[04:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-177.207] (core, kernel)
[05:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-177.207]
[05:11] <vorlon> who wants to sort out node-chokidar/amd64 for nodejs? (blocks icu)
[05:13] <xnox> vorlon:  how bad is it that libicu depends on tzdata?
[05:13] <vorlon> I don't know, what's the issue?
[05:14] <vorlon> ruby-defaults isn't ready to go yet, is it?
[05:14] <xnox> vorlon:  somehow i thought we have people removing tzdata, but i see that it is in minimal so should be fine.
[05:14] <vorlon> it's not in the minimal images
[05:15] <xnox> vorlon:  ..... because task:minimal != minimal images =)
[05:15] <xnox> right
[05:15] <vorlon> yep
[05:15] <xnox> that's what i thought, but is libicu in the minimal images?
[05:15] <vorlon> php7.4 also not a candidate yet
[05:15] <vorlon> xnox: no, but if one installs something using it and doesn't also install tzdata, things are broken?
[05:16] <vorlon> in principle you run the minimal images as a starting point for running workloads, and one of the supported ways of installing workloads is as debs, so
[05:16] <xnox> vorlon:  no, but wrong out-of-date built-in timezone data is used
[05:16] <xnox> for all the U_TIME apis
[05:16] <xnox> i.e. i'm fixing the fact that php never gets tzdata updates
[05:17] <xnox> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/2019c-3ubuntu1 & https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/icu/66.1-2ubuntu1
[05:17] <vorlon> ok
[05:17] <xnox> but now i'm not sure if Depends: tzdata is appropriate in this case or not
[05:17] <xnox> on release day it doesn't matter, it will matter the first time we update tzdata
[05:17] <vorlon> so it looks like the blockers for icu right now are webkit2gtk (which seb128 said he was going to take responsibility for), libical3, php7.4, ruby, and nodejs
[05:18] <vorlon> xnox: it sounds appropriate to me
[05:18] <xnox> all of the packages in that list smell! =)
[05:22] <vorlon> nodejs is only one amd64-specific autopkgtest regression away
[05:30] <xnox> vorlon:  given https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nodejs/+bug/1863463 do you want to badtest that test, let it migrate, sync new nodejs, and do all of this again?
[05:31] <xnox> but i love how 10.19 ftbfs on all arches in debian
[05:36] <vorlon> xnox: I don't want to sync new nodejs at all, I just want the icu transition through
[05:36] <xnox> ack
[05:36] <vorlon> (and I want the uploader to take responsibility for it, but, well)
[05:37] <xnox> the first one or the second one?
[05:37] <xnox> =)))))
[05:37] <xnox> or both of them?
[05:37] <vorlon> both ;P
[05:44] <xnox> i fear all of horde stuff was not merged since bionic and needs merge to 3.10
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hud [amd64] (focal-proposed) [14.10+17.10.20170619-0ubuntu3.1]
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hud [armhf] (focal-proposed) [14.10+17.10.20170619-0ubuntu3.1]
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hud [s390x] (focal-proposed) [14.10+17.10.20170619-0ubuntu3.1]
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hud [arm64] (focal-proposed) [14.10+17.10.20170619-0ubuntu3.1]
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted hud [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [14.10+17.10.20170619-0ubuntu3.1]
[12:17] <xnox> Can arm64 be added to the Ubuntu Desktop product on isotracker? KeyError: "Product 'Ubuntu Desktop arm64' not found"
[12:18] <Laney> okey
[12:21] <Laney> should be there... perhaps?
[12:21] <xnox> Laney:  or maybe I need to remove it from qa products? there is traceback in cd-build-logs, which doesn't fail the build but doesn't look tidy
[12:22] <xnox> Laney:  i plan to submit iso tracker test results for the two arm64 laptops i have
[12:22] <Laney> I think it's OK to post it there
[12:22] <Laney> we'll see what happens after the next build
[12:23] <xnox> tah!
[12:47] <kanashiro> I've requested uploads of some node packages from Debian to fix a src:jekyll's dependency issue, could someone please approve them for me? they are node-webassemblyjs and node-webpack
[12:49] <xnox> where did you request them?
[12:49] <xnox> Laney:  do you have powers to commit to debian-cd? I want to land https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/debian-cd/ux-review-uefi-labels/+merge/379769 which has been reviewed and has agreed wording with mpt and is now final.
[12:49] <xnox> Laney:  and steve is afk today
[12:49] <Laney> This isn't really the channel for making general sponsorship requests, BTW
[12:50] <Laney> xnox: yeah, ok, let me look later
[12:50]  * xnox slaps myself on the rist
[12:50]  * xnox slaps myself on the wrist
[12:50] <xnox> kanashiro:  where did you request them?
[12:51] <kanashiro> xnox, I filed some sync requests and provided some patches, but those packages were already uploaded, I just need an approval because those are not in focal atm
[12:51] <Laney> xnox: actually that was for kanashiro, yours is *slightly* more on topic
[12:51] <kanashiro> Laney, it is not a sponsorship request, they are in NEW I think
[12:52] <xnox> yeap they are https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue
[12:53] <xnox> kanashiro:  you need an archive-admin for those, of which neither laney or I, are =(
[12:54] <kanashiro> xnox, ok, thanks anyway
[12:54] <kanashiro> but here is the right place to find archive-admins, right?
[12:59] <Laney> yeah, I think they are supposed to respond to ubuntu-archive highlight (cf. the /topic)
[12:59] <Laney> I don't know if they expect people to ping for each new review though, or wait until it's done
[13:01] <kanashiro> I am just pinging because they are blocking some the other syncs I need, but ok, let's wait
[13:01] <cjwatson> kanashiro: What's the dependency issue here?  I don't see any dependency on node-webassemblyjs in the current jekyll
[13:02] <kanashiro> cjwatson, node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin depends no node-webassemblyjs
[13:02] <kanashiro> this is my next sync request
[13:02] <cjwatson> kanashiro: How did https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jekyll/3.8.6+dfsg-3/+build/18759718 build then?
[13:03] <cjwatson> (I'm assuming you're trying to upgrade something, and am mainly trying to get you to tell me what the overall goal here is)
[13:04] <kanashiro> cjwatson, if you try to build jekyll now it will fail, I didn't investigate why it built previously
[13:05] <kanashiro> it needs webpack which is provided by node-webpack
[13:05] <cjwatson> Oh right, node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin was removed
[13:06] <cjwatson> So yes, if you're committing to getting this all the way through, I guess that's fine
[13:07] <xnox> (indeed currently we try to make nodejs icu php ruby migrate)
[13:07] <kanashiro> yes, I already sorted it out locally, just need to get those packages in the archive
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-webassemblyjs [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.9.0+dfsg-2]
[13:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-webpack [source] (focal-proposed) [4.30.0-7~ubuntu1]
[13:08] <cjwatson> I don't think these should interfere with any transitions in progress, since they're both new
[13:08] <kanashiro> cjwatson, FYI my next step is: request a sync of node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin and node-webpack
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-webassemblyjs [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.0+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[13:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-webassemblyjs [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.9.0+dfsg-2]
[13:30] <xnox> hopefully they will help with autopkgtest regressions eventually
[13:33] <kanashiro> they will fix at least jekyll's autopkgtest regression
[14:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: yagf (focal-proposed/primary) [0.9.5+repack1-1]
[14:22] <xnox> vorlon:  Laney: any guidance on what review analysis you want for the s390-tools FFe for this codedrop diffstat https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/pB5TxkbMjs/ ?
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-92.93] (core, kernel)
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-92.93] (core, kernel)
[14:23] <franksmcb> Can anyone get to this https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867714 supposed to be a bug report for ubiquity not starting on the current MATE ISO
[14:23] <xnox> vorlon:  Laney: the genprotimg stuff is "new" and thus well can't regress. But the zipl/ stuff is effectively a refactor of the bootloader affecting all s390x substrates; interlined with bug fixes; and features; and whitespace changes; some dating to 2018 but only code-dropped released yesterday
[14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-92.93]
[14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-92.93]
[14:36] <Laney> xnox: I dunno, what's your existing testing strategy?
[14:46] <xnox> Laney:  do line by line codereview + boot install test on our z13 (lpar, z/vm, kvm). But we have no access to do boot testing on z14 and z15.
[15:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin (focal-proposed/primary) [1.3.0-5]
[15:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: what-is-python (focal-proposed/primary) [1]
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-43.36] (core, kernel)
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-43.36] (core, kernel)
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-43.36] (core, kernel)
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-43.36] (core, kernel)
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-43.36]
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-43.36]
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-43.36]
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-43.36]
[16:09] <xnox> doko:  what-is-python uploaded into the New queue, please review if you like it or not.
[16:09] <xnox> doko:  do feel free to like reject it, if you don't.
[16:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1034.35] (kernel)
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1033.34] (kernel)
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1059.63] (kernel)
[16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1034.35]
[16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1033.34]
[17:10] <jamespage> please can the ceph SRU in the eoan-proposed UNAPPROVED queue be rejected - I need to fold in the security update that was just released
[17:12] <jamespage> ditto on bionic-proposed - thanks!
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (eoan-proposed/main) [14.2.4-0ubuntu0.19.10.2 => 14.2.7-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[17:19] <jamespage> I've uploaded revised version so the newer uploads are valid - please reject the older ones
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (bionic-proposed/main) [12.2.12-0ubuntu0.18.04.5 => 12.2.13-0ubuntu0.18.04.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[17:38] <kanashiro> could someone approve node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin in the focal NEW queue? It is needed to fix a src:jekyll's autopkgtest regression
[17:42] <cjwatson> done
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-5]
[17:47] <kanashiro> thanks
[17:48] <cjwatson> Uh what?  I accepted it
[17:49] <cjwatson> Oh, because that version was previously in focal so the sync attempt failed, probably
[17:49] <cjwatson> kanashiro: You'll need to upload a 1.3.0-5build1
[17:49] <kanashiro> cjwatson, ack
[17:57] <rafaeldtinoco> cjwatson: sorry for that, I did the syncpackage
[17:57] <rafaeldtinoco> a question there.. if we do 1.3.0-5build1 theoretically eoan can have the same version
[17:57] <rafaeldtinoco> if a build1 is made there
[17:57] <rafaeldtinoco> correct ?
[17:58] <rafaeldtinoco> should I do 1.3.0-5ubuntu0.20.04.1 instead ?
[17:58] <rafaeldtinoco> kanashiro: would that ^ version work for u ?
[17:59] <rafaeldtinoco> or ~ubuntu0.20.04.1
[17:59] <rafaeldtinoco> sorry +ubuntu0.20.04
[17:59] <rafaeldtinoco> just thinking in upgrade path =)
[18:01] <rafaeldtinoco> 1.3.0-5 to 1.3.0-5ubuntu0.1 (SRU in Eoan) and 1.3.0-5ubuntu1 (Focal) would work
[18:02] <kanashiro> rafaeldtinoco, I think node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin will unlikely be rebuilt in eoan but yeah there is a chance, the version string you are proposing should work fine
[18:02] <rafaeldtinoco> kanashiro: instead of a sync, i suggest we go for the later ^ if that works for u
[18:02] <rafaeldtinoco> ahasenack: could u re-check this for me ? ^
[18:02] <ahasenack> hm?
[18:02] <rafaeldtinoco> kanashiro needs a "sync" from debian but eoan already has the version
[18:02] <rafaeldtinoco> my suggestion is:
[18:02] <rafaeldtinoco> 15:01 <rafaeldtinoco> 1.3.0-5 to 1.3.0-5ubuntu0.1 (SRU in Eoan) and 1.3.0-5ubuntu1 (Focal) would work
[18:03] <rafaeldtinoco> to submit the source package in focal with 1.3.0-5ubuntu1
[18:03] <rafaeldtinoco> leaving ubuntu0.xxx for eoan if ever needed
[18:05] <ahasenack> so you want 1.3.0-5 in focal
[18:05] <ahasenack> let's take this into #ubuntu-devel
[18:05] <rafaeldtinoco> yep
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin (focal-proposed/primary) [1.3.0-5build1]
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-5build1]
[18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.3.0-5build1] (no packageset)
[18:41] <kanashiro> cjwatson, node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin version 1.3.0-5build1 is in the NEW queue, could you please approve it?
[18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-uglifyjs-webpack-plugin [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-5build1]
[18:42] <kanashiro> ^ thanks!
[18:43] <cjwatson> Yep, was on it :)
[21:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1059.63]