/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/03/20/#ubuntu-release.txt

kanashirovorlon, I created this bug to request a FFe for chef: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chef/+bug/186818700:20
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1868187 in chef (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Sync version 15.8.25.3.gcf41df6a2-6 from Debian unstable" [Undecided,New]00:20
kanashirolet me know if more information is needed00:20
tumbleweedkanashiro: I know the story here, so easy to approve00:30
tumbleweedkanashiro: need sponsorship?00:30
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1036.40~16.04.1] (kernel)06:46
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1036.40~16.04.1]06:53
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
LocutusOfBorghello, does anybody have a clue about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unicode-data/+bug/1868242 ?09:34
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1868242 in unicode-data (Ubuntu) "[Ffe] unicode-data" [Undecided,New]09:34
Laneywhat kind of FFe is that?09:35
Laneyplease flesh it out a bit and then I can take a look09:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1015.16~18.04.1] (no packageset)09:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1015.16~18.04.1]10:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.3.0-1015.16~18.04.2] (no packageset)10:06
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-43.36~18.04.2] (kernel)10:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-43.36~18.04.2] (kernel)10:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-43.36~18.04.2] (kernel)10:10
LocutusOfBorgLaney, I'm working on it yes10:23
dokobdmurray (& sforshee): apport needs an autopkg test update for some kernel packaging reorganisation11:07
kanashirotumbleweed, great, and yes, I need sponsorship. Do you want to do it for me? Otherwise I can find someone else11:30
dokoLocutusOfBorg: frama-c is missing in the coq removal issue11:34
dokowhich needs adjustment of creduce's build deps11:35
dokokanashiro: which packages need syncs?11:38
kanashirodoko, I just filed 2 sync requests: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868250 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18682511:38
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1868250 in Ubuntu "Sync ruby-ffi-libarchive 1.0.0+-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New]11:38
ubot5Ubuntu bug 186825 in Checkbox "Command line options should support --delay" [Critical,Fix released]11:38
kanashiroruby-ffi-libarchive and ruby-train11:39
kanashirothose are new packages11:39
kanashirothe rest is here in the bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chef/+bug/186818711:39
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1868187 in chef (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Sync version 15.8.25.3.gcf41df6a2-6 from Debian unstable" [Medium,Confirmed]11:39
kanashirosorry, I linked the wrong bug for ruby-train, this is the right one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186825111:40
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1868251 in Ubuntu "Sync ruby-train 3.2.20-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New]11:40
kanashirodoko, could you handle those uploads for me? Or do I need to find someone else?11:44
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-ffi-libarchive (focal-proposed/primary) [1.0.0+-2]11:57
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-ffi-libarchive [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0.0+-2]12:04
dokosyncpackage takes ages12:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-ffi-libarchive [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.0.0+-2] (no packageset)12:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-ffi-libarchive [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.0.0+-2]12:08
kanashirodoko about the existent packages please start with ruby-mixlib-log12:08
kanashirosome other packages depend on it12:09
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-train [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.2.20-2] (no packageset)12:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-train [amd64] (focal-proposed) [3.2.20-2]12:11
dokokanashiro: synced12:27
kanashirodoko, you mean the 2 new packages, right?12:28
dokoplus ruby-mixlib-log12:29
dokosforshee, apw: there are bug reports like https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-defaults/+bug/1868169.  I assume that will only change once kernels and drivers are rebuilt with 7.5?  who would take care about that?12:35
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1868169 in gcc-defaults (Ubuntu) "Cannot build nvidia driver via dkms because compiler doesn't match kernel" [Undecided,Confirmed]12:35
kanashirothanks doko, I can handle the other packages with rafaeldtinoco12:37
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (focal-proposed/main) [2.12.0-0ubuntu2 => 2.12.0-0ubuntu3] (core)12:46
dokokanashiro: let's continue, so that we are ready once steve is awake12:55
kanashirodoko, I am already doing it with rafaeldtinoco12:57
kanashiroit will be ready on time12:58
dokota12:59
sforsheedoko: yes, that's only fixed by having a kernel built with the same compiler version. The kernels in bionic-proposed are built with the new version, but unfortunately are not set to be released until Apr 613:24
dokosforshee: good enough for me13:25
sforsheedoko: seems that compiler version bumps ought be coordinated with the kernel team13:25
dokosforshee: dude, that has been coordinated, since the Paris sprint ... and teward as well13:26
sforsheethe worst case could be much longer with 3-week sru cycles, and having to rebuild kernels mid-cycle is not cheap13:26
tewarddoko I was poked?13:27
dokoI'm fine with waiting, so maybe we should leave some comment int the bugs13:27
dokoteward: your OK for 7.5 was not coordinated with the kernel team ;p13:28
tewardE:CONTEXTMISSING13:28
dokosforshee: otoh, I think these checks are still from the time, when major GCC releases had version bumps in the minor version. Time to fix that?13:29
sforsheedoko: perhaps, I think that specific check comes from the nvidia packages and not the kernel itself13:31
dokoteward: sorry, I meant to ping trudd13:41
tewardAll good13:50
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.183.5]14:10
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.173.17]14:11
tjaaltonrafaeldtinoco: hi, your kmod upload(s) have two changes, only one of them has a bug on lp14:15
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.8.1-1ubuntu14.4]14:18
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.5-1ubuntu16.9]14:20
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1015.16~18.04.2]14:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-43.36~18.04.2]14:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-43.36~18.04.2]14:29
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-43.36~18.04.2]14:29
rafaeldtinocotjaalton: lemme check14:30
kanashiroohai is taking so long to land in proposed14:31
dokobryce: did you already ask for the demotion of php7.3 in -proposed? php-recode still pulls it into main14:34
rafaeldtinocotjaalton: thats because without the second it FTBFS14:34
rafaeldtinocoI did not create a LP bug as it already has a debian bug and its a clean cherry-pick14:36
rafaeldtinocolet me know if you want me to change it, i thought it was documented enough14:36
rafaeldtinocothanks for reviewing it14:36
tjaaltonok, guess it's clear enough14:42
rafaeldtinocotku!14:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kmod [source] (eoan-proposed) [26-1ubuntu1.1]14:42
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kmod [source] (bionic-proposed) [24-1ubuntu3.3]14:44
LocutusOfBorgdoko, adding it14:53
bdmurraydoko: I'll take care of apport today14:57
ahasenackhi ubuntu-release, another FFe your way if you please: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/186827215:08
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1868272 in bind9 (Ubuntu) "FFe: bind9 9.16.1 update" [Undecided,New]15:08
ahasenackwere it not for one change, the FFe wouldn't be required15:08
ahasenackdoko: that's the glibc question I asked yesterday ^15:08
brycedoko, I've been working on clearing the remaining migration for php-defaults before doing that, but am not sure if that's absolutely required or not.  I can at least get the paperwork started on that.15:22
dokobryce: there's no paperwork to do. I just don't understand what is pulling that binary package into main15:23
dokoin -proposed15:23
brycedoko php-defaults?15:28
dokobryce: 73ubuntu2 drops that package ...15:32
brycedoko, hasn't finished migration yet15:34
brycedoko, it's being held back by php-horde-* and a few other things15:34
dokoyeah, and somebody demoted it. now promoting php7.3 again15:34
dokobryce: if you look at php-horde-*, please also look at php-tijsverkoyen-css-to-inline-styles15:38
dokobryce: ahh, wait, you don't need to fix the autopkg tests for php7.3, they are ignored15:39
brycedoko, I can take a look at php-tijsverkoyen-css-to-inline-styles15:40
dokobryce: no, not needed15:41
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: chef [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [15.8.25.3.gcf41df6a2-1] (no packageset)15:51
EickmeyerHey release team: I have a new FFe for you at bug 186828016:22
ubot5bug 1868280 in materia-gtk-theme (Ubuntu) "[FFe] [UIFe] Please update materia-gtk-theme to 20200320 (latest release)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186828016:22
brycedoko, regarding php-horde I think best to remove - lp: #186828116:24
ubot5Launchpad bug 1868281 in php-horde (Ubuntu) "Please remove php-horde and php-horde-* from focal" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186828116:24
tewarddoko: re: php-horde does it have any rdeps?  If not, I'd remove because orphaned.  my 2 cents17:26
dokoteward: the problem is not to remove it, but to keep it removed if debian uploads new packages. so I assume blacklisting is the way to go ...17:27
tewardyep that'd need a sync blacklist17:28
teward(same criterion because Orphaned and Removed Here)17:28
cjwatsonHm?  Packages that have been removed aren't automatically auto-synced again without a human being in the loop17:36
cjwatsonauto-sync explicitly checks for previously Deleted publications if the package isn't currently in the target series17:37
rbasakWe can just remove from the release pocket anyway, can't we?17:40
rbasakIf they later migrate from proposed then that won't be a problem?17:40
rbasak(I appreciate that technically that probably means a copy _to_ the proposed pocket before a deletion or whatevevr)17:40
dokoit will be a problem, because these are triggering autopkg tests again17:40
vorloncjwatson: I'm pretty sure I changed that behavior several years ago17:54
vorlonto explicitly move the needle on the human cost of removing never-gonna-migrate packages from -proposed that might get fixed later in Debian17:54
cjwatsonvorlon: Huh, so you did17:55
cjwatsonFair enough17:55
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: chef [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [15.8.25.3.gcf41df6a2-6] (no packageset)17:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3]18:00
LocutusOfBorgdoko, I no change rebuilt frama-c against new coq, is that enough for the removal process?19:06
LocutusOfBorghttps://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/frama-c/20191204+calcium-0ubuntu219:06
LocutusOfBorgdoko, seems frama-c is safe, because it depends on why3 without coq on the armhf and s390x archs   coq [amd64 arm64 ppc64 ppc64el sh4],19:23
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apr-util [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.6.1-4ubuntu0.1]20:24
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-keyring [source] (eoan-proposed) [18.0.1-1ubuntu1]20:31
kanashiroI have some removal requests because of ruby 2.7 transition:20:52
kanashirohttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sup-mail/+bug/186831120:52
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1868311 in sup-mail (Ubuntu) "[RM] Removal request of sup-mail/0.22.1-3 from Focal" [Undecided,New]20:52
kanashirohttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-session/+bug/186831220:53
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1868312 in ruby-session (Ubuntu) "[RM] Removal request of ruby-session/3.2.0-3 from Focal" [Undecided,New]20:53
kanashirohttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper/+bug/186831320:53
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1868313 in ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper (Ubuntu) "[RM] Removal request of ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper/2.6.2-1 from Focal" [Undecided,New]20:53
kanashirohttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-rspec-puppet/+bug/186831420:53
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1868314 in ruby-rspec-puppet (Ubuntu) "[RM] Removal request of ruby-rspec-puppet/2.7.8-1 from Focal" [Undecided,New]20:53
kanashirohttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-grape/+bug/186831820:53
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1868318 in ruby-grape (Ubuntu) "[RM] Removal request of ruby-grape/1.1.0-2 from Focal " [Undecided,New]20:53
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chef [amd64] (focal-proposed) [15.8.25.3.gcf41df6a2-1]20:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chef [amd64] (focal-proposed) [15.8.25.3.gcf41df6a2-6]20:56
kanashirovorlon, ruby-gnome autopkgtest is failing against ruby2.7 only on ppc64el, but it was failing with the same error log messages when triggered by webkit2gtk and now it is passing for webkit2gtk21:22
kanashirohere is the upstream bug: https://github.com/ruby-gnome/ruby-gnome/issues/138921:22
gitbotruby-gnome issue 1389 in ruby-gnome "load_uri(TestWebKit2GtkWebView::#load_uri) test failure with newer webkit" [Closed]21:22
kanashirocould we just badtest it?21:23
vorlonkanashiro: see changelog, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/2.28.0-1ubuntu221:23
vorlonI've already retried the test21:23
vorlonit should clear21:23
kanashiroah great, thanks21:24

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!