| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-177.207] (core, kernel) | 04:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-177.207] | 05:02 | |
| vorlon | who wants to sort out node-chokidar/amd64 for nodejs? (blocks icu) | 05:11 |
|---|---|---|
| xnox | vorlon: how bad is it that libicu depends on tzdata? | 05:13 |
| vorlon | I don't know, what's the issue? | 05:13 |
| vorlon | ruby-defaults isn't ready to go yet, is it? | 05:14 |
| xnox | vorlon: somehow i thought we have people removing tzdata, but i see that it is in minimal so should be fine. | 05:14 |
| vorlon | it's not in the minimal images | 05:14 |
| xnox | vorlon: ..... because task:minimal != minimal images =) | 05:15 |
| xnox | right | 05:15 |
| vorlon | yep | 05:15 |
| xnox | that's what i thought, but is libicu in the minimal images? | 05:15 |
| vorlon | php7.4 also not a candidate yet | 05:15 |
| vorlon | xnox: no, but if one installs something using it and doesn't also install tzdata, things are broken? | 05:15 |
| vorlon | in principle you run the minimal images as a starting point for running workloads, and one of the supported ways of installing workloads is as debs, so | 05:16 |
| xnox | vorlon: no, but wrong out-of-date built-in timezone data is used | 05:16 |
| xnox | for all the U_TIME apis | 05:16 |
| xnox | i.e. i'm fixing the fact that php never gets tzdata updates | 05:16 |
| xnox | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/2019c-3ubuntu1 & https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icu/66.1-2ubuntu1 | 05:17 |
| vorlon | ok | 05:17 |
| xnox | but now i'm not sure if Depends: tzdata is appropriate in this case or not | 05:17 |
| xnox | on release day it doesn't matter, it will matter the first time we update tzdata | 05:17 |
| vorlon | so it looks like the blockers for icu right now are webkit2gtk (which seb128 said he was going to take responsibility for), libical3, php7.4, ruby, and nodejs | 05:17 |
| vorlon | xnox: it sounds appropriate to me | 05:18 |
| xnox | all of the packages in that list smell! =) | 05:18 |
| vorlon | nodejs is only one amd64-specific autopkgtest regression away | 05:22 |
| xnox | vorlon: given https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nodejs/+bug/1863463 do you want to badtest that test, let it migrate, sync new nodejs, and do all of this again? | 05:30 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1863463 in nodejs (Ubuntu) "Firefox 75 requires nodejs >= 10.19" [High,Confirmed] | 05:30 |
| xnox | but i love how 10.19 ftbfs on all arches in debian | 05:31 |
| vorlon | xnox: I don't want to sync new nodejs at all, I just want the icu transition through | 05:36 |
| xnox | ack | 05:36 |
| vorlon | (and I want the uploader to take responsibility for it, but, well) | 05:36 |
| xnox | the first one or the second one? | 05:37 |
| xnox | =))))) | 05:37 |
| xnox | or both of them? | 05:37 |
| vorlon | both ;P | 05:37 |
| xnox | i fear all of horde stuff was not merged since bionic and needs merge to 3.10 | 05:44 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hud [amd64] (focal-proposed) [14.10+17.10.20170619-0ubuntu3.1] | 10:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hud [armhf] (focal-proposed) [14.10+17.10.20170619-0ubuntu3.1] | 10:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hud [s390x] (focal-proposed) [14.10+17.10.20170619-0ubuntu3.1] | 10:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hud [arm64] (focal-proposed) [14.10+17.10.20170619-0ubuntu3.1] | 10:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hud [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [14.10+17.10.20170619-0ubuntu3.1] | 10:43 | |
| xnox | Can arm64 be added to the Ubuntu Desktop product on isotracker? KeyError: "Product 'Ubuntu Desktop arm64' not found" | 12:17 |
| Laney | okey | 12:18 |
| Laney | should be there... perhaps? | 12:21 |
| xnox | Laney: or maybe I need to remove it from qa products? there is traceback in cd-build-logs, which doesn't fail the build but doesn't look tidy | 12:21 |
| xnox | Laney: i plan to submit iso tracker test results for the two arm64 laptops i have | 12:22 |
| Laney | I think it's OK to post it there | 12:22 |
| Laney | we'll see what happens after the next build | 12:22 |
| xnox | tah! | 12:23 |
| kanashiro | I've requested uploads of some node packages from Debian to fix a src:jekyll's dependency issue, could someone please approve them for me? they are node-webassemblyjs and node-webpack | 12:47 |
| xnox | where did you request them? | 12:49 |
| xnox | Laney: do you have powers to commit to debian-cd? I want to land https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/debian-cd/ux-review-uefi-labels/+merge/379769 which has been reviewed and has agreed wording with mpt and is now final. | 12:49 |
| xnox | Laney: and steve is afk today | 12:49 |
| Laney | This isn't really the channel for making general sponsorship requests, BTW | 12:49 |
| Laney | xnox: yeah, ok, let me look later | 12:50 |
| * xnox slaps myself on the rist | 12:50 | |
| * xnox slaps myself on the wrist | 12:50 | |
| xnox | kanashiro: where did you request them? | 12:50 |
| kanashiro | xnox, I filed some sync requests and provided some patches, but those packages were already uploaded, I just need an approval because those are not in focal atm | 12:51 |
| Laney | xnox: actually that was for kanashiro, yours is *slightly* more on topic | 12:51 |
| kanashiro | Laney, it is not a sponsorship request, they are in NEW I think | 12:51 |
| xnox | yeap they are https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue | 12:52 |
| xnox | kanashiro: you need an archive-admin for those, of which neither laney or I, are =( | 12:53 |
| kanashiro | xnox, ok, thanks anyway | 12:54 |
| kanashiro | but here is the right place to find archive-admins, right? | 12:54 |
| Laney | yeah, I think they are supposed to respond to ubuntu-archive highlight (cf. the /topic) | 12:59 |
| Laney | I don't know if they expect people to ping for each new review though, or wait until it's done | 12:59 |
| kanashiro | I am just pinging because they are blocking some the other syncs I need, but ok, let's wait | 13:01 |
| cjwatson | kanashiro: What's the dependency issue here? I don't see any dependency on node-webassemblyjs in the current jekyll | 13:01 |
| kanashiro | cjwatson, node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin depends no node-webassemblyjs | 13:02 |
| kanashiro | this is my next sync request | 13:02 |
| cjwatson | kanashiro: How did https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jekyll/3.8.6+dfsg-3/+build/18759718 build then? | 13:02 |
| cjwatson | (I'm assuming you're trying to upgrade something, and am mainly trying to get you to tell me what the overall goal here is) | 13:03 |
| kanashiro | cjwatson, if you try to build jekyll now it will fail, I didn't investigate why it built previously | 13:04 |
| kanashiro | it needs webpack which is provided by node-webpack | 13:05 |
| cjwatson | Oh right, node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin was removed | 13:05 |
| cjwatson | So yes, if you're committing to getting this all the way through, I guess that's fine | 13:06 |
| xnox | (indeed currently we try to make nodejs icu php ruby migrate) | 13:07 |
| kanashiro | yes, I already sorted it out locally, just need to get those packages in the archive | 13:07 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-webassemblyjs [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.9.0+dfsg-2] | 13:07 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-webpack [source] (focal-proposed) [4.30.0-7~ubuntu1] | 13:07 | |
| cjwatson | I don't think these should interfere with any transitions in progress, since they're both new | 13:08 |
| kanashiro | cjwatson, FYI my next step is: request a sync of node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin and node-webpack | 13:08 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-webassemblyjs [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset) | 13:14 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-webassemblyjs [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.9.0+dfsg-2] | 13:15 | |
| xnox | hopefully they will help with autopkgtest regressions eventually | 13:30 |
| kanashiro | they will fix at least jekyll's autopkgtest regression | 13:33 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: yagf (focal-proposed/primary) [0.9.5+repack1-1] | 14:03 | |
| xnox | vorlon: Laney: any guidance on what review analysis you want for the s390-tools FFe for this codedrop diffstat https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/pB5TxkbMjs/ ? | 14:22 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-92.93] (core, kernel) | 14:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-92.93] (core, kernel) | 14:23 | |
| franksmcb | Can anyone get to this https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867714 supposed to be a bug report for ubiquity not starting on the current MATE ISO | 14:23 |
| ubot5 | Error: ubuntu bug 1867714 not found | 14:23 |
| xnox | vorlon: Laney: the genprotimg stuff is "new" and thus well can't regress. But the zipl/ stuff is effectively a refactor of the bootloader affecting all s390x substrates; interlined with bug fixes; and features; and whitespace changes; some dating to 2018 but only code-dropped released yesterday | 14:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-92.93] | 14:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-92.93] | 14:30 | |
| Laney | xnox: I dunno, what's your existing testing strategy? | 14:36 |
| xnox | Laney: do line by line codereview + boot install test on our z13 (lpar, z/vm, kvm). But we have no access to do boot testing on z14 and z15. | 14:46 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin (focal-proposed/primary) [1.3.0-5] | 15:18 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: what-is-python (focal-proposed/primary) [1] | 15:19 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-43.36] (core, kernel) | 15:37 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-43.36] (core, kernel) | 15:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-43.36] (core, kernel) | 15:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-43.36] (core, kernel) | 15:38 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-43.36] | 15:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-43.36] | 15:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-43.36] | 15:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-43.36] | 15:39 | |
| xnox | doko: what-is-python uploaded into the New queue, please review if you like it or not. | 16:09 |
| xnox | doko: do feel free to like reject it, if you don't. | 16:09 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1034.35] (kernel) | 16:42 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1033.34] (kernel) | 16:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1059.63] (kernel) | 16:43 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1034.35] | 16:51 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1033.34] | 16:51 | |
| jamespage | please can the ceph SRU in the eoan-proposed UNAPPROVED queue be rejected - I need to fold in the security update that was just released | 17:10 |
| jamespage | ditto on bionic-proposed - thanks! | 17:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (eoan-proposed/main) [14.2.4-0ubuntu0.19.10.2 => 14.2.7-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 17:14 | |
| jamespage | I've uploaded revised version so the newer uploads are valid - please reject the older ones | 17:19 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (bionic-proposed/main) [12.2.12-0ubuntu0.18.04.5 => 12.2.13-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 17:20 | |
| kanashiro | could someone approve node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin in the focal NEW queue? It is needed to fix a src:jekyll's autopkgtest regression | 17:38 |
| cjwatson | done | 17:42 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-5] | 17:43 | |
| kanashiro | thanks | 17:47 |
| cjwatson | Uh what? I accepted it | 17:48 |
| cjwatson | Oh, because that version was previously in focal so the sync attempt failed, probably | 17:49 |
| cjwatson | kanashiro: You'll need to upload a 1.3.0-5build1 | 17:49 |
| kanashiro | cjwatson, ack | 17:49 |
| rafaeldtinoco | cjwatson: sorry for that, I did the syncpackage | 17:57 |
| rafaeldtinoco | a question there.. if we do 1.3.0-5build1 theoretically eoan can have the same version | 17:57 |
| rafaeldtinoco | if a build1 is made there | 17:57 |
| rafaeldtinoco | correct ? | 17:57 |
| rafaeldtinoco | should I do 1.3.0-5ubuntu0.20.04.1 instead ? | 17:58 |
| rafaeldtinoco | kanashiro: would that ^ version work for u ? | 17:58 |
| rafaeldtinoco | or ~ubuntu0.20.04.1 | 17:59 |
| rafaeldtinoco | sorry +ubuntu0.20.04 | 17:59 |
| rafaeldtinoco | just thinking in upgrade path =) | 17:59 |
| rafaeldtinoco | 1.3.0-5 to 1.3.0-5ubuntu0.1 (SRU in Eoan) and 1.3.0-5ubuntu1 (Focal) would work | 18:01 |
| kanashiro | rafaeldtinoco, I think node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin will unlikely be rebuilt in eoan but yeah there is a chance, the version string you are proposing should work fine | 18:02 |
| rafaeldtinoco | kanashiro: instead of a sync, i suggest we go for the later ^ if that works for u | 18:02 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ahasenack: could u re-check this for me ? ^ | 18:02 |
| ahasenack | hm? | 18:02 |
| rafaeldtinoco | kanashiro needs a "sync" from debian but eoan already has the version | 18:02 |
| rafaeldtinoco | my suggestion is: | 18:02 |
| rafaeldtinoco | 15:01 <rafaeldtinoco> 1.3.0-5 to 1.3.0-5ubuntu0.1 (SRU in Eoan) and 1.3.0-5ubuntu1 (Focal) would work | 18:02 |
| rafaeldtinoco | to submit the source package in focal with 1.3.0-5ubuntu1 | 18:03 |
| rafaeldtinoco | leaving ubuntu0.xxx for eoan if ever needed | 18:03 |
| ahasenack | so you want 1.3.0-5 in focal | 18:05 |
| ahasenack | let's take this into #ubuntu-devel | 18:05 |
| rafaeldtinoco | yep | 18:05 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin (focal-proposed/primary) [1.3.0-5build1] | 18:28 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-5build1] | 18:30 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.3.0-5build1] (no packageset) | 18:35 | |
| kanashiro | cjwatson, node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin version 1.3.0-5build1 is in the NEW queue, could you please approve it? | 18:41 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-5build1] | 18:42 | |
| kanashiro | ^ thanks! | 18:42 |
| cjwatson | Yep, was on it :) | 18:43 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1059.63] | 21:47 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!