[01:14] <foka> Hello!  I would like to request FFe to sync some packages from Debian, the first set being libsass from 3.5.5-4 to 3.6.3-1 and subsequently sassc, ruby-sassc, libsass-python and node-node-sass.
[01:15] <foka> My question is: should I file one single Launchpad [FFe] bug for libsass and friends, or should I file one bug for each single package?  Many thanks!
[01:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libwpe to i386-whitelist in focal
[01:44] <vorlon> doko: libseccomp in -proposed still fails on armhf with glibc 2.31
[03:39] <sforshee> doko: bug 1866882 is causing problems for our linux autopkgtests on s390
[05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu22]
[05:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu22]
[06:20] <vorlon> juliank: hey, so it seems all the i386 autopkgtests fail because apt refuses to install the /cross/ libcrypt1:i386 on a system where libc6 is not yet unpacked and therefore bails.  I guess that means we do after all need a glibc without pre-depends, and can keep the libcrypt1 with Breaks
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pg-fact-loader (focal-proposed/primary) [1.5.2-2]
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pglogical (focal-proposed/primary) [2.3.0-1]
[06:38] <vorlon> so, glibc 2.31-0ubuntu5 uploaded; I will not be around to flush the autopkgtest queues
[06:38] <vorlon> Laney, juliank: once these glibc-triggered autopkgtests start getting scheduled, could you please dump them from the queue?
[06:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: libxcrypt (focal-proposed/primary) [1:4.4.10-10ubuntu4]
[06:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxcrypt [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:4.4.10-10ubuntu4]
[07:13] <vorlon> the libseccomp failures are because glibc is starting to use clock_gettime64() on armhf
[07:16] <doko> Fetched 60.9 MB in 2s (30.9 MB/s)
[07:16] <doko> E: This installation run will require temporarily removing the essential package libc6:arm64 due to a Conflicts/Pre-Depends loop. This is often bad, but if you really want to do it, activate the APT::Force-LoopBreak option.
[07:16] <doko> E: Internal Error, Could not early remove libc6:arm64 (2)
[07:17] <vorlon> doko: source?
[07:17] <doko> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/468751924/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-arm64.postgresql-12_12.2-1ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[07:17] <doko> just trying to give back a failed build
[07:17] <vorlon> doko: oh. it's because I republished libxcrypt with the Breaks: readded, but glibc is still building.  this will resolve itself once https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.31-0ubuntu5 is built and published everywhere.
[07:17] <doko> ahh, ok
[07:18] <vorlon> and clock_gettime64 isn't enough to get libseccomp passing, bah
[07:18] <vorlon> (fixes some tests but not all)
[07:20] <vorlon> oh, it does fix it, I just didn't correctly add it everywhere
[07:37] <cpaelzer> Hi,
[07:37] <cpaelzer> oh - premature enter :-/
[07:38] <cpaelzer> Hi, I'm about to bring back some packages that got removed by bug 1862601 that have since then grown compatibility for postgresql-12
[07:38] <cpaelzer> since that alway means they add -12- in the name they have hit new queue
[07:38] <cpaelzer> I'd appreaciate is someone could accept pglogical and pg-fact-loader from the new queue
[07:39] <cpaelzer> once pglogical is in propsoed there will be another (dependent one) coming as well
[07:47] <doko> sforshee: could you point me to a test case?
[08:25] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/borgbackup/1.1.11-1/+build/18830373
[08:25] <LocutusOfBorg> looks like armhf is still chroot sad?
[08:26] <LocutusOfBorg> also somewhere else https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpam-alreadyloggedin/0.3-8 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/2.4.3-0ubuntu2 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-12/12.2-1ubuntu1
[08:56] <doko> see backlog
[09:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: quassel (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.12.2-0ubuntu1.16.04.1 => 0.12.2-0ubuntu1.16.04.2] (no packageset)
[09:17] <LocutusOfBorg> rbasak, you there? I did reupload quassel, with two upstream patches to fix a build failure ^^ can you please accept this one?
[09:20]  * rbasak looks
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kipi-plugins [sync] (focal-proposed) [4:19.12.3-1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pg-fact-loader [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.5.2-2]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-factory-bot-rails [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.1.1-2]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted morris [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.2-6]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-1]
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-fact-loader [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.2-2] (no packageset)
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-fact-loader [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.2-2] (no packageset)
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-factory-bot-rails [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.1.1-2] (no packageset)
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-fact-loader [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.2-2] (no packageset)
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: morris [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-6] (no packageset)
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: morris [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-6] (no packageset)
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kipi-plugins [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:19.12.3-1] (no packageset)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-fact-loader [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.2-2] (no packageset)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: morris [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-6] (no packageset)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-fact-loader [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.2-2] (no packageset)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: morris [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-6] (no packageset)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kipi-plugins [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:19.12.3-1] (no packageset)
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: morris [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-6] (no packageset)
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kipi-plugins [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:19.12.3-1] (no packageset)
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted morris [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.2-6]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted morris [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.2-6]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted morris [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.2-6]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted morris [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.2-6]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted morris [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.2-6]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pg-fact-loader [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.5.2-2]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pg-fact-loader [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.5.2-2]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pg-fact-loader [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.5.2-2]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-1]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-1]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-factory-bot-rails [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.1.1-2]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pg-fact-loader [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.5.2-2]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-1]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-1]
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pg-fact-loader [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.5.2-2]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [armhf] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kipi-plugins [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:19.12.3-1] (no packageset)
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kipi-plugins [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:19.12.3-1] (no packageset)
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kipi-plugins [amd64] (focal-proposed) [4:19.12.3-1]
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kipi-plugins [armhf] (focal-proposed) [4:19.12.3-1]
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kipi-plugins [s390x] (focal-proposed) [4:19.12.3-1]
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kipi-plugins [arm64] (focal-proposed) [4:19.12.3-1]
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kipi-plugins [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [4:19.12.3-1]
[09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: foxtrotgps [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: foxtrotgps [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: foxtrotgps [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: foxtrotgps [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: foxtrotgps [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted quassel [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.12.2-0ubuntu1.16.04.2]
[09:56] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, can we please get an hint on 32bit gpgme1.0 architectures? there is a new test "checky2106" that fails if long is 32bit...
[09:57] <LocutusOfBorg> it is related to signatures not being valid after 2106 https://dev.gnupg.org/T4766 and honestly, I don't plan to be around on that date
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pglogical-ticker (focal-proposed/primary) [1.4.0-2]
[10:53] <Laney> looks like those glibc tests are scheduled there, guess I should kill them off ?
[10:53] <Laney> I'm not sure what the plan / idea was there but I'll do it ...
[10:57] <juliank> Laney: oh yes, they weren't last time I looked
[10:59]  * Laney is zapping
[11:04] <Laney> this is just going to get hinted through or what?
[11:31] <juliank> Laney: vorlon wants to start the interesting ones or something
[11:56] <mfo> sil2100, hey o/  if you have a chance, could you please review util-linux in e/b upload queue?  just fyi, this is _not_ urgent afaik, so it can wait if timing is not good today. :)  thanks!
[12:01] <sforshee> doko: added instructions to reproduce to the bug
[12:29] <bluca> hello release team - any chance https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/azure-cli/+bug/1866612 could be considered for Focal, please? It just needs 2 syncs from sid - thanks!
[12:38] <sil2100> mfo: hey! I'll see about that, will put it on my TODO list for today :)
[12:38] <mfo> sil2100, alright, thank you!
[13:30] <cpaelzer> hiho ubuntu-archive people, could someone accept pglogical-ticker from the new queue
[13:31] <cpaelzer> this is another one beign removed for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pglogical/+bug/1862601
[13:31] <cpaelzer> but now with PG-12 support coming back
[13:32] <cpaelzer> This overall effort will also eventually need someone from the release Team to ack and merge https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-focal-pglogical-back/+merge/380613
[13:32] <cpaelzer> if someone is around that would be great
[13:33] <cpaelzer> ahasenack: ^^ FYI this is ongoing all day, you might have seen the trello updates already
[13:33] <ahasenack> cpaelzer: I saw you synced, but don't know yet what happened to the tests in the bileto ticket, given the chroot breakage from last night
[13:33] <cpaelzer> that is fine, all that were expected to run were good
[13:34] <cpaelzer> some others were "always failed" anyway
[13:34] <cpaelzer> and the MP above for pglogical will reset for that one
[13:34] <cpaelzer> it effectively also is an always failed, I'm just bringing back the old rule that was cleaned up
[14:20] <sil2100> cpaelzer: hey! I will try to get to it today, but I wouldn't mind if someone gets to it before me ;)
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted foxtrotgps [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1]
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted foxtrotgps [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1]
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted foxtrotgps [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1]
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted foxtrotgps [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1]
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical-ticker [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.4.0-2]
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted foxtrotgps [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1]
[15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical-ticker [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.0-2] (no packageset)
[15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical-ticker [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.0-2] (no packageset)
[15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical-ticker [armhf] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.0-2] (no packageset)
[15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical-ticker [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.0-2] (no packageset)
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.9-1ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: javaproperties (focal-proposed/primary) [0.6.0-2]
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:20200311.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1]
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:20200311.1-0ubuntu0.19.10.1]
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20200311.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1]
[15:42] <cpaelzer> thanks sil2100
[15:42] <cpaelzer> also still looking for an ubuntu-archive person to accept pglogical-ticker
[15:42] <cpaelzer> and in the meantime the new queue also has javaproperties for bug 1866612
[15:43] <cpaelzer> which needs ubuntu-archive attention as well to pass
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical-ticker [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.4.0-2]
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical-ticker [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.4.0-2]
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical-ticker [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.4.0-2]
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical-ticker [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.4.0-2]
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical-ticker [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4.0-2] (no packageset)
[15:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.34-0.1ubuntu2.4]
[15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.6]
[16:11] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: gpgme1.0 hint - no, a regression in proposed of the autopkgtests for a package in main needs to be fixed, not hinted
[16:12] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: the test should obviously be skipped on archs with 32-bit time_t
[16:27] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, do you have an idea for i386 build failure? there is some usual uninstallability, I would like to fix it if possible
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical-ticker [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.4.0-2]
[16:28] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: sorry, are you talking about a build failure now or a test failure? (gpgme1.0?)
[16:29] <LocutusOfBorg> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/i386/g/gpgme1.0/20200310_150943_6e3c7@/log.gz
[16:29] <LocutusOfBorg> this one
[16:29] <LocutusOfBorg> looks like even python3 is not cross-installable
[16:29] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: replace gcc+libc6-dev with build-essential in the test deps
[16:29] <vorlon> ah but yes, python3 is definitely not cross-installable
[16:29] <vorlon> so badtesting i386 is appropriate here
[16:30] <vorlon> armhf should still be sorted however
[16:33] <LocutusOfBorg> ok, what is the appropriate keyword here? DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS or DEB_TARGET_ARCH_BITS?
[16:38] <Laney> mozjs68 needs promoting please, and then mozjs60 should drop into c-m
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (eoan-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu12.1 => 2.04-1ubuntu12.2] (core)
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (eoan-proposed/main) [1.128.1 => 1.128.2] (core)
[16:49] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS (if you forget which is which, you can always run 'dpkg-architecture -amips' and look at the output for a refresher)
[16:55] <LocutusOfBorg> I fail to parse sometimes, e.g. if the armhf test is run on arm64 kernel, isn't DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS=64 and DEB_TARGET_ARCH_BITS=32? in this case, which one is appropriate?
[16:55] <LocutusOfBorg> oh probably host because the time struct is a kernel stuff...
[16:56] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: HOST_ARCH_BITS really refers to the userspace word size, not the kernel
[16:56] <vorlon> (and even at the kernel level, armhf is using a different set of syscalls which are all 32-bit)
[16:57] <cpaelzer> This is waiting for an FFe ack https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1847361
[16:57] <cpaelzer> I have this ready now and another qmeu bug as well
[16:57] <cpaelzer> would love to be able to upload before the weekend
[16:58] <cpaelzer> so if soemone has time to FFe-Ack this that would be great
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu12.2]
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.128.2]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.15]
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (eoan-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu12.2 => 2.04-1ubuntu12.2] (core)
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.02-2ubuntu8.15 => 2.02-2ubuntu8.15] (core)
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.93.15 => 1.93.16] (core)
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kmod (eoan-proposed/main) [26-1ubuntu1 => 26-1ubuntu1.1] (core)
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.93.15ubuntu1]
[17:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.93.16]
[17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (eoan-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu12.2 => 2.04-1ubuntu12.2] (core)
[18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.15]
[18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu12.2]
[18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu12.2]
[18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1043.48] (no packageset)
[19:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.02-2ubuntu8.15 => 2.02-2ubuntu8.15] (core)
[19:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.15]
[20:34] <mwhudson> vorlon: does the autopkgtest queue need savaging again?
[20:34] <mwhudson> oh no, you've done that
[20:48] <vorlon> mwhudson: yeah, we're ok there; what I need now is to know why gnudatalanguage is finding memory corruption only with glibc 2.31 on armhf
[20:53] <vorlon> and why does gdb take so long to resolve symbol names for gnudatalanguage...
[21:17] <vorlon> mwhudson: alright, I've gotten to the point now where trying to set a watchpoint with gdb is causing gdb itself to error out; and valgrind gives me nothing; so if you were to want to dig into gnudatalanguage further to see what's up you are welcome to and I can dump some state to you, but in the meantime I'm letting glibc through
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1043.48]
[21:43] <mwhudson> hm that was strange, where did my irc client go
[21:43] <mwhudson> vorlon: hmm debugging in that armhf environment where all our debugging tools work SO WELL, tempting
[21:44] <mwhudson> vorlon: do you have a canonistack vm you can add my ssh keys to?
[21:44] <mwhudson> i suppose i could test on the pi too
[21:50] <mwhudson> % TEST_XDR_READ: Succesfully read of : /tmp/autopkgtest.XuifkF/build.aBF/src/testsuite/idl.xdr
[21:50] <mwhudson> corrupted size vs. prev_size
[21:50] <mwhudson> Magick: abort due to signal 6 (SIGABRT) "Abort"...
[21:50] <mwhudson> Aborted (core dumped)
[21:50] <mwhudson> vorlon: is that ^ the failure?
[21:51] <mwhudson> vorlon: it's fairly hard to tell from the log...
[22:39] <vorlon> mwhudson: yes that's the failure
[22:40] <mwhudson> vorlon: it's happened at least a few times before glibc 2.31 it seems
[22:40] <vorlon> mwhudson: reproducible with GDL_PATH=+/usr/share/gnudatalanguage:/tmp/gnudatalanguage-0.9.9/testsuite /usr/bin/gdl -quiet -e test_xdr
[22:41] <vorlon> ah, even better
[22:48] <mwhudson> vorlon: and in general http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/gnudatalanguage is ... a thing
[22:48] <mwhudson> although some of those are different
[22:49] <mwhudson> https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/ppc64el/g/gnudatalanguage/20200310_021853_92c62@/log.gz <- that looks completely broken
[22:51]  * mwhudson afk for a bit
[23:50] <vorlon> mwhudson: ISTR it broke on ppc64el due to a gfortran? update
[23:51] <vorlon> doko: python3-defaults, those were all test progressions caused by new django, so --all-proposed sorted it
[23:52] <vorlon> oh /now/ britney wants to not promote libxcrypt because it's uninstallable