| xnox | vorlon: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/auto-assimp.html as per that tracker please remove decruft assimp on i386, no longer in the whitelist and wants to migrate | 00:05 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtlocation-opensource-src [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5+dfsg-5] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5) | 00:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtlocation-opensource-src [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5+dfsg-5] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5) | 00:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [amd64] (focal-proposed) [65.1-1] | 00:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [armhf] (focal-proposed) [65.1-1] | 00:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [s390x] (focal-proposed) [65.1-1] | 00:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtlocation-opensource-src [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.12.5+dfsg-5] | 00:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtlocation-opensource-src [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.12.5+dfsg-5] | 00:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [arm64] (focal-proposed) [65.1-1] | 00:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtlocation-opensource-src [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.12.5+dfsg-5] | 00:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtlocation-opensource-src [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.12.5+dfsg-5] | 00:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [i386] (focal-proposed) [65.1-1] | 00:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtlocation-opensource-src [armhf] (focal-proposed) [5.12.5+dfsg-5] | 00:32 | |
| vorlon | xnox: I think your tracker is wrong; there are no i386 binaries from assimp source in focal | 00:40 |
| vorlon | xnox: and the blocker for assimp migration per update_output is rviz | 00:43 |
| vorlon | xnox: which depends on python3-defaults, so | 00:43 |
| xnox | vorlon: right, so python-pyassimp is bad and there is no new built on i386, hence it is getting confused. | 01:15 |
| xnox | so i should really fix python3-defaults | 01:15 |
| xnox | vorlon: sagemath / sagetex were removed in testing because sagemath is rc buggy. | 01:16 |
| xnox | vorlon: can we remove it too? | 01:16 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (bionic-proposed/main) [2.20.9-0ubuntu7.10 => 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.11] (core) | 01:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (eoan-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu8.3 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu8.4] (core) | 01:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0~dfsg0-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) | 05:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0~dfsg0-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) | 05:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [i386] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0~dfsg0-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) | 05:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0~dfsg0-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) | 05:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0~dfsg0-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) | 05:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0~dfsg0-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) | 05:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tupi [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2+git08-2] (no packageset) | 05:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tupi [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2+git08-2] (no packageset) | 05:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tupi [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2+git08-2] (no packageset) | 05:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tupi [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2+git08-2] (no packageset) | 05:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tupi [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2+git08-2] (no packageset) | 05:50 | |
| vorlon | xnox: why does sagemath not show up on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/rcbuggy-problem-packages.html as something we should remove? | 06:03 |
| RAOF | Just to double-check: the way to resolve the Mir i386 autopkgtest failure is to remove the i386 binaries, right? They're not on the whitelist. | 06:07 |
| vorlon | RAOF: the way to resolve the mir i386 autopkgtest failure is to fix my spelling of 'badtest' as 'badetst' | 06:08 |
| RAOF | Heh. | 06:08 |
| vorlon | xnox: so the reason it's not on the rcbuggy list is that sagemath has no RC bugs filed against it in Debian, so -EMOREINFO | 06:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmysofa [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.0~dfsg0-1] | 06:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmysofa [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.0~dfsg0-1] | 06:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmysofa [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.0~dfsg0-1] | 06:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-gffutils [source] (focal-proposed) [0.10.1-1ubuntu1] | 06:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tupi [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.2+git08-2] | 06:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tupi [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.2+git08-2] | 06:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmysofa [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.0~dfsg0-1] | 06:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmysofa [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.0~dfsg0-1] | 06:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tupi [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.2+git08-2] | 06:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmysofa [i386] (focal-proposed) [1.0~dfsg0-1] | 06:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tupi [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.2+git08-2] | 06:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tupi [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.2+git08-2] | 06:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-gffutils [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.10.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 06:15 | |
| handsome_feng | Hi, release team, If Kylin wants to release a ARM version for 20.04, dose Ubuntu platform support the creation of arm image? Or should we make the image ourselves? | 06:30 |
| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| cpaelzer | cjwatson: hiho, you said you'd free wal2json in proposed but it is still stuck. I think it needs "one more" action | 06:44 |
| cpaelzer | yesterday we talked about it showing up in update_excuses missing the build of binaries of the never-migrated 2.0-1 | 06:44 |
| cpaelzer | it show up still, but with a slight change, now it reports | 06:44 |
| cpaelzer | missing build on armhf: postgresql-11-wal2json (from 1.0-5ubuntu1) | 06:44 |
| cpaelzer | which is the former version that is in focal-release | 06:45 |
| cpaelzer | does that need the same action by you or do we now need something else? | 06:45 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-gffutils [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.10.1-1ubuntu1] | 07:36 | |
| mwhudson | vorlon: so the next version of containerd passed tests, i'll read the upstream changelog first next time, sorry for wasting your time! | 08:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spamassassin (bionic-proposed/main) [3.4.2-0ubuntu0.18.04.3 => 3.4.2-0ubuntu0.18.04.4] (ubuntu-server) | 08:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spamassassin (xenial-proposed/main) [3.4.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.3 => 3.4.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.4] (ubuntu-server) | 08:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spamassassin (eoan-proposed/main) [3.4.2-1ubuntu0.19.10.2 => 3.4.2-1ubuntu0.19.10.3] (ubuntu-server) | 08:32 | |
| === andrewc is now known as Guest5715 | ||
| cjwatson | cpaelzer__: ah yeah I guess, but looks like this has been superseded by 2.1-1 arriving and building on armhf | 09:05 |
| cpaelzer__ | oh it appeared now | 09:05 |
| cpaelzer__ | so the new version has surpassed resolving the old situation | 09:06 |
| cpaelzer__ | let me check if the old binary packages that are BS now are correctly gone to really call it done | 09:06 |
| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| cjwatson | cpaelzer: (a) this is not really a thing you need to check on (b) I just removed them | 09:07 |
| cpaelzer | thanks cjwatson for helping on this | 09:07 |
| cpaelzer | I think I can now finally "activate" the remaining removal request for PG-11 | 09:08 |
| cpaelzer | cjwatson: which would be https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pglogical/+bug/1862601 | 09:12 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1862601 in postgresql-11 (Ubuntu) "[Remove] Please remove postgresql-11 from Focal" [High,Triaged] | 09:12 |
| cpaelzer | cjwatson: do you have the time to consider and process that removal or should we keep it open until another AA has time for it? | 09:12 |
| cjwatson | cpaelzer: I don't, sorry | 09:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-instance-connect (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~18.04.0 => 1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~18.04.0] (no packageset) | 09:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-instance-connect (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~16.04.0] (no packageset) | 09:21 | |
| cpaelzer | np, up for any AA then | 09:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-instance-connect (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~19.10.0 => 1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~19.10.0] (no packageset) | 09:21 | |
| mitya57 | Hi! qtlocation-opensource-src fails to migrate because “missing build on i386”. However it now has new build-dependencies which are not in i386 whitelist: | 10:48 |
| mitya57 | https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtlocation/commit/a7ef4609bb54ee82 | 10:49 |
| mitya57 | Please either add them to whitelist, or remove qtlocation. | 10:49 |
| LocutusOfBorg | apw, is it possible to kick eviacam out? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950545 | 11:29 |
| ubot5 | Debian bug 950545 in src:eviacam "FTBFS against opencv 4.2.0" [Serious,Open] | 11:29 |
| apw | LocutusOfBorg, sorry i don't have a chance to look right now | 12:09 |
| ddstreet | sil2100 i know it's not your sru day, but any chance you have a minute to release qemu for b/e, and network-manager for e? | 12:45 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-keyring [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [2020.02.11.1] (core) | 13:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1032.34] (kernel) | 13:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1031.32] (kernel) | 13:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1054.58] (kernel) | 13:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polymake [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 13:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polymake [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 13:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-keyring [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2020.02.11.1] | 13:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polymake [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 14:26 | |
| juliank | so component-mismatches shows apport-gtk Depends terminator, when it actually Depends on x-terminal-emulator | 14:35 |
| juliank | something is off there | 14:35 |
| cjwatson | If it has an unadorned dependency on a pure virtual package, then the results are not quite random but can be hard to distinguish from it | 14:42 |
| cjwatson | It'll depend on the expansion of other "inner" seeds with respect to whatever seed's expansion contains apport-gtk | 14:42 |
| cjwatson | Explicitly seeding a particular provider in the right place usually works around this sort of thing | 14:43 |
| juliank | To be fair, apport-gtk should probably depends on gnome-terminal | x-terminal-emulator I guess | 14:44 |
| cjwatson | It used to only Suggests: x-terminal-emulator | 14:45 |
| cjwatson | So it wouldn't have mattered then | 14:45 |
| juliank | ack | 14:46 |
| juliank | just was very confused | 14:46 |
| cjwatson | https://git.launchpad.net/germinate/tree/germinate/germinator.py#n1322 is more or less the relevant logic, if you love pain enough to want to try to follow it | 14:48 |
| cjwatson | (who am I kidding, you maintain apt) | 14:48 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1054.58] | 15:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1032.34] | 15:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1031.32] | 15:05 | |
| juliank | cjwatson: that's lovely code, it's not pain | 15:09 |
| juliank | I can understand it and fix it if it's broken | 15:10 |
| juliank | can't say the same thing about apt's solver | 15:10 |
| juliank | That said, I use my own germinate rewrite | 15:10 |
| juliank | with less features | 15:10 |
| juliank | Like it just is dumb and copies lines into shlibs | 15:11 |
| cjwatson | oh good, I like more people who can understand germinate | 15:12 |
| cjwatson | but yes, not having a scoring algorithm makes it easier to understand | 15:12 |
| cjwatson | OTOH its specification, such as it is, means that any case where it produces different results from apt is probably necessarily a bug. So there's that | 15:13 |
| juliank | I need to get back to writing a new apt solver based on real math | 15:14 |
| juliank | aka reusing general-purpose solvers like z3 (SAT) or clasp (ASP) for package solving | 15:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polymake [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 15:23 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | doko, what do you think about kicking out mapnik 3.0.22+ds1-1build3 from focal, copy back mapnik 3.0.22+ds1-1build2 and let the transition move a little bit further | 16:13 |
| LocutusOfBorg | wecan copy-back the build3 later | 16:13 |
| doko | didn't look, and I'm afk in a few minutes | 16:14 |
| LocutusOfBorg | maybe vorlon ^^ I'm trying to let gdal go in release | 16:15 |
| LocutusOfBorg | with python3-defaults testsuites fixed, we should be mostly ready | 16:15 |
| rbalint | vorlon, could you please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/378651 for systemd? i'm almost ready to land 244.2-1ubuntu1 | 16:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (bionic-proposed/partner) [1:20200114.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 1:20200211.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset) | 16:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20191210.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.2 => 1:20200211.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset) | 16:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (eoan-proposed/partner) [1:20200114.1-0ubuntu0.19.10.1 => 1:20200211.1-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] (no packageset) | 16:41 | |
| === andrewc is now known as Guest20 | ||
| vorlon | rbalint: done, thanks | 16:55 |
| RikMills | vorlon: when convenient, could you add libksysguard to the i386 badtest list please | 17:04 |
| vorlon | RikMills: done | 17:05 |
| RikMills | thanks! | 17:05 |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: mapnik> done | 17:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opensurgsim [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-9] (no packageset) | 17:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opensurgsim [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-9] (no packageset) | 17:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:20200211.1-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] | 18:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:20200211.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] | 18:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20200211.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] | 18:02 | |
| bdmurray | sil2100: Could you review apport for bionic and eoan? bug 1847967 | 18:06 |
| ubot5 | bug 1847967 in apport (Ubuntu Eoan) "oem kernel packages treated differently from generic kernel ones" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1847967 | 18:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opensurgsim [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-9] (no packageset) | 18:08 | |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: sure, just need to jump out to the garage real quick first | 18:19 |
| sil2100 | (not for SRU tools though) | 18:20 |
| sil2100 | (I have those at home) | 18:20 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polymake [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 19:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opensurgsim [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-9] (no packageset) | 19:29 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opensurgsim [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-9] (no packageset) | 19:33 | |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: so there is already an ADT-fix-only apport in -proposed, I guess it would be good to have it included in the .changes? | 19:44 |
| sil2100 | So that we can close both bugs? Or should we just consider it fixed? | 19:45 |
| sil2100 | I guess this part of the SRU block-proposed process still needs to be discussed | 19:45 |
| bdmurray | sil2100: ah right, I grabbed it from -proposed but forget about the .changes | 19:46 |
| bdmurray | that's an easy reupload | 19:46 |
| sil2100 | Thanks o/ | 19:46 |
| bdmurray | sil2100: uploaded | 19:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (eoan-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu8.3 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu8.4] (core) | 19:51 | |
| sil2100 | On it | 19:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (bionic-proposed/main) [2.20.9-0ubuntu7.10 => 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.11] (core) | 19:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apport [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.20.9-0ubuntu7.11] | 19:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apport [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu8.4] | 19:53 | |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: what do you think about this? https://code.launchpad.net/~sil2100/ubuntu-archive-tools/remove-block-proposed-on-sru/+merge/378917 | 20:01 |
| sil2100 | Since I always have to clear out the block-proposed tags by hand, once already I forgot about it | 20:02 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu8.4] | 20:03 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.20.9-0ubuntu7.11] | 20:05 | |
| apw | sil2100, isn't that kind of a valid choice though asking for an SRU and blocking it in -proposed | 20:55 |
| vorlon | apw: I guess the point is that if you're accepting a new SRU over one already in -proposed, the block-proposed tags on the bugs for the previous SRU must no longer apply? | 21:03 |
| vorlon | but for bugs in the changes of the /new/ SRU we certainly shouldn't be clearing | 21:04 |
| apw | vorlon, ahh yes i see your subtlty, if it is doing what you are saying it likely is sane | 21:04 |
| vorlon | I'm not sure that is what it's doing | 21:05 |
| vorlon | :) | 21:05 |
| apw | me either :) | 21:05 |
| locutus__ | please vorlon htslib NBS in s390x (removed) hint: grabix/all/s390x htslib/all/s390x samtools/all/s390x vcftools/all/s390x | 21:55 |
| locutus__ | this makes the gdal/foo transition move forward | 21:56 |
| vorlon | doko: ^^ your removal of htslib/s390x rdeps was incomplete, grabix depends on tabix (source:htslib) | 23:03 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdeflate [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5-2] (no packageset) | 23:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdeflate [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5-2] (no packageset) | 23:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdeflate [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5-2] (no packageset) | 23:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pbsuite [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [15.8.24+dfsg-4] (no packageset) | 23:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdeflate [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5-2] (no packageset) | 23:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdeflate [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5-2] (no packageset) | 23:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hisat2 [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-4] (no packageset) | 23:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: actor-framework [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.16.3-0.3] (no packageset) | 23:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: actor-framework [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.16.3-0.3] (no packageset) | 23:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: actor-framework [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.16.3-0.3] (no packageset) | 23:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1013.14~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 23:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1013.14] (core, kernel) | 23:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1013.14] | 23:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1013.14~18.04.1] | 23:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: actor-framework [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.16.3-0.3] (no packageset) | 23:47 | |
| doko | vorlon: thanks, the s390x test failures triggered by htslib should be ignored then | 23:48 |
| vorlon | doko: yes, I've added the hints per locutusofborg's request above, and noticed the missed removal while doing due diligence on them | 23:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hisat2 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0-4] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbsuite [amd64] (focal-proposed) [15.8.24+dfsg-4] | 23:52 | |
| vorlon | I've also added a skiptest hint for python3-defaults now, I don't think we should wait for libreoffice/armhf test results which will tell us nothing new about the quality of python3 before getting information about the next round of blockers | 23:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdeflate [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.5-2] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdeflate [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.5-2] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdeflate [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.5-2] | 23:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdeflate [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.5-2] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdeflate [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.5-2] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polymake [amd64] (focal-proposed) [4.0-2ubuntu1] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polymake [armhf] (focal-proposed) [4.0-2ubuntu1] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polymake [s390x] (focal-proposed) [4.0-2ubuntu1] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polymake [arm64] (focal-proposed) [4.0-2ubuntu1] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polymake [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [4.0-2ubuntu1] | 23:53 | |
| vorlon | xnox: what should we do with cegui-mk2? | 23:53 |
| vorlon | xnox: looks like it needs fixes for symbols files? | 23:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opensurgsim [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.7.0-9] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opensurgsim [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.7.0-9] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opensurgsim [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.7.0-9] | 23:53 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opensurgsim [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.7.0-9] | 23:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opensurgsim [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.7.0-9] | 23:54 | |
| xnox | vorlon: i had a cunning plan to just upload with new symbols => because ember switched from deb to snap and there are no other reverse depends | 23:54 |
| vorlon | >_< | 23:54 |
| xnox | vorlon: we should be renaming it, as it is abi break (it re-exports symbols that changed, because boost templates changed) | 23:54 |
| vorlon | xnox: reexports but doesn't expose in headers? | 23:55 |
| xnox | vorlon: are you happy for me to rename the binary package to b171 for boost171? | 23:55 |
| xnox | correct | 23:55 |
| vorlon | if these are just templates that nothing will ever compile against, then I don't care about a rename | 23:55 |
| xnox | but like apps will fail to load.... | 23:55 |
| vorlon | let upstream fix it properly by using a linker script to hide symbols | 23:55 |
| xnox | as far as i understand | 23:55 |
| vorlon | why will apps fail to load? | 23:55 |
| xnox | good question, sometimes in the past ember did but maybe something else broke in the abi | 23:56 |
| xnox | at the moment i only see changes in boosty sybmols | 23:56 |
| xnox | i'll just upload that | 23:56 |
| xnox | is it blocking things? | 23:56 |
| vorlon | xnox: yes, it's one of the last uninstallables for the python3-defaults transition | 23:56 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: actor-framework [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.16.3-0.3] (no packageset) | 23:56 | |
| vorlon | xnox: but if a reupload is going to entangle with boost1.71, I'd rather rollback right now | 23:57 |
| vorlon | to 0.8.7-5ubuntu1 if that's an option | 23:57 |
| vorlon | xnox: let me roll back, and you can upload your change tomorrow | 23:58 |
| doko | libreoffice-gtk still depends on libreoffice-gtk2 which isn't built anymore | 23:59 |
| xnox | untangle yes | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!