[01:46] <dazage> Hi there, I'd like to upgrade a non-essential of mine to 20.04 before released. My question is just how strongly inadvisable is that?
[01:49] <oerheks> as it is an LTS version, long support, sure you can upgrade and expect no huge issues.
[01:50] <dazage> Even if I'm upgrading a month or so before it's official release?
[01:51] <oerheks> sure, the feature freeze is in place. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FocalFossa/ReleaseSchedule
[01:52] <oerheks> the testing week is about to start.
[01:52] <dazage> oh wonderful, in that case I've got perfect timing. :-P
[01:53] <oerheks> Yes, that is where we are at
[01:53] <tomreyn> !ubuntu+1
[01:54] <oerheks> oops my bad :-P
[01:55] <dazage> splendid. If I have my debian correct, `sed -i.bak 's/bionic/focal/g' /etc/apt/sources.list` with an update&reboot should do the trick, correct?
[01:56] <oerheks> that is the debian way, please use  the release update tool with -d development, it does some more checks.
[02:02] <dazage> "You have to download a total of 373 M. This download will take about 47 minutes with a 1Mbit DSL connection and about 14 hours with a 56k modem."
[02:03] <dazage> Haha, seeing the 56k modem cracked me up. Good times.
[02:16] <sarnold> :)
[02:20] <dazage> aand we're live. Ubuntu Focal Fossa (Dev Branch) :-)
[02:21] <dazage> Anything I should keep in mind/do for when 20.04 releases?
[02:23] <sarnold> keep a careful eye on those apt upgrades to make sure it doesn't decide to remove something important to resolve a conflict :)
[02:24] <sarnold> I've been running it on my laptop for a while and it's certainly got more issues than 18.04
[02:24] <sarnold> don't hesitate to file bugs
[02:25] <dazage> Will do, thanks a ton oerheks and sarnold.
[02:27] <tomreyn> and ubottu!
[02:27] <sarnold> haha
[07:34] <lordievader> Good morning
[17:34] <Ussat> So, um...I assume we have a patch for this:  https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1938
[17:39] <sdeziel> Ussat: https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2020/CVE-2020-1938.html shows the packages as 'needs-triage'
[17:40] <Ussat> OK
[17:40] <Ussat> Thanks
[17:41] <Ussat> so, what means, what exactly ?
[17:42] <sdeziel> I'm not sure, would be best to ask directly in #ubuntu-hardened which is where the security team is
[19:51] <kiokoman> under esxi i have 2 ubuntu server running 5.3.0-40-generic if i run iperf3 from another machine (same subnet) server 1 say 238 Mbits/sec server 2 say  633 Mbits/sec both are vmxnet3 driver, any suggestion on how to troubleshoot this ?
[19:59] <ahasenack> are you using virtio for the nic on the slow server?
[19:59] <ahasenack> ah, you said both are using vmxnet3
[19:59] <ahasenack> I don't know then
[22:43] <teward> powersj: rbasak: FYI re 1865948 I think it's too late to consider this for Focal, as we are past FF.  Any objections to adding this to a discussion point post-Focal release as a consideration for G-series?
[22:44] <teward> s/FYI//
[22:44] <powersj> bug 1865948
[22:44]  * powersj needs a link :P
[22:44] <teward> powersj: blame irccloud derping and missing a word
[22:44] <teward> :P
[22:45] <teward> but I think its past FF so it's a little late to start adding new features even to the packaging in Ubuntu (it's also an extra delta NOT proposed yet in Debian)
[22:45] <teward> (though we are extremely diverged from Debian at this point heh)
[22:45] <powersj> agreed in general, but let me tie off with why the request has come in and what version he is targeting
[22:45] <teward> yep.
[22:46] <teward> I just dont want to start making package changes which only one or two people use (the data about who uses the stream module is not available just yet)
[22:46] <teward> hence the multiping ;)
[22:49] <teward> oh @powersj also they are suggesting changes to nginx.conf which affect all packages (nginx-common is a dep for all NGINX flavors in the repo) - which is why it's a larger discussion
[22:50] <teward> nginx-common is included for all current nginx-{core,full,light extras} installs
[22:57] <teward> powersj: dug into the build rules.  This change would break nginx-light in it's current state.  we would have to have the stream module a dependency for it.  It's currently only in full, extras, and core.  Light will error with an invalid directive in the config if stream is added as-is.
[22:58] <teward> so unless we ship multiple config versions based on the NGINX version installed it will break as is.  we need a larger discussion on whether to enable the stream module globally or not before we have that change
[22:58] <teward> as proposed, anyways.
[23:02] <teward> powersj: more data, it looks like this is almost HAProxy-esque functionality in NGINX now with TCP socket streams as well
[23:03] <teward> so it might be something we can enable for all versions but not for Focal.  Needs a discussion with the canonical team on their thoughts.
[23:03] <teward> (I am not on the Canonical server team xD)
[23:08] <powersj> teward, spoke to reporter and +1 on post-focal
[23:10] <teward> ok.  I will set up some kind of notepad on my thoughts on this - mostly because adding this config change will break nginx-light as is
[23:11] <teward> stream support isnt a default feature it's an optional one
[23:11] <teward> do we still have etherpad?
[23:11] <teward> I forget if we do...
[23:12] <powersj> I think we do, but don't know the link off hand
[23:15] <teward> ok.  I will do a brain dump on a blueprint...
[23:15] <teward> itll be huge but it will have my thoughts.  is there a Canonical server team group on LP I can set as reviewer?
[23:19] <teward> ... which is disabled >.>
[23:22] <powersj> teward, yes https://launchpad.net/~canonical-server
[23:47] <teward> powersj: rbasak: http://pad.ubuntu.com/ny2VtEsNlE  <-- in case you want to see what I've got so far.
[23:47] <teward> i've split this all into a running list of G-series considerations, including two changes to feature availability in the package I've made (one related to the requested 'stream' functon changes, and one that would remove the 'this breaks nginx-light' issue entirely)
[23:48] <teward> i'm going to go get food now.