[07:09] <didrocks> good morning
[07:28] <Wimpress> Morning didrocks
[07:29] <didrocks> Guten Morgen Wimpress
[08:07] <hellsworth> good morning desktopers!
[08:08] <oSoMoN> good morning
[08:14] <didrocks> hey hellsworth, salut oSoMoN
[08:14] <didrocks> quel temps à Francfort ?
[08:14] <oSoMoN> salut didrocks, ça va?
[08:14] <oSoMoN> not raining :)
[08:15] <didrocks> oSoMoN: ça va :) raining here :p
[08:31] <robert_ancell> https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2020-February/058417.html
[08:31] <robert_ancell> seb128, Wimpress Laney ^^
[08:36] <Laney> woah!
[08:39] <marcustomlinson> morning desktoppers
[08:40] <oSoMoN> good morning marcustomlinson
[08:42] <ricotz> good morning
[08:43] <seb128> gooood morning desktopers
[08:43] <ricotz> robert_ancell, imho this kind of impact of CI is expected
[08:43] <seb128> hey marcustomlinson popey ricotz , how are you?
[08:43] <marcustomlinson> seb128: doing ok thanks, you?
[08:43] <seb128> I'm good, thanks!
[08:46] <Laney> hey marcustomlinson ricotz didrocks
[08:47] <RikMills> morning
[08:47] <RikMills> seb128: I note autohinter seems to have just migrated the poppler transition :)
[08:49] <RikMills> oh, and there is an email as proof.....
[08:49] <seb128> hey RikMills, ah, good, I though gnome-desktop would have been needed to go together though, weird
[08:50] <Laney> didrocks: can you please promote me on https://salsa.debian.org/groups/ubuntu-dev-team/-/group_members ?
[08:51] <Laney> need some admin stuff
[09:15] <didrocks> Laney: will do once I find my creds :p
[09:16] <Laney> merci!
[09:17] <robert_ancell> ricotz, right, but we want it to keep working, as it's much better than the old system!
[09:22] <ricotz> robert_ancell, this is true -- I am seeing gitlab CI (on GNOME) running multiple times on the same commit (on any branch) which is overkill
[09:24] <ricotz> so there is room for improvements by restricting it to certains branches and making people aware when CI gets triggered
[09:24] <ricotz> hey seb128 Laney marcustomlinson didrocks
[09:25] <robert_ancell> ricotz, yeah
[10:17] <GunnarHj> Good morning seb128!
[10:17] <GunnarHj> I decided to prepare the update of ibus after all:
[10:17] <GunnarHj> https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ibus
[10:17] <GunnarHj> Does the GNOME specific FF exception apply?
[10:18] <seb128> hey GunnarHj , no it doesn't
[10:18] <seb128> is there features in the new version?
[10:19] <GunnarHj> seb128: Don't know. Guess I'd better look a bit closer to the changelog, then.
[10:21] <Laney> there is no GNOME specific FF exception
[10:21] <Laney> it's that GNOME's release schedule aligns with ours
[10:21] <Laney> (ish)
[10:23] <GunnarHj> Laney: Then I got it wrong, apparently.
[10:25] <Laney> That's OK, just wanted to clarify
[10:25] <GunnarHj> seb128: My impression is that there are only bug fixes and translations. The two first items are already in the archive via patches. https://github.com/ibus/ibus/releases/tag/1.5.22
[10:28]  * Laney salsa pokes didrocks 
[10:28] <Laney> sorry, but trying to help Trevinho with pushing something
[10:39] <amurray> hey desktoppers - on an up-to-date focal install I am seeing weird font issues - seems like gnome-shell is perhaps using Cantarell instead of Ubuntu - and so things like shell dialogs look off - https://imgur.com/a/w6yEiB5
[10:40] <amurray> I tried searching for LP bugs but couldn't find any against gnome-shell or yaru-theme - should I file one and if so against which source package?
[10:40] <Laney> maybe wait a bit, we're trying to get gnome-shell 3.35 migrated so you can give that a go
[10:41] <amurray> Laney: sure, no worries - thanks!
[10:47] <didrocks> Laney: got it, you should be fine
[10:47] <Laney> thanks!
[10:47] <didrocks> Laney: what was the missing perm as maintainer?
[10:47]  * Laney feels the power
[10:47] <Laney> adding new people and creating new projects
[10:48] <didrocks> I can understand adding new people. Restriction creating projects is weird though
[10:48] <amurray> Laney: oh I just found https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1865373 which sounds like the same thing but filed against xorg
[10:49] <Laney> ah interesting
[11:13] <seb128> amurray, could be because yaru-theme migrated before gnome-shell, you could try downgrading that or upgrade the shell (hopefully it migrates in the next publisher run)
[11:26] <seb128> didrocks, the archive admin tools mostly work (at least change-override/remove-package/demote-to-proposed) with python3, easier than vm booting :) I just switched them in the vcs now
[11:28] <seb128> amurray, gnome-shell and co are just migrating, should make easier to test if the update fixes things
[12:22] <tseliot> Laney, hi did you build u-d-c in a PPA? (that triggers the test suite, and any syntax checks that we have in place)
[12:41] <Laney> tseliot: hmm, not sure about a PPA but I did use sbuild if that's enough?
[12:48] <tseliot> Laney, yes, that works too, thanks
[12:52] <seb128> tjaalton, the x11-utils update or maybe the xkeyboard-config made http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/a/awesome/focal/amd64 unhappy
[12:52] <seb128> GunnarHj, ^
[12:53] <seb128> xkbcomp failing with errors lik Could not resolve keysym XF86RotationLockToggle
[13:07] <seb128> kenvandine, you had a snap-store-packagekit build failure due to
[13:07] <seb128> 'error: requested a non-existing branch on latest/edge for snap "snapcraft":
[13:07] <seb128>        pr-2794'
[13:07] <seb128> (armhf)
[13:08] <kenvandine> yeah, ignore that
[13:08] <kenvandine> amd64 built :)
[13:11] <Laney> tseliot: https://people.canonical.com/~laney/weird-things/udc.log.gz
[13:16] <tseliot> Laney, I don't see the test suite in that log. See this, for example: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/466697798/buildlog_ubuntu-bionic-amd64.ubuntu-drivers-common_1%3A0.5.2.6~0.18.04.1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[13:16] <Laney> I didn't disable it!
[13:16] <Laney> but ok, give me a second
[13:22] <GunnarHj> tjaalton: In xkeyboard-config 2.26 there were a few Debian patches which reverted certain upstream commits, for instance:
[13:22] <GunnarHj> https://salsa.debian.org/xorg-team/data/xkb-data/-/blob/aaf547756a393f0a9ef74b4136ca4a2050e8c478/debian/patches/revert-Map-evdev-keycode-KEY_BRIGHTNESS_CYCLE.diff
[13:22] <GunnarHj> Those patches were dropped in 2.29. Can that possibly have something to do with it?
[14:13] <GunnarHj> seb128: https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/03/02/%23ubuntu-desktop.html#t13:22
[14:24] <Laney> tseliot: ah there is a test failure!!!
[14:25] <seb128> GunnarHj, thx for the hint, looks similar indeed
[14:26] <tseliot> Laney, good, have fun :P
[14:27] <GunnarHj> seb128: Guess it's best if tjaalton takes a look. He did the whole update - I was merely cheer leader. :)
[14:34] <marcustomlinson> hellsworth: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/1:6.3.5-0ubuntu0.19.10.1
[14:34] <marcustomlinson> Accepted :)
[14:35] <marcustomlinson> To proposed that is. Now once that builds you can test and update the SRU bug etc
[14:36] <Laney> tseliot: you know this fails on master too :P
[14:42] <tseliot> Laney, master (1:0.7.8.1) is in focal, so it definitely built https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-common
[14:42] <Laney> jus' sayin!
[14:43] <Laney> I'll look into it
[14:43] <Laney> (after break)
[14:50] <GunnarHj> seb128: Are we agreed that the IBus update can be considered free of new features?
[15:09] <seb128> GunnarHj, let me have a look to the NEWS
[15:26] <GunnarHj> seb128: NEWS is not so useful, but this may help: https://github.com/ibus/ibus/releases/tag/1.5.22
[15:39] <seb128> GunnarHj, right, agreed it's not a ff item
[15:51] <GunnarHj> seb128: Good. It needs sponsoring, though... Can you put it into your 'queue'?
[15:53] <Laney> tseliot: ok I was wrong, it does build: https://launchpad.net/~laney/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/11035868/+listing-archive-extra
[15:54] <Laney> I dunno why the gpu-manager tests were failing for me when I manualyran them
[15:57] <tseliot> Laney, maybe it was because gpu-manager hadn't been compiled yet, so the binary wasn't there
[16:01] <tseliot> Laney, either way, any specific reason why the feature needs to be on by default, and we allow users to disable it, whereas it would probably be used only in limited cases (so maybe keeping it disabled, unless "--with-oem" is used, would be better than it being enabled and passing "--no-oem")?
[16:02] <seb128_> GunnarHj, I can do the sponsoring yes, where are the files to upload?
[16:03] <GunnarHj> seb128: https://launchpad.net/~gunnarhj/+archive/ubuntu/ibus
[16:11] <seb128_> GunnarHj, uploaded
[16:12] <GunnarHj> seb128: Thanks!
[16:13] <GunnarHj> seb128: Hmm... You didn't remove '~ppa' from the version number...
[16:22] <RikMills> oops
[16:26] <seb128> GunnarHj, sorry about that, reuploaded with the ppa
[16:27] <seb128> GunnarHj, the build failing weirdly on s390x, I hope it was only a random error
[16:32] <GunnarHj> seb128: Saw that. And the amd64 build failed! Crossing my fingers.
[16:37] <Laney> tseliot: there is - we're going to want to be doing in-session prompting for this next
[16:37] <Laney> i.e. "your hardware just got enabled, want to install the extra stuff?"
[16:39] <seb128> GunnarHj, new builds worked
[16:41] <GunnarHj> seb128: Great!
[18:30] <tjaalton> yes, it needed the new xkbcomp
[18:31] <tjaalton> x11-utils i mean
[23:41] <kenvandine_> popey: ping from srain
[23:41] <popey> haha
[23:41] <popey> that works then
[23:41] <kenvandine_> it does :)