/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/02/28/#juju.txt

wallyworld_kelvinliu: if you have a chance at some stage, here's that PR https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/1125801:08
kelvinliuyep01:08
wallyworld_kelvinliu: sorry, i didin't see your comments before i hit merge03:36
wallyworld_i thought it had been approved03:36
wallyworld_i managed to hit abort just in time03:38
kelvinliuwallyworld_: nws, just a few minor suggestions03:50
hmlcan i pls get a quick review of https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/1125614:16
achilleasahml: I have rebased 11255. Can you take another look at the pod-spec commits and verify that the k8s QA steps now work for you?14:17
hmlachilleasa: sure14:17
hmlachilleasa:  working on the qa - for some reason i’m pulling down the old code.  instead of the new…15:12
achilleasamake install followed by make for the operator before bootstrapping seems to do the trick for me15:13
hmlachilleasa:  not.. the actual code, i do a git log after i pull down the pr and get commits from feb 26 and feb 17 instead of feb 2815:13
achilleasahml: those are the right dates. I had the PR on the backburner until part 1 landed15:15
hmlachilleasa:  hrm… okay.  checking commit shas right now.15:16
achilleasaso it's just rebase on top of different head; it preserves the original commit dates unless you explicitly override15:16
achilleasayou should see dcf42c9 as the head for my branch locally15:17
hmlachilleasa:  the shas are okay.  trying the iaas charm again15:22
achilleasamanadart: where can I find the cleanup script for manual machines?15:28
manadartachilleasa: I don't think there is one.15:30
achilleasamanadart: it's the one where we clean up the juju data so the machine can be reprovisioned. IIRC you patched it recently15:30
manadartachilleasa: Ah, that one. https://github.com/juju/juju/blob/develop/scripts/removejujuservices.bash15:32
achilleasamanadart: thanks15:32
manadartThis is also installed into /usr/sbin IIRC, via a cloud init during provisioning.15:32
achilleasamanadart: is it overwritten when uprading?15:32
manadartachilleasa: No, there is no associated upgrade step.15:33
achilleasawonder whether it's worth adding one... probably should15:34
achilleasathough if you get rid of the uniter state, even if you reprovision the start hook wont fire because the unit will not have been started... it's probably safe to skip the upgrade15:35
hmlachilleasa:  qa was good - approved15:54
achilleasathanks!15:54

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!