[01:14] Hello! I would like to request FFe to sync some packages from Debian, the first set being libsass from 3.5.5-4 to 3.6.3-1 and subsequently sassc, ruby-sassc, libsass-python and node-node-sass. [01:15] My question is: should I file one single Launchpad [FFe] bug for libsass and friends, or should I file one bug for each single package? Many thanks! [01:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libwpe to i386-whitelist in focal [01:44] doko: libseccomp in -proposed still fails on armhf with glibc 2.31 [03:39] doko: bug 1866882 is causing problems for our linux autopkgtests on s390 [03:39] bug 1866882 in llvm-toolchain-10 (Ubuntu) "segfault in libllvm-10 when building kernel bpf selftests on s390" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1866882 === pieq_ is now known as pieq [05:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu22] [05:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu22] [06:20] juliank: hey, so it seems all the i386 autopkgtests fail because apt refuses to install the /cross/ libcrypt1:i386 on a system where libc6 is not yet unpacked and therefore bails. I guess that means we do after all need a glibc without pre-depends, and can keep the libcrypt1 with Breaks [06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pg-fact-loader (focal-proposed/primary) [1.5.2-2] [06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pglogical (focal-proposed/primary) [2.3.0-1] [06:38] so, glibc 2.31-0ubuntu5 uploaded; I will not be around to flush the autopkgtest queues [06:38] Laney, juliank: once these glibc-triggered autopkgtests start getting scheduled, could you please dump them from the queue? [06:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: libxcrypt (focal-proposed/primary) [1:4.4.10-10ubuntu4] [06:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libxcrypt [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:4.4.10-10ubuntu4] [07:13] the libseccomp failures are because glibc is starting to use clock_gettime64() on armhf [07:16] Fetched 60.9 MB in 2s (30.9 MB/s) [07:16] E: This installation run will require temporarily removing the essential package libc6:arm64 due to a Conflicts/Pre-Depends loop. This is often bad, but if you really want to do it, activate the APT::Force-LoopBreak option. [07:16] E: Internal Error, Could not early remove libc6:arm64 (2) [07:17] doko: source? [07:17] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/468751924/buildlog_ubuntu-focal-arm64.postgresql-12_12.2-1ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz [07:17] just trying to give back a failed build [07:17] doko: oh. it's because I republished libxcrypt with the Breaks: readded, but glibc is still building. this will resolve itself once https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/2.31-0ubuntu5 is built and published everywhere. [07:17] ahh, ok [07:18] and clock_gettime64 isn't enough to get libseccomp passing, bah [07:18] (fixes some tests but not all) [07:20] oh, it does fix it, I just didn't correctly add it everywhere [07:37] Hi, [07:37] oh - premature enter :-/ [07:38] Hi, I'm about to bring back some packages that got removed by bug 1862601 that have since then grown compatibility for postgresql-12 [07:38] bug 1862601 in postgresql-11 (Ubuntu) "[Remove] Please remove postgresql-11 from Focal" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1862601 [07:38] since that alway means they add -12- in the name they have hit new queue [07:38] I'd appreaciate is someone could accept pglogical and pg-fact-loader from the new queue [07:39] once pglogical is in propsoed there will be another (dependent one) coming as well [07:47] sforshee: could you point me to a test case? [08:25] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/borgbackup/1.1.11-1/+build/18830373 [08:25] looks like armhf is still chroot sad? [08:26] also somewhere else https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpam-alreadyloggedin/0.3-8 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libseccomp/2.4.3-0ubuntu2 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-12/12.2-1ubuntu1 [08:56] see backlog [09:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: quassel (xenial-proposed/universe) [0.12.2-0ubuntu1.16.04.1 => 0.12.2-0ubuntu1.16.04.2] (no packageset) [09:17] rbasak, you there? I did reupload quassel, with two upstream patches to fix a build failure ^^ can you please accept this one? [09:20] * rbasak looks [09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kipi-plugins [sync] (focal-proposed) [4:19.12.3-1] [09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pg-fact-loader [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.5.2-2] [09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-factory-bot-rails [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.1.1-2] [09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted morris [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.2-6] [09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-1] [09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-fact-loader [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.2-2] (no packageset) [09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-fact-loader [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.2-2] (no packageset) [09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-factory-bot-rails [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.1.1-2] (no packageset) [09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-fact-loader [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.2-2] (no packageset) [09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-1] (no packageset) [09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: morris [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-6] (no packageset) [09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-1] (no packageset) [09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: morris [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-6] (no packageset) [09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-1] (no packageset) [09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kipi-plugins [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:19.12.3-1] (no packageset) [09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-fact-loader [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.2-2] (no packageset) [09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-1] (no packageset) [09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: morris [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-6] (no packageset) [09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pg-fact-loader [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.2-2] (no packageset) [09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: morris [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-6] (no packageset) [09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.3.0-1] (no packageset) [09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kipi-plugins [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:19.12.3-1] (no packageset) [09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: morris [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2-6] (no packageset) [09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kipi-plugins [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:19.12.3-1] (no packageset) [09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted morris [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.2-6] [09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted morris [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.2-6] [09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted morris [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.2-6] [09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted morris [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.2-6] [09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted morris [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.2-6] [09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pg-fact-loader [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.5.2-2] [09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pg-fact-loader [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.5.2-2] [09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pg-fact-loader [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.5.2-2] [09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-1] [09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-1] [09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-factory-bot-rails [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.1.1-2] [09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pg-fact-loader [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.5.2-2] [09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-1] [09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-1] [09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pg-fact-loader [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.5.2-2] [09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [armhf] (focal-proposed) [2.3.0-1] [09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kipi-plugins [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:19.12.3-1] (no packageset) [09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kipi-plugins [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:19.12.3-1] (no packageset) [09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kipi-plugins [amd64] (focal-proposed) [4:19.12.3-1] [09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kipi-plugins [armhf] (focal-proposed) [4:19.12.3-1] [09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kipi-plugins [s390x] (focal-proposed) [4:19.12.3-1] [09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kipi-plugins [arm64] (focal-proposed) [4:19.12.3-1] [09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kipi-plugins [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [4:19.12.3-1] [09:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: foxtrotgps [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: foxtrotgps [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: foxtrotgps [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: foxtrotgps [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: foxtrotgps [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1] (no packageset) [09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted quassel [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.12.2-0ubuntu1.16.04.2] [09:56] vorlon, can we please get an hint on 32bit gpgme1.0 architectures? there is a new test "checky2106" that fails if long is 32bit... [09:57] it is related to signatures not being valid after 2106 https://dev.gnupg.org/T4766 and honestly, I don't plan to be around on that date [10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pglogical-ticker (focal-proposed/primary) [1.4.0-2] [10:53] looks like those glibc tests are scheduled there, guess I should kill them off ? [10:53] I'm not sure what the plan / idea was there but I'll do it ... [10:57] Laney: oh yes, they weren't last time I looked [10:59] * Laney is zapping [11:04] this is just going to get hinted through or what? [11:31] Laney: vorlon wants to start the interesting ones or something [11:56] sil2100, hey o/ if you have a chance, could you please review util-linux in e/b upload queue? just fyi, this is _not_ urgent afaik, so it can wait if timing is not good today. :) thanks! [12:01] doko: added instructions to reproduce to the bug [12:29] hello release team - any chance https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/azure-cli/+bug/1866612 could be considered for Focal, please? It just needs 2 syncs from sid - thanks! [12:29] Ubuntu bug 1866612 in azure-cli (Ubuntu) "Wrong dependency javaproperties -> pyjavaproperties" [Undecided,New] [12:38] mfo: hey! I'll see about that, will put it on my TODO list for today :) [12:38] sil2100, alright, thank you! [13:30] hiho ubuntu-archive people, could someone accept pglogical-ticker from the new queue [13:31] this is another one beign removed for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pglogical/+bug/1862601 [13:31] Ubuntu bug 1862601 in postgresql-11 (Ubuntu) "[Remove] Please remove postgresql-11 from Focal" [High,Fix released] [13:31] but now with PG-12 support coming back [13:32] This overall effort will also eventually need someone from the release Team to ack and merge https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-focal-pglogical-back/+merge/380613 [13:32] if someone is around that would be great [13:33] ahasenack: ^^ FYI this is ongoing all day, you might have seen the trello updates already [13:33] cpaelzer: I saw you synced, but don't know yet what happened to the tests in the bileto ticket, given the chroot breakage from last night [13:33] that is fine, all that were expected to run were good [13:34] some others were "always failed" anyway [13:34] and the MP above for pglogical will reset for that one [13:34] it effectively also is an always failed, I'm just bringing back the old rule that was cleaned up [14:20] cpaelzer: hey! I will try to get to it today, but I wouldn't mind if someone gets to it before me ;) [15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted foxtrotgps [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1] [15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted foxtrotgps [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1] [15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted foxtrotgps [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1] [15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted foxtrotgps [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1] [15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical-ticker [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.4.0-2] [15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted foxtrotgps [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2-2ubuntu1] [15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical-ticker [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.0-2] (no packageset) [15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical-ticker [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.0-2] (no packageset) [15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical-ticker [armhf] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.0-2] (no packageset) [15:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical-ticker [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.0-2] (no packageset) [15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sosreport [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.9-1ubuntu0.16.04.1] [15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: javaproperties (focal-proposed/primary) [0.6.0-2] [15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:20200311.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] [15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:20200311.1-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] [15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20200311.1-0ubuntu0.16.04.1] [15:42] thanks sil2100 [15:42] also still looking for an ubuntu-archive person to accept pglogical-ticker [15:42] and in the meantime the new queue also has javaproperties for bug 1866612 [15:42] bug 1866612 in azure-cli (Ubuntu) "Wrong dependency javaproperties -> pyjavaproperties" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1866612 [15:43] which needs ubuntu-archive attention as well to pass [15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical-ticker [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.4.0-2] [15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical-ticker [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.4.0-2] [15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical-ticker [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.4.0-2] [15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical-ticker [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.4.0-2] [15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pglogical-ticker [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4.0-2] (no packageset) [15:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.34-0.1ubuntu2.4] [15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.31.1-0.4ubuntu3.6] [16:11] LocutusOfBorg: gpgme1.0 hint - no, a regression in proposed of the autopkgtests for a package in main needs to be fixed, not hinted [16:12] LocutusOfBorg: the test should obviously be skipped on archs with 32-bit time_t [16:27] vorlon, do you have an idea for i386 build failure? there is some usual uninstallability, I would like to fix it if possible [16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical-ticker [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.4.0-2] [16:28] LocutusOfBorg: sorry, are you talking about a build failure now or a test failure? (gpgme1.0?) [16:29] https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/i386/g/gpgme1.0/20200310_150943_6e3c7@/log.gz [16:29] this one [16:29] looks like even python3 is not cross-installable [16:29] LocutusOfBorg: replace gcc+libc6-dev with build-essential in the test deps [16:29] ah but yes, python3 is definitely not cross-installable [16:29] so badtesting i386 is appropriate here [16:30] armhf should still be sorted however [16:33] ok, what is the appropriate keyword here? DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS or DEB_TARGET_ARCH_BITS? [16:38] mozjs68 needs promoting please, and then mozjs60 should drop into c-m [16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (eoan-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu12.1 => 2.04-1ubuntu12.2] (core) [16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (eoan-proposed/main) [1.128.1 => 1.128.2] (core) [16:49] LocutusOfBorg: DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS (if you forget which is which, you can always run 'dpkg-architecture -amips' and look at the output for a refresher) [16:55] I fail to parse sometimes, e.g. if the armhf test is run on arm64 kernel, isn't DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS=64 and DEB_TARGET_ARCH_BITS=32? in this case, which one is appropriate? [16:55] oh probably host because the time struct is a kernel stuff... [16:56] LocutusOfBorg: HOST_ARCH_BITS really refers to the userspace word size, not the kernel [16:56] (and even at the kernel level, armhf is using a different set of syscalls which are all 32-bit) [16:57] This is waiting for an FFe ack https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1847361 [16:57] Ubuntu bug 1847361 in qemu (Ubuntu) "Upgrade of qemu binaries causes running instances not able to dynamically load modules" [Wishlist,In progress] [16:57] I have this ready now and another qmeu bug as well [16:57] would love to be able to upload before the weekend [16:58] so if soemone has time to FFe-Ack this that would be great [17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu12.2] [17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.128.2] [17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.15] [17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (eoan-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu12.2 => 2.04-1ubuntu12.2] (core) [17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.02-2ubuntu8.15 => 2.02-2ubuntu8.15] (core) [17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.93.15 => 1.93.16] (core) [17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kmod (eoan-proposed/main) [26-1ubuntu1 => 26-1ubuntu1.1] (core) [17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.93.15ubuntu1] [17:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.93.16] [17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (eoan-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu12.2 => 2.04-1ubuntu12.2] (core) [18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.15] [18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu12.2] [18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu12.2] [18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1043.48] (no packageset) [19:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.02-2ubuntu8.15 => 2.02-2ubuntu8.15] (core) [19:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.15] [20:34] vorlon: does the autopkgtest queue need savaging again? [20:34] oh no, you've done that [20:48] mwhudson: yeah, we're ok there; what I need now is to know why gnudatalanguage is finding memory corruption only with glibc 2.31 on armhf [20:53] and why does gdb take so long to resolve symbol names for gnudatalanguage... [21:17] mwhudson: alright, I've gotten to the point now where trying to set a watchpoint with gdb is causing gdb itself to error out; and valgrind gives me nothing; so if you were to want to dig into gnudatalanguage further to see what's up you are welcome to and I can dump some state to you, but in the meantime I'm letting glibc through [21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1043.48] [21:43] hm that was strange, where did my irc client go [21:43] vorlon: hmm debugging in that armhf environment where all our debugging tools work SO WELL, tempting [21:44] vorlon: do you have a canonistack vm you can add my ssh keys to? [21:44] i suppose i could test on the pi too [21:50] % TEST_XDR_READ: Succesfully read of : /tmp/autopkgtest.XuifkF/build.aBF/src/testsuite/idl.xdr [21:50] corrupted size vs. prev_size [21:50] Magick: abort due to signal 6 (SIGABRT) "Abort"... [21:50] Aborted (core dumped) [21:50] vorlon: is that ^ the failure? [21:51] vorlon: it's fairly hard to tell from the log... [22:39] mwhudson: yes that's the failure [22:40] vorlon: it's happened at least a few times before glibc 2.31 it seems [22:40] mwhudson: reproducible with GDL_PATH=+/usr/share/gnudatalanguage:/tmp/gnudatalanguage-0.9.9/testsuite /usr/bin/gdl -quiet -e test_xdr [22:41] ah, even better [22:48] vorlon: and in general http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/g/gnudatalanguage is ... a thing [22:48] although some of those are different [22:49] https://objectstorage.prodstack4-5.canonical.com/v1/AUTH_77e2ada1e7a84929a74ba3b87153c0ac/autopkgtest-focal/focal/ppc64el/g/gnudatalanguage/20200310_021853_92c62@/log.gz <- that looks completely broken [22:51] * mwhudson afk for a bit [23:50] mwhudson: ISTR it broke on ppc64el due to a gfortran? update [23:51] doko: python3-defaults, those were all test progressions caused by new django, so --all-proposed sorted it [23:52] oh /now/ britney wants to not promote libxcrypt because it's uninstallable