kanashiro | vorlon, I created this bug to request a FFe for chef: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chef/+bug/1868187 | 00:20 |
---|---|---|
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1868187 in chef (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Sync version 15.8.25.3.gcf41df6a2-6 from Debian unstable" [Undecided,New] | 00:20 |
kanashiro | let me know if more information is needed | 00:20 |
tumbleweed | kanashiro: I know the story here, so easy to approve | 00:30 |
tumbleweed | kanashiro: need sponsorship? | 00:30 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1036.40~16.04.1] (kernel) | 06:46 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1036.40~16.04.1] | 06:53 | |
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
LocutusOfBorg | hello, does anybody have a clue about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unicode-data/+bug/1868242 ? | 09:34 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1868242 in unicode-data (Ubuntu) "[Ffe] unicode-data" [Undecided,New] | 09:34 |
Laney | what kind of FFe is that? | 09:35 |
Laney | please flesh it out a bit and then I can take a look | 09:42 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1015.16~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 09:44 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1015.16~18.04.1] | 10:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.3.0-1015.16~18.04.2] (no packageset) | 10:06 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-43.36~18.04.2] (kernel) | 10:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-43.36~18.04.2] (kernel) | 10:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-43.36~18.04.2] (kernel) | 10:10 | |
LocutusOfBorg | Laney, I'm working on it yes | 10:23 |
doko | bdmurray (& sforshee): apport needs an autopkg test update for some kernel packaging reorganisation | 11:07 |
kanashiro | tumbleweed, great, and yes, I need sponsorship. Do you want to do it for me? Otherwise I can find someone else | 11:30 |
doko | LocutusOfBorg: frama-c is missing in the coq removal issue | 11:34 |
doko | which needs adjustment of creduce's build deps | 11:35 |
doko | kanashiro: which packages need syncs? | 11:38 |
kanashiro | doko, I just filed 2 sync requests: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868250 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186825 | 11:38 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1868250 in Ubuntu "Sync ruby-ffi-libarchive 1.0.0+-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] | 11:38 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 186825 in Checkbox "Command line options should support --delay" [Critical,Fix released] | 11:38 |
kanashiro | ruby-ffi-libarchive and ruby-train | 11:39 |
kanashiro | those are new packages | 11:39 |
kanashiro | the rest is here in the bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chef/+bug/1868187 | 11:39 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1868187 in chef (Ubuntu) "[FFe] Sync version 15.8.25.3.gcf41df6a2-6 from Debian unstable" [Medium,Confirmed] | 11:39 |
kanashiro | sorry, I linked the wrong bug for ruby-train, this is the right one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868251 | 11:40 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1868251 in Ubuntu "Sync ruby-train 3.2.20-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] | 11:40 |
kanashiro | doko, could you handle those uploads for me? Or do I need to find someone else? | 11:44 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-ffi-libarchive (focal-proposed/primary) [1.0.0+-2] | 11:57 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-ffi-libarchive [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0.0+-2] | 12:04 | |
doko | syncpackage takes ages | 12:07 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-ffi-libarchive [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.0.0+-2] (no packageset) | 12:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-ffi-libarchive [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.0.0+-2] | 12:08 | |
kanashiro | doko about the existent packages please start with ruby-mixlib-log | 12:08 |
kanashiro | some other packages depend on it | 12:09 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-train [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.2.20-2] (no packageset) | 12:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-train [amd64] (focal-proposed) [3.2.20-2] | 12:11 | |
doko | kanashiro: synced | 12:27 |
kanashiro | doko, you mean the 2 new packages, right? | 12:28 |
doko | plus ruby-mixlib-log | 12:29 |
doko | sforshee, apw: there are bug reports like https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-defaults/+bug/1868169. I assume that will only change once kernels and drivers are rebuilt with 7.5? who would take care about that? | 12:35 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1868169 in gcc-defaults (Ubuntu) "Cannot build nvidia driver via dkms because compiler doesn't match kernel" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 12:35 |
kanashiro | thanks doko, I can handle the other packages with rafaeldtinoco | 12:37 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (focal-proposed/main) [2.12.0-0ubuntu2 => 2.12.0-0ubuntu3] (core) | 12:46 | |
doko | kanashiro: let's continue, so that we are ready once steve is awake | 12:55 |
kanashiro | doko, I am already doing it with rafaeldtinoco | 12:57 |
kanashiro | it will be ready on time | 12:58 |
doko | ta | 12:59 |
sforshee | doko: yes, that's only fixed by having a kernel built with the same compiler version. The kernels in bionic-proposed are built with the new version, but unfortunately are not set to be released until Apr 6 | 13:24 |
doko | sforshee: good enough for me | 13:25 |
sforshee | doko: seems that compiler version bumps ought be coordinated with the kernel team | 13:25 |
doko | sforshee: dude, that has been coordinated, since the Paris sprint ... and teward as well | 13:26 |
sforshee | the worst case could be much longer with 3-week sru cycles, and having to rebuild kernels mid-cycle is not cheap | 13:26 |
teward | doko I was poked? | 13:27 |
doko | I'm fine with waiting, so maybe we should leave some comment int the bugs | 13:27 |
doko | teward: your OK for 7.5 was not coordinated with the kernel team ;p | 13:28 |
teward | E:CONTEXTMISSING | 13:28 |
doko | sforshee: otoh, I think these checks are still from the time, when major GCC releases had version bumps in the minor version. Time to fix that? | 13:29 |
sforshee | doko: perhaps, I think that specific check comes from the nvidia packages and not the kernel itself | 13:31 |
doko | teward: sorry, I meant to ping trudd | 13:41 |
teward | All good | 13:50 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.183.5] | 14:10 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.173.17] | 14:11 | |
tjaalton | rafaeldtinoco: hi, your kmod upload(s) have two changes, only one of them has a bug on lp | 14:15 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.8.1-1ubuntu14.4] | 14:18 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.5-1ubuntu16.9] | 14:20 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1015.16~18.04.2] | 14:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-43.36~18.04.2] | 14:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-43.36~18.04.2] | 14:29 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-43.36~18.04.2] | 14:29 | |
rafaeldtinoco | tjaalton: lemme check | 14:30 |
kanashiro | ohai is taking so long to land in proposed | 14:31 |
doko | bryce: did you already ask for the demotion of php7.3 in -proposed? php-recode still pulls it into main | 14:34 |
rafaeldtinoco | tjaalton: thats because without the second it FTBFS | 14:34 |
rafaeldtinoco | I did not create a LP bug as it already has a debian bug and its a clean cherry-pick | 14:36 |
rafaeldtinoco | let me know if you want me to change it, i thought it was documented enough | 14:36 |
rafaeldtinoco | thanks for reviewing it | 14:36 |
tjaalton | ok, guess it's clear enough | 14:42 |
rafaeldtinoco | tku! | 14:42 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kmod [source] (eoan-proposed) [26-1ubuntu1.1] | 14:42 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kmod [source] (bionic-proposed) [24-1ubuntu3.3] | 14:44 | |
LocutusOfBorg | doko, adding it | 14:53 |
bdmurray | doko: I'll take care of apport today | 14:57 |
ahasenack | hi ubuntu-release, another FFe your way if you please: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1868272 | 15:08 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1868272 in bind9 (Ubuntu) "FFe: bind9 9.16.1 update" [Undecided,New] | 15:08 |
ahasenack | were it not for one change, the FFe wouldn't be required | 15:08 |
ahasenack | doko: that's the glibc question I asked yesterday ^ | 15:08 |
bryce | doko, I've been working on clearing the remaining migration for php-defaults before doing that, but am not sure if that's absolutely required or not. I can at least get the paperwork started on that. | 15:22 |
doko | bryce: there's no paperwork to do. I just don't understand what is pulling that binary package into main | 15:23 |
doko | in -proposed | 15:23 |
bryce | doko php-defaults? | 15:28 |
doko | bryce: 73ubuntu2 drops that package ... | 15:32 |
bryce | doko, hasn't finished migration yet | 15:34 |
bryce | doko, it's being held back by php-horde-* and a few other things | 15:34 |
doko | yeah, and somebody demoted it. now promoting php7.3 again | 15:34 |
doko | bryce: if you look at php-horde-*, please also look at php-tijsverkoyen-css-to-inline-styles | 15:38 |
doko | bryce: ahh, wait, you don't need to fix the autopkg tests for php7.3, they are ignored | 15:39 |
bryce | doko, I can take a look at php-tijsverkoyen-css-to-inline-styles | 15:40 |
doko | bryce: no, not needed | 15:41 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: chef [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [15.8.25.3.gcf41df6a2-1] (no packageset) | 15:51 | |
Eickmeyer | Hey release team: I have a new FFe for you at bug 1868280 | 16:22 |
ubot5 | bug 1868280 in materia-gtk-theme (Ubuntu) "[FFe] [UIFe] Please update materia-gtk-theme to 20200320 (latest release)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1868280 | 16:22 |
bryce | doko, regarding php-horde I think best to remove - lp: #1868281 | 16:24 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1868281 in php-horde (Ubuntu) "Please remove php-horde and php-horde-* from focal" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1868281 | 16:24 |
teward | doko: re: php-horde does it have any rdeps? If not, I'd remove because orphaned. my 2 cents | 17:26 |
doko | teward: the problem is not to remove it, but to keep it removed if debian uploads new packages. so I assume blacklisting is the way to go ... | 17:27 |
teward | yep that'd need a sync blacklist | 17:28 |
teward | (same criterion because Orphaned and Removed Here) | 17:28 |
cjwatson | Hm? Packages that have been removed aren't automatically auto-synced again without a human being in the loop | 17:36 |
cjwatson | auto-sync explicitly checks for previously Deleted publications if the package isn't currently in the target series | 17:37 |
rbasak | We can just remove from the release pocket anyway, can't we? | 17:40 |
rbasak | If they later migrate from proposed then that won't be a problem? | 17:40 |
rbasak | (I appreciate that technically that probably means a copy _to_ the proposed pocket before a deletion or whatevevr) | 17:40 |
doko | it will be a problem, because these are triggering autopkg tests again | 17:40 |
vorlon | cjwatson: I'm pretty sure I changed that behavior several years ago | 17:54 |
vorlon | to explicitly move the needle on the human cost of removing never-gonna-migrate packages from -proposed that might get fixed later in Debian | 17:54 |
cjwatson | vorlon: Huh, so you did | 17:55 |
cjwatson | Fair enough | 17:55 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: chef [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [15.8.25.3.gcf41df6a2-6] (no packageset) | 17:58 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3] | 18:00 | |
LocutusOfBorg | doko, I no change rebuilt frama-c against new coq, is that enough for the removal process? | 19:06 |
LocutusOfBorg | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/frama-c/20191204+calcium-0ubuntu2 | 19:06 |
LocutusOfBorg | doko, seems frama-c is safe, because it depends on why3 without coq on the armhf and s390x archs coq [amd64 arm64 ppc64 ppc64el sh4], | 19:23 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apr-util [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.6.1-4ubuntu0.1] | 20:24 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-keyring [source] (eoan-proposed) [18.0.1-1ubuntu1] | 20:31 | |
kanashiro | I have some removal requests because of ruby 2.7 transition: | 20:52 |
kanashiro | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sup-mail/+bug/1868311 | 20:52 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1868311 in sup-mail (Ubuntu) "[RM] Removal request of sup-mail/0.22.1-3 from Focal" [Undecided,New] | 20:52 |
kanashiro | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-session/+bug/1868312 | 20:53 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1868312 in ruby-session (Ubuntu) "[RM] Removal request of ruby-session/3.2.0-3 from Focal" [Undecided,New] | 20:53 |
kanashiro | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper/+bug/1868313 | 20:53 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1868313 in ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper (Ubuntu) "[RM] Removal request of ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper/2.6.2-1 from Focal" [Undecided,New] | 20:53 |
kanashiro | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-rspec-puppet/+bug/1868314 | 20:53 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1868314 in ruby-rspec-puppet (Ubuntu) "[RM] Removal request of ruby-rspec-puppet/2.7.8-1 from Focal" [Undecided,New] | 20:53 |
kanashiro | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-grape/+bug/1868318 | 20:53 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1868318 in ruby-grape (Ubuntu) "[RM] Removal request of ruby-grape/1.1.0-2 from Focal " [Undecided,New] | 20:53 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chef [amd64] (focal-proposed) [15.8.25.3.gcf41df6a2-1] | 20:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chef [amd64] (focal-proposed) [15.8.25.3.gcf41df6a2-6] | 20:56 | |
kanashiro | vorlon, ruby-gnome autopkgtest is failing against ruby2.7 only on ppc64el, but it was failing with the same error log messages when triggered by webkit2gtk and now it is passing for webkit2gtk | 21:22 |
kanashiro | here is the upstream bug: https://github.com/ruby-gnome/ruby-gnome/issues/1389 | 21:22 |
gitbot | ruby-gnome issue 1389 in ruby-gnome "load_uri(TestWebKit2GtkWebView::#load_uri) test failure with newer webkit" [Closed] | 21:22 |
kanashiro | could we just badtest it? | 21:23 |
vorlon | kanashiro: see changelog, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/2.28.0-1ubuntu2 | 21:23 |
vorlon | I've already retried the test | 21:23 |
vorlon | it should clear | 21:23 |
kanashiro | ah great, thanks | 21:24 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!