[00:40] are all aware that adwaita icons seems to be broken - https://discourse.bigdaddylinux.com/uploads/default/original/1X/796e73015e3ad8fdacf99d82750f8bf6b3a2d390.png [00:40] they are symbol icons [00:41] i switched to adwaita style and icons and thunar looks bad [00:41] https://imgur.com/pwg27In.png [00:42] no icons for the home child folders [00:46] since when? [00:46] looks normal here [00:48] last update of the adwaita icons package was 2019-10-18 [00:51] the first pic was from 19.10 by the BDLL team and the second pic was from 20.04 from me [00:54] I have 20.04 too [00:55] What icons packages? There's extended ones I believe. [00:55] you mean -full? [00:55] Binary: adwaita-icon-theme, adwaita-icon-theme-full sure, so it seems. I don't care about Adwaita, soo. [01:35] ochosi: are you aware of this ^^^ [01:40] so -full isnt installed by default [01:41] -full is 7mb to download and 23mb installed [01:44] we would need to either also bundle -full or remove the non-full as having something broken by default its good UX === brainwash_ is now known as brainwash [06:55] bluesabre: So. Maybe we should do a meeting before release time. [08:28] JackFrost: yes definitely. i got things on the agenda :D [08:29] brainwash: so about the adwaita issue, dont know where to file the bug, as its not a bug in the package, but a bug with xubuntu, so do you know where on launchpad to file this [08:42] But it's not one we can really fix, things depend on adwaita-icon-theme so we can't blacklist it. [08:44] ...Pretty sure the icon selector thing mentions that the icon theme is incomplete. [09:23] JackFrost: nope doesn't mention it. so you're saying that we cant remove it from being bundled and if so, then we should also bundle -full [09:26] I highly disagree with that, we don't use it by default and have no use for it. [09:27] can the broken one be removed? [09:27] sorry, you already answered that :D [09:28] You can see what all it'd affect with `apt -s remove adwaita-icon-theme` though. [09:43] pretty much takes down the entire xubuntu and xfce stack [09:46] main dependant is likely libgtk-3-0 [10:38] jphilips: xubuntu-meta [10:43] search on launchpad is bad. had to use google to find the page [10:50] okay submitted - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xubuntu-meta/+bug/1866814 [10:50] Launchpad bug 1866814 in xubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) "Adwaita icon theme is broken" [Undecided,New] === jphilips_ is now known as jphilips [12:45] are all the panel profiles distributed with xubuntu from upstream? [13:00] jphilips: https://git.xfce.org/apps/xfce4-panel-profiles/tree/data/layouts [13:02] so they are all upstream [13:02] would xubuntu want to carry any new ones downstream, as i'm working on one to resemble windows 7 [13:03] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/2020-March/011869.html [13:06] and the reasoning is? [13:06] you can just forward them upstream [13:07] the goal should be to reduce workload [13:14] initially assumed the xubuntu themes would have been carried downstream, as they are xubuntu specific, but see thats not the case [13:16] doubt the mac os panel layout could be done downstream as it would also need activation of plank [14:21] -BottyMcBotFace:#xubuntu-devel- ::platform:: Add neutron-ovn-metadata-agent to supported-misc-servers @ http://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform/commit/?id=767bc794b6c122b840ede895f3f267bfcad4f123 (by James Page) [14:58] does xubuntu participate in gsoc? [15:05] jphilips: wouldn't make much sense I'd think [15:05] but for Xfce it could [15:05] sorry wrong channel :D [15:05] but yes does xfce participate [15:07] no [15:09] might be a good idea way to bring in some new blood [15:09] as long as there are mentors to assist them [15:10] guess its to late for this year as they announced the orgs last month [21:24] I'm not sure the Xfce devs have the available time to properly mentor someone. [21:24] Of course I could be wrong.