[06:45] <fo0bar> yes, this seems an appropriate channel :)
[06:46] <fo0bar> a few hours ago, I got a series of Reject emails regarding binary .changes on builds done days ago, saying the PPA was disabled (it wasn't)
[06:47] <fo0bar> e.g.: Subject: [~invalid/ubuntu/ppa] xserver-xorg-video-fbturbo_0~git.20151007.f9a6ed7.1-0~nightly_armhf.changes (Rejected)
[06:48] <fo0bar> TBC, I uploaded a source.changes, it went through the buildds, and the binary packages have been published for a few days now
[06:48] <fo0bar> so these emails seem spurious
[06:55] <wgrant> fo0bar: What may have happened is that someone copied the source package into their PPA, then deleted it, hmm. Can you pastebin more of the email?
[06:57] <fo0bar> wgrant: sure: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/XRzqc6QMZp/
[06:57] <fo0bar> 10 emails along those lines within the course of about 3 minutes, all for the same PPA
[06:58] <fo0bar> (though admittedly, that's the only PPA I've uploaded to recently)
[06:59] <wgrant> fo0bar: You don't have a PPA named "rpi-nightly", so I think someone indeed copied it to their own PPA, deleted the PPA before the builds finished, and then LP got confused when it tried to process the uploads for the builds with no PPA, and emailed the uploader.
[07:00] <fo0bar> wgrant: it's https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-raspi2/+archive/ubuntu/ppa-nightly actually (of which I'm the only member)
[07:00] <wgrant> Oh
[07:00] <wgrant> Still not quite the right name.
[07:00] <wgrant> And the PPA in question didn't exist a week ago
[07:01] <fo0bar> ppa-nightly?  it's existed since ~2016
[07:01] <wgrant> No, rpi-nightly.
[07:01] <fo0bar> oh!  ah, didn't notice the difference
[07:03] <fo0bar> so yeah, someone copying from this PPA seems plausible
[07:06] <fo0bar> I should also point out that it's possible this has happened many times before, as I basically never checked launchpad emails because having the duck meant an ocean of LP notification emails, and most got archived and tarred up :)
[07:06] <wgrant> Heh
[07:06] <wgrant> Indeed
[07:07] <fo0bar> anyway, ta
[14:21] <ricotz> hi, looks like PPA packages don't get published, is buildd-manager stuck?
[14:24] <cjwatson> ricotz: No
[14:24] <cjwatson> And that's a bit of a conceptual leap anyway.  Can you provide links to the actual problem?
[14:25] <cjwatson> Hm, last substantive log line in cron.ppa.log is 12:13:46
[14:25] <cjwatson> Nothing to do with buildd-manager
[14:26] <cjwatson> I've requested a kill
[14:29] <cjwatson> ricotz: Will hopefully recover soon.  I'll keep an eye on it
[14:30] <ricotz> cjwatson, see https://launchpad.net/~vala-team/+archive/ubuntu/daily/+packages
[14:31] <ricotz> thanks
[14:31] <ricotz> cjwatson, could you take a look at this https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/689262
[14:32] <cjwatson> SpecialK|Canon: ^- please distribute
[14:32] <cjwatson> note the help contact in the topic
[14:33] <ricotz> ah I see, thanks
[14:34] <SpecialK|Canon> cjwatson: sorry, distribute what?
[14:34] <cjwatson> SpecialK|Canon: ricotz's request
[14:35] <cjwatson> 689262
[14:35] <cjwatson> I'm assuming you don't want me just doing all these :)
[14:35] <SpecialK|Canon> I don't, no, I just saw the ping, I'm just not clear what you mean by "distribute" there
[14:35] <cjwatson> Oh, I mean, either do it or pick somebody to do it :)
[14:35] <SpecialK|Canon> Right, yep
[14:36] <cjwatson> Sorry, doing several things at once so got a bit telegraphic
[14:36] <SpecialK|Canon> Np, likewise!
[14:38] <SpecialK|Canon> ricotz: on it
[14:39] <cjwatson> Ah, joke's on me, apparently needs my permissions
[14:39] <cjwatson> Principle stands though :)
[14:40] <cjwatson> done
[14:40] <SpecialK|Canon> Indeed
[14:40] <SpecialK|Canon> I monitor this channel periodically, but I don't hilight on all messages
[14:43] <ricotz> SpecialK|Canon, thanks
[15:08] <SpecialK|Canon> ricotz: looks like cjwatson has handled that for you, cheers