[05:41] <RikMills> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/468188742/buildlog_ubuntu_focal_amd64_kubuntu_BUILDING.txt.gz
[05:41] <RikMills> I: Extracting libcrypt1...
[05:41] <RikMills> E: Tried to extract package, but file already exists. Exit...
[05:43] <RikMills> ditto for ubuntu-mate and xubuntu livefs recently
[05:55] <RikMills> in release libcrypt1 Breaks libc6 (<< 2.31), but glibc in release is still 2.30!
[05:56] <RikMills> that is screwed up :/
[06:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: kipi-plugins (focal-proposed/primary) [4:19.12.3-1]
[07:29] <OldManWinter> Indeed, and it's throwing dose3 on my personal repo all out of whack. :P
[07:48] <juliank> RikMills: that sounds right?
[07:49] <RikMills> nope
[07:49] <juliank> RikMills: libc6 2.30 contains libcrypt1, libc6 2.31 does not
[07:49] <juliank> Hence Breaks / Replaces (<< 2.31)
[07:49] <vorlon> it doesn't sound right that there should be a package in the release pocket which Depends: libc6 and Breaks: libc6 (<< 2.31) when the release pocket has libc6 2.30
[07:50] <vorlon> p-m shouldn't have allowed this into the release pocket
[07:50] <RikMills> juliank: the breaks is right. it being in the release pocket is not
[07:50] <juliank> ah yes
[07:54] <vorlon> I could demote it back to -proposed, but I don't see how it got into the release pocket in the first place so I expect it would just sneak back
[07:59] <RikMills> trying: base-files libxcrypt
[07:59] <RikMills> accepted: base-files libxcrypt
[07:59] <RikMills> :?
[08:00] <juliank> this is very confusing!
[08:00] <juliank> base-files should not be in release pocket either?
[08:01] <RikMills> it doesn't install
[08:01] <juliank> yeah
[08:01] <juliank> does britney not understand breaks correctly?
[08:02] <juliank> did someone hint it badly
[08:02] <juliank> it sure sounds dangerous
[08:02] <RikMills> in a vm I have base-files, login and passwd held back
[08:03] <juliank> on m y laptop I have base-files, libcrypt1 held back
[08:03] <juliank> login and passwd it is going to upgrade
[08:04] <vorlon> found no evidence of a hint
[08:06] <juliank> ack
[08:06] <juliank> so a bug in britney solver then
[08:07] <juliank> vorlon: revert base-files and libcrypt1, demoting the versions to proposed, and add a block hint?
[08:07] <vorlon> yeah probably
[08:07] <vorlon> let's see
[08:08] <RikMills> looks like dok was doing something weird with publishing base-files and build essential?
[08:09] <vorlon> why are there packages in the release pocket that depend on libcrypt1 :P
[08:09] <RikMills> I have emails about the going into focal, not focal-proposed
[08:09] <RikMills> *them going
[08:09] <RikMills> as if they have been repubished there
[08:11] <vorlon> I don't see any manual publications to the release pocket in the lp history
[08:16] <vorlon> libxcrypt, base-files, shadow, libuser, apache2 rolled back
[08:18] <vorlon> and p-m disabled for the moment to make sure it doesn't start up again mid-publication
[08:20] <RikMills> :)
[08:22] <RikMills> btw, I think we should be good to get rid of Qt4 now. It has been removed from unstable
[08:25] <vorlon> publication appears to be done, turning p-m back on
[08:26] <vorlon> and I'm off to bed
[08:26] <RikMills> night, and thanks!
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1015.16~18.04.1]
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1042.47]
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1033.34]
[15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-10 [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1:10.0.0~+rc3-1] (no packageset)
[16:48] <doko> is this libcrypt1 breaks/replaces libc6 (<< 2.31) the reason that the package doesn't migrate?
[16:49] <doko> can't retry autopkg tests, all requests are timing out
[17:00] <RikMills> doko: 'the package' = libxcrypt? vorlon put a block hint on that this morning
[17:01] <doko> yep, I know, but I don't understand why the breaks/replaces would affect that.
[17:01] <doko> I mean, why is it blocked without the hint?
[17:03] <RikMills> it wasn't blocked and did migrate, that was what broke things. it was demoted back to -proposed along with a few other things that should never have migrated
[17:06] <doko> RikMills: could you retry an autopkg test to see if it times out for you?
[17:06] <RikMills> any test?
[17:07] <doko> yep. http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running isn't updated either. so there might be more than the timing out retries
[17:08]  * RikMills waits
[17:10] <RikMills> not timing out so far, but retry page is not loading either
[17:10] <RikMills> something is not well
[17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-10 [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1:10.0.0~+rc3-1]
[17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntustudio-look [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.68]
[17:44] <doko> still showing the 4413/2004 pending builds for arm64/armhf
[20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.10.3+dfsg-1~exp2] (no packageset)
[20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.10.3+dfsg-1~exp2] (no packageset)
[22:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.10.3+dfsg-1~exp2] (no packageset)
[22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.10.3+dfsg-1~exp2] (no packageset)
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-tinyalign [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-tinyalign [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-tinyalign [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-tinyalign [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-tinyalign [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (eoan-proposed/main) [1.49-0ubuntu1.19.10.0 => 1.56-0ubuntu0.19.10.0] (desktop-core)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (eoan-proposed/main) [1.49-0ubuntu1.19.10.0 => 1.56-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] (desktop-core)