[04:14] <vorlon> RikMills: extra-cmake-modules and kconfig can't be removed from the whitelist, they're part of the build-dependency closure on i386 for things we do need to keep
[04:16] <vorlon> RikMills: I'm looking at bringing in the new dependencies of lintian, but also it would appear this lintian is going to require an MIR
[04:16] <vorlon> xnox: ^^ do you intend to follow through on an MIR for the new lintian deps?
[04:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libcpanel-json-xs-perl to i386-whitelist in focal
[04:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libdevel-size-perl to i386-whitelist in focal
[04:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libsereal-decoder-perl to i386-whitelist in focal
[04:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libsereal-encoder-perl to i386-whitelist in focal
[06:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libjson-xs-perl to i386-whitelist in focal
[07:00] <vorlon> RikMills: lintian should be installable now on i386
[07:49] <RikMills> vorlon: thanks
[07:50] <RikMills> what build depends on ecm and kconfig?
[07:54] <RikMills> seb128: can you accept the nv-codec-headers binary?
[08:33] <RikMills> seb128: also, enabling nvenc on ffmpeg. can you confirm as release-team that you do not consider this as requiring a FFe. since over cosmic upwards, this IS a new feature per se, but you can also see it as restoring a feature that was in bionic
[08:34] <seb128> rikMills, hey, NEWing done now
[08:34] <RikMills> :)
[08:34] <seb128> rikMills, I'm not part of the r-t, it does sound like a feature to turn it on in ffmpeg though
[08:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nv-codec-headers [amd64] (focal-proposed) [9.1.23.1-0ubuntu1]
[08:35] <RikMills> seb128: right. I need to sticky note on my monitor who is AA, who is release-team, and who is both
[08:35] <RikMills> it is confusing ;)
[08:38] <RikMills> sil2100 or Laney - can you offer advise on whether you consider this needs turning into a FFe? LP: #1810649
[08:39] <seb128> Wimpress, ^
[08:40] <seb128> rikMills, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1866709 is sort of a ffe request
[08:40] <seb128> since the packaging is done now might make sense to rename it to ffe
[08:42] <RikMills> can do it either way, but would have to be marked as affecting both packages
[08:42] <RikMills> + if I am to sponsor the ffmpeg upload, I want release-team opinion on the ffmpeg upload
[08:46] <sil2100> RikMills: ok, I think it would be best if this had an FFe, but I'd be +1 on approving it - could you rename the bug + document if you did a test-build and that it built? (logs maybe?)
[08:46] <sil2100> RikMills: I'll approve it then
[08:47] <RikMills> sil2100: thanks. Wimpress is driving this, so I will coordinate to get that done. he has a ppa somewhere with stuff prepared
[08:49] <sil2100> RikMills: excellent, thanks! A link to the PPA would be enough o/
[08:49] <RikMills> ok, I'll get that sorted this morning
[09:07] <RikMills> sil2100: LP: #1810649
[09:41] <xnox> vorlon:  can i unseed devscripts from "server-ship"? cause the classic d-i server iso pool is the only thing that is pulling devscripts & lintian into main.
[09:41] <xnox> unless we want devscripts & lintian in main
[09:42] <xnox> but like ubuntu-dev-tools are in universe
[09:49] <sil2100> RikMills: awesome, approving o/
[09:49] <RikMills> TY :)
[09:51] <Wimpress> seb128: Thanks for the notification.
[09:51] <Wimpress> RikMills: I'll be in touch a little later :-)
[09:51] <RikMills> ok
[09:57] <seb128> Wimpress, np!
[10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-debbundle-es-to-primitive [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.2.0+~1.1.4+~1.1.0+~1.1.0+~1.0.1+~1.0.2+~1.0.0+~1.0.1-2]
[10:26] <cpaelzer> hi, can I get a ubuntu-release team member to merge a fix to my silly typo at https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-focal-pglogical-ticker/+merge/380705 ?
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-debbundle-es-to-primitive [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.0+~1.1.4+~1.1.0+~1.1.0+~1.0.1+~1.0.2+~1.0.0+~1.0.1-2] (no packageset)
[10:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-debbundle-es-to-primitive [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.2.0+~1.1.4+~1.1.0+~1.1.0+~1.0.1+~1.0.2+~1.0.0+~1.0.1-2]
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8 (bionic-proposed/main) [8.3.0-26ubuntu1~18.04 => 8.4.0-1ubuntu1~18.04] (core) (sync)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8-cross (bionic-proposed/main) [18ubuntu0.4 => 18ubuntu0.6] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8-cross-ports (bionic-proposed/universe) [9ubuntu0.4 => 9ubuntu0.5] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8 (eoan-proposed/universe) [8.3.0-26ubuntu1~19.10 => 8.4.0-1ubuntu1~19.10] (core) (sync)
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8-cross-ports (eoan-proposed/universe) [24ubuntu2 => 24ubuntu2.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8-cross (eoan-proposed/universe) [31ubuntu2 => 31ubuntu2.1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[11:01] <RikMills> sil2100: would you mind acking on the ffe bug and marking as triaged (assuming you can at the moment)
[11:04] <sil2100> RikMills: did that already 45 mins ago!
[11:04] <sil2100> ;)
[11:06] <RikMills> sil2100: sorry. I got no email!
[11:06] <RikMills> thanks
[11:07] <RikMills> ah, as I never formally replied, I did not get subbed. sigh
[11:08] <RikMills> even after all this time. LP still catches me out every so often!
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: node-webassemblyjs (focal-proposed/primary) [1.9.0+dfsg-2]
[13:24] <ahasenack> hi release team, if you have a moment, I'd love a review of the following FFes to bring back geoip support for bind9 in focal:
[13:24] <ahasenack> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1866875
[13:24] <ahasenack> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmaxminddb/+bug/1867624
[13:24] <ahasenack> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/1867150
[15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hud [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [14.10+17.10.20170619-0ubuntu3.1] (no packageset)
[15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hud [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [14.10+17.10.20170619-0ubuntu3.1] (no packageset)
[15:08] <powersj> sil2100, if you are still around could you look at ahasenack FFEs above?
[15:17] <sil2100> powersj: hey! Sure
[15:17] <sil2100> Oh my, 3 FFes!
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hud [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [14.10+17.10.20170619-0ubuntu3.1] (no packageset)
[15:18]  * RikMills finds another FFe
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hud [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [14.10+17.10.20170619-0ubuntu3.1] (no packageset)
[15:19] <RikMills> LP: #1867136
[15:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hud [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [14.10+17.10.20170619-0ubuntu3.1] (no packageset)
[15:19] <RikMills> if any release tem could ack that ^ it would be appreciated
[15:20] <RikMills> Simon seems to have gone dark for a bit, and I can't get a response from him under ffe delegation
[15:21] <RikMills> it is not critical :)
[15:52] <Laney> sil2100: hey, pinging you since it's your sru day today... I just got asked by upstream about mutter/eoan, wondering if we can chat about it
[15:52] <Laney> there are a couple of bugs which are maybe/probably not fixed, so I don't feel great about marking them as v-done
[15:53] <Laney> but there are *not* regressions ... so I'd like to release that mutter to -updates to give everyone else the rest of the fixes which are working
[15:53] <Laney> any opinion?
[15:53] <sil2100> Laney: hey! I was wonderng about it some time ago already, asked about what's up with LP: #1853357
[15:53] <Laney> ya, that's one of them
[15:54] <Laney> the claim is that it's not fixed like we said it was
[15:54] <Laney> which I can't disprove, so ... release and then re-open the eoan task?
[15:54] <sil2100> hm, guess we could in theory release those and then switch them back to 'Confirmed'
[15:54] <Laney> that's what I'd like to happen anyway :-)
[15:54] <sil2100> How many such bugs would we have?
[15:54] <sil2100> All the ones that are not verified?
[15:54] <Laney> also bug #1859135
[15:54] <Laney> also bug #1849135
[16:14] <sil2100> Laney: let me get back to you in a bit
[16:14] <Laney> ok
[16:14]  * sil2100 needs to handle the gcc-8 SRU first
[16:14] <Laney> no worries
[16:15] <Laney> apparently there's some problem with firefox that is fixed by this, and upstream are getting a lot of reports which is upsetting them :)
[16:25] <sil2100> RikMills: I might not have enough cycles to take a look at it today sadly!
[16:26]  * sil2100 looks at his today's TODO list with terror in his eyes
[16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8 [sync] (eoan-proposed) [8.4.0-1ubuntu1~19.10]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8-cross [sync] (eoan-proposed) [31ubuntu2.1]
[16:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8-cross-ports [sync] (eoan-proposed) [24ubuntu2.1]
[16:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [8.4.0-1ubuntu1~18.04]
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8-cross [sync] (bionic-proposed) [18ubuntu0.6]
[17:03] <RikMills> sil2100: no problem
[17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8-cross-ports [sync] (bionic-proposed) [9ubuntu0.5]
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: node-webpack (focal-proposed/primary) [4.30.0-7~ubuntu1]
[19:40] <sil2100> Laney: released! And switched the two bugs back to 'New'
[19:54] <Laney> sil2100: ♥ thanks
[20:54] <kanashiro> hello, I've sync'ed some node packages from Debian to fix a src:jekyll's dependency issue, could someone please approve them for me? they are node-webassemblyjs and node-webpack
[21:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fence-agents (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.0.25-2ubuntu1 => 4.0.25-2ubuntu1.1] (no packageset)
[21:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pacemaker (bionic-proposed/main) [1.1.18-0ubuntu1.1 => 1.1.18-0ubuntu1.2] (ubuntu-server)
[22:02] <RikMills> vorlon: could you please consider approving LP: #1867136
[22:02] <mwhudson> RikMills: he's not working today
[22:03] <mwhudson> RikMills: of course he's not very good at not working but you still might get better results poking some other member of the release team
[22:04] <RikMills> mwhudson: whaaaaaaaaaaaat? he is normally here 24/7 except when asleep!
[22:04] <RikMills> I jest, but thanks for the info
[22:05] <sarnold> he sleeps?
[22:09] <RikMills> anyway, @release-team, I am unable to get a response from Simon under FFe delegation, so I have to fall back to old paradigm
[23:19] <xnox> sarnold:  their alter-egos alternate sleep, yes.
[23:22] <sarnold> xnox: ahhh that's how they do it :)