=== ben_r_ is now known as ben_r
[02:35] <Eighth_Doctor> would someone be able to process this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pagure/+bug/1867775
[02:35] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1867775 in pagure (Ubuntu) "Sync pagure 5.8.1+dfsg-3 (universe) from Debian sid (main)" [Undecided,New]
[02:35] <Eighth_Doctor> it's a sync request for a package in focal from debian sid that only contains packaging fixes
[02:36] <Eighth_Doctor> there's basically zero risk to the ubuntu archive
[03:42] <RAOF> Conan Kudo: Hm. What is that actually fixing? You say “basically no risk”, but the second changelog entry suggests that the first one broke the package 😜
[06:04] <ivoks> rafaeldtinoco why not just take over ubuntu-ha? it has more members, ppas, history...?
[06:42] <alkisg> Hi, what's the last date when we can sync bug-fixing-releases from debian without FFEs? FinalFreeze on April 16th? (there's a security issue I'm trying to find the best way to resolve)
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
[09:35] <LocutusOfBorg> hello tjaalton, did you have chance to test it?
[09:36] <Laney> ddstreet: Just noticed that all(?) systemd-upstream CIs are borked ...
[09:36] <Laney> they seem to randomly terminate with no useful output
[09:38] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: yes, didn't help :/
[09:38] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: filed it upstream as https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/191
[09:38] <tjaalton> fedora doesn't seem to enable polly, which is why they haven't hit this
[09:51] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, do you have a log?
[09:51] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: looks the same
[09:52] <LocutusOfBorg> mmm strange, the bug and patches looked good to me
[10:27] <tjaalton> something broke the url handler in terminator..
[10:29] <ginggs> hasta la vista url handler
[11:06] <sil2100> Aw crap, the langpack gpg key expired
[11:07] <sil2100> seb128: hey! Do you remember the procedure of getting new gpg keys for Ubuntu Langpack Uploader ?
[11:07] <sil2100> The current key expired 2020-02-10
[11:11] <Eighth_Doctor> RAOF: well, I mean, the package is kind of broken right now, when I meant no risk, nothing important in ubuntu would break :P
[11:12] <Eighth_Doctor> as of right now, the missing dependency and the broken maint scripts means this thing doesn't work at all
[11:55] <sil2100> Oh, and I need to wait for the translation stats to publish, the first focal ones should appear soonish
[11:55] <sil2100> So I'll kick the updates then
[11:57] <ddstreet> Laney it seems like some are currently running ok, did you fix it?
[11:57] <Laney> nope
[11:57] <Laney> they will probably fail out
[11:57] <Laney> or you mean you can see successful results?
[11:58] <ddstreet> no i was jjust looking at currently running ones - i'm pulling the last 40 finished runs now to look at
[12:30] <seb128> sil2100, no idea, I don't think the key ever expired since pitti left
[13:11] <xnox> doko:  have you been working on removal of unversioned python build-deps? or not at the moment? I think I see a few more, but not too sure if they are in progress or not.
[13:18] <doko> xnox: I had the hope I catched them all. what are you seeing?
[13:19] <xnox> doko:  things like https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinfony/+bug/1868259
[13:19] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1868259 in cinfony (Ubuntu) "RM: build-dep python; cannot be built anymore; removed from testing" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[13:21] <xnox> doko:  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/WbcnxrPn8v/
[13:21] <xnox> doko:  lots of Build-Depends-Indep: python (>= 2.*)
[13:21] <ddstreet> Laney yeah it seems like the testbed is hanging while installing the newly built systemd pkgs to test :-/
[13:22] <xnox> and Build-Depends: python (>= 2.*) too
[13:22] <ddstreet> i'll run some tests manually to see if it hangs for me also
[13:22] <doko> hmm, wondering why I didn't catch those
[13:22] <Laney> ddstreet: :(
[13:22] <Laney> cool
[13:22] <Laney> hopefully it does and then you get get into the instance to debug
[13:22] <xnox> doko:  https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/JnbqWMD9xh/ is the pkg list imho
[13:23] <xnox> doko:  but some might be like fixed in -proposed =( i don't have a good way to catch that
[13:24] <doko> crap, some more work :-(
[13:24] <xnox> doko:  do you want to do them? or me?
[13:24] <xnox> doko:  i don't have powers to like RM packages like cinfony above
[13:24] <xnox> (cannot be built anymore, removed from testing)
[13:25] <doko> I'll walk through that list
[13:25] <xnox> thank you, hopefully most of it, is just RM removed from debian
[13:26] <xnox> some we still need for sure, like libaccounts-glib
[13:26] <xnox> but not sure
[13:30] <doko> xnox: edgy-community-wallpapers, naked people?
[13:31] <xnox> doko:  let's see
[13:31] <xnox> doko:  naked people were calendar wallpapers, no?!
[13:31] <xnox> doko:  that one is just a plant
[13:32] <xnox> doko:  which for a static file has setup.py and setup.cfg
[13:32] <xnox> ah to translate <_name>Dawn Of Ubuntu</_name>
[13:32] <xnox> doko:  i'll make that one python3
[13:32] <xnox> doko:  continue with something else
[13:33] <cjwatson> the dubious wallpapers were edgy in nature but not in timing :)
[13:39] <doko> heh
[13:40] <xnox> uploaded port to python3
=== andrewsh[m] is now known as andrewsh_
[15:21] <Eickmeyer> Hi all! I've got some very pressing issues in ubiquity that need to be taken care of. At first I had bug 1851346 back in December, but now bug 1868191 has popped up and they're both related to the manual package selection for Ubuntu Studio.
[15:21] <ubottu> bug 1851346 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Focal) "Ubuntu Studio 19.10 Installer Causes Wanted Programs to be Removed" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1851346
[15:21] <ubottu> bug 1868191 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Unchecking all optional media apps, install fails" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1868191
[15:22] <Eickmeyer> I see two solutions for this: 1) we fix the problem (preferable) or 2) we disable the package selection altogether.
[15:22] <Eickmeyer> Either way, I don't want these bugs landing in an LTS, and I don't have the know-how to fix them
[15:22] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: ^
[15:24] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: bug 1851346 is on our list of things to fix
[15:24] <ubottu> bug 1851346 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Focal) "Ubuntu Studio 19.10 Installer Causes Wanted Programs to be Removed" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1851346
[15:26] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: I hope so. Looks like 1868191 might be a duplicate? I'm not sure, but it seems to be the same problem.
[15:38] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: I'll add it to our list to look at as a team
[15:38] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: I'd appreciate it. :)
[16:14] <bdmurray> vorlon: Is there any duplicate searching to be done for bug 1867431 or did you do that already?
[16:14] <ubottu> bug 1867431 in glibc (Ubuntu) "ERROR got an error from dpkg for pkg: 'libc6'" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1867431
=== Serge is now known as hallyn
[16:53] <vorlon> bdmurray: I had not looked for duplicates of LP: #1867431
[16:53] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1867431 in glibc (Ubuntu) "ERROR got an error from dpkg for pkg: 'libc6'" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1867431
[16:54] <vorlon> coreycb: I was on PTO yesterday; did you get what you needed wrt python-decorator? (did you talk to #ubuntu-release?)
[17:25] <rbasak> bryce: I filed a fairly minor MP with definitely-needed commits that are finished from my branch, to reduce the size of the upcoming one. No rush to review, though it should be trivial.