[00:05] <xnox> vorlon:  https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/auto-assimp.html as per that tracker please remove decruft assimp on i386, no longer in the whitelist and wants to migrate
[00:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtlocation-opensource-src [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5+dfsg-5] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5)
[00:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qtlocation-opensource-src [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.12.5+dfsg-5] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu, qt5)
[00:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [amd64] (focal-proposed) [65.1-1]
[00:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [armhf] (focal-proposed) [65.1-1]
[00:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [s390x] (focal-proposed) [65.1-1]
[00:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtlocation-opensource-src [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.12.5+dfsg-5]
[00:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtlocation-opensource-src [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.12.5+dfsg-5]
[00:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [arm64] (focal-proposed) [65.1-1]
[00:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtlocation-opensource-src [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.12.5+dfsg-5]
[00:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtlocation-opensource-src [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.12.5+dfsg-5]
[00:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [i386] (focal-proposed) [65.1-1]
[00:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qtlocation-opensource-src [armhf] (focal-proposed) [5.12.5+dfsg-5]
[00:40] <vorlon> xnox: I think your tracker is wrong; there are no i386 binaries from assimp source in focal
[00:43] <vorlon> xnox: and the blocker for assimp migration per update_output is rviz
[00:43] <vorlon> xnox: which depends on python3-defaults, so
[01:15] <xnox> vorlon:  right, so python-pyassimp is bad and there is no new built on i386, hence it is getting confused.
[01:15] <xnox> so i should really fix python3-defaults
[01:16] <xnox> vorlon:  sagemath / sagetex were removed in testing because sagemath is rc buggy.
[01:16] <xnox> vorlon:  can we remove it too?
[01:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (bionic-proposed/main) [2.20.9-0ubuntu7.10 => 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.11] (core)
[01:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (eoan-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu8.3 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu8.4] (core)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0~dfsg0-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0~dfsg0-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [i386] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0~dfsg0-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0~dfsg0-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0~dfsg0-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmysofa [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0~dfsg0-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[05:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tupi [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2+git08-2] (no packageset)
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tupi [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2+git08-2] (no packageset)
[05:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tupi [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2+git08-2] (no packageset)
[05:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tupi [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2+git08-2] (no packageset)
[05:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tupi [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2+git08-2] (no packageset)
[06:03] <vorlon> xnox: why does sagemath not show up on https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/focal/rcbuggy-problem-packages.html as something we should remove?
[06:07] <RAOF> Just to double-check: the way to resolve the Mir i386 autopkgtest failure is to remove the i386 binaries, right? They're not on the whitelist.
[06:08] <vorlon> RAOF: the way to resolve the mir i386 autopkgtest failure is to fix my spelling of 'badtest' as 'badetst'
[06:08] <RAOF> Heh.
[06:11] <vorlon> xnox: so the reason it's not on the rcbuggy list is that sagemath has no RC bugs filed against it in Debian, so -EMOREINFO
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmysofa [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.0~dfsg0-1]
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmysofa [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.0~dfsg0-1]
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmysofa [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.0~dfsg0-1]
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-gffutils [source] (focal-proposed) [0.10.1-1ubuntu1]
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tupi [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.2+git08-2]
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tupi [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.2+git08-2]
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmysofa [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.0~dfsg0-1]
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmysofa [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.0~dfsg0-1]
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tupi [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.2+git08-2]
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmysofa [i386] (focal-proposed) [1.0~dfsg0-1]
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tupi [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.2+git08-2]
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tupi [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.2+git08-2]
[06:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-gffutils [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.10.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:30] <handsome_feng> Hi, release team, If Kylin wants to release a ARM version for 20.04, dose Ubuntu platform support the creation of arm image? Or should we make the image ourselves?
[06:44] <cpaelzer> cjwatson: hiho, you said you'd free wal2json in proposed but it is still stuck. I think it needs "one more" action
[06:44] <cpaelzer> yesterday we talked about it showing up in update_excuses missing the build of binaries of the never-migrated 2.0-1
[06:44] <cpaelzer> it show up still, but with a slight change, now it reports
[06:44] <cpaelzer> missing build on armhf: postgresql-11-wal2json (from 1.0-5ubuntu1)
[06:45] <cpaelzer> which is the former version that is in focal-release
[06:45] <cpaelzer> does that need the same action by you or do we now need something else?
[07:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-gffutils [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.10.1-1ubuntu1]
[08:19] <mwhudson> vorlon: so the next version of containerd passed tests, i'll read the upstream changelog first next time, sorry for wasting your time!
[08:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spamassassin (bionic-proposed/main) [3.4.2-0ubuntu0.18.04.3 => 3.4.2-0ubuntu0.18.04.4] (ubuntu-server)
[08:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spamassassin (xenial-proposed/main) [3.4.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.3 => 3.4.2-0ubuntu0.16.04.4] (ubuntu-server)
[08:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spamassassin (eoan-proposed/main) [3.4.2-1ubuntu0.19.10.2 => 3.4.2-1ubuntu0.19.10.3] (ubuntu-server)
[09:05] <cjwatson> cpaelzer__: ah yeah I guess, but looks like this has been superseded by 2.1-1 arriving and building on armhf
[09:05] <cpaelzer__> oh it appeared now
[09:06] <cpaelzer__> so the new version has surpassed resolving the old situation
[09:06] <cpaelzer__> let me check if the old binary packages that are BS now are correctly gone to really call it done
[09:07] <cjwatson> cpaelzer: (a) this is not really a thing you need to check on (b) I just removed them
[09:07] <cpaelzer> thanks cjwatson for helping on this
[09:08] <cpaelzer> I think I can now finally "activate" the remaining removal request for PG-11
[09:12] <cpaelzer> cjwatson: which would be https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pglogical/+bug/1862601
[09:12] <cpaelzer> cjwatson: do you have the time to consider and process that removal or should we keep it open until another AA has time for it?
[09:20] <cjwatson> cpaelzer: I don't, sorry
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-instance-connect (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~18.04.0 => 1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~18.04.0] (no packageset)
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-instance-connect (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~16.04.0 => 1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~16.04.0] (no packageset)
[09:21] <cpaelzer> np, up for any AA then
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-instance-connect (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~19.10.0 => 1.1.12+dfsg1-0ubuntu3~19.10.0] (no packageset)
[10:48] <mitya57> Hi! qtlocation-opensource-src fails to migrate because “missing build on i386”. However it now has new build-dependencies which are not in i386 whitelist:
[10:49] <mitya57> https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtlocation/commit/a7ef4609bb54ee82
[10:49] <mitya57> Please either add them to whitelist, or remove qtlocation.
[11:29] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, is it possible to kick eviacam out? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950545
[12:09] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, sorry i don't have a chance to look right now
[12:45] <ddstreet> sil2100 i know it's not your sru day, but any chance you have a minute to release qemu for b/e, and network-manager for e?
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-keyring [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [2020.02.11.1] (core)
[13:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1032.34] (kernel)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1031.32] (kernel)
[13:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1054.58] (kernel)
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polymake [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polymake [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntu-keyring [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2020.02.11.1]
[14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polymake [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:35] <juliank> so component-mismatches shows apport-gtk Depends terminator, when it actually Depends on x-terminal-emulator
[14:35] <juliank> something is off there
[14:42] <cjwatson> If it has an unadorned dependency on a pure virtual package, then the results are not quite random but can be hard to distinguish from it
[14:42] <cjwatson> It'll depend on the expansion of other "inner" seeds with respect to whatever seed's expansion contains apport-gtk
[14:43] <cjwatson> Explicitly seeding a particular provider in the right place usually works around this sort of thing
[14:44] <juliank> To be fair, apport-gtk should probably depends on gnome-terminal | x-terminal-emulator I guess
[14:45] <cjwatson> It used to only Suggests: x-terminal-emulator
[14:45] <cjwatson> So it wouldn't have mattered then
[14:46] <juliank> ack
[14:46] <juliank> just was very confused
[14:48] <cjwatson> https://git.launchpad.net/germinate/tree/germinate/germinator.py#n1322 is more or less the relevant logic, if you love pain enough to want to try to follow it
[14:48] <cjwatson> (who am I kidding, you maintain apt)
[15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1054.58]
[15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1032.34]
[15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1031.32]
[15:09] <juliank> cjwatson: that's lovely code, it's not pain
[15:10] <juliank> I can understand it and fix it if it's broken
[15:10] <juliank> can't say the same thing about apt's solver
[15:10] <juliank> That said, I use my own germinate rewrite
[15:10] <juliank> with less features
[15:11] <juliank> Like it just is dumb and copies lines into shlibs
[15:12] <cjwatson> oh good, I like more people who can understand germinate
[15:12] <cjwatson> but yes, not having a scoring algorithm makes it easier to understand
[15:13] <cjwatson> OTOH its specification, such as it is, means that any case where it produces different results from apt is probably necessarily a bug.  So there's that
[15:14] <juliank> I need to get back to writing a new apt solver based on real math
[15:14] <juliank> aka reusing general-purpose solvers like z3 (SAT) or clasp (ASP) for package solving
[15:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polymake [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:13] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, what do you think about kicking out mapnik 3.0.22+ds1-1build3 from focal, copy back mapnik 3.0.22+ds1-1build2 and let the transition move a little bit further
[16:13] <LocutusOfBorg> wecan copy-back the build3 later
[16:14] <doko> didn't look, and I'm afk in a few minutes
[16:15] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe vorlon ^^ I'm trying to let gdal go in release
[16:15] <LocutusOfBorg> with python3-defaults testsuites fixed, we should be mostly ready
[16:21] <rbalint> vorlon, could you please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/378651  for systemd? i'm almost ready to land  244.2-1ubuntu1
[16:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (bionic-proposed/partner) [1:20200114.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 => 1:20200211.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (no packageset)
[16:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20191210.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.2 => 1:20200211.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] (no packageset)
[16:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (eoan-proposed/partner) [1:20200114.1-0ubuntu0.19.10.1 => 1:20200211.1-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] (no packageset)
[16:55] <vorlon> rbalint: done, thanks
[17:04] <RikMills> vorlon: when convenient, could you add libksysguard to the i386 badtest list please
[17:05] <vorlon> RikMills: done
[17:05] <RikMills> thanks!
[17:08] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: mapnik> done
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opensurgsim [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-9] (no packageset)
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opensurgsim [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-9] (no packageset)
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:20200211.1-0ubuntu0.19.10.1]
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:20200211.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20200211.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[18:06] <bdmurray> sil2100: Could you review apport for bionic and eoan? bug 1847967
[18:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opensurgsim [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-9] (no packageset)
[18:19] <sil2100> bdmurray: sure, just need to jump out to the garage real quick first
[18:20] <sil2100> (not for SRU tools though)
[18:20] <sil2100> (I have those at home)
[19:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polymake [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opensurgsim [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-9] (no packageset)
[19:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: opensurgsim [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-9] (no packageset)
[19:44] <sil2100> bdmurray: so there is already an ADT-fix-only apport in -proposed, I guess it would be good to have it included in the .changes?
[19:45] <sil2100> So that we can close both bugs? Or should we just consider it fixed?
[19:45] <sil2100> I guess this part of the SRU block-proposed process still needs to be discussed
[19:46] <bdmurray> sil2100: ah right, I grabbed it from -proposed but forget about the .changes
[19:46] <bdmurray> that's an easy reupload
[19:46] <sil2100> Thanks o/
[19:51] <bdmurray> sil2100: uploaded
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (eoan-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu8.3 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu8.4] (core)
[19:52] <sil2100> On it
[19:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (bionic-proposed/main) [2.20.9-0ubuntu7.10 => 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.11] (core)
[19:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apport [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.20.9-0ubuntu7.11]
[19:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apport [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu8.4]
[20:01] <sil2100> bdmurray: what do you think about this? https://code.launchpad.net/~sil2100/ubuntu-archive-tools/remove-block-proposed-on-sru/+merge/378917
[20:02] <sil2100> Since I always have to clear out the block-proposed tags by hand, once already I forgot about it
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu8.4]
[20:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.20.9-0ubuntu7.11]
[20:55] <apw> sil2100, isn't that kind of a valid choice though asking for an SRU and blocking it in -proposed
[21:03] <vorlon> apw: I guess the point is that if you're accepting a new SRU over one already in -proposed, the block-proposed tags on the bugs for the previous SRU must no longer apply?
[21:04] <vorlon> but for bugs in the changes of the /new/ SRU we certainly shouldn't be clearing
[21:04] <apw> vorlon, ahh yes i see your subtlty, if it is doing what you are saying it likely is sane
[21:05] <vorlon> I'm not sure that is what it's doing
[21:05] <vorlon> :)
[21:05] <apw> me either :)
[21:55] <locutus__> please vorlon htslib NBS in s390x (removed) hint: grabix/all/s390x htslib/all/s390x samtools/all/s390x vcftools/all/s390x
[21:56] <locutus__> this makes the gdal/foo transition move forward
[23:03] <vorlon> doko: ^^ your removal of htslib/s390x rdeps was incomplete, grabix depends on tabix (source:htslib)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdeflate [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5-2] (no packageset)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdeflate [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5-2] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdeflate [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5-2] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pbsuite [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [15.8.24+dfsg-4] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdeflate [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5-2] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdeflate [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5-2] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hisat2 [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-4] (no packageset)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: actor-framework [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.16.3-0.3] (no packageset)
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: actor-framework [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.16.3-0.3] (no packageset)
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: actor-framework [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.16.3-0.3] (no packageset)
[23:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1013.14~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1013.14] (core, kernel)
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1013.14]
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1013.14~18.04.1]
[23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: actor-framework [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.16.3-0.3] (no packageset)
[23:48] <doko> vorlon: thanks, the s390x test failures triggered by htslib should be ignored then
[23:51] <vorlon> doko: yes, I've added the hints per locutusofborg's request above, and noticed the missed removal while doing due diligence on them
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hisat2 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0-4]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pbsuite [amd64] (focal-proposed) [15.8.24+dfsg-4]
[23:52] <vorlon> I've also added a skiptest hint for python3-defaults now, I don't think we should wait for libreoffice/armhf test results which will tell us nothing new about the quality of python3 before getting information about the next round of blockers
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdeflate [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.5-2]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdeflate [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.5-2]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdeflate [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.5-2]
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdeflate [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.5-2]
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libdeflate [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.5-2]
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polymake [amd64] (focal-proposed) [4.0-2ubuntu1]
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polymake [armhf] (focal-proposed) [4.0-2ubuntu1]
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polymake [s390x] (focal-proposed) [4.0-2ubuntu1]
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polymake [arm64] (focal-proposed) [4.0-2ubuntu1]
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted polymake [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [4.0-2ubuntu1]
[23:53] <vorlon> xnox: what should we do with cegui-mk2?
[23:53] <vorlon> xnox: looks like it needs fixes for symbols files?
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opensurgsim [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.7.0-9]
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opensurgsim [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.7.0-9]
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opensurgsim [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.7.0-9]
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opensurgsim [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.7.0-9]
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted opensurgsim [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.7.0-9]
[23:54] <xnox> vorlon:  i had a cunning plan to just upload with new symbols => because ember switched from deb to snap and there are no other reverse depends
[23:54] <vorlon> >_<
[23:54] <xnox> vorlon:  we should be renaming it, as it is abi break (it re-exports symbols that changed, because boost templates changed)
[23:55] <vorlon> xnox: reexports but doesn't expose in headers?
[23:55] <xnox> vorlon:  are you happy for me to rename the binary package to b171 for boost171?
[23:55] <xnox> correct
[23:55] <vorlon> if these are just templates that nothing will ever compile against, then I don't care about a rename
[23:55] <xnox> but like apps will fail to load....
[23:55] <vorlon> let upstream fix it properly by using a linker script to hide symbols
[23:55] <xnox> as far as i understand
[23:55] <vorlon> why will apps fail to load?
[23:56] <xnox> good question, sometimes in the past ember did but maybe something else broke in the abi
[23:56] <xnox> at the moment i only see changes in boosty sybmols
[23:56] <xnox> i'll just upload that
[23:56] <xnox> is it blocking things?
[23:56] <vorlon> xnox: yes, it's one of the last uninstallables for the python3-defaults transition
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: actor-framework [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.16.3-0.3] (no packageset)
[23:57] <vorlon> xnox: but if a reupload is going to entangle with boost1.71, I'd rather rollback right now
[23:57] <vorlon> to 0.8.7-5ubuntu1 if that's an option
[23:58] <vorlon> xnox: let me roll back, and you can upload your change tomorrow
[23:59] <doko> libreoffice-gtk still depends on libreoffice-gtk2 which isn't built anymore
[23:59] <xnox> untangle yes