[13:30] tjaalton: hi, any objections to sync sssd? The only meaningful change for ubuntu is the automounter one [13:30] or is that something we shouldn't have yet? [13:51] ahasenack: no it's fine, should be safe to sync [13:52] xnox: hi, I saw you proposed my glibc branch for #1864864 [13:52] I added review slots, one for infinity specifically, and updated the MP description [13:52] tjaalton: thanks [13:54] ahasenack: i reviewed it, just upload it. [13:54] ahasenack: it's ok. [13:54] "just upload glibc, no biggie"? :) [13:54] ahasenack: yes. [13:54] ahasenack: we will be hunting thousands of autopkgtest regressions for weeks anyway [13:54] xnox: could you please +1 in the mp then? [13:54] ahasenack: so it will take months to release it. [13:55] ahasenack: there isn't a single review that i can claim on that merge proposal..... [13:55] oh, because you filed it [13:55] xnox: try now [13:55] ahasenack: no, because you requested it from the three identical ~server team only teams [13:55] * ahasenack cheating [13:56] ahasenack: none of which include core-devs =) [13:56] the default review slot sucks [13:56] ahasenack: please dput into bionic unapproved. [13:56] ok [14:21] ahasenack: your glibc MP is mostly for infinity to review than for us I guess [14:21] ahasenack: never the less the patch has no dep3 header making it harder to compare if it matches what got upstream [14:22] ahasenack: a) do you want to add that and b) do you also want a review from me or do you just wait for infinity to comment and probably sponsor it? [14:22] I can add (a), sure [14:22] and extra reviews won't hurt [14:26] ok [14:27] I'll revisit after ldap and bind then [14:42] Wimpress, hi, your last steam package update has bad AppData and Steam (Steam Installer) is not available anymore in the GUI Software center on Ubuntu 20.04... is there any way I could help with resolving this issue? [14:42] here is a Launchpad ticket: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1864635 [14:42] Launchpad bug 1864635 in steam (Ubuntu) ""Steam Installer" not available in Software app since latest Steam update" [Undecided,New] [14:44] (btw. I wonder if appstream-generator is also available for proposed repo) [14:48] AsciiWolf, he tried to fix it with https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/steam/1:1.0.0.61-2ubuntu2 but if that's not enough and you know what is needed patch would be welcome [14:49] Wimpress, the bug has this comment [14:49] 'The problem seems to be with "steam.desktop" that points to a desktop file not present in the package. I would try removing this line.' [14:49] could be worth trying if that could be the issue [14:51] Is there any documentation on what to do about autopkgtest failures blocking proposed migration due to the i386 reduction work? [14:51] inspircd for example [14:52] rbasak: I don't know of documentation but when working on those there are certain categories of badtests - you'll see them when looking into the britney files [14:53] if it belongs any of the "known cases" add a unversioned badtest [14:53] seb128, oops, I didn't notice the new build :) [14:53] if not it usually comes down to anlyzing the case and then considering if it is a new kind [14:53] if it is, discuss (with vorlon probably) if this should be a force-badtest or a fix (depends too mcuh on the cae to predict) [14:54] rbasak: but I agree having a recommended procedure dumped into some place as doc ould be nice [14:54] as everyone seems to know a few different bits of the whole thing [14:54] seb128, Wimpress, I would try removing the launchable + re-adding "steam" [14:54] that could help :) [14:55] AsciiWolf, we discussed that with W_impress and he mentioned that the validator tool was complaining about the icon which is why he removed it [14:55] ahasenack: glibc MP wasn't refreshed yet, will take a look once I see it in my inbox [14:55] cpaelzer: I'm just about to push [14:56] seb128, yeah, I mentioned it in the ticket as well... the .desktop suffix in is also not recommended to be used anymore, but these things somehow made appstream-generator used in Ubuntu happy :) [14:56] AsciiWolf, the generator maybe needs an update to not bug on entries compatible with the standards? [14:58] seb128, yeah, maybe :) [14:59] anyway, try removing the launchlable without re-adding the icon tag... GNOME Software does not have issues with apps without icon anymore so these changes could be sufficient [14:59] Wimpress, ^ [14:59] I just checked the AppData file from steam 1:1.0.0.61-2ubuntu2 and it looks fine except the launchable tag [15:00] AsciiWolf, do you know if there is any other way to test those changes than going through an archive upload? [15:00] seb128, I don't :( [15:00] !dmb-ping [15:00] ddstreet, rafaeldtinoco, rbasak, sil2100, slashd, teward, tsimonq2: DMB ping [15:18] AsciiWolf: I made some changes at the weekend. No joy. Will revent the metadata. === genii_ is now known as genii [16:04] Wimpress, yeah, reverting the metadata changes will probably be best idea :) feel free to let me know if you need any testing after you upload the changes [16:47] rbasak: OK so I'm going to need first-timer guidance to edit-acl for giving rights to rcj. [16:48] but as for the announce email that's easy :) [16:48] Again no rush so i may bug you in the next 2 days - work is work after all and stuff just hit the fan [16:58] teward: the DMB doesn't actually have the ACL bits to change PPU rights specifically, so we have to ask the TB [16:58] ok [16:59] So this falls under that bit of part 2 of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/KnowledgeBase#Actions_after_a_successful_application [16:59] so, ask the TB to create the ppu packageset for rcj, with upload rights to the package they were approved for then. [16:59] edit-acl does have some --help text [17:00] teward: here's an example: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2018-August/002403.html [17:00] So if you file a similar bug first, then write to the TB like that email, that should be all that's required. [17:00] I usually sign my email to the TB [17:01] yep, will do. going through the email response to cascardo's application right now (as that's the easiest) [17:07] rbasak: DMB replies to unsuccessful applications to yes? (the "What to do when unsuccessful" piece)? [17:21] teward: I'm not sure I follow your question [17:21] nevermind [17:21] rbasak: do you mind if I run my email through you for a glance before I send it? [17:21] since i'm new to DMB :) [17:21] Sure [19:03] bryce: I believe the problem with uwsgi-plugin-php is the lack of a default python. strace shows it calling just "python" when building a plugin, and not findin it [19:04] I'm investigating that now [19:10] bryce: got it, this is "a" fix: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/gjKr4wcy3Y/ [19:10] I'll file a bug and get started on it [19:22] rbasak: thanks for the guidance :) I'll remember it all eventually but for now i have no more questions :) [19:35] bryce: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/uwsgi-plugin-php/+git/uwsgi-plugin-php/+merge/380440 [20:08] ahasenack, excellent thanks [20:43] gnome-shell is crashing on lock screen in focal, where can i open a bug? [20:48] cmars: ubuntu-bug gnome-shell should be a good first start [20:52] sarnold: ty