[05:41] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/468188742/buildlog_ubuntu_focal_amd64_kubuntu_BUILDING.txt.gz [05:41] I: Extracting libcrypt1... [05:41] E: Tried to extract package, but file already exists. Exit... [05:43] ditto for ubuntu-mate and xubuntu livefs recently [05:55] in release libcrypt1 Breaks libc6 (<< 2.31), but glibc in release is still 2.30! [05:56] that is screwed up :/ [06:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: kipi-plugins (focal-proposed/primary) [4:19.12.3-1] [07:29] Indeed, and it's throwing dose3 on my personal repo all out of whack. :P [07:48] RikMills: that sounds right? [07:49] nope [07:49] RikMills: libc6 2.30 contains libcrypt1, libc6 2.31 does not [07:49] Hence Breaks / Replaces (<< 2.31) [07:49] it doesn't sound right that there should be a package in the release pocket which Depends: libc6 and Breaks: libc6 (<< 2.31) when the release pocket has libc6 2.30 [07:50] p-m shouldn't have allowed this into the release pocket [07:50] juliank: the breaks is right. it being in the release pocket is not [07:50] ah yes [07:54] I could demote it back to -proposed, but I don't see how it got into the release pocket in the first place so I expect it would just sneak back [07:59] trying: base-files libxcrypt [07:59] accepted: base-files libxcrypt [07:59] :? [08:00] this is very confusing! [08:00] base-files should not be in release pocket either? [08:01] it doesn't install [08:01] yeah [08:01] does britney not understand breaks correctly? [08:02] did someone hint it badly [08:02] it sure sounds dangerous [08:02] in a vm I have base-files, login and passwd held back [08:03] on m y laptop I have base-files, libcrypt1 held back [08:03] login and passwd it is going to upgrade [08:04] found no evidence of a hint [08:06] ack [08:06] so a bug in britney solver then [08:07] vorlon: revert base-files and libcrypt1, demoting the versions to proposed, and add a block hint? [08:07] yeah probably [08:07] let's see [08:08] looks like dok was doing something weird with publishing base-files and build essential? [08:09] why are there packages in the release pocket that depend on libcrypt1 :P [08:09] I have emails about the going into focal, not focal-proposed [08:09] *them going [08:09] as if they have been repubished there [08:11] I don't see any manual publications to the release pocket in the lp history [08:16] libxcrypt, base-files, shadow, libuser, apache2 rolled back [08:18] and p-m disabled for the moment to make sure it doesn't start up again mid-publication [08:20] :) [08:22] btw, I think we should be good to get rid of Qt4 now. It has been removed from unstable [08:25] publication appears to be done, turning p-m back on [08:26] and I'm off to bed [08:26] night, and thanks! [15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1015.16~18.04.1] [15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1042.47] [15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1033.34] [15:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-toolchain-10 [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1:10.0.0~+rc3-1] (no packageset) [16:48] is this libcrypt1 breaks/replaces libc6 (<< 2.31) the reason that the package doesn't migrate? [16:49] can't retry autopkg tests, all requests are timing out [17:00] doko: 'the package' = libxcrypt? vorlon put a block hint on that this morning [17:01] yep, I know, but I don't understand why the breaks/replaces would affect that. [17:01] I mean, why is it blocked without the hint? [17:03] it wasn't blocked and did migrate, that was what broke things. it was demoted back to -proposed along with a few other things that should never have migrated [17:06] RikMills: could you retry an autopkg test to see if it times out for you? [17:06] any test? [17:07] yep. http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running isn't updated either. so there might be more than the timing out retries [17:08] * RikMills waits [17:10] not timing out so far, but retry page is not loading either [17:10] something is not well [17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-toolchain-10 [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1:10.0.0~+rc3-1] [17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ubuntustudio-look [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.68] [17:44] still showing the 4413/2004 pending builds for arm64/armhf [20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.10.3+dfsg-1~exp2] (no packageset) [20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.10.3+dfsg-1~exp2] (no packageset) [22:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.10.3+dfsg-1~exp2] (no packageset) [22:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.10.3+dfsg-1~exp2] (no packageset) [22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-tinyalign [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [22:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-tinyalign [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-tinyalign [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-tinyalign [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-tinyalign [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) [23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (eoan-proposed/main) [1.49-0ubuntu1.19.10.0 => 1.56-0ubuntu0.19.10.0] (desktop-core) [23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd-glib (eoan-proposed/main) [1.49-0ubuntu1.19.10.0 => 1.56-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] (desktop-core)