[13:30] <ahasenack> tjaalton: hi, any objections to sync sssd? The only meaningful change for ubuntu is the automounter one
[13:30] <ahasenack> or is that something we shouldn't have yet?
[13:51] <tjaalton> ahasenack: no it's fine, should be safe to sync
[13:52] <ahasenack> xnox: hi, I saw you proposed my glibc branch for #1864864
[13:52] <ahasenack> I added review slots, one for infinity specifically, and updated the MP description
[13:52] <ahasenack> tjaalton: thanks
[13:54] <xnox> ahasenack:  i reviewed it, just upload it.
[13:54] <xnox> ahasenack:  it's ok.
[13:54] <ahasenack> "just upload glibc, no biggie"? :)
[13:54] <xnox> ahasenack:  yes.
[13:54] <xnox> ahasenack:  we will be hunting thousands of autopkgtest regressions for weeks anyway
[13:54] <ahasenack> xnox: could you please +1 in the mp then?
[13:54] <xnox> ahasenack:  so it will take months to release it.
[13:55] <xnox> ahasenack:  there isn't a single review that i can claim on that merge proposal.....
[13:55] <ahasenack> oh, because you filed it
[13:55] <ahasenack> xnox: try now
[13:55] <xnox> ahasenack:  no, because you requested it from the three identical ~server team only teams
[13:55]  * ahasenack cheating
[13:56] <xnox> ahasenack:  none of which include core-devs =)
[13:56] <ahasenack> the default review slot sucks
[13:56] <xnox> ahasenack:  please dput into bionic unapproved.
[13:56] <ahasenack> ok
[14:21] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: your glibc MP is mostly for infinity to review than for us I guess
[14:21] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: never the less the patch has no dep3 header making it harder to compare if it matches what got upstream
[14:22] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: a) do you want to add that and b) do you also want a review from me or do you just wait for infinity to comment and probably sponsor it?
[14:22] <ahasenack> I can add (a), sure
[14:22] <ahasenack> and extra reviews won't hurt
[14:26] <cpaelzer> ok
[14:27] <cpaelzer> I'll revisit after ldap and bind then
[14:42] <AsciiWolf> Wimpress, hi, your last steam package update has bad AppData and Steam (Steam Installer) is not available anymore in the GUI Software center on Ubuntu 20.04... is there any way I could help with resolving this issue?
[14:42] <AsciiWolf> here is a Launchpad ticket: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1864635
[14:44] <AsciiWolf> (btw. I wonder if appstream-generator is also available for proposed repo)
[14:48] <seb128> AsciiWolf, he tried to fix it with https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/steam/1:1.0.0.61-2ubuntu2 but if that's not enough and you know what is needed patch would be welcome
[14:49] <seb128> Wimpress, the bug has this comment
[14:49] <seb128> 'The problem seems to be with "<launchable type="desktop-id">steam.desktop</launchable>" that points to a desktop file not present in the package. I would try removing this line.'
[14:49] <seb128> could be worth trying if that could be the issue
[14:51] <rbasak> Is there any documentation on what to do about autopkgtest failures blocking proposed migration due to the i386 reduction work?
[14:51] <rbasak> inspircd for example
[14:52] <cpaelzer> rbasak: I don't know of documentation but when working on those there are certain categories of badtests - you'll see them when looking into the britney files
[14:53] <cpaelzer> if it belongs any of the "known cases" add a unversioned badtest
[14:53] <AsciiWolf> seb128, oops, I didn't notice the new build :)
[14:53] <cpaelzer> if not it usually comes down to anlyzing the case and then considering if it is a new kind
[14:53] <cpaelzer> if it is, discuss (with vorlon probably) if this should be a force-badtest or a fix (depends too mcuh on the cae to predict)
[14:54] <cpaelzer> rbasak: but I agree having a recommended procedure dumped into some place as doc ould be nice
[14:54] <cpaelzer> as everyone seems to know a few different bits of the whole thing
[14:54] <AsciiWolf> seb128, Wimpress, I would try removing the launchable + re-adding "<icon type="stock">steam</icon>"
[14:54] <AsciiWolf> that could help :)
[14:55] <seb128> AsciiWolf, we discussed that with W_impress and he mentioned that the validator tool was complaining about the icon which is why he removed it
[14:55] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: glibc MP wasn't refreshed yet, will take a look once I see it in my inbox
[14:55] <ahasenack> cpaelzer: I'm just about to push
[14:56] <AsciiWolf> seb128, yeah, I mentioned it in the ticket as well... the .desktop suffix in <id> is also not recommended to be used anymore, but these things somehow made appstream-generator used in Ubuntu happy :)
[14:56] <seb128> AsciiWolf, the generator maybe needs an update to not bug on entries compatible with the standards?
[14:58] <AsciiWolf> seb128, yeah, maybe :)
[14:59] <AsciiWolf> anyway, try removing the launchlable without re-adding the icon tag... GNOME Software does not have issues with apps without icon anymore so these changes could be sufficient
[14:59] <seb128> Wimpress, ^
[14:59] <AsciiWolf> I just checked the AppData file from steam 1:1.0.0.61-2ubuntu2 and it looks fine except the launchable tag
[15:00] <seb128> AsciiWolf, do you know if there is any other way to test those changes than going through an archive upload?
[15:00] <AsciiWolf> seb128, I don't :(
[15:00] <rbasak> !dmb-ping
[15:18] <Wimpress> AsciiWolf: I made some changes at the weekend. No joy. Will revent the metadata.
[16:04] <AsciiWolf> Wimpress, yeah, reverting the metadata changes will probably be best idea :) feel free to let me know if you need any testing after you upload the changes
[16:47] <teward> rbasak: OK so I'm going to need first-timer guidance to edit-acl for giving rights to rcj.
[16:48] <teward> but as for the announce email that's easy :)
[16:48] <teward> Again no rush so i may bug you in the next 2 days - work is work after all and stuff just hit the fan
[16:58] <rbasak> teward: the DMB doesn't actually have the ACL bits to change PPU rights specifically, so we have to ask the TB
[16:58] <teward> ok
[16:59] <rbasak> So this falls under that bit of part 2 of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/KnowledgeBase#Actions_after_a_successful_application
[16:59] <teward> so, ask the TB to create the ppu packageset for rcj, with upload rights to the package they were approved for then.
[16:59] <rbasak> edit-acl does have some --help text
[17:00] <rbasak> teward: here's an example: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/technical-board/2018-August/002403.html
[17:00] <rbasak> So if you file a similar bug first, then write to the TB like that email, that should be all that's required.
[17:00] <rbasak> I usually sign my email to the TB
[17:01] <teward> yep, will do.  going through the email response to cascardo's application right now (as that's the easiest)
[17:07] <teward> rbasak: DMB replies to unsuccessful applications to yes?  (the "What to do when unsuccessful" piece)?
[17:21] <rbasak> teward: I'm not sure I follow your question
[17:21] <teward> nevermind
[17:21] <teward> rbasak: do you mind if I run my email through you for a glance before I send it?
[17:21] <teward> since i'm new to DMB :)
[17:21] <rbasak> Sure
[19:03] <ahasenack> bryce: I believe the problem with uwsgi-plugin-php is the lack of a default python. strace shows it calling just "python" when building a plugin, and not findin it
[19:04] <ahasenack> I'm investigating that now
[19:10] <ahasenack> bryce: got it, this is "a" fix: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/gjKr4wcy3Y/
[19:10] <ahasenack> I'll file a bug and get started on it
[19:22] <teward> rbasak: thanks for the guidance :)  I'll remember it all eventually but for now i have no more questions :)
[19:35] <ahasenack> bryce: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/uwsgi-plugin-php/+git/uwsgi-plugin-php/+merge/380440
[20:08] <bryce> ahasenack, excellent thanks
[20:43] <cmars> gnome-shell is crashing on lock screen in focal, where can i open a bug?
[20:48] <sarnold> cmars: ubuntu-bug gnome-shell should be a good first start
[20:52] <cmars> sarnold: ty