| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: efl [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.23.3-7] (i386-whitelist, ubuntustudio) | 00:11 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: efl [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.23.3-7] (i386-whitelist, ubuntustudio) | 00:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: efl [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.23.3-7] (i386-whitelist, ubuntustudio) | 00:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted efl [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.23.3-7] | 00:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted efl [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.23.3-7] | 00:35 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted efl [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.23.3-7] | 00:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted efl [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.23.3-7] | 00:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-ginkgo [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.12.0-7] | 00:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-ginkgo [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.12.0-7] | 00:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted efl [i386] (focal-proposed) [1.23.3-7] | 00:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-ginkgo [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.12.0-7] | 00:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted efl [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.23.3-7] | 00:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-cassandra-driver [amd64] (focal-proposed) [3.20.2-1] | 00:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-ginkgo [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.12.0-7] | 00:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ocaml [amd64] (focal-proposed) [4.08.1-8] | 00:36 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-ginkgo [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.12.0-7] | 00:36 | |
| vorlon | xnox: bombono-dvd has a reverse-recommends, do you want to fix that? | 00:38 |
|---|---|---|
| vorlon | xnox: you haven't closed LP: #1862267 yet, is LP still timing out for you? | 00:40 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1862267 in sqlite3 (Ubuntu) "sqlite3 3.31.1-1 is broken on s390x" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1862267 | 00:40 |
| xnox | vorlon: no, because it's a bogus metapackage | 00:40 |
| xnox | vorlon: now closed. | 00:41 |
| xnox | vorlon: force syning debian-multimedia to see what happens | 00:42 |
| Kamilion | any idea why my console's getting spammed with python warnings during package upgrades now? | 01:26 |
| Kamilion | /usr/lib/python3.8/subprocess.py:844: RuntimeWarning: line buffering (buffering=1) isn't supported in binary mode, the default buffer size will be used | 01:26 |
| Kamilion | http://puu.sh/FaoPe/4962557a5a.png | 01:28 |
| Kamilion | https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/FFYGhB6m68/ | 01:29 |
| sarnold | ouch | 01:32 |
| Kamilion | less than 24 hours since the last package update run, so something's gone south. | 01:32 |
| Kamilion | i'll grab yesterday's daily iso and try again, see if it recurs. | 01:34 |
| sarnold | I can't spot anything that looks related on https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/3.8.html . I wonder when this was introduced | 01:40 |
| Kamilion | hm, yeah, I thought the warnings were supposed to come back for 3.9, not 3.8 | 01:48 |
| Kamilion | https://lwn.net/Articles/811369/ | 01:48 |
| Kamilion | yeah, recurs with yesterday's lubuntu daily iso -> today's packages | 02:14 |
| Kamilion | autoremove just got rid of python3.7-minimal. | 02:21 |
| xnox | Kamilion: sarnold: https://bugs.python.org/issue32236 | 02:25 |
| xnox | it used to be silently ignored, now it complaints, but we have a lot of code that calls this somewhere up the stack, so the culprit is a package which is being configured/bytecompiled just before | 02:26 |
| Kamilion | just tried some other python3 apps I had around, nothing else broke with 3.8. Getting warnings now when I wasn't before, however. | 02:26 |
| Kamilion | most of the noise from the package manager seemed to be from hplip | 02:26 |
| sarnold | xnox: python is sooo annoying | 02:30 |
| Kamilion | small little quirks like sys.maxint -> sys.maxsize >.< | 02:30 |
| xnox | doko: can we turnoff that runtimewarning? at least during bycode compilation on package installation. Our users cannot do anything, and it looks add when they dist upgrade | 02:31 |
| Kamilion | yeah, python will read the shebang line and parse it | 02:31 |
| Kamilion | https://lwn.net/Articles/740804/ | 02:32 |
| Kamilion | #!/usr/bin/python3 -W default | 02:32 |
| Kamilion | python itself will handle the split in "-W default" | 02:32 |
| xnox | i am more thinking to fix dh-python, as it is called in the maintainer scripts upon package installation | 02:33 |
| xnox | not changing packages themselves, or shebangs in them | 02:33 |
| Kamilion | sure, just figure'd I'd point out how to suppress the warning | 02:34 |
| Kamilion | and that python3 will handle argv[1] | 02:35 |
| sarnold | I suspect we'd be better served to just fix the surprise bugs; otherwise a future python release may just outright break all these things | 02:37 |
| Kamilion | as the first LWN link I posted implied (in 3.9) | 02:37 |
| xnox | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dh-python/+bug/1863195 | 02:41 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1863195 in dh-python (Ubuntu) "py3compile should not emit python runtime warnings during dist-upgrade" [Undecided,New] | 02:41 |
| xnox | sarnold: sure, but we are all exhausted after completing python3.8 by default transition which took months to land. | 02:41 |
| Kamilion | *nods* | 02:42 |
| sarnold | xnox: remind me why anyone still uses this language? | 02:42 |
| xnox | and emitting that, on every package install, to the users, is not showing it to the upstream maintainers who don't even have 3.8 enabled in their travis.yaml | 02:42 |
| Kamilion | it's got an extremely conveniant REPL | 02:42 |
| sarnold | Kamilion: well, true. it does. | 02:43 |
| sarnold | xnox: it's like that stupid gtk pixbuf "you're not configured!" warning. I hate that thing. | 02:43 |
| xnox | sarnold: because it's the fast and free matlab with matrixes index right way around. | 02:43 |
| Kamilion | and it's pretty easy to mix performance C extensions with a bit of python glue without having a massive boilerplate script | 02:43 |
| xnox | (ipython / jypiter / numpy) | 02:43 |
| Kamilion | ugh. You think that's bad, enlightenment's errors are egregious | 02:44 |
| Kamilion | but now that I have done my Holly work, "Emergency. There's an emergency going on. ... .... It's still going on. It's still an emergency.", I shall digress and return to the ether | 02:45 |
| sarnold | mmm ether. enjoy | 02:45 |
| xnox | ooooh | 02:49 |
| xnox | https://adamj.eu/tech/2020/01/21/why-does-python-3-8-syntaxwarning-for-is-literal/ | 02:49 |
| xnox | sounds scary | 02:49 |
| Kamilion | i've made the same mistake before | 02:50 |
| Kamilion | "is not None" is fine for example since all Nones are the same | 02:51 |
| Kamilion | but `is not ""` is not, because not all ""s are the same | 02:51 |
| Kamilion | or for small integers in CPython, which are allocated once and referenced all over, but not in micropython which lacks that performance-over-memory optimization. | 02:53 |
| Kamilion | also, one of the other reasons of 'popularity', sarnold, is micropython itself, as many MCUs today offer lua, javascript (duktape), micropython, and if you're on ARM, a golang target. Xtensas and other esoterics have no functional golang/rust support, for example. | 02:55 |
| Kamilion | of those choices, people tend to be most familiar with either python's syntax or javascripts (since lua has no batteries) | 02:55 |
| sarnold | Kamilion: so crazy to think that a language that compiles down to machine code isn't on those platforms, but *python*, not known for being lightweight, is.. | 02:55 |
| Kamilion | micropython, specifically, which only requires like six posix-like libc functions to operate. Mainly just a working malloc/free. | 02:56 |
| Kamilion | but yah, esp32s and such, lua/js/mpy... | 02:57 |
| Kamilion | or you're stuck with the platform's memmap limit, since the instruction ram is separate from the data ram bus | 02:58 |
| Kamilion | obviously a bytecode interpreter mixed with C extensions tends to win in that situation. :) | 02:58 |
| sarnold | yeah, constrain what it can do enough and it'll run on those little tiny things :) | 02:59 |
| sarnold | dinner time ;) have fun Kamilion, thanks for the bug report | 02:59 |
| Kamilion | hugely popular among the makercrowd along with adafruit's circuitpython, the BBC's micro:bit, and the popularity of the raspberry pi genre of single board linux computers. | 03:00 |
| Kamilion | that's the nutshell. hope that provides a little perspective :) | 03:00 |
| Kamilion | enjoy your foodings. | 03:00 |
| sarnold | thanks! :) | 03:01 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1072.82] (kernel) | 06:21 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1072.82] | 06:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libreoffice [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [1:6.4.0-0ubuntu6] (ubuntu-desktop) | 06:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:5.5.0-2] (kubuntu) | 06:47 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:5.5.0-2] (kubuntu) | 06:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: procps [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [2:3.3.16-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 07:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: procps [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [2:3.3.16-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 07:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: procps [i386] (focal-proposed/main) [2:3.3.16-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 07:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: procps [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [2:3.3.16-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 07:15 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: procps [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [2:3.3.16-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 07:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: procps [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [2:3.3.16-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist) | 07:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:5.5.0-2] (kubuntu) | 07:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:5.5.0-2] (kubuntu) | 07:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kdevelop [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:5.5.0-2] (kubuntu) | 07:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: caml-mode (focal-proposed/primary) [4.06-2] | 08:05 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: lwt-ssl (focal-proposed/primary) [1:1.1.3-1] | 08:06 | |
| locutus_ | they are new packages, taken over from ocaml ^^ | 08:14 |
| === andrewc is now known as Guest80637 | ||
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ubuntu-mate-artwork [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.0] (ubuntu-mate) | 08:31 | |
| juliank | ben in debian shows transition collisions, our ben does not seem to have that yet | 08:54 |
| juliank | I think that would be convenient | 08:54 |
| juliank | hmm it should | 08:55 |
| juliank | but apt transition should collide with boost transition, and i don't see that? | 08:56 |
| juliank | because aptitude depends on both | 08:56 |
| Laney | vorlon: I'm not sure, it looks like sometimes apt is happy to remove vim-tiny:amd64 + ubuntu-minimal and sometimes not, more likely to be to do with something in the archive changing rather than autopkgtest changing | 09:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qemu [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [1:4.2-3ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 09:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted intel-microcode [source] (eoan-proposed) [3.20191115.1ubuntu0.19.10.3] | 09:34 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gmic [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.4.5-1.1] (ubuntustudio) | 11:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmic [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.4.5-1.1] | 11:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop [arm64] (focal-proposed) [4:5.5.0-2] | 11:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [4:5.5.0-2] | 11:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop [amd64] (focal-proposed) [4:5.5.0-2] | 11:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop [s390x] (focal-proposed) [4:5.5.0-2] | 11:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kdevelop [armhf] (focal-proposed) [4:5.5.0-2] | 11:28 | |
| cpaelzer | apw: doko: I guess you are the AAs around atm - could one of you before the weekend takea look at qemu in the NEW queue? | 13:38 |
| cpaelzer | we added an amd64 only package for some low-overhead isolation use-cases | 13:39 |
| cpaelzer | this will have no dep, so once it passed new and migratd it should auto-demot to universe (for now) | 13:39 |
| cpaelzer | but passing the new queue today would allow to have the tests running over the weekend | 13:39 |
| LocutusOfBorg | question: is node-chokidar eligible for an hint-reset on s390x? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/node-chokidar/focal/s390x | 14:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | apw, ^^ | 14:00 |
| LocutusOfBorg | regressed in release btw | 14:00 |
| apw | cpaelzer, done | 14:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qemu [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1:4.2-3ubuntu1] | 14:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-gollum-lib [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.2.7.7-2] (no packageset) | 14:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-ring [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.16.9-2] (no packageset) | 14:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-ring [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.16.9-2] (no packageset) | 14:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-ring [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.16.9-2] (no packageset) | 14:57 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-gollum-lib [amd64] (focal-proposed) [4.2.7.7-2] | 15:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-ring [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.16.9-2] | 15:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-ring [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.16.9-2] | 15:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-ring [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.16.9-2] | 15:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gitaly [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.78.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 15:14 | |
| RikMills | An AA, perhaps apw free to action? LP: #1862105 | 15:19 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1862105 in chinese-calendar (Ubuntu) "RM: chinese-calendar uses qt4 which is obsolete" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1862105 | 15:19 |
| apw | RikMills, actioned | 15:28 |
| RikMills | thanks :) | 15:29 |
| vorlon | Laney: yep fair enough, so I've badtested vim/i386 now | 15:47 |
| coreycb | sil2100: hello, would you be able to release pandas to bionic-updates on monday? | 15:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: curtin (bionic-proposed/main) [19.3-17-g50ffca46-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 19.3-26-g82f23e3d-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 16:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: curtin (eoan-proposed/main) [19.3-17-g50ffca46-0ubuntu1~19.10.1 => 19.3-26-g82f23e3d-0ubuntu1~19.10.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server) | 16:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: curtin (xenial-proposed/main) [19.3-17-g50ffca46-0ubuntu1~16.04.1 => 19.3-26-g82f23e3d-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (ubuntu-server) | 16:02 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | vorlon, is it possible to node-chokidar reset failed counter on s390x? it is regressed in release I think | 16:10 |
| rharper | tjaalton: Hi, we've had some sru verifications failed, and I've uploaded new packages to address those issues, would you be able to look at getting the newer curtin uploads into -proposed? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/curtin/+bug/1861452 | 16:14 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1861452 in curtin (Ubuntu) "sru curtin 2020-01-30 - 19.3-17-g50ffca46-0ubuntu1" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 16:14 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gitaly [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.78.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 16:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gitaly [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.78.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 16:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gitaly [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.78.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 16:31 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gitaly [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.78.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 16:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgclib [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.4-1] (no packageset) | 17:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: toil [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [3.24.0-1] (no packageset) | 17:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgclib [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.4-1] (no packageset) | 17:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgclib [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.4-1] (no packageset) | 17:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgclib [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.4-1] (no packageset) | 17:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgclib [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.4-1] (no packageset) | 17:33 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cmark [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.29.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cmark [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.29.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cmark [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.29.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:41 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cmark [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.29.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cmark [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.29.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 17:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cmark [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.29.0-1ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 17:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cmark [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.29.0-1ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 17:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cmark [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.29.0-1ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 17:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cmark [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.29.0-1ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 17:44 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cmark [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.29.0-1ubuntu2] (no packageset) | 17:45 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1039.44] (no packageset) | 18:03 | |
| Eickmeyer[m] | Can anybody provide some guidance on anything I need to change, if anything, in the ubuntustudio seed to get it building again? Seems like there's some conflict with libreoffice. | 19:39 |
| cjwatson | Eickmeyer[m]: Doesn't look like your problem, more that libreoffice was in binary NEW, which I've just dealt with | 19:51 |
| cjwatson | Though I assume it'll still need to get through proposed-migration | 19:51 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libreoffice [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1:6.4.0-0ubuntu6] | 19:51 | |
| Eickmeyer[m] | cjwatson: Thanks. I'll go back to to my hole. :) | 19:52 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gitaly [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.78.0+dfsg-2] | 19:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gitaly [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.78.0+dfsg-2] | 19:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gitaly [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.78.0+dfsg-2] | 19:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgclib [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.11.4-1] | 19:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgclib [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.11.4-1] | 19:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted toil [amd64] (focal-proposed) [3.24.0-1] | 19:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gitaly [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.78.0+dfsg-2] | 19:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgclib [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.11.4-1] | 19:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgclib [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.11.4-1] | 19:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gitaly [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.78.0+dfsg-2] | 19:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgclib [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.11.4-1] | 19:55 | |
| === sergiusens_ is now known as sergiusens | ||
| RikMills | Eickmeyer[m]: is there a good reason why you want libreoffice-gtk2 instead of -gtk3 ? | 20:04 |
| wxl | please let gtk2 die already | 20:05 |
| RikMills | Eickmeyer[m] wxl actually, looks like the libreoffice-gtk in proposed is an empty transitional package anyway | 20:08 |
| RikMills | -gtk3 one in -release installs ok | 20:09 |
| cjwatson | Yeah, I was just poking ricotz in #ubuntu-devel about the fact that it's totally empty | 20:19 |
| RikMills | Eickmeyer[m]: ok. your seed is * (libreoffice-gtk), that depends on libreoffice-gtk2, which is not useful even when it does come back | 20:19 |
| cjwatson | Not sure I see the point of a transitional package that has no (meaningful) contents and no dependencies | 20:19 |
| RikMills | yeah, it doesn't migrate you to the gtk3! | 20:20 |
| RikMills | studio should probably switch to seeding just the gtk3 anyway | 20:21 |
| cjwatson | Indeed | 20:22 |
| cjwatson | Eickmeyer[m]: ^- I guess you can take care of that? | 20:23 |
| rharper | vorlon: Hi, we've had some sru verifications failed, and I've uploaded new packages to address those issues, would you be able to look at approving the curtin uploads into -proposed? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/curtin/+bug/1861452 | 21:10 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1861452 in curtin (Ubuntu) "sru curtin 2020-01-30 - 19.3-17-g50ffca46-0ubuntu1" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 21:10 |
| vorlon | sure thing | 21:10 |
| rharper | thanks! | 21:11 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted curtin [source] (eoan-proposed) [19.3-26-g82f23e3d-0ubuntu1~19.10.1] | 21:17 | |
| vorlon | xnox: does new gpgme1.0 need new gnupg? | 21:21 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted curtin [source] (bionic-proposed) [19.3-26-g82f23e3d-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] | 21:21 | |
| vorlon | LocutusOfBorg: node-chokidar: done | 21:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted curtin [source] (xenial-proposed) [19.3-26-g82f23e3d-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] | 21:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gffread [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.7-2] (no packageset) | 21:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gffread [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.7-2] (no packageset) | 21:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gffread [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.7-2] (no packageset) | 21:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gffread [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.7-2] (no packageset) | 21:32 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gffread [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.7-2] (no packageset) | 21:32 | |
| vorlon | xnox: "seed future boost1.71" please keep the i386 seed clean to contain only those packages which we directly want to keep, overrides for bootstrapping should go into ubuntu-archive-tools update-i386-whitelist | 21:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libdigest-sha-perl from i386-whitelist in focal | 21:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libtrio from i386-whitelist in focal | 21:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed sgmltools-lite from i386-whitelist in focal | 21:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added fonts-urw-base35 to i386-whitelist in focal | 21:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libarray-intspan-perl to i386-whitelist in focal | 21:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added liblist-someutils-perl to i386-whitelist in focal | 21:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libmoox-struct-perl to i386-whitelist in focal | 21:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libobject-id-perl to i386-whitelist in focal | 21:58 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added python-crypto to i386-whitelist in focal | 21:58 | |
| xnox | vorlon: ok, why does the seed exist then? Should i drop it from the seed text, or did you already do it? | 22:32 |
| xnox | vorlon: we need to document somewhere how to do transitive transition to whitelist things where source package names change. | 22:33 |
| xnox | vorlon: i don't know how gpgme1.0 at all works. I thought it's "just" a wrapper around the fork/exec of gnupg..... | 22:34 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfido2 [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfido2 [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:16 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfido2 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfido2 [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.8-1 => 1.3.8-1] (core) | 23:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfido2 [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1] (no packageset) | 23:18 | |
| Eickmeyer[m] | cjwatson: Yeah, I can fix that. | 23:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.8-1 => 1.3.8-1] (core) | 23:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.8-1 => 1.3.8-1] (core) | 23:24 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gffread [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.11.7-2] | 23:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gffread [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.11.7-2] | 23:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gffread [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.11.7-2] | 23:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfido2 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-1] | 23:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfido2 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-1] | 23:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gffread [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.11.7-2] | 23:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfido2 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-1] | 23:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfido2 [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-1] | 23:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gffread [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.11.7-2] | 23:40 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfido2 [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-1] | 23:40 | |
| Eickmeyer[m] | cjwatson, RikMills, wxl: Updated seed, now doing gtk3 variant directly instead of relying on the old transitional package, which was likely there long before my time. | 23:49 |
| wxl | Eickmeyer[m]: that's ok. you should tell your users to get back to audio production and stop word processing anyways XD | 23:50 |
| Eickmeyer[m] | wxl: Tell that to the publishing studios. :P | 23:50 |
| * wxl hangs his head in shame | 23:51 | |
| Eickmeyer[m] | hehehe | 23:51 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
