/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/02/14/#ubuntu-desktop.txt

oSoMoNgood morning desktoppers07:01
oSoMoNhappy Friday!07:01
didrocksgood morning07:11
dufluMorning oSoMoN and didrocks07:15
dufluHappy Friday07:15
oSoMoNsalut didrocks, hey duflu07:16
marcustomlinsonhappy friday oSoMoN didrocks and duflu!07:22
oSoMoNhey marcustomlinson07:24
didrockshey duflu, oSoMoN, marcustomlinson07:27
WimpressMorning o/07:33
dufluMorning Wimpress07:35
didrockshey Wimpress07:37
marcustomlinsonmorning Wimpress07:41
dufluHi marcustomlinson07:43
jibeltjaalton, I cannot verify bug 1792932 in bionic. .4 already comes with xorg 1.20 and is not affected by this bug08:32
ubot5bug 1792932 in xorg-server (Ubuntu Xenial) "Desktop fails to boot in vbox: Xorg assert failure: Xorg: ../../../../dix/privates.c:384: dixRegisterPrivateKey: Assertion `!global_keys[type].created' failed." [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/179293208:32
jibeland I cannot install the packages from proposed08:32
jibelit removes the entire hwe stack08:33
jibeland if I try to force the version in proposed I get a conflict with xserver-xorg-video-modesetting08:35
tjaaltonmodesetting? it's a virtual pkg08:37
tjaaltonhasn't been a real pkg in years08:37
tjaaltonshould be able to downgrade to the GA stack by apt install xserver-xorg08:38
tjaaltonthen enable proposed and install the update08:38
tjaaltonbut assuming you install from scratch, using the .0/1 image is still possible08:41
jibeltjaalton, right, I proceeded with the replacement of xorg-.*hwe* packages and it's all working fine with proposed08:44
tjaaltoncool08:50
tjaaltonand thanks!08:51
jibeltjaalton, I tried with .0 too on which I could observe the bug and it's fixed with proposed08:57
Laneymoin09:02
dufluMorning Laney, and jibel and tjaalton09:03
jibelafternoon duflu09:08
tjaaltonheya09:13
tjaaltonI'm planning to upload mesa 20.0.0-rc3 today, final should arrive next week10:12
tjaaltonscratch that, next week is just as fine10:20
Saviqxnox: hey, got a secure boot question for you: I've installed 20.04 fresh on my laptop and I _think_ I failed to enroll the MOK (I got scared of the menu when it rebooted - I wasn't sure what to do, maybe I didn't read the dialog properly when installing)11:13
Saviqsince then it seems I'm stuck with two "ubuntu" boot entries, one of which is SecureBoot-enabled, the other is not…11:14
Saviqefibootmgr says https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Mrc88j9PGG/11:15
Saviq`update-secureboot-policy --enroll-key` says just "Adding '/var/lib/shim-signed/mok/MOK.der' to shim:" and nothing's there after reboot11:16
Saviqxnox: whatever I do via `efibootmgr` (delete, reorder), I'm then back with the two entries and the order is "broken; working" - I can reorder in System Setup and that seems to work, at least for now11:21
xnoxSaviq:  i wonder what their values are.11:23
xnoxSaviq:  also i wonder if you can delete bogus entries in System Setup11:24
Saviqxnox: how do I get their values?11:24
xnoxSaviq:  also do you need Mok? most popular drivers are now signed by us and need not a MOK enrolled key11:24
SaviqVBox…11:24
xnoxsigned by us11:24
xnoxin linux-ristricted-modules11:24
SaviqSo o should install something else than -dkms?11:25
xnoxmaybe our depenendencies are wrong?!11:25
xnoxre: variables11:25
xnoxi use $ bootctl11:25
Saviqxnox: it's grub and shim11:27
xnoxi mean bootctl can print status of uefi variables irrespective of which bootloader is in use11:27
xnoxhm11:28
xnoxmaybe we only do guest modules and not host11:28
xnox$ apt show linux-image-5.4.0-14-generic  | grep virtualbox11:28
xnoxProvides: aufs-dkms, fuse-module, ivtv-modules, kvm-api-4, linux-image, redhat-cluster-modules, spl-dkms, spl-modules, virtualbox-guest-dkms, virtualbox-guest-modules, zfs-dkms, zfs-modules11:28
Saviqxnox: ok can confirm removing the grubx64 one and rebooting just makes it come back again, and default11:32
Saviqxnox: but even though it tells me I'll need to enroll the MOK, nothing happens on reboot11:33
xnoxSaviq:  can you add an entry for mokmanager and boot that? and see if you can complete the mok enrollment?11:33
xnoxalso maybe juliank might be better to help with this, but he is not in this channel11:33
Laneyo ubiquity11:58
kenvandineLaney: did you see the email to desktop-devel-list about the proposed release schedule changes?14:20
kenvandinehttps://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2020-February/msg00042.html14:20
Laneykenvandine: yeah, I made a note to reply but don't think it'll be today15:19
Laneythanks for pointing it out!15:19
Laneyand morning15:19
kenvandineLaney: thanks!15:23
hellsworthgood morning desktopers!15:43
oSoMoNgood morning hellsworth15:44
hellsworthhola!15:45
marcustomlinson\o15:46
hellswortho/15:47
oSoMoNhaving fixed an 8-year old bug (bug #887079), I'm calling it a week. Have a good week-end everyone!18:02
ubot5bug 887079 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "Software Sources shows codenames not version numbers" [Low,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/88707918:02
hellsworthoh man nice oSoMon!!18:18
=== ijohnson is now known as ijohnson|lunch
=== sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens
=== heather1 is now known as hellsworth
=== ijohnson|lunch is now known as ijohnson

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!