[00:08] <vorlon> Laney: so is there some kind of new flood protection in place on autopkgtest? I'm getting 403s on the site
[00:08] <vorlon> (intermittently, over the past week)
[01:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[01:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[02:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[02:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[02:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[02:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[02:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7]
[02:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [armhf] (focal-proposed) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7]
[02:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7]
[02:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[02:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[02:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7]
[02:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (focal-proposed) [1.41.0+dfsg1+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[02:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uwsgi [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.0.18-5ubuntu7]
[05:32] <vorlon> Laney: hmm do you know how network-manager 1.22.8-1ubuntu1 got into the release pocket without ever triggering netplan.io autopkgtests?
[07:49] <Laney> vorlon: Yeah, last week it was being made unresponsive by web crawlers / attackers(?) hitting each page so I enabled mod_evasive or whatever the name is
[07:50] <Trevinho> vorlon: mh, well was to follow librprint naming I think, but ok to change
[07:52] <Laney> and that fixed the problem, but perhaps it affects people making lots of legitimate requests in rapid sequence
[07:54] <Laney> I'll look at network-manager quickly
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libfprint [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1]
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libfprint [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1]
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libfprint [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1]
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libfprint [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1]
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libfprint [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu1]
[08:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1.10.6-2ubuntu1.3 => 1.10.6-2ubuntu1.4] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[10:00] <xnox> bryce: facter has  usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ruby/vendor_ruby/2.5.0/libfacter.so
[10:00] <xnox> despite not having any ruby2.5 deps, i guess you need to rebuild facter against ruby2.7
[10:00] <xnox> not sure how you will be able to ensure it doesn't migrate pre-maturely =/
[10:02] <Laney> vorlon: netplan.io has no Testsuite-Triggers in its .dsc
[10:03] <Laney> That can happen if you use an old dpkg-source to build the source package
[10:05] <RikMills> could an AA please action the removal in LP: #1757647
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted network-manager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.10.6-2ubuntu1.4]
[10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu2] (desktop-core)
[10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1015.16] (core, kernel)
[10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1011.12] (core, kernel)
[10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1014.15] (core, kernel)
[10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu2] (desktop-core)
[10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu2] (desktop-core)
[10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu2] (desktop-core)
[10:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfprint [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu2] (desktop-core)
[10:35] <seb128> Laney, vorlon, sorry, that was my fault, I did a new upload to restore the Testsuite-Triggers now
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 [amd64] (eoan-proposed/multiverse) [440.59-0ubuntu0.19.10.2] (no packageset)
[10:39] <xnox> seb128:  you can use sbuild to build source packages from the target release chroot, rather than on your host. There are things like that, which matter to have target series build-deps to run the clean stage and/or generate a matching source package for a given target release series.
[10:40] <seb128> xnox, right, I don't remember what I did there, probably picked the wrong env
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfprint [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu2]
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfprint [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu2]
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfprint [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu2]
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfprint [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu2]
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libfprint [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1:1.90.1+tod1-0ubuntu2]
[13:43] <Laney> cpaelzer: Did you try retrying?
[13:43] <Laney> context: 03/03 13:37:22 <cpaelzer> Laney: Do you know what could have happened or who I could ask what is going on here https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/amd64/c/ctioga2/20200303_131512_05a90@/log.gz ?
[13:45] <cpaelzer> Laney: I hit retry, but it is too soon - I have no retry result yet
[13:45] <cpaelzer> started maybe 5 minutes ago
[13:46] <cpaelzer> the test is no more in http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running so its result should show up in a bit
[13:58] <cpaelzer> Laney: ok it was a one time issue
[13:58] <cpaelzer> on retry it worked
[14:00] <doko> o/
[14:01] <Laney> interesting
[14:01] <Laney> wonder what happened, maybe some transient failure in the cloud
[14:01] <Laney> ideally we wouldn't have marked that as a real failure
[14:02] <doko> ubuntu-archive: o/
[14:03] <seb128> doko, hey
[14:03] <RAOF> Hey, yo!
[14:03] <doko> ubuntu-archive: for sil2100 ...
[14:03] <sil2100> doko: works!
[14:04] <sil2100> ubuntu-archive: something something
[14:04] <RAOF> ubuntu-archive: Mumble mumble grumble ping.
[14:05] <stgraber> working
[14:05] <bdmurray> Is somebody announcing this alias?
[14:08] <cjwatson> Worked for me
[14:08] <cjwatson> Like that maybe?
[14:12] <bdmurray> sure
[14:13] <mwhudson> ooo
[14:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.620.1]
[14:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.41]
[15:35] <tseliot> sil2100, hey, can you approve nvidia-graphics-drivers-440, please? They ended up in NEW, so they're not in eoan-proposed yet
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [440.59-0ubuntu0.19.10.2]
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-440 [i386] (eoan-proposed) [440.59-0ubuntu0.19.10.2]
[15:44] <ginggs> ubuntu-archive: ^
[15:44] <ginggs> ah, i was too slow
[16:06] <tseliot> sil2100, thanks
[16:07] <rbasak> FFe request in bug 1865518 please, just because it's a little late. I hope that the lack of being more than a few days late means that the bar is still low.
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1015.16]
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1011.12]
[16:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-1014.15]
[18:05] <teward> FFE request on #1865902 please.  This is mostly bugfixes, but NGINX Upstream made a change to only allow a single Host request header which is the only 'change' that needs to be FFe'd otherwise this would be a bugfix only microrelease. (We're still tracking Mainline ahead of NGINX Stable release in April, like we did last LTS cycle and the one before it.)  (It's been uploaded right now and is sitting in Proposed...
[18:05] <teward> ... not sure if that means it's 'done' or not, but...)
[18:39] <powersj> bug 1865902
[19:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [66.1~rc-1~ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [66.1~rc-1~ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [66.1~rc-1~ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [i386] (focal-proposed/main) [66.1~rc-1~ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [66.1~rc-1~ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: icu [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [66.1~rc-1~ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [amd64] (focal-proposed) [66.1~rc-1~ubuntu1]
[20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [armhf] (focal-proposed) [66.1~rc-1~ubuntu1]
[20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [66.1~rc-1~ubuntu1]
[20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [arm64] (focal-proposed) [66.1~rc-1~ubuntu1]
[20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [s390x] (focal-proposed) [66.1~rc-1~ubuntu1]
[20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted icu [i386] (focal-proposed) [66.1~rc-1~ubuntu1]
[20:45] <RikMills> vorlon: could you please do this removal? LP: #1757647
[22:32] <vorlon> Laney: ok; I didn't see any communication about the fact that the server config was changed, did I overlook that?
[22:34] <vorlon> seb128, Laney: missing Testsuite-Triggers> ouch ok
[22:39] <vorlon> RikMills: removals processed
[22:39] <RikMills> thanks!
[22:41] <RikMills> only qt4 now is heimdall-flash
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-getting-started-docs [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [3.35.92-0ubuntu1] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop)
[23:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1014.15~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.3.0-1014.15~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1032.33] (kernel)
[23:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1011.12~18.04.1] (no packageset)