[06:23] <mwhudson> er, hm? system monitor is showing me that i'm download at like 1 byte/sec
[06:23] <mwhudson> (i'm not, i'm downloading package updates at a few MiB/s)
[06:29] <mwhudson> (focal)
[06:32] <mwhudson> oh heh two bugs on this already
[06:38] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[06:38] <oSoMoN> happy Friday!
[06:48] <mwhudson> uhhh https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-system-monitor/commit/bb494d6e06f134bc538d732d0ca6dea263becf22
[06:49] <mwhudson> what are the units g_get_monotonic_time () works in? i don't think it's seconds...
[06:52] <didrocks> good morning
[06:52] <oSoMoN> salut didrocks
[06:52] <oSoMoN> hey mwhudson
[06:53] <didrocks> salut oSoMoN
[06:54] <mwhudson> oSoMoN: hi
[06:54] <mwhudson> oSoMoN: feels like it must be time for a rustc update soon....
[06:55] <oSoMoN> mwhudson, indeed, but mozilla haven't bumped the build dep for beta yet
[06:55] <oSoMoN> I guess if you start on the update now it won't hurt, if you feel like it
[06:56] <mwhudson> well if i didn't have 1 million other things to do before focal...
[06:56] <mwhudson> i guess i can see if it's going to be an easy one
[07:05] <mwhudson> first gnome patch: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-system-monitor/merge_requests/16
[07:05] <gitbot> GNOME issue (Merge request) 16 in gnome-system-monitor "Fix displayed network transfer rates" [Opened]
[07:28] <duflu> Morning oSoMoN, didrocks
[07:29] <oSoMoN> hey duflu
[07:41] <duflu> Morning mwhudson
[07:41] <duflu> BTW, that will get truncated unless one of the variables is already a float... (time - graph->net.time) / G_USEC_PER_SEC;
[07:42] <mwhudson> duflu: oh good point
[07:43] <mwhudson> (spot the person who hasn't done c/c++ in an eon)
[07:44]  * mwhudson quickly force pushes a fix
[07:48] <Mirv> Good morning.. I asked on #ubuntu-devel earlier this week and didn't get a reply, but I'd like to once more raise eyebrow aloud (..) about the fact that the 'current' daily-live desktop image is one month old now, 20200124. I'd mostly want to know it's on the radar and a bit curious about what's causing it for so many weeks.
[07:49] <Mirv> I've installed from newer daily-live successfully.
[07:50] <duflu> Mirv: Not sure, but I was wondering. jibel will know
[07:50] <duflu> Also good morning
[07:53] <jibel> Hi Mirv, smoke tests have been broken since the removal of python2. I'll promote latest build manually
[07:57] <Mirv> jibel: thank you, I think that makes sense!
[07:57] <Mirv> and good afternoon duflu
[07:58] <jibel> Mirv, done, 20200220 is in current
[08:02] <duflu> ❤️ jibel
[08:03] <Mirv> jibel: confirming, thank you!
[08:03] <duflu> 20200220 isn't a confusing date at all
[08:06] <ricotz> hey desktoppers :)
[08:06] <ricotz> oSoMoN, mwhudson, hi, https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1615003
[08:06] <ubot5> Mozilla bug 1615003 in General "Require rustc 1.41 to build" [Normal,New]
[08:07] <duflu> Hi ricotz
[08:08] <ricotz> duflu, hey
[08:52] <marcustomlinson> morning all
[09:02] <Laney> heya
[09:08] <duflu> Morning marcustomlinson and Laney
[09:10] <Laney> salut duflu
[09:11] <Laney> salutflu
[09:12] <oSoMoN> good morning ricotz! that's a timely one, considering mwhudson was asking about it just before you joined :)
[09:12] <oSoMoN> I'll file the usual bug to track it in ubuntu
[09:12] <oSoMoN> sup Laney, marcustomlinson
[09:22] <marcustomlinson> I've just officially sponsored my first upload :)
[09:25] <oSoMoN> ricotz, mwhudson: bug #1864174
[09:25] <ubot5> bug 1864174 in rustc (Ubuntu) "rustc 1.41 and cargo 0.42 required by firefox 75" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1864174
[09:25] <oSoMoN> marcustomlinson, congrats!
[09:27] <Laney> moin oSoMoN marcustomlinson
[09:39] <oSoMoN> mpt, can I have your opinion on https://code.launchpad.net/~osomon/software-properties/+git/software-properties/+merge/379345 ?
[09:39] <oSoMoN> In short: if a user hand-edited their sources.list and left it in a inconsistent state (where e.g. they disabled main for the release pocket), software-properties doesn't do a good job of fixing this, and the updates subscriptions combobox will select the "Custom" entry but won't let the user actually change it to something else. Is this really a use-case we want to handle? I was thinking maybe we could just make the combobox insensitive in such ca
[09:39] <oSoMoN> ses.
[10:21] <Wimpress> Morning o/
[10:37] <tkamppeter> Any core-dev around? robert_ancell has uploaded my SANE update for me (bug 1862926) but it FTBFS, I have found the problem and added a fix to the bug, also as debdiff. Can someone upload for me? It is only some missing Build-Depends: in debian/control.
[10:37] <ubot5> bug 1862926 in sane-backends (Ubuntu) "Request for update: SANE 1.0.29" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1862926
[10:49] <oSoMoN> morning Wimpress
[10:53] <ricotz> oSoMoN, great, thanks
[11:13] <Laney> tseliot: hey, any chance you can push ubuntu-drivers 0.7.8.1 please?
[11:13] <Laney> I just rebased my branch and it still ended up with a lower version than focal /o\
[11:13] <Laney> btw, going to be proposing that soon, probably early next week
[11:20]  * Laney is just trying to bend ubiquity into not removing the oem-*-meta packages
[11:23] <Laney> would be good if you could install multiple times from the same live session
[11:23]  * Laney wonders if didrocks or jibel have any tricks for making that work
[11:24] <tseliot> Laney, pushed. Sorry, but I've been dealing with too many things
[11:25] <didrocks> Laney: installing multiple times from the same live session (or with a mock system) is a dream I wish we could have (or someone assigned to this). That will indeed really speed up dev
[11:26] <didrocks> what we did was vm snapshot + revert
[11:26] <Laney> I just restart the VM
[11:26] <Laney> but it's annoying to have to re-patch ubiquity and everything each time
[11:26] <Laney> AH well
[11:26] <didrocks> yeah, hence reverting helps and you can only scp the new files
[11:26] <didrocks> (a little bit less bothering than repatching everything)
[11:26] <didrocks> (a little)
[11:27] <Laney> heh
[11:27] <Laney> yeah probably is better
[13:26] <Laney> didrocks: I just uploaded oem-qemu-meta to the new queue, would be nice if you could review it and ideally accept to main, package itself is super trivial
[13:26] <Laney> that'll be the base package for that script you asked for
[13:26] <Laney> we need at least one of these on the iso now to be able to go on with the installer work
[13:30] <didrocks> Laney: sure, let me have a quick look
[13:31] <Laney> thx
[13:31]  * Laney pops out to the shops
[13:31] <didrocks> Laney: the pocket name is expected?
[13:31] <didrocks> focal-qemu
[13:32] <didrocks> no trailing comma on the binary package dep, /me is sad :p
[13:49]  * oSoMoN sends didrocks a trailing comma,
[13:49]  * didrocks feels better,
[13:49] <didrocks> :)
[14:01] <marcustomlinson> hmm, I uploaded libreoffice to eoan like 5 hours ago, and still nothing in unapproved
[14:02] <marcustomlinson> no email ack either
[14:04] <oSoMoN> marcustomlinson, ask on #launchpad, it's happened to me a couple of times in the past, and when it did re-uploading (dput -f) did the trick
[14:05] <marcustomlinson> oSoMoN: thanks I'll try a -f
[15:09] <Laney> didrocks: sorry, got caught out in a windy storm!
[15:09] <Laney> yeah, they are going to fix that soon™™™©®
[15:15] <marcustomlinson> oSoMoN: I didn't debsign it (facepalm)
[15:26] <marcustomlinson> let's try that again... I just officially sponsored my first upload! (like for reals this time)
[15:35] <Laney> marcustomlinson: use dput-ng, it will call debsign for you if it needs to :-)
[15:35]  * Laney never manually signs stuff any more
[15:35] <marcustomlinson> Laney: mind blown
[15:35] <marcustomlinson> thanks :)
[15:37]  * RikMills goes looking for dput-ng
[18:04] <oSoMoN> have a good week-end desktoppers
[18:08] <marcustomlinson> cheers oSoMoN!
[18:09] <marcustomlinson> oh he’s already gone :P
[18:09] <marcustomlinson> and now so am I, byyyyye