[04:58] <mwhudson> can a kind friendly AA process rustc through binary NEW please
[04:58] <mwhudson> ?
[06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.40.0+dfsg1+llvm-5ubuntu1]
[06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.40.0+dfsg1+llvm-5ubuntu1]
[06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.40.0+dfsg1+llvm-5ubuntu1]
[06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.40.0+dfsg1+llvm-5ubuntu1]
[06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.40.0+dfsg1+llvm-5ubuntu1]
[06:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (focal-proposed) [1.40.0+dfsg1+llvm-5ubuntu1]
[07:08] <mwhudson> apw: thanks
[08:57] <bdmurray> sil2100: Can you have a look at an early release for apport to -updates?
[08:57] <bdmurray> sil2100: the verification is all done
[08:59] <sil2100> bdmurray: looking
[09:32] <seb128> is there any reason to not switch ubuntu-archive-tools to python3?
[09:32] <seb128> no python2 launchpadlib on focal
[09:33] <seb128> demote-to-proposed just work with python3, but I was wondering if others want to keep compatibility by doing archive tools on older series?
[10:07] <cjwatson> seb128: Just needs to be tested and done
[10:07] <cjwatson> seb128: It should mostly work modulo bitrot
[10:07] <cjwatson> (and #! changes)
[10:07] <cjwatson> seb128: But IMO feel free to JFDI anything you use and can test
[10:07] <seb128> cjwatson, right, the question was mostly if depending on python3 would break people using e.g bionic (I didn't test there)
[10:08] <cjwatson> No, it should be fine
[10:08] <seb128> k, thanks, I though so but I preferred to still ask/get another opinion before doing it
[10:08] <seb128> thx
[10:09] <cjwatson> python3-launchpadlib goes back to xenial.  Older versions had some bugs, but I'd be surprised if many users of u-a-t were doing so on anything older than bionic at this point
[10:09] <cjwatson> (at least xenial, anyway)
[10:10] <seb128> right
[10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1034.36] (kernel)
[11:25] <kanashiro> LocutusOfBorg, thanks for jruby and ruby-psych
[13:16] <LocutusOfBorg> kanashiro, my pleasure!
[13:17] <enyc> LocutusOfBorg: meow!  at what point consider updating bionic vbox to 5.2.38  for compatible with newer kernels  (main reason)
[13:32] <mfo> sil2100, hey. When you have a chance, could you please review util-linux in the upload queue for Eoan?
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 (eoan-proposed/multiverse) [440.59-0ubuntu0.19.10.1 => 440.59-0ubuntu0.19.10.2] (no packageset)
[13:56] <tseliot> sil2100, hey, apparently the amd64 build of nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 failed to build in eoan-proposed. So, I have just uploaded a new release. Sorry. ^
[14:04] <locutus_> enyc, bug?
[14:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.34-0.1ubuntu2.3]
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1034.36]
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted crash [source] (eoan-proposed) [7.2.8-1ubuntu0.19.10.1]
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1058.62] (kernel)
[14:25] <sil2100> tseliot: oh my, ok o/
[14:26] <sil2100> hellsworth: hello! I'm looking at your libreoffice SRU upload right now, and I just have a quick question for double confirmation:
[14:26] <tseliot> sil2100, thanks
[14:27] <locutus_> vorlon, good morning, please hint aspectc++/i386?
[14:27] <sil2100> hellsworth: ...actually, nvm! I think I have everything
[14:28] <locutus_> satpy/proposed/s390x gained a dependency on python3-zarr->python3-numcodecs that is NBS on s390x, what can I do about it? it is an arch:all package that is not installable anymore on s390x, same on Debian, hint the test?
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:6.3.5-0ubuntu0.19.10.1]
[14:33] <sil2100> tseliot: ah, so the package_name does seem to matter in the end!
[14:33] <ginggs> locutus_: LP: #1865437
[14:34] <tseliot> sil2100, what do you mean?
[14:50] <locutus_> so apw please can you run "force-reset-test satpy/0.19.1-1/s390x" t fix LP: #1865437 ?
[14:52] <tseliot> sil2100, oh, now I remember, no it's definitely not that.
[15:40] <hellsworth> sil2100: ah ok good you have anything but let me know if that changes :)
[15:42] <sil2100> tseliot: ah, yeah, see more changes than that, thanks!
[15:42] <sil2100> hellsworth: sure o/
[15:43] <rbasak> FFe request in bug 1865518 please, just because it's a little late. I hope that the lack of being more than a few days late means that the bar is still low.
[15:44] <enyc> locutus_: uerm? you'd like me to make an SRU request bug?
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 [source] (eoan-proposed) [440.59-0ubuntu0.19.10.2]
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 [i386] (eoan-proposed/multiverse) [440.59-0ubuntu0.19.10.2] (no packageset)
[15:54] <locutus_> enyc, without a bug I won't act on anything, on stable it is required
[16:02] <enyc> locutus_: I was (more) asking when it might be appropricate, // making the suggestion
[16:02] <enyc> locutus_: you might say ... bionic should never be used with 5.4+ kernel
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected network-manager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.10.6-2ubuntu1.4]
[16:07] <doko> vorlon: please could you whitelist libxcrypt/i386? will be a new glibc dependency
[16:15] <locutus_> enyc, I support whatever goes into linux-hwe and linux-hwe-edge
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1058.62]
[16:17] <enyc> locutus_: AHA useful answer, that means 5.4.0 for bionic-updates seemingly
[16:17] <locutus_> so, a bug report asking for "please update to 5.2.38" to support python3.8 and kernel up to 5.5 is a good start for me
[16:17] <locutus_> and of course, test my builds
[16:18] <enyc> locutus_: oh maybe not
[16:18] <enyc> locutus_: is 5.3 seemingly
[16:18] <locutus_> yes I know, but meh, the update to 5.2.38 is not too huge
[16:18] <locutus_> so I can do it
[16:19] <enyc> kernel.org list 5.4 as longterm so reasonable to presume likely to be the LTS-HWE kernel
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1055.58] (no packageset)
[16:37] <locutus_> enyc, so, please check or open a bug, and test an eventual build I'll give you!
[16:52] <enyc> bah!
[16:53] <enyc> in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/  signed in etc... try to click "report a bug"  [link to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug]
[16:53] <enyc> instead keep getting redirected to   https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ReportingBugs   !!!
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed libmicrodns from i386-whitelist in focal
[17:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sip4 (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.19.7+dfsg-1 => 4.19.7+dfsg-1ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[17:42] <vorlon> doko: libxcrypt/i386 done
[17:54] <ahasenack> vorlon: I have a fix for apache's cacti armhf failure, btw
[17:55] <ahasenack> https://bugs.launchpad.net/cacti/+bug/1865067
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libxcrypt to i386-whitelist in focal
[19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1055.58]
[20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sip4 (xenial-proposed/universe) [4.17+dfsg-1build1 => 4.17+dfsg-1ubuntu0.1] (kubuntu)
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1074.79] (kernel)
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[22:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [i386] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[22:15] <vorlon> Trevinho: W: libfprint-2-tod-1: package-name-doesnt-match-sonames libfprint-2-tod1
[22:15] <vorlon> Trevinho: is there a good reason to not follow the standard convention?
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7] (no packageset)
[22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7] (no packageset)
[22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1074.79]
[22:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7] (no packageset)
[23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7] (no packageset)
[23:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7] (no packageset)
[23:52] <vorlon> Test-Command: tox -e py37
[23:52] <vorlon> >_<