, or hung up, with a new kernel.... [02:34] xnox: it's triggered by the new containerd [02:34] that also sounds like something familear [02:34] (in focal-proposed) [02:35] once it times out and fails, there should be a log right. i wonder if things are not happy with new kernel, new systmed, new apparmor and the like with the new containerd. [02:35] plus i thought debian has broken networking [02:35] * xnox wonders if ubuntu true test would just work [02:35] although networking stuff should have been fixed by now [02:35] horum [02:36] i'm gonna finish my mint tea and go to bed =) [02:44] xnox: nothing in logs iirc but maybe i should check an old failure indeed [02:44] xnox: good night [02:45] no nothing useful in artifacts [02:48] xnox: i want to talk to you about vtoc tomorrow :) [03:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gitless [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.8.8-2] [03:52] Sorry, I got it, It's because it migrate from python to qt, and the architecture changes from all to any. [03:52] handsome_feng: p.s. kylin's looking good in qt :) [03:53] wxl, Thanks! :) [04:00] And anyone know how to deal with this situation? I didn't find the document. :( [05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-418 [amd64] (focal-proposed/multiverse) [418.116.00-3] (no packageset) [05:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-418 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/multiverse) [418.116.00-3] (no packageset) [05:34] handsome_feng: Fixing ukui-menu (and panel appears to have the same issue). [06:08] infinity: Thanks! [06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cinnamon-control-center [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.4.0-2] (no packageset) [06:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cinnamon-control-center [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.4.0-2] (no packageset) [06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cinnamon-control-center [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.4.0-2] (no packageset) [06:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cinnamon-control-center [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.4.0-2] (no packageset) [06:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cinnamon-control-center [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.4.0-2] (no packageset) [07:05] So, now that Mir builds and passes it's !i386 autopkgtests, the thing try do is to delete the stale i386 binaries and everything is hunky-dory, right? [07:27] RAOF: did you you schedule the rebuilds for the soname change? [07:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cinnamon-control-center [amd64] (focal-proposed) [4.4.0-2] [07:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cinnamon-control-center [armhf] (focal-proposed) [4.4.0-2] [07:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cinnamon-control-center [s390x] (focal-proposed) [4.4.0-2] [07:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-418 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [418.116.00-3] [07:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cinnamon-control-center [arm64] (focal-proposed) [4.4.0-2] [07:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-418 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [418.116.00-3] [07:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cinnamon-control-center [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [4.4.0-2] [07:46] doko: To my knowledge there are no rdepends of Mir-built binaries (at present) [07:47] (At least, ones that are not built from the Mir source package) [07:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [65.1-1] (core, i386-whitelist) [07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [i386] (focal-proposed/main) [65.1-1] (core, i386-whitelist) [07:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [65.1-1] (core, i386-whitelist) [08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [65.1-1] (core, i386-whitelist) [08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [65.1-1] (core, i386-whitelist) === andrewc is now known as Guest88169 [09:35] mwhudson, hello, I did sync python-traits, not sure but flaky tests seems to be not flaky anymore? [09:36] it built fine on first attempt [09:48] locutus_: i don't remember that package i'm afraid [09:48] i guess it's s good thing it's building :) [10:32] hello admins, I don't think nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-418 should have been synced, since we don't sync nvidia drivers from Debian [10:32] apw ^^ [10:32] also sil2100 ^ [12:05] sil2100, could you please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/378651 for systemd? [12:25] tseliot, i'll pull it, and that should also cause it to be blacklisted [12:27] apw, thanks, I think this one should go with it too https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-settings-tesla-418 [12:27] tseliot, yeah ... both done [12:27] apw, thanks again === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer [13:23] hiho, why is wal2json in update_excuses complaining about "missing build on armhf: postgresql-12-wal2json (from 2.0-1)" [13:23] the whole point of 2.0-2 was to drop armhf and i386 [13:24] please do not that is misses the "2.0-1" binary [13:24] but this is for 2.0-2 [13:25] or it misses the armhf binary "coming from 2.0-1" [13:25] but never the less - the current 2.0-2 doesn't want to have the armhf/i386 binaries [13:25] anything I can do to resolve that and get it moving again? [13:26] Because 2.0-1 was built on armhf in focal-proposed and not migrated, and proposed-migration doesn't automatically handle that case [13:26] I'll remove it by hand [13:26] Full discplaimer: in a few days hopefulyl there will be a 2.1-1 which will re-add armhf/i386 but I'd prefer not to rely on that [13:26] cjwatson: ah so it really is because 2.0-1 had armhf and it is now missing [13:26] thanks cjwatson [13:27] done [13:27] great, checking back later how migration goes on then [13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (eoan-proposed/main) [1.39.1 => 1.41] (core) (sync) [13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (eoan-proposed/main) [15+1533136590.3beb971-0ubuntu1 => 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu1] (core) (sync) [13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.37~18.04.4 => 1.41] (core) (sync) [13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (bionic-proposed/main) [15+1533136590.3beb971-0ubuntu1 => 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu1] (core) (sync) [13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.33.1~16.04.5 => 1.41] (core) (sync) [13:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (xenial-proposed/main) [15+1533136590.3beb971-0ubuntu1 => 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu1] (core) (sync) [13:47] xnox: ^ shims for everyone :) [13:47] Not sure how this is going to work SRU wise, as we don't have an SRU bug number [13:48] last one did not have one either, though [13:48] juliank: blame the guy who quit! =) [13:49] We can reuse my bug, and tag it update-excuses maybe? [13:49] idk [13:49] certainly we can tag it block-proposed-{xenial,bionic,eoan} [13:49] idk [13:49] oooh update-excuse yeah [13:49] * xnox ponders if update-excuse tag should be renamed to udpate-excuses [13:51] * RikMills wonders who decided that a test error should show a red grinning face emoji [14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1071.81] (kernel) === andrewc is now known as Guest3295 [14:24] RikMills: I believe the "design" (I use that term loosely) of most of that UI was pitti. [14:25] sil2100, could you please drop current ec2-instance-connect srus from from the unapproved queue? I'm about to upload a new set instead [14:38] hmm should I only have copied shim, and not shim-signed? [14:38] * juliank confused [14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibm-java80 (xenial-release/partner) [8.0.6.0-0ubuntu1 => 8.0.6.5-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync) [14:39] or should I have used proper backport SRUs for shim-signed, so that we get an SRU bug in there? [14:40] wiki page just said copy binaries, but shim-signed seems to have been uploaded with version per release [15:07] juliank, if i am remembering correctly (and that is questionable) we have switched things like enforcement at different times which might have necessitated skew [15:08] Hmm [15:09] I think those should be hardcoded in the binaries, and they're the same [15:09] but surrounding might be different [15:09] e.g. update-secureboot-policy [15:09] someone should probably reject the shim-signed uploads [15:10] and then they need redoing [15:10] Well, eoan probably nobody cares [15:11] ah we do [15:12] Yup gotta redo those [15:12] juliank, so reject the lot, or just -signed [15:12] apw: just signed is fine, if you reject all, I could copy the unsigned ones back, though, it doesn't really matter [15:13] juliank, ack === msalvatore_ is now known as msalvatore [15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.41] [15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [sync] (eoan-proposed) [1.41] [15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1071.81] [15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [sync] (xenial-proposed) [1.41] [15:15] juliank, ^ [15:15] thanks, apw [15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted clamav [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.102.1+dfsg-0ubuntu0.19.10.3] [15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted clamav [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.102.1+dfsg-0ubuntu0.18.04.3] [15:59] Big thanks sil2100 ^ [16:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted clamav [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.102.1+dfsg-0ubuntu0.16.04.3] [16:08] yw! [16:19] infinity: I'm just curious. Are you by chance aware as to when the LTS applications have to be in by? [16:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ec2-instance-connect [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu2~18.04.0] [16:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ec2-instance-connect [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu2~19.10.0] [16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ec2-instance-connect [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu2~16.04.0] [16:40] vorlon: hey! Looking at the xenial queue, I see a new ibm-java80 for partner, but the target destination seems to be the Release pocket - guess when I accept it, it will bypass partner proposed, right? [17:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-gffutils (focal-proposed/primary) [0.10.1-1ubuntu1] [17:34] sil2100_: yeah, if it's targeted to the release pocket, that's the case [17:34] dannf: ^^ [17:40] vorlon, sil2100_ ah, sorry - probably me failing at trying to use copy-package again. should i retry w/ --to-suite xenial-proposed? [17:41] dannf: yes please :-) [17:41] vorlon: ok - that looks better. [17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibm-java80 (xenial-proposed/partner) [8.0.6.0-0ubuntu1 => 8.0.6.5-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync) [17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.37~18.04.4 => 1.37~18.04.5] (core) [17:58] sil2100_: ^^ if you're doing reviews, this is a one-liner fix for a regression in the previous -proposed upload [18:09] vorlon: on it o/ === andrewc is now known as Guest88553 [18:19] vorlon: is this also fixing the previous issue? Since the previous LP bug got lost in the .changes, probably needs a reupload with -v [18:20] sil2100_: I can do that [18:20] plz reject [18:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.37~18.04.4 => 1.37~18.04.5] (core) [18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected shim-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.37~18.04.5] [18:22] rbalint, xnox: should LP: #1860432 be wontfix for systemd? sounds like juju is going to change their behavior [18:22] Launchpad bug 1860432 in systemd (Ubuntu Focal) "juju agent fails to start on focal " [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1860432 [18:23] i still wanted to at least file an upstream issue about it [18:25] so we still have a lot of b-d's on python and python-dev, which showed up in NBS a while ago. but not anymore. why not? [18:26] doko: because python and python-dev are not NBS because they have been removed? [18:26] they were uninstallable, so there was no reason in terms of archive consistency to keep them around in the release pocket [18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted shim-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.37~18.04.5] [18:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibm-java80 [sync] (xenial-proposed) [8.0.6.5-0ubuntu1] [18:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ibm-java80 [sync] (xenial-release) [8.0.6.5-0ubuntu1] [18:28] ok, then I assume we need to setup a transition tracker to point out the remaining ones [20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [65.1-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [65.1-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [i386] (focal-proposed/main) [65.1-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [65.1-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [65.1-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [65.1-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) [21:14] vorlon: ok https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#pkg-docker.io is hanging, if you could log in and run ps / lsof / strace any likely looking things / etc that would be great [21:17] infinity i see you're listed in the sru rotation for today, though i'm not sure if that's still accurate, but if it is could you release qemu for b/e and network-manager for e [21:45] mwhudson: ps: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Yp84qQWhp2/ [21:46] mwhudson: docker ps: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/48jhgHGY7s/ [21:49] mwhudson: lsof/strace on the 'docker run': https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/tTVWNJ79H9/ [21:50] mwhudson: a second 'docker run' also hangs [21:56] vorlon: can you strace the containerd-shim process? [21:57] vorlon: also lsof [22:25] vorlon: ideally before the test times out :) [22:27] mwhudson: there are 2 containerd-shim processes, do you know if I should be looking at parent or child? [22:28] vorlon: i only see one in your first ps listing, is that because you ran docker run again? [22:28] oh, maybe? [22:28] https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Yp84qQWhp2/ only has 8092 [22:28] right, it's not parent/child [22:28] aiui docker run talks to dockerd talks to containerd [22:29] mwhudson: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/bJ4CKfS6tS/ [22:30] the thread eventually woke up again, but it's just more futex/nanosleep nonsense [22:30] yeah that's doing a whole lot of nothing isn't it [22:31] i wonder if there's any way to see what the eventpoll things are [22:35] yeah i definitely think that containerd-shim should have exited [22:35] biab [22:58] vorlon: i don't suppose it'll reveal much but "ls -l /var/lib/containerd/io.containerd.runtime.v1.linux/moby/c37559527799313b65be7e8b63736947312b28986a3d6fcf3ee9a5a20cdd415a/" ? [22:59] vorlon: and maybe ls -l /run/docker/containerd/ [23:01] vorlon: also can you gdb -p to a containerd-shim and 'thread apply all bt' or whatever that command is? [23:02] hm might need to install the ddeb for that to be at all useful :( [23:02] mwhudson: $ sudo ls -l /var/lib/containerd/io.containerd.runtime.v1.linux/moby/c37559527799313b65be7e8b63736947312b28986a3d6fcf3ee9a5a20cdd415a/ [23:02] total 0 [23:02] prwx------ 1 root root 0 Feb 10 21:05 shim.stderr.log [23:02] prwx------ 1 root root 0 Feb 10 21:05 shim.stdout.log [23:02] $ sudo ls -l /run/docker/containerd/ [23:02] total 0 [23:02] drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 Feb 10 21:05 c37559527799313b65be7e8b63736947312b28986a3d6fcf3ee9a5a20cdd415a [23:03] drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 80 Feb 10 21:50 f8d72d17248ce5eb41b87f63a63c7507332bee28f7bee0214a79e3f60c09cff7 [23:03] hm no we don't strip go things still [23:03] hm no apparently we do but there is no ddeb on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/1.3.1-0ubuntu1/+build/18193736 ? [23:04] heh oops [23:04] how did we manage that [23:04] ask the go maintainers [23:04] yeah unfortunately that's me [23:05] mwhudson: yeah, a whole lot of No symbol table info [23:06] ah upstream Makefile [23:06] ifndef GODEBUG [23:06] EXTRA_LDFLAGS += -s -w [23:06] ffffffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuu [23:12] oh heh i have containerd 1.3.2 in git locally [23:16] I do not think I want to define a God EBUG [23:17] oh wait maybe we want this fix https://github.com/containerd/containerd/pull/3857 [23:17] so maybe if i just upload things will start working by magic [23:17] containerd issue (Pull request) 3857 in containerd "Fix container pid race condition." [Cherry-Pick/1.3.X, Cherry-Picked/1.3.X, Priority/P0, Closed] [23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.7-2 => 1.3.7-3] (core) [23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.7-2 => 1.3.7-3] (core) [23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.7-2 => 1.3.7-3] (core) [23:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.3.7-3] [23:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.3.7-3] [23:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.3.7-3] [23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtlocation-opensource-src [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5+dfsg-5] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5) [23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtlocation-opensource-src [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5+dfsg-5] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5) [23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtlocation-opensource-src [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5+dfsg-5] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5)