[01:36] <turova> hello! I'm trying to install ubuntu server as an OEM install on proxmox and while I see the option when I press F4, it seems to just direct me to the standard installer
[01:36] <turova> anyone know what I can do?
[01:36] <turova> this is for 18.04lts
[02:20] <turova> I used the alternative installer and while I'm having an issue with networking, it did seem to do the oem install correctly
[04:39] <dinkoarun> Hi, since the last week, a random command has been run by postgres user that his hogging a lot of CPU. It is not showing in the pg_stat_activity. I suspect it is some sort of malware, but I am unable to diagnose it. Can someone help? I am using it on Ubuntu 16.04 server. Postgres 9.5
[04:39] <dinkoarun> 	It is running even when postgres service is stopped.
[05:02] <xibalba> sha256sum the binary
[05:02] <xibalba> google the hash
[05:02] <xibalba> see what you get
[05:04] <xibalba> probably normal
 Are you answering my question?
[07:07] <lordievader> Good morning
[07:08] <alunazero> good morning
[07:09] <lordievader> dinkoarun: That is one way to go about it. Another would be to check where the program is coming from (if it ain't from a package it is a suspect, if it is from a package... has the binary been modified?)
 clamav found two infected files and removed it. It has been 3 hours. There has been no instance of malware issue till now. Here is the link to clamav results. https://ibin.co/5C4AfTUGD2FI.png
[10:25] <avu> dinkoarun: if you know a system has been compromised, re-installing it from scratch is really the only way to be sure to get it back to a known clean state (although I wouldn't say that "clamav found something" and "system is known to be compromised" are the same thing ;))
[10:32] <lotuspsychje> dinkoarun: keep in mind not all clamav founds are real malware, sometimes they are false postives, check your result logs
[10:33] <dinkoarun> ok. thanks for your feedback
[10:36] <jamespage> coreycb: I completed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-tabulate/+bug/1862773
[10:36] <jamespage> however one project jumping first this late in cycle was not super helpful
[13:14] <coreycb> jamespage: our cinder snapshot got delayed quite a bit this cycle so it's probably on us
[13:14] <coreycb> jamespage: thanks for that
[21:20] <coreycb> jamespage: fyi bug for nova autopkgtest failure. the new python3 default is starting to expose python3.8 issues. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/+bug/1863021
[22:14] <TwistedBlizzard> Hi all, I'm trying to do load balancing across 2 network interfaces - all the tutorials I can find are out of date and do not use network-manager and make reference to the old network interface naming scheme.
[22:14] <tds> what do you mean by load balancing exactly? bonding?
[22:15] <TwistedBlizzard> Yes, sorry
[22:15] <tds> are you definitely using network-manager? modern ubuntu server installs will do netplan by default
[22:16] <TwistedBlizzard> Ah right - That explains why I couldn't restart the service
[22:16] <tds> you probably want something like the example here - https://netplan.io/examples#configuring-interface-bonding
[22:16] <tds> then `netplan apply` when you're done
[22:16] <TwistedBlizzard> Thank you!
[22:17] <tds> oh, and assuming you're doing real lacp rather than round robin, you can see the example for 802.3ad a bit further down the page
[22:18] <TwistedBlizzard> 802.3ad is what I've been looking for, thanks again - my routers are using vlan - is that a better way of achieving what I want?
[22:20] <tds> what do you mean by that exactly? vlans and lacp are different things
[22:20] <tds> (though running vlans over a bond is quite common, and is often sensible)
[22:23] <TwistedBlizzard> Right, I'm going entirely from what I've read on google so a lot of my understanding is probably inaccurate. I got a second broadband connection installed to my home and bought a bonding router in order to combine them. The router just died and I'm trying to recreate what it does on my ubuntu server box.
[22:24] <sarnold> does your provider offer 802.3ad over these two connections directly?
[22:27] <TwistedBlizzard> I don't know, maybe? If not, a friend of mine said that I can use his node(?) in order to bond the connections.
[22:28] <TwistedBlizzard> I know that before, I had to use multiple connections for upload/download to get the combined speed.
[22:30] <tds> unless your provider has explicitly told you that they support 802.3ad, it seems unlikely that they do
[22:31] <tds> for a pair of normal residential connections, you could probably achieve much the same with an ecmp default route between them though
[22:33] <TwistedBlizzard> Is there information on how to do that on the link you posted earlier?
[22:40] <tds> i'm not sure netplan provides support for that at all