[02:42] good morning === TheRedQueen is now known as Drone [06:13] Moornimg [07:51] http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-preinstalled/current/ whats the default passwd for root? [09:06] user ubuntu pass clear? [11:11] btw, this bug just bit me: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=908516 [11:11] Debian bug 908516 in evince "Apparmor profile breaks print preview" [Normal,Fixed] [11:12] (tried to open multiple PDFs with one evince command line, evince a.pdf b.pdf c.pdf; -> a.pdf gets opened, plus error msgs for b and c -> Error launching evince file:///home/XY/.../b.pdf: Failed to execute child process “/bin/sh” (Permission denied)) [11:13] ... I guess, again I won't create an Ubuntu bug report because I upgraded from 19.10 ... [11:16] regression? this does not happen on 18.04 evince 3.28.4-0ubuntu1.2 [11:17] didn't happen in 19.10 either. this is a 20.04 regression. [11:17] either way I've been told not to open bug reports from bugs observed in an upgraded system ... [11:17] sure, file a bugreport. [11:18] oh [11:18] (this is not a clean 20.04 install; it has been upgraded all the way since 16.something) [11:18] well [11:19] i see Focal should have 3.35.92-1 [11:19] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince [11:19] check yours?? [11:19] Yes, that's the one I have. [11:20] And it's definitively an AppArmor-caused issue, I see DENIED log entries associated with my running evince. === genii_ is now known as genii [15:59] bigfoot-: why on earth would someone ask you to avoid filing a bug report on an upgraded system? [16:01] mcphail: i adviced you help test devel release on a clean daily, to avoid giving the devs extra work [16:01] *him [16:01] i never knew this rule too. [16:01] But upgrades are supported and should be tested [16:02] well, we often get users here that force upgrades when they shouldnt yet, and get corrupted issues, that does not occur on clean dailys [16:03] so, i advice to at least compare their issues on a clean daily [16:04] Yes, fair enough to compare to a clean daily. But still worth filing against the upgraded system version, referencing the behaviour on the clean daily, is it not? [16:04] the debian bugreport mentioned is invalid. [16:05] regression, sure, but can you guys reproduce it? [16:05] if they compare sure, but thats often not the case, they jump from non-lts release to an early devel release, thats just wrong in my opinion [16:05] I'm on Mate here. Can't reproduce it on Atril, which is an evince fork, I think [18:57] It's probably not the exact same bug, but in the same ballpark (evince trying to do something that AppArmor prevents it to do). [21:37] is there a torrent for focal? [21:38] CarlFK, nope :-( [21:38] meh, no prob - I'm guessing if it was a problem there would be. [21:39] why did rsynd do this? http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/4pyFjkDdRY/ [21:40] er, rsync. not d. [21:40] zsync seems to be working ok, so im not fussed. [22:00] live, install, wifi picker - the SSIDs are alphabetical, not by power [22:01] should I log an issue? [22:01] sounds normal? [22:03] I would expect sorted by power so that the close one was at the top of the list [22:34] Are scripts located in /lib/systemd/system-shutdown no longer executed? [22:35] There is one computer that has a serial port which communicates to a projector, and the command to power off the projector can't be send on reboot or kexec [22:36] The way I had found back then (16.04) was to have one script that checks if it was a poweroff or halt that was sent. And, if yes, it would run screen to send the required command to power the projector off [22:36] Now, I'm not sure it just not work or there is some race condition or something. The script that does this is the exact same used on 16.04 [22:38] FurretUber: pastebin it [22:39] https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/C4BBWBnGDc/ [22:47] The sleep command was required back then because, without at least one second, the command wouldn't be sent in time for the projector [22:49] FurretUber: for systemd, you need a file that looks like this: https://salsa.debian.org/debconf-video-team/ansible/-/blob/master/roles/opsis-ingest/files/videoteam-ingest.service [22:50] your script gets called from ExecStart=/usr/local/bin/videoteam-ingest [22:51] A service file didn't work when I tried. Because it ran on reboot and poweroff. The script I sent before is speficically for system-shutdown [22:51] systemd-shutdown is, supposedly, the last thing that runs before the shutdown. It even has to be on this case, as the projector is the screen [22:52] oh wow, I didn't know about the "run all in this dir" thing.. https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/347306/how-to-execute-scripts-in-usr-lib-systemd-system-shutdown-at-reboot-or-shutdow [22:54] This is being very useful for cases where there is some special hardware that requires some setup or configuration to power off properly. At least, until 20.04 :( [22:55] FurretUber: I would ask in /j #systemd - likely get to the bottom of this sooner there, and then if they say "somethings broke, log an issue" then you know what is broken [22:56] I will try there, thank you [23:06] Thinking on that now, it's possible to query the projector if it's on or off. A while loop running until it is powered off may work...