| vorlon | xnox: well, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/unversioned-python-rm.html still looks wrong, only 2 packages in the "bad" set which is definitely a lie | 07:01 |
|---|---|---|
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected system-config-printer [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.5.11-4ubuntu2] | 09:29 | |
| xnox | vorlon: but is it more than 16? | 10:03 |
| xnox | vorlon: so i think regexp is not matching things right with like | 10:05 |
| xnox | ", python (<< 2.8)," not being detected as "bad" potentially | 10:06 |
| vorlon | xnox: yes, if you expose the 'good' packages, the very first package in the list, bareos, has a build-dependency on python-dev (in -proposed; no version in release) | 10:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.10.07-1ubuntu4] | 10:09 | |
| vorlon | xnox: bcron is similar, but in release and not in -proposed | 10:09 |
| vorlon | (i.e. no version in -proposed) | 10:09 |
| sil2100 | cking: hey! I'm looking at the stress-ng upload for bionic - there is a verification-failed stress-ng already in bionic-proposed | 10:12 |
| sil2100 | cking: I guess we want to revert it before we want to push the new one? | 10:13 |
| sil2100 | cking: I think the stress-ng upload in the bionic queue is based on the -proposed version, right? | 10:13 |
| sil2100 | cking: could you re-upload after sorting this out? If you think the previous bionic-proposed upload is still valid, please re-upload with -v to include the old bugs in the .changes, but I suppose it was supposed to be reverted | 10:15 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected stress-ng [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.09.25-1ubuntu8] | 10:18 | |
| seb128 | I've submitted a small improvement to the by-team proposed-migration report, if someone want to give a look/review | 10:20 |
| seb128 | https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/ubuntu-archive-scripts/display-migrate-after/+merge/380276 | 10:21 |
| seb128 | it adds the "needs to migrate after those items" information to Candidates | 10:21 |
| mwhudson | seb128: lgtm but needs ubuntu-archive to look i guess, do you have example output? | 10:22 |
| sil2100 | The highlighting works o/ | 10:24 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, would be nice to see an example output of this, if possible, to see if it looks sane | 10:25 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-biometric-auth (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-2 => 1.0.3-2ubuntu0.1] (ubuntukylin) | 10:30 | |
| seb128 | sil2100, mwhudson, https://people.canonical.com/~seb128/report.html | 10:39 |
| seb128 | sil2100, mwhudson , look at the dee entry or for libical3 for a fake multi-after-items one | 10:40 |
| mwhudson | seb128: i didn't know laney was not in the release pocket! :) | 10:40 |
| seb128 | :) | 10:40 |
| * Laney caused too many regressions | 10:41 | |
| seb128 | sil2100, mwhudson, appdirs is a case of candidate without migrate-after showing that this case didn't regress | 10:42 |
| sil2100 | seb128: I htink it looks good, approved | 11:01 |
| doko | vorlon, xnox: looks like ben is unable to handle transitions where virtual packages are involved. it throws everything into the same dependency level | 11:03 |
| vorlon | well ben's idea of dependency levels are upside-down anyway | 11:03 |
| Laney | we should update to a non ancient ben :( | 11:04 |
| Laney | can we get a container / chroot for a non-ancient release on snakefruit to do that in? | 11:04 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1042.47] (no packageset) | 11:05 | |
| vorlon | via an RT request, probably | 11:05 |
| doko | hmm, didn't Colin try to do that and failed to get it working? maybe retry with a focal container? | 11:06 |
| vorlon | I don't know | 11:07 |
| Laney | I do remember some experimentation having taken place but no details | 11:08 |
| vorlon | chroot:bionic-transitions | 11:10 |
| vorlon | exists | 11:10 |
| cjwatson | Yeah, I failed to get ben to work there | 11:15 |
| cjwatson | Feel free to try | 11:15 |
| cjwatson | I got lost in ocaml | 11:15 |
| cjwatson | I talked about it here at the time so it should be in IRC logs somewhere | 11:15 |
| seb128 | sil2100, thanks | 11:18 |
| kanashiro | hi! I'd like to ask your help to solve an issue I am facing regarding the multiple ruby-defaults regressions. More than 100 of them have this: "command1 FAIL non-zero exit status 77" | 12:26 |
| kanashiro | the latest gem2deb returns this when no test suite is declared | 12:26 |
| kanashiro | and the latest autodep8 considers this test skippable if it returns 77 | 12:27 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apr-util (eoan-proposed/main) [1.6.1-4build1 => 1.6.1-4ubuntu0.1] (core) | 12:27 | |
| kanashiro | however, yesterday we triggered a bunch of test executions against the autodep8 in proposed and we still get the same failures | 12:27 |
| kanashiro | is there a way to make sure that the autodep8 from proposed is used since it is not an actual test dependency? | 12:29 |
| Laney | autodep8's not run from the archive | 12:29 |
| Laney | we need to update that on the controller | 12:30 |
| Laney | I'll do that | 12:30 |
| kanashiro | Laney, thanks for the info and for taking action, I appreciate that :) | 12:31 |
| Laney | kanashiro: should be done, can you try one retry? | 12:34 |
| kanashiro | Laney, I can't, I am not a core-dev yet | 12:35 |
| kanashiro | Laney, could you try ruby-curses? | 12:36 |
| Laney | ok | 12:36 |
| Laney | kanashiro: it resulted in https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/s390x/r/ruby-curses/20200305_123852_4fea8@/log.gz | 12:40 |
| LocutusOfBorg | nice kanashiro Laney thanks | 12:40 |
| kanashiro | Laney, great, the test was skipped | 12:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted procps [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:3.3.10-4ubuntu2.5] | 12:41 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | I tried to understand how to get autodep8 used | 12:41 |
| LocutusOfBorg | so can we retry them now? without even needing the extra trigger? | 12:41 |
| kanashiro | hey LocutusOfBorg o/ I've seen you triggered some reruns, thanks for your work | 12:42 |
| kanashiro | LocutusOfBorg, yes, I have a list of packages that should be fixed with the new autodep8, just a sec | 12:42 |
| kanashiro | LocutusOfBorg, https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/pdhSgsYVSh/ | 12:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: hud (focal-proposed/primary) [14.10+17.10.20170619-0ubuntu3] | 12:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-biometric-auth [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.3-2ubuntu0.1] | 12:56 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (eoan-proposed) [5.4.0-0ubuntu5.1] | 14:02 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.0.0-1ubuntu8.15] | 14:04 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1015.16~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 14:25 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1004.4] (core, kernel) | 15:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (xenial-proposed/main) [1.3.1-1ubuntu10.29 => 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.30] (ubuntu-server, virt) | 16:02 | |
| seb128 | sil2100, another easy on to review, https://code.launchpad.net/~seb128/ubuntu-archive-scripts/report-include-timezone/+merge/380301 | 16:13 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1033.34] (kernel) | 16:26 | |
| siqueira | Hi, Does anyone knows if Gnome3 session with Wayland will be set as a default on Ubuntu LTS 20.04 (FocalFossa)? | 16:53 |
| bryce | php-mailparse has a version string "3.0.4+2.1.7~dev20160128.orig" | 16:56 |
| bryce | so the tarball is named php-mailparse_3.0.4+2.1.7~dev20160128.orig.orig.tar.xz | 16:57 |
| bryce | when I upload a no-change rebuild of this package, I get an error back from Ubuntu Installer <archive@ubuntu.com>: | 16:58 |
| bryce | Rejected: | 16:58 |
| bryce | Unable to find php-mailparse_3.0.4+2.1.7~dev20160128.orig-1build1.debian.tar.xz in upload or distribution. | 16:58 |
| bryce | php-mailparse_3.0.4+2.1.7~dev20160128.orig-1build1.dsc: must have only an orig.tar.*, a debian.tar.*, and | 16:58 |
| bryce | optionally orig-*.tar.* | 16:58 |
| bryce | Files specified in DSC are broken or missing, skipping package unpack verification. | 16:58 |
| bryce | I'm guessing the '.orig' in the upstream tarball is the cause of the problem here, yes? | 16:58 |
| cjwatson | Adventures in corner cases | 16:58 |
| cjwatson | It seems like a good theory ... | 16:59 |
| bryce | so I'm wondering if there is an established workaround for this type of corner case? | 16:59 |
| cjwatson | I've never heard of this before | 17:00 |
| bryce | ah fun | 17:00 |
| cjwatson | If it is as you suggest then I think the workaround would be to use a less daft version | 17:00 |
| bryce | it sync'd in from Debian ok | 17:00 |
| cjwatson | But I haven't actually checked | 17:00 |
| cjwatson | I can't see anything in LP that specifically looks for .orig | 17:01 |
| cjwatson | Do you have the .changes file handy? | 17:01 |
| bryce | yeah | 17:02 |
| bryce | https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/2jtzpVssV2/ | 17:03 |
| bryce | I wonder if something is detecting the .orig as indicating this is a source archive upload | 17:05 |
| cjwatson | bryce: Well, LP is right, you don't have a debian.tar.xz there. I expect ... yes, that | 17:05 |
| cjwatson | Probably dpkg-genchanges | 17:05 |
| cjwatson | You could work around it by manually editing the .changes or by finding the dpkg bug and fixing that locally ... | 17:05 |
| cjwatson | foreach my $f (grep { m/\.orig(-.+)?\.tar\.$ext$/ } $checksums->get_files()) { | 17:05 |
| cjwatson | Maybe that | 17:05 |
| bryce | cjwatson, ok thanks I'll try that. Never edited the .changes before... adventures indeed | 17:05 |
| cjwatson | So basically it thinks that the file is one of the extra orig component things (.orig-foo.tar.xz) and removed it | 17:06 |
| bryce | cjwatson, ahh that regex looks like what I was thinking must exist | 17:06 |
| cjwatson | Building with -sa would also work around it, more easily | 17:06 |
| cjwatson | You'd just redundantly upload the .orig.tar.xz, but that's OK | 17:07 |
| bryce | ok I'll try that first | 17:07 |
| bryce | no go, same error returned; trying .changes editing next | 17:19 |
| bryce | no go on the .changes editing either (https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/gHNfknNqkr/). | 17:31 |
| locutus__ | kanashiro, I syncd rails to make the ruby transition move a little bit | 17:36 |
| locutus__ | but autopkgtests are sad | 17:36 |
| locutus__ | and I also dropped that bootsnap hack | 17:37 |
| locutus__ | not sure if still needed or not | 17:37 |
| locutus__ | please have a look | 17:37 |
| locutus__ | (I remember it was making some armhf autopkgtests sad against rails) | 17:38 |
| locutus__ | http://launchpadlibrarian.net/417386218/rails_2%3A5.2.2+dfsg-6_2%3A5.2.2+dfsg-6ubuntu1.diff.gz | 17:38 |
| kanashiro | locutus__, taking a look now | 17:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-factory-bot-rails (focal-proposed/primary) [5.1.1-2] | 18:13 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: morris (focal-proposed/primary) [0.2-6] | 18:13 | |
| kanashiro | locutus__, I think I have a patch to fix it, I should come up with a bug report + patch soon | 18:30 |
| kanashiro | locutus__, could you review/sponsor this patch? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-bootsnap/+bug/1866223 | 18:42 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1866223 in ruby-bootsnap (Ubuntu) "Missing Ruby 2.7 support" [Undecided,New] | 18:42 |
| kanashiro | it fixed rails autopkgtest regression for me locally | 18:42 |
| locutus__ | sure | 18:46 |
| locutus__ | kanashiro, please upload them into a ppa, so I can sponsor from there | 18:47 |
| kanashiro | locutus__, ack | 18:47 |
| kanashiro | locutus__, it is building it in different architectures but here is the link: https://launchpad.net/~lucaskanashiro/+archive/ubuntu/focal-ruby-bootsnap-ruby27-support/+packages | 18:59 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1004.4] | 20:29 | |
| cjwatson | bryce: Ah, it trips a similar regex in LP, I see. | 22:25 |
| cjwatson | bryce: dak doesn't hit this because it has a slightly stricter regex (orig_source_ext_re in daklib.regexes) | 22:26 |
| cjwatson | bryce: Using a less silly version is probably the only possible workaround for now. You can certainly file a bug against LP for the set of rejections you got after working around the dpkg bug, although it will certainly be Priority: low :-) | 22:27 |
| bryce | cjwatson, ok thanks, that clarifies that then. :-) Yes, I figured best path is to redo the tarball. | 22:31 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!