[04:58] can a kind friendly AA process rustc through binary NEW please [04:58] ? [06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.40.0+dfsg1+llvm-5ubuntu1] [06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.40.0+dfsg1+llvm-5ubuntu1] [06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.40.0+dfsg1+llvm-5ubuntu1] [06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.40.0+dfsg1+llvm-5ubuntu1] [06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.40.0+dfsg1+llvm-5ubuntu1] [06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (focal-proposed) [1.40.0+dfsg1+llvm-5ubuntu1] [07:08] apw: thanks === cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer [08:57] sil2100: Can you have a look at an early release for apport to -updates? [08:57] sil2100: the verification is all done [08:59] bdmurray: looking [09:32] is there any reason to not switch ubuntu-archive-tools to python3? [09:32] no python2 launchpadlib on focal [09:33] demote-to-proposed just work with python3, but I was wondering if others want to keep compatibility by doing archive tools on older series? [10:07] seb128: Just needs to be tested and done [10:07] seb128: It should mostly work modulo bitrot [10:07] (and #! changes) [10:07] seb128: But IMO feel free to JFDI anything you use and can test [10:07] cjwatson, right, the question was mostly if depending on python3 would break people using e.g bionic (I didn't test there) [10:08] No, it should be fine [10:08] k, thanks, I though so but I preferred to still ask/get another opinion before doing it [10:08] thx [10:09] python3-launchpadlib goes back to xenial. Older versions had some bugs, but I'd be surprised if many users of u-a-t were doing so on anything older than bionic at this point [10:09] (at least xenial, anyway) [10:10] right [10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1034.36] (kernel) [11:25] LocutusOfBorg, thanks for jruby and ruby-psych [13:16] kanashiro, my pleasure! [13:17] LocutusOfBorg: meow! at what point consider updating bionic vbox to 5.2.38 for compatible with newer kernels (main reason) [13:32] sil2100, hey. When you have a chance, could you please review util-linux in the upload queue for Eoan? [13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 (eoan-proposed/multiverse) [440.59-0ubuntu0.19.10.1 => 440.59-0ubuntu0.19.10.2] (no packageset) [13:56] sil2100, hey, apparently the amd64 build of nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 failed to build in eoan-proposed. So, I have just uploaded a new release. Sorry. ^ [14:04] enyc, bug? [14:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.34-0.1ubuntu2.3] [14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1034.36] [14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted crash [source] (eoan-proposed) [7.2.8-1ubuntu0.19.10.1] [14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1058.62] (kernel) [14:25] tseliot: oh my, ok o/ [14:26] hellsworth: hello! I'm looking at your libreoffice SRU upload right now, and I just have a quick question for double confirmation: [14:26] sil2100, thanks [14:27] vorlon, good morning, please hint aspectc++/i386? [14:27] hellsworth: ...actually, nvm! I think I have everything [14:28] satpy/proposed/s390x gained a dependency on python3-zarr->python3-numcodecs that is NBS on s390x, what can I do about it? it is an arch:all package that is not installable anymore on s390x, same on Debian, hint the test? [14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:6.3.5-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] [14:33] tseliot: ah, so the package_name does seem to matter in the end! [14:33] locutus_: LP: #1865437 [14:33] Launchpad bug 1865437 in satpy (Ubuntu) "satpy: autopkgtest unable to run on s390x" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1865437 [14:34] sil2100, what do you mean? [14:50] so apw please can you run "force-reset-test satpy/0.19.1-1/s390x" t fix LP: #1865437 ? [14:50] Launchpad bug 1865437 in satpy (Ubuntu) "satpy: autopkgtest unable to run on s390x" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1865437 [14:52] sil2100, oh, now I remember, no it's definitely not that. === hggdh is now known as hggdh-msft [15:40] sil2100: ah ok good you have anything but let me know if that changes :) [15:42] tseliot: ah, yeah, see more changes than that, thanks! [15:42] hellsworth: sure o/ [15:43] FFe request in bug 1865518 please, just because it's a little late. I hope that the lack of being more than a few days late means that the bar is still low. [15:43] bug 1865518 in inspircd (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Update to inspircd 3.4.0-2 from Debian" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1865518 [15:44] locutus_: uerm? you'd like me to make an SRU request bug? [15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 [source] (eoan-proposed) [440.59-0ubuntu0.19.10.2] [15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 [i386] (eoan-proposed/multiverse) [440.59-0ubuntu0.19.10.2] (no packageset) [15:54] enyc, without a bug I won't act on anything, on stable it is required [16:02] locutus_: I was (more) asking when it might be appropricate, // making the suggestion [16:02] locutus_: you might say ... bionic should never be used with 5.4+ kernel [16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected network-manager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.10.6-2ubuntu1.4] [16:07] vorlon: please could you whitelist libxcrypt/i386? will be a new glibc dependency [16:15] enyc, I support whatever goes into linux-hwe and linux-hwe-edge [16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1058.62] [16:17] locutus_: AHA useful answer, that means 5.4.0 for bionic-updates seemingly [16:17] so, a bug report asking for "please update to 5.2.38" to support python3.8 and kernel up to 5.5 is a good start for me [16:17] and of course, test my builds [16:18] locutus_: oh maybe not [16:18] locutus_: is 5.3 seemingly [16:18] yes I know, but meh, the update to 5.2.38 is not too huge [16:18] so I can do it [16:19] kernel.org list 5.4 as longterm so reasonable to presume likely to be the LTS-HWE kernel [16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1055.58] (no packageset) [16:37] enyc, so, please check or open a bug, and test an eventual build I'll give you! [16:52] bah! [16:53] in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/ signed in etc... try to click "report a bug" [link to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug] [16:53] instead keep getting redirected to https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs !!! [17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libmicrodns from i386-whitelist in focal [17:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sip4 (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.19.7+dfsg-1 => 4.19.7+dfsg-1ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core) [17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core) [17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core) [17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core) [17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core) [17:42] doko: libxcrypt/i386 done [17:54] vorlon: I have a fix for apache's cacti armhf failure, btw [17:55] https://bugs.launchpad.net/cacti/+bug/1865067 [17:55] Ubuntu bug 1865067 in cacti (Ubuntu) "DEP8 error on armhf (32bits): long2ip() requires int" [Undecided,In progress] [18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libxcrypt to i386-whitelist in focal [19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1055.58] [20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sip4 (xenial-proposed/universe) [4.17+dfsg-1build1 => 4.17+dfsg-1ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu) [21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1074.79] (kernel) [21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) [22:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [i386] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) [22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) [22:15] Trevinho: W: libfprint-2-tod-1: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libfprint-2-tod1 [22:15] Trevinho: is there a good reason to not follow the standard convention? [22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7] (no packageset) [22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7] (no packageset) [22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1074.79] [22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7] (no packageset) [23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7] (no packageset) [23:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7] (no packageset) [23:52] Test-Command: tox -e py37 [23:52] >_<