[03:56] <feoh> Evening all
[03:57] <feoh> Anyone else seeing: dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/libdleyna-core-1.0-5_0.6.0-3_amd64.deb (--unpack): in their apt dist-upgrade on 20.04?
[03:58] <lotuspsychje> lets see
[03:59] <lotuspsychje> feoh: i dont have that package installed, can you tell us wich package that it depens on?
[04:00] <feoh> Good question let me look up the apt syntax for that.
[04:03] <prologic> [13:57:24]  <prologic>	Is there a problem with the flocal-security repo on 20.04 right now?
[04:03] <prologic> [13:57:25]  <prologic>	E: The repository 'http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security InRelease' is not signed.
[04:03] <Bashing-om> !info libdleyna-core focal
[04:03] <ubottu> Package libdleyna-core does not exist in focal
[04:04] <lotuspsychje> prologic: can you pastebin the whole output plz?
[04:04] <prologic> Sure can
[04:04] <lotuspsychje> prologic: i just updated to latest, no issues with apt here
[04:04] <tomreyn> sudo /bin/true && cat &>/tmp/aptlog < <(sudo apt-get -y update 2>&1; apt-cache policy 2>&1; sudo apt-get -syV full-upgrade 2>&1;); nc termbin.com 9999 </tmp/aptlog && rm /tmp/aptlog 
[04:04] <tomreyn> ^ can help diagnosing apt issues
[04:05] <feoh> tttThanks
[04:05] <prologic> https://gist.github.com/prologic/987a2084ef3b6fa6dc708b494c045248
[04:05] <feoh> I'll give that a shot
[04:06] <feoh> I wonder if it got brought in when I installed krita
[04:07] <lotuspsychje> feoh: if you doublecheck, i can install & test if you want
[04:07] <tomreyn> prologic: are you using a proxy?
[04:07] <prologic> no
[04:07] <lotuspsychje> prologic: and for wich reason are you using backports on 20.04?
[04:08] <prologic> some packages I can't get on 20.04
[04:08] <prologic> Also FWIW I'm using the upstream ubuntu:20.04 docker image as a base here
[04:09] <tomreyn> is this a regular ubuntu installation you did yourself?
[04:09] <feoh> lotuspsychje: No worries. I can't get any of the depends or rdepends or anything to leak what might have brought this package in.
[04:09] <tomreyn> where is the docker image from exactly?
[04:09] <feoh> DockerHub I'd wager :)
[04:09] <prologic> here https://hub.docker.com/layers/ubuntu/library/ubuntu/20.04/images/sha256-7345a0001b12b9d537ae2936205827ddd6a9aac6616943e67f9623d2ef338c52
[04:10] <prologic> Anyway if there are no KP I'll carry on and figure this out on my own
[04:11] <prologic> it was working upuntil recently so I don't htink it was something I did necessarily :)
[04:11] <prologic> And the base image itself hasn't been updated in over a month
[04:11] <prologic> so 🤷‍♂️
[04:12] <tomreyn> i assume 'KP' doesn't stand for 'kommunist party' but 'known problems' there?
[04:14] <prologic> D'oh I think I suspect whats happenning
[04:14] <tomreyn> i don't know who the publisher of this image is https://hub.docker.com/u/doijanky - or whether you should trust them. but i assume you researched this already.
[04:14] <prologic> Running out of disk space can cause this :)
[04:14] <prologic> stupid symptoms of a different underlying problem you can't see
[04:14] <tomreyn> oh interesting effect
[04:14] <prologic> indeed
[04:14] <prologic> Just confimring it now
[04:15] <prologic> Also I assume the publishers of the image are you guys :)
[04:15] <prologic> By "you guys" I mean someone in the Ubuntu development community/team :)
[04:15] <prologic> it is part of the Docker Hub "official images" afterall :)
[04:16] <prologic> Confirmed
[04:16] <tomreyn> could be, i don't know, but i'm not official ubuntu either. ;)
[04:16] <prologic> running out of disk space maeks apt go crazy with gpg signed repos
[04:17] <tomreyn> or i'm not anyways ;)
[04:17] <prologic> TIL
[04:17] <tomreyn> it's a rare result of running out of disk space, but obviously you shouldn't do that ni the first place.
[04:18] <prologic> obviously :)
[04:18] <prologic> but who monitors the disk space of ephemeral vms used for dev :)
[04:18] <tomreyn> not you ;-)
[04:18] <prologic> not anyone I suspect :D
[04:19] <prologic> Unless you're Fb and your dev machine is an ex production machine
[04:19] <lotuspsychje> prologic: does apt spit out same errors when disabling backports?
[04:20] <prologic> I didn't try sorry
[04:20] <prologic> it was Disk Space that caused this
[04:20] <tomreyn> the gist showed the error for multiple repositories, so i assume it would have
[04:21] <feoh> lotuspsychje: Wherever it came from I fixed the problem. The install was whining about failing to overwrite is an old version of the same package, so I just removed that, ran the apt --fix-broken install and everything worked.
[04:21] <feoh> Thank you for helping me prod at this and get it going ultimately :)
[04:21] <lotuspsychje> ok
[04:21] <lotuspsychje> feoh: so wich package was this about exactly?
[04:22] <feoh> libdleyna-core-1.0-3
[04:22] <lotuspsychje> i know but was there a main package this depended on?
[04:23] <feoh>   Depends: libgupnp-1.2-0 (>= 0.20.7)
[04:23] <feoh> That, libc, and glib2
[04:25] <lotuspsychje> prologic feoh you guys have a launchpad account?
[04:25] <feoh> I do
[04:25] <lotuspsychje> feoh: wanna test an easy qbittorrent bug?
[04:26] <feoh> Absolutely!
[04:26] <feoh> Provided said testing is short-ish, I've gotta get sleep at some point along the curve :)
[04:26] <lotuspsychje> feoh: sudo apt install qbitorrent, and launch please
[04:27] <lotuspsychje> if it crashes for you, please affect bug #1862016
[04:27] <ubottu> bug 1862016 in qbittorrent (Ubuntu) "qbittorrent crashed with SIGABRT in raise()" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1862016
[04:27] <feoh> installing
[04:28] <feoh> UI comes up just fine
[04:28] <feoh> Anything you need me to do further to validate other than just bringing up the GUI?
[04:28] <lotuspsychje> feoh: try to search function or adding a torrent
[04:28] <feoh> k
[04:29] <lotuspsychje> mine crashes after 3sec
[04:29] <lotuspsychje> doing nothing
[04:31] <feoh> Search works great
[04:31] <lotuspsychje> weird
[04:31] <feoh> Bummer.
[04:31] <feoh> I'm running stock Gnome
[04:31] <lotuspsychje> same
[04:31] <feoh> dunno if that has anything to do with it
[04:31] <feoh> huh
[04:31] <feoh> Anything else you'd like me to try?
[04:31] <lotuspsychje> feoh: try adding something after searching a keyword
[04:35] <feoh> Yup, attempting to download crashed it
[04:35] <feoh> Caught signal: SIGSEGV
[04:35] <lotuspsychje> yeah
[04:36] <lotuspsychje> affect yourself plz?
[04:36] <feoh> Pardon me?
[04:36] <feoh> Ah, twiddle the bug. Gotcha.
[04:37] <lotuspsychje> tnx for your time feoh 
[04:37] <tomreyn> "This bug affects 1 person. Does this bug affect you?"
[04:38] <feoh> My pleasure happy to help
[04:39] <feoh> It's a nice client
[05:26] <lotuspsychje> feoh: here's another eay test if youre up to it, bug #1849787
[05:26] <ubottu> bug 1849787 in gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu) "The dock is shown in front of full screen windows since 19.10" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1849787
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
[11:16] <feoh> lotuspsychje: There's that sleep thing, but I just got paged out of bed again so. Yay? :)
[11:17] <feoh> I've also got a few of my own reported bugs in LP that I can validate as no longer being a thing in 20.04
[11:22] <lotuspsychje> feoh: feel free to share, always glad to test things
[11:50] <user14> Good day, anyone here tried to install 20.04 dev on a Hyper-V VM?
[12:17] <user14> Well yes, 20.04 installs fine in Hyper-V, there seems to be no package for the 5.4 kernel specific for azure yet, so Enhanced session will not ben working.
[13:51] <arif-ali> what's the current state of focal for raspberry pi, I ran the daily from iso.qa.u.c, and setting up a bridge using netplan doesn't seem to be working after reboot, is that a known issue? Is this the best channel for this?
[14:02] <lotuspsychje> arif-ali: i did not test the iso for PI myself yet, but at this stage a lot is still changing, like the server installer is being worked on etc
[14:03] <lotuspsychje> there's still alot of breakage and bugs currently that need revision
[14:04] <arif-ali> lotuspsychje: no worries, I was able to boot it, and get an ip on it without a problem. doing a netplan try/apply works, and the bridge gets an IP. But the bridge doesn't come up with ipv4 on startup.
[14:05] <lotuspsychje> arif-ali: do you suspect a specific package?
[14:06] <lotuspsychje> we could check the packagename's recent bugs for example on fossa
[14:07] <arif-ali> will have to dig deep on where specifically the issue is that is causing it, may have to do that after EOD
[14:08] <lotuspsychje> arif-ali: this user for example filed one against systemd: bug #1860926
[14:08] <ubottu> bug 1860926 in systemd (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu 20.04 Systemd fails to configure bridged network" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1860926
[14:10] <arif-ali> ok, that could be it, thanks
[14:10] <lotuspsychje> if you suspect its the same, please affect yourself to the bug, this helps the community to solve
[14:10] <arif-ali> I was searching specifically for rpi, and not more generally
[14:10] <arif-ali> yeah, will do
[14:10] <lotuspsychje> tnx
[14:36] <lotuspsychje> arif-ali: did you find it similar?
[15:08] <lotuspsychje> feoh: did you report bug #1862782 ?
[15:08] <ubottu> bug 1862782 in dleyna-core (Ubuntu) "package libdleyna-core-1.0-5 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: poging tot overschrijven van '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdleyna-core-1.0.so.5.0.0', wat ook in pakket libdleyna-core-1.0-3:amd64 0.6.0-1 zit" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1862782
[15:30] <feoh> I didn't
[15:31] <lotuspsychje> feoh: then can you doublecheck if that was your issue yesterday?
[15:46] <arif-ali> lotuspsychje: it does look similar, but I will double check later, when I can verify and test the particular scenario. I want to start from a fresh flash of the image, and ensure I follow the same steps as that bug
[15:46] <lotuspsychje> great, tnx for taking your time for it arif-ali 
[15:46] <lotuspsychje> in this stage, we can use all the help :p
[15:48] <arif-ali> :) no worries
[15:49] <feoh> lotuspsychjesure
[15:49] <lotuspsychje> tnx feoh that looks like the same package of your issue right?
[15:54] <feoh> yes. marked it as affecting me and posted my successful work-around.
[15:54] <lotuspsychje> +1 for your work feoh ; )
[15:57] <feoh> Pleasure.
[16:08] <feoh> lotuspsychje: I have a couple of bugs I reported in prior releases that are fixed in 20.04 - what's the appropriate step for me to take to mark them as such? It's not clear to me from Launchpad's web UI.
[16:08] <feoh> I don't see a "Resolve as fixed" button :)
[16:09] <lotuspsychje> feoh: well normal case scenario's we let the devs decide when a bug is fixxed
[16:09] <lotuspsychje> but more expert users playing well with launchpad can do it themselfs too
[16:09] <lotuspsychje> depending on your skills
[16:10] <lotuspsychje> personally, i dont touch it myself
[16:10] <feoh> OK so I'll just comment that as a the reporter I can vouch for it as being fixed
[16:10] <feoh> Thanks!
[16:10] <lotuspsychje> feoh: yes, a user can always add a comment, its fixxed on his side
[16:13] <lotuspsychje> feoh: other users and devs will read & test if they can also fix the same way
[16:13] <feoh> Great. Did that. Thanks.
[16:17] <lotuspsychje> feoh: oh well, a bug created on 18.04 and got marked fixed, should not be a bug anymore in higher ubuntu releases, so you should not specific mark it solved anymore
[16:18] <lotuspsychje> feoh: the way around is possible, if the bug would still be there in 20.04 you can add a comment
[16:18] <feoh> OK so was I wrong to comment about it being fixed in 20.04?
[16:19] <lotuspsychje> yeah reading your 18.04 bug made me realize
[16:21] <feoh> How can I know whether or not that's the case?
[16:35] <feoh> Gonna chalk it up to "I don't think my comments did any harm" and just not do that next time if the bugs are old :)
[16:42] <lotuspsychje> !bug | feoh the official etiquette
[16:42] <ubottu> feoh the official etiquette: If you find a bug in Ubuntu or any of its official !flavors, please report it using the command « ubuntu-bug <package> » - See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs for other ways to report bugs.
[20:51] <feoh> Thanks. FWIW the devs closed 2/3 of the bugs I commented on so I think that was the right call.
[20:52] <feoh> But I'll also read that :)