| mruffell | does anyone know why the default kvm eumlator on focal is /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 directly, and not /usr/bin/kvm-spice? | 00:06 |
|---|---|---|
| mruffell | I filed a bug for the above ^^ https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868029 | 03:54 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1868029 in libvirt (Ubuntu Focal) "focal not using /usr/bin/kvm-spice as default emulator" [Undecided,New] | 03:54 |
| cpaelzer | mruffell: answered on the bug, TL;DR the change is intentional | 06:11 |
| === tacocat is now known as jlu5 | ||
| === bipul is now known as reckless | ||
| cpaelzer | doko: is there a place with e.g. upstream builds of all gcc minor releases or something like it? | 10:54 |
| cpaelzer | doko: I might want to "bisect" through those a bit, and having soem pre-built would help | 10:54 |
| doko | cpaelzer: no, ubuntu-toolchain-r ppa/test has some | 10:57 |
| doko | what are you looking for? | 10:58 |
| cpaelzer | I'm hunting down a qemu issue that turned out to be a seabios issue that turned out to -maybe- be a compiler issue | 10:58 |
| cpaelzer | TL;DR something after Disco changed and in build environments since then the resulting binary breaks on older Penryn chips | 10:58 |
| doko | ugh | 10:58 |
| doko | not the clash-protection stuff that s m b reported? | 10:59 |
| cpaelzer | a new case for sure, but mabye eventually the same reason | 11:00 |
| cpaelzer | doko: it is indeed again fcf-protection | 11:21 |
| cpaelzer | doko: I'll submit a fix to disable it to the seabios project, I'll CC you in case there are any "why is fcf on" questions | 11:33 |
| tsimonq2 | On 2019-10-18 19:40z (152 days 16 hours 32 minutes ago), you uploaded a | 12:29 |
| tsimonq2 | file with French (fr) translations for templates in Ubuntu Focal package | 12:29 |
| tsimonq2 | "lintian" to Launchpad. | 12:29 |
| tsimonq2 | We were unable to import the file because of errors in its format | 12:29 |
| tsimonq2 | Why would I get an email like this? | 12:30 |
| tsimonq2 | I don't have TIL last time I checked. | 12:30 |
| tsimonq2 | Also, hello. I've been fairly absent as of lately. | 12:33 |
| cjwatson | tsimonq2: Note the rather old date; https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+publishinghistory says you synced 2.28.0 then. I'm guessing somebody just unstuck a translation approval queue. | 12:33 |
| tsimonq2 | Nice. | 12:34 |
| tsimonq2 | Thanks. | 12:35 |
| === Wryhder is now known as Lucas_Gray | ||
| coreycb | hello release team, I'd like to bump python-decorator from 4.3.0 to 4.4.2. new versions of openstacksdk won't work with decorator < 4.4.0. the delta is mostly bug fixes and most of the non-openstack reverse depends are in universe. | 14:16 |
| ddstreet | cjwatson quick q, i have a build recipe in LP, but the resulting source package in the ppa is not signed...is there a way to get LP to sign recipe-built source packages? | 14:32 |
| cjwatson | No | 14:33 |
| ddstreet | ok, thnx :) | 14:34 |
| cjwatson | Almost nothing relies on signatures on source packages anyway | 14:34 |
| cjwatson | The containing archive is signed | 14:34 |
| ddstreet | well pull-lp-source does at least try to check them | 14:34 |
| ddstreet | but yeah, it's not really useful since lots of src pkgs are signed by keys that aren't in the debian keyring | 14:34 |
| === bdmurray_ is now known as bdmurray | ||
| seb128 | sil2100, hey, could we have langpacks rolled for focal? looks we have none since the start of the cycle? | 16:24 |
| cjwatson | It's possible we never got the crontab set up. I think I was waiting for some kind of confirmation before doing that | 16:27 |
| cjwatson | Indeed, looks like it | 16:28 |
| cjwatson | In the short term this is our (LP's) problem not sil2100's | 16:28 |
| seb128 | cjwatson, thanks, I'm going to ask on #launchpad | 16:38 |
| cjwatson | seb128: Well I just made progress on it so ... | 16:39 |
| seb128 | cjwatson, k, thanks | 16:39 |
| sil2100 | Yeah, sorry about that, GunnarHj pinged me about it a while ago but I was deep in other stuff | 16:49 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson, seb128: so is the first translation export running right now? Or is there something else we still need to do before that can happen? | 16:52 |
| cjwatson | sil2100: Could you apply https://code.launchpad.net/~cjwatson/langpack-o-matic/focal/+merge/380897 ? | 16:53 |
| cjwatson | And then it should be sorted out automatically next week | 16:53 |
| cjwatson | It isn't running right now - I was going to leave it to cron | 16:53 |
| cjwatson | Can run it if it's more urgent than that though, I guess | 16:53 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: when is the focal export planned? I usually do the first full base packs manually, so I can do those whenever we get the export | 16:54 |
| * sil2100 checks the Full language pack export checkbox | 16:55 | |
| sil2100 | It's not urgent or anything | 16:55 |
| seb128 | urgent it's not, but it would be useful to be able to test whether strings are translatable/translated | 16:56 |
| seb128 | if it's not too expensive to kick an export now it would be nice still | 16:56 |
| seb128 | we are not that far from beta | 16:56 |
| GunnarHj | Agree with seb128 here. There av dozens of translators out there who would like to check the result of their work. | 16:57 |
| cjwatson | If I do nothing it'd be Tuesday | 16:57 |
| cjwatson | I'll go and request one | 16:57 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: thank you! In that case I'll create the first base packs tomorrow | 16:58 |
| sil2100 | GunnarHj: ^ | 16:58 |
| seb128 | cjwatson, thanks | 16:58 |
| seb128 | hey GunnarHj :) | 16:58 |
| sil2100 | GunnarHj: (sorry it took so long, it's a bit crazy again) | 16:58 |
| GunnarHj | sil2100: Np. I understand about priorities. | 16:59 |
| cjwatson | Dropped ball here I think. I think I missed https://lists.launchpad.net/ubuntu-translations-coordinators/msg11353.html | 17:00 |
| cjwatson | Ah, because it wasn't CCed to me | 17:00 |
| cjwatson | So the state machine I was running hung | 17:01 |
| cjwatson | Export is running now on the LP side; should take a few hours. | 17:01 |
| GunnarHj | sil2100: Btw, good if you keep bug #1864680 in mind. | 17:03 |
| ubottu | bug 1864680 in localechooser (Ubuntu) "Revival of language packs for Kurdish (Sorani)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1864680 | 17:03 |
| seb128 | sil2100, btw I updated the proposed migration mp with the import a new line | 17:08 |
| sil2100 | GunnarHj: will do! | 17:50 |
| sil2100 | cjwatson: thank you! | 17:50 |
| sil2100 | seb128: thanks, looking o/ | 17:50 |
| xevious | bryce: Do you have a link that shows the build status for the PHP 7.4 packages? I only see php-text-captcha (its status says it's waiting on php-numbers-words) on the build failures link in the topic. | 18:04 |
| ahasenack | kanashiro: this is the only red remaining for gem2deb, I found the right combination of triggers for the ruby-commander reds and those will clear next round | 18:32 |
| ahasenack | http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/r/ruby-activeldap/focal/armhf | 18:32 |
| ahasenack | kanashiro: any idea? ^ | 18:32 |
| ahasenack | it passed with gem2deb/1.0.5, but failed with gem2deb/1.0.5ubuntu1 | 18:33 |
| ahasenack | 1second diff | 18:34 |
| ahasenack | <"2020-03-12T14:39:59Z"> expected but was | 18:34 |
| ahasenack | <"2020-03-12T14:39:58Z"> | 18:34 |
| kanashiro | ahasenack, it might be an issue just in armhf because of timing | 18:34 |
| kanashiro | yes, just checked this failure log | 18:34 |
| ahasenack | let me retry it | 18:34 |
| ahasenack | thanks | 18:35 |
| ahasenack | doko: hi, if you are still around, about one paragraph in the bind9.16.1 release notes here: https://downloads.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.16.1/RELEASE-NOTES-bind-9.16.1.html | 18:45 |
| ahasenack | " Feature Changes" | 18:45 |
| ahasenack | about pthread-rwlock | 18:45 |
| ahasenack | bind is switching from their own implementation (?) to the glibc one | 18:46 |
| ahasenack | "The system-provided POSIX Threads read-write lock implementation is now used by default instead of the native BIND 9 implementation" | 18:46 |
| ahasenack | any comment about that? Should we follow this upstream change, or disable it? Note the bug they mention affects only bionic | 18:46 |
| bryce | hi xevious, sorry was in a meeting, yes I have a link one sec | 19:03 |
| bryce | xevious, what I've been looking at is this page - https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#ubuntu-server | 19:03 |
| bryce | under ubuntu-server, the php-defaults bullet lists the php-horde regressions, with links to logs | 19:04 |
| bryce | I'm going to send an email to the ubuntu-server@lists.ubuntu.com mailing list with a longer list of packages and what I noticed in a cursory look | 19:05 |
| GunnarHj | Hi vorlon, sorry to bother you again about this, but d-i has been built after your latest upload of gfxboot-theme-ubuntu, and still no tg language in the isolinux menu (checked today's daily build). | 19:14 |
| ahasenack | kanashiro: passed on a simple retry: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/r/ruby-activeldap/focal/armhf | 19:19 |
| ahasenack | good | 19:19 |
| ahasenack | gem2deb will migrate in the next run then, or the one after | 19:19 |
| kanashiro | ahasenack, good :) | 19:20 |
| xevious | bryce: Have you already sent that? If not, let me subscribe first. | 19:20 |
| bryce | xevious, sorry not yet, got caught up in some followup meeting notes | 19:25 |
| xevious | No worries. I'm not going to be able to really look into this until tomorrow, anyway. I subscribed to the mailing list, so I'll keep an eye out for your post. | 19:27 |
| bryce | xevious, great! | 19:27 |
| doko | ahasenack: hmm, where should that be added? | 19:38 |
| pgnd | juliank: to your comment in convo with hggdh re: grub update 'vs' continuation lines, specifically: | 19:38 |
| pgnd | <juliank> So they made a change in their files between those and that blew up after the upgrade | 19:38 |
| ahasenack | doko: it's a new default in bind9.16.1's ./configure, i.e., without doing anything, we get the changed behavior | 19:38 |
| pgnd | nope. no changes for a loong time. | 19:38 |
| ahasenack | if we want to revert to how 9.16.0 is, we have to now pass --disable-pthread-rwlock to ./configure | 19:39 |
| ahasenack | focal has 9.16.0 | 19:39 |
| ahasenack | my intention is to update to 9.16.1 | 19:39 |
| doko | why do you tell me that? | 19:39 |
| ahasenack | doko: because you know glibc | 19:39 |
| ahasenack | and I wanted your opinion on this feature | 19:39 |
| doko | ahh, looking at Fedora ... | 19:39 |
| ahasenack | doko: we also have a bug in bionic's glibc when using pthread-rwlock, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1864864 | 19:40 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1864864 in glibc (Ubuntu Bionic) "[SRU] pthread_rwlock_trywrlock results in hang" [Undecided,Triaged] | 19:40 |
| doko | ahasenack: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bind/blob/master/f/bind.spec I don't see it disabled there | 19:42 |
| ahasenack | doko: checking. Is that for 9.16.1? | 19:43 |
| ahasenack | that was released today | 19:43 |
| ahasenack | doko: that's 9.11? | 19:43 |
| doko | yes | 19:43 |
| ahasenack | irrelevant for 9.11 | 19:43 |
| rafaeldtinoco | ivoks: ping. I see you are an admin for ubunt-ha community but it appears to be inactive since ~2010 or so. I'm doing the maintenance of all HA related packages and going through bugs and all, would u mind closing that group and/or pointing to "ubuntu-server-ha" group ? <- we're using that group to track ubuntu-ha related stuff | 19:52 |
| coreycb | vorlon: hi, if you're avail, I would like to get release team permission to bump python-decorator from 4.3.0 to 4.4.2 in focal | 20:09 |
| tjaalton | LocutusOfBorg: hi, do you have an idea why building mesa with llvm-10 fails with "undefined reference to `getPollyPluginInfo()"? Wondering if it's a packaging bug, before I go complain upstream.. | 20:12 |
| LocutusOfBorg | tjaalton, let me sync llvm-toolchain-10-rc5 with the fix hopefully | 20:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | otherwise I'll fix it | 20:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | can you please check debian/sid in the meanwhile? | 20:16 |
| LocutusOfBorg | I'm speaking about https://reviews.llvm.org/D74464 | 20:16 |
| tjaalton | is rc5 in sid? | 20:22 |
| LocutusOfBorg | tjaalton, not yet built | 20:24 |
| LocutusOfBorg | but I checked, no patch there, so I'm uploading it to focal | 20:24 |
| tjaalton | ok, cool | 20:25 |
| LocutusOfBorg | tjaalton, here you go https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm-toolchain-10/1:10.0.0~+rc5-1ubuntu1 | 20:29 |
| LocutusOfBorg | please report back when you can, so I upload in debian too | 20:30 |
| tjaalton | LocutusOfBorg: it probably takes some hours to build?-) | 20:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | yep | 20:32 |
| LocutusOfBorg | ~5h | 20:33 |
| tjaalton | I didn't realize they use github now for issues | 20:33 |
| LocutusOfBorg | fortunately yes! | 20:43 |
| ahasenack | if a debian package has no d/gbp.conf, nor d/README.source, how can I tell what rules were applied to prepare its dfsg orig tarball? | 20:52 |
| ahasenack | d/watch has just the +dfsg mangling | 20:53 |
| ginggs | ahasenack: maybe Files-Excluded in d/copyright? | 21:12 |
| ahasenack | ginggs: oh, there is a hint | 21:12 |
| ahasenack | Files-Excluded: docs/doxygen | 21:12 |
| ahasenack | thanks, I'll try that | 21:12 |
| ahasenack | kanashiro: gem2deb is a valid candidate! | 21:17 |
| ahasenack | kanashiro: and has in fact migrated already: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gem2deb | 21:17 |
| kanashiro | ahasenack, \o/ | 21:18 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!