| mwhudson | can a kind friendly AA process rustc through binary NEW please | 04:58 |
|---|---|---|
| mwhudson | ? | 04:58 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.40.0+dfsg1+llvm-5ubuntu1] | 06:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.40.0+dfsg1+llvm-5ubuntu1] | 06:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.40.0+dfsg1+llvm-5ubuntu1] | 06:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.40.0+dfsg1+llvm-5ubuntu1] | 06:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.40.0+dfsg1+llvm-5ubuntu1] | 06:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (focal-proposed) [1.40.0+dfsg1+llvm-5ubuntu1] | 06:14 | |
| mwhudson | apw: thanks | 07:08 |
| === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
| bdmurray | sil2100: Can you have a look at an early release for apport to -updates? | 08:57 |
| bdmurray | sil2100: the verification is all done | 08:57 |
| sil2100 | bdmurray: looking | 08:59 |
| seb128 | is there any reason to not switch ubuntu-archive-tools to python3? | 09:32 |
| seb128 | no python2 launchpadlib on focal | 09:32 |
| seb128 | demote-to-proposed just work with python3, but I was wondering if others want to keep compatibility by doing archive tools on older series? | 09:33 |
| cjwatson | seb128: Just needs to be tested and done | 10:07 |
| cjwatson | seb128: It should mostly work modulo bitrot | 10:07 |
| cjwatson | (and #! changes) | 10:07 |
| cjwatson | seb128: But IMO feel free to JFDI anything you use and can test | 10:07 |
| seb128 | cjwatson, right, the question was mostly if depending on python3 would break people using e.g bionic (I didn't test there) | 10:07 |
| cjwatson | No, it should be fine | 10:08 |
| seb128 | k, thanks, I though so but I preferred to still ask/get another opinion before doing it | 10:08 |
| seb128 | thx | 10:08 |
| cjwatson | python3-launchpadlib goes back to xenial. Older versions had some bugs, but I'd be surprised if many users of u-a-t were doing so on anything older than bionic at this point | 10:09 |
| cjwatson | (at least xenial, anyway) | 10:09 |
| seb128 | right | 10:10 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1034.36] (kernel) | 10:19 | |
| kanashiro | LocutusOfBorg, thanks for jruby and ruby-psych | 11:25 |
| LocutusOfBorg | kanashiro, my pleasure! | 13:16 |
| enyc | LocutusOfBorg: meow! at what point consider updating bionic vbox to 5.2.38 for compatible with newer kernels (main reason) | 13:17 |
| mfo | sil2100, hey. When you have a chance, could you please review util-linux in the upload queue for Eoan? | 13:32 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 (eoan-proposed/multiverse) [440.59-0ubuntu0.19.10.1 => 440.59-0ubuntu0.19.10.2] (no packageset) | 13:55 | |
| tseliot | sil2100, hey, apparently the amd64 build of nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 failed to build in eoan-proposed. So, I have just uploaded a new release. Sorry. ^ | 13:56 |
| locutus_ | enyc, bug? | 14:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.34-0.1ubuntu2.3] | 14:12 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1034.36] | 14:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted crash [source] (eoan-proposed) [7.2.8-1ubuntu0.19.10.1] | 14:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1058.62] (kernel) | 14:23 | |
| sil2100 | tseliot: oh my, ok o/ | 14:25 |
| sil2100 | hellsworth: hello! I'm looking at your libreoffice SRU upload right now, and I just have a quick question for double confirmation: | 14:26 |
| tseliot | sil2100, thanks | 14:26 |
| locutus_ | vorlon, good morning, please hint aspectc++/i386? | 14:27 |
| sil2100 | hellsworth: ...actually, nvm! I think I have everything | 14:27 |
| locutus_ | satpy/proposed/s390x gained a dependency on python3-zarr->python3-numcodecs that is NBS on s390x, what can I do about it? it is an arch:all package that is not installable anymore on s390x, same on Debian, hint the test? | 14:28 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:6.3.5-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] | 14:29 | |
| sil2100 | tseliot: ah, so the package_name does seem to matter in the end! | 14:33 |
| ginggs | locutus_: LP: #1865437 | 14:33 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1865437 in satpy (Ubuntu) "satpy: autopkgtest unable to run on s390x" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1865437 | 14:33 |
| tseliot | sil2100, what do you mean? | 14:34 |
| locutus_ | so apw please can you run "force-reset-test satpy/0.19.1-1/s390x" t fix LP: #1865437 ? | 14:50 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1865437 in satpy (Ubuntu) "satpy: autopkgtest unable to run on s390x" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1865437 | 14:50 |
| tseliot | sil2100, oh, now I remember, no it's definitely not that. | 14:52 |
| === hggdh is now known as hggdh-msft | ||
| hellsworth | sil2100: ah ok good you have anything but let me know if that changes :) | 15:40 |
| sil2100 | tseliot: ah, yeah, see more changes than that, thanks! | 15:42 |
| sil2100 | hellsworth: sure o/ | 15:42 |
| rbasak | FFe request in bug 1865518 please, just because it's a little late. I hope that the lack of being more than a few days late means that the bar is still low. | 15:43 |
| ubot5 | bug 1865518 in inspircd (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Update to inspircd 3.4.0-2 from Debian" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1865518 | 15:43 |
| enyc | locutus_: uerm? you'd like me to make an SRU request bug? | 15:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 [source] (eoan-proposed) [440.59-0ubuntu0.19.10.2] | 15:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 [i386] (eoan-proposed/multiverse) [440.59-0ubuntu0.19.10.2] (no packageset) | 15:53 | |
| locutus_ | enyc, without a bug I won't act on anything, on stable it is required | 15:54 |
| enyc | locutus_: I was (more) asking when it might be appropricate, // making the suggestion | 16:02 |
| enyc | locutus_: you might say ... bionic should never be used with 5.4+ kernel | 16:02 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected network-manager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.10.6-2ubuntu1.4] | 16:06 | |
| doko | vorlon: please could you whitelist libxcrypt/i386? will be a new glibc dependency | 16:07 |
| locutus_ | enyc, I support whatever goes into linux-hwe and linux-hwe-edge | 16:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1058.62] | 16:15 | |
| enyc | locutus_: AHA useful answer, that means 5.4.0 for bionic-updates seemingly | 16:17 |
| locutus_ | so, a bug report asking for "please update to 5.2.38" to support python3.8 and kernel up to 5.5 is a good start for me | 16:17 |
| locutus_ | and of course, test my builds | 16:17 |
| enyc | locutus_: oh maybe not | 16:18 |
| enyc | locutus_: is 5.3 seemingly | 16:18 |
| locutus_ | yes I know, but meh, the update to 5.2.38 is not too huge | 16:18 |
| locutus_ | so I can do it | 16:18 |
| enyc | kernel.org list 5.4 as longterm so reasonable to presume likely to be the LTS-HWE kernel | 16:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1055.58] (no packageset) | 16:34 | |
| locutus_ | enyc, so, please check or open a bug, and test an eventual build I'll give you! | 16:37 |
| enyc | bah! | 16:52 |
| enyc | in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/ signed in etc... try to click "report a bug" [link to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug] | 16:53 |
| enyc | instead keep getting redirected to https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs !!! | 16:53 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libmicrodns from i386-whitelist in focal | 17:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sip4 (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.19.7+dfsg-1 => 4.19.7+dfsg-1ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 17:08 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 17:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 17:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 17:20 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 17:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core) | 17:23 | |
| vorlon | doko: libxcrypt/i386 done | 17:42 |
| ahasenack | vorlon: I have a fix for apache's cacti armhf failure, btw | 17:54 |
| ahasenack | https://bugs.launchpad.net/cacti/+bug/1865067 | 17:55 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1865067 in cacti (Ubuntu) "DEP8 error on armhf (32bits): long2ip() requires int" [Undecided,In progress] | 17:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libxcrypt to i386-whitelist in focal | 18:01 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1055.58] | 19:23 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sip4 (xenial-proposed/universe) [4.17+dfsg-1build1 => 4.17+dfsg-1ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) | 20:10 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1074.79] (kernel) | 21:17 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 21:49 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [i386] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 22:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 22:10 | |
| vorlon | Trevinho: W: libfprint-2-tod-1: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libfprint-2-tod1 | 22:15 |
| vorlon | Trevinho: is there a good reason to not follow the standard convention? | 22:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7] (no packageset) | 22:48 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7] (no packageset) | 22:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1074.79] | 22:54 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7] (no packageset) | 22:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7] (no packageset) | 23:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7] (no packageset) | 23:07 | |
| vorlon | Test-Command: tox -e py37 | 23:52 |
| vorlon | >_< | 23:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!