[00:31] <vorlon> doko: where's the freeze exception paperwork for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icu/66.1~rc-1~ubuntu1 ? (cc: xnox)
[00:32] <vorlon> doko: also cf the discussion on ubuntu-devel about the reasons why icu 66 is risky
[00:52] <vorlon> Laney: fwiw the current mod_evasive config appears to specifically conflict with the sample recommended usage of retry-autopkgtest-regressions, which tries to push 10 requests at a time in parallel
[00:54] <vorlon> rbalint: are you tracking the autopkgtest failures on kodi?
[03:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1004.4] (core, kernel)
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-getting-started-docs [amd64] (focal-proposed) [3.35.92-0ubuntu1]
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1004.4]
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1014.15~18.04.1]
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1014.15~18.04.1]
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1032.33]
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1011.12~18.04.1]
[07:56] <Laney> vorlon: I was chuntering on in some channel at the time, yeah, but I guess I overlooked highlighting you, sorry
[07:58] <Laney> tweaking it sounds like a Top Idea
[08:44] <vorlon> Laney: done, raised the parallel limit to 10
[08:44] <Laney> cheers
[08:46] <Laney> I suppose I could delete the entries blacklisting those web crawlers now, since they should fetch robots.txt now
[08:52] <Laney> it didn't exist at the time, and I wanted to cut them off immediately, but now it's there
[08:55] <Laney> (done)
[09:21] <rbalint> vorlon, yes, i'm on it
[09:23] <rbalint> vorlon, just file the update-excuse bug
[09:23] <vorlon> rbalint: ta
[09:26] <rbalint> vorlon, just filed
[10:55] <cpaelzer> doko: runc/containerd are showing up in component mismatches now and have approved MIRs
[10:55] <cpaelzer> doko: do you have the time on the sprint to promote them to main?
[10:56] <cpaelzer> actually since any of you could do that apw seb128 didrocks ^^
[10:56] <mwhudson> cpaelzer: you can ping "ubuntu-archive" now!
[10:58] <cpaelzer> oh really
[10:58] <cpaelzer> It is not a user/bot
[10:58] <cpaelzer> mwhudson: is it just an AA agreement that they highlight on this word?
[10:59] <cpaelzer> I see the channel topci was changed by cjwatson adding theinfo to highlight it
[11:01] <vorlon> cpaelzer, doko: I can take this
[11:13] <mwhudson> cpaelzer: yes, as of like yesterday or something
[11:13] <cpaelzer> thanks vorlon
[11:13] <cpaelzer> I hope I can beat my muscle-memory of highlighting the people indivicually
[12:17] <vorlon> Laney, juliank: anyone analyzed why the amd64 autopkgtest queue is growing much more than the other archs?
[12:17] <vorlon> (and i386 to a lesser degree)
[12:22] <Laney> vorlon: lcy01 being down some compute capacity so we are at 75% of normal available workers
[12:22] <vorlon> aha
[12:22] <Laney> but I don't know if that would explain it fully
[12:22] <vorlon> it's an explanation I accept for the moment :-)
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (eoan-proposed/main) [5.4.0-0ubuntu5 => 5.4.0-0ubuntu5.1] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[12:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (bionic-proposed/main) [4.0.0-1ubuntu8.14 => 4.0.0-1ubuntu8.15] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[13:08] <rbasak> FFe request in bug 1865518 please, just because it's a little late. I hope that the lack of being more than a few days late means that the bar is still low.
[14:42] <LocutusOfBorg> rafaeldtinoco, kanashiro should ruby autopkgtests run with --all proposed stuff?
[14:42] <rafaeldtinoco> kanashiro: ^ i think so
[14:42] <rafaeldtinoco> all my builds, before uploading, were done locally with -proposed up to date
[14:43] <LocutusOfBorg> yes but I mean autopkgtests
[14:43] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, your opinion=
[14:44] <kanashiro> LocutusOfBorg, yeah, we have many regressions because some packages need some deps from proposed
[14:44] <rafaeldtinoco> LocutusOfBorg: yep, me too
[14:44] <rafaeldtinoco> there are deps satisfied during autopkgtest run only
[14:44] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm retrying only s390x and ppc64el, since queues are empty
[14:44] <kanashiro> I've been building a list of packages that need to be triggered together to make them pass
[14:45] <kanashiro> but if it is possible to enable deps from proposed (without specifying which deps are needed) it'd be helpful
[15:11] <doko> vorlon: nodejs ftbfs with the new acorn. what would the next version for 6.2.1+ds+~0.4.0+~4.0.0+really4.0.0+~1.0.0+~5.0.1+ds+~1.7.0+ds+~0.1.1+~0.3.1+~0.2.0+~0.1.0+~0.3.0+~0.3.0-14 really being 5.3 ...?
[15:11] <juliank> doko: wooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow
[15:19] <doko> I mean, the acorn version ...
[15:52] <xnox> ahahhahahhahhahahhahhahaa
[15:53] <xnox> doko:  thank you for helping me clear my lungs with this coughing fit i just had over this version number
[15:53] <Laney> :D
[15:53] <Laney> that's actually real, amazing
[15:57] <mdeslaur> WAAAAAAA
[15:59] <oSoMoN> doko, I successfully built nodejs 12.16.1 against that version of acorn yesterday (in https://launchpad.net/~osomon/+archive/ubuntu/nodejs-mozilla/+packages)
[15:59] <oSoMoN> and that version is being prepared in Debian
[16:11] <mwhudson> https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/a/acorn/acorn_6.2.1+ds+~0.4.0+~4.0.0+really4.0.0+~1.0.0+~5.0.1+ds+~1.7.0+ds+~0.1.1+~0.3.1+~0.2.0+~0.1.0+~0.3.0+~0.3.0-14_changelog
[16:11] <mwhudson> i have questions
[16:11] <doko> oSoMoN: is it planned to update focal to it?
[16:12] <doko> there's also a 10.19.0 upstream
[16:12] <oSoMoN> doko, I would like to, if it doesn't break too many rdeps
[16:13] <oSoMoN> both versions are LTS releases of nodejs, but the 12 series will be supported longer
[16:13] <doko> well, if you drive that ...
[16:14] <oSoMoN> doko, for context I'm looking at that because nodejs is a build dep of firefox, and they recently bumped the version requirement to something > than what we currently have in the archive
[16:14] <oSoMoN> (they==mozilla)
[16:24] <xnox> mwhudson:  i'm going to open an RC bug report
[16:26] <xnox> doko:  the next version apperantly is different "A new upstream version 7.1.1+~0.4.0+~4.0.0+~1.0.0+~5.2.0+~2.0.0+~0.1.1+~0.3.1+~0.2.0+~0.1.0+~0.3.0+~0.3.0 is available, you should consider packaging it."
[16:27] <mwhudson> xnox: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=940708
[16:28] <xnox> oh
[16:28] <xnox> ok
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: collectd (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.7.2-2ubuntu1.1 => 5.7.2-2ubuntu1.2] (no packageset)
[20:39] <vorlon> rafaeldtinoco, kanashiro: fyi I did rerun all ruby-defaults autopkgtests with all-proposed=1 yesterday, so the remaining failures appear to need further uploads to fix them
[20:40] <vorlon> doko: acorn> ugh
[20:40] <rafaeldtinoco> vorlon: thanks a lot!
[20:42] <kanashiro> vorlon, many of them will be fixed when we rerun with the autodep8 now in proposed, and for some packages autopkgtest pulled the version from the release pocket and not from proposed
[20:43] <kanashiro> I am handling those with bryce's help
[20:43] <vorlon> ah
[21:04] <bryce> kanashiro, vorlon I've retriggered them just now
[21:04] <kanashiro> thanks bryce
[22:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.9-1 => 1.3.9-1] (core)
[22:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.9-1 => 1.3.9-1] (core)
[22:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.9-1 => 1.3.9-1] (core)