[00:20] <kanashiro> vorlon, I created this bug to request a FFe for chef: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chef/+bug/1868187
[00:20] <kanashiro> let me know if more information is needed
[00:30] <tumbleweed> kanashiro: I know the story here, so easy to approve
[00:30] <tumbleweed> kanashiro: need sponsorship?
[06:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1036.40~16.04.1] (kernel)
[06:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1036.40~16.04.1]
[09:34] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, does anybody have a clue about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unicode-data/+bug/1868242 ?
[09:35] <Laney> what kind of FFe is that?
[09:42] <Laney> please flesh it out a bit and then I can take a look
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1015.16~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1015.16~18.04.1]
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.3.0-1015.16~18.04.2] (no packageset)
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-43.36~18.04.2] (kernel)
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-43.36~18.04.2] (kernel)
[10:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-43.36~18.04.2] (kernel)
[10:23] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, I'm working on it yes
[11:07] <doko> bdmurray (& sforshee): apport needs an autopkg test update for some kernel packaging reorganisation
[11:30] <kanashiro> tumbleweed, great, and yes, I need sponsorship. Do you want to do it for me? Otherwise I can find someone else
[11:34] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: frama-c is missing in the coq removal issue
[11:35] <doko> which needs adjustment of creduce's build deps
[11:38] <doko> kanashiro: which packages need syncs?
[11:38] <kanashiro> doko, I just filed 2 sync requests: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868250 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186825
[11:39] <kanashiro> ruby-ffi-libarchive and ruby-train
[11:39] <kanashiro> those are new packages
[11:39] <kanashiro> the rest is here in the bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chef/+bug/1868187
[11:40] <kanashiro> sorry, I linked the wrong bug for ruby-train, this is the right one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868251
[11:44] <kanashiro> doko, could you handle those uploads for me? Or do I need to find someone else?
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: ruby-ffi-libarchive (focal-proposed/primary) [1.0.0+-2]
[12:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-ffi-libarchive [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0.0+-2]
[12:07] <doko> syncpackage takes ages
[12:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-ffi-libarchive [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.0.0+-2] (no packageset)
[12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-ffi-libarchive [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.0.0+-2]
[12:08] <kanashiro> doko about the existent packages please start with ruby-mixlib-log
[12:09] <kanashiro> some other packages depend on it
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-train [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.2.20-2] (no packageset)
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-train [amd64] (focal-proposed) [3.2.20-2]
[12:27] <doko> kanashiro: synced
[12:28] <kanashiro> doko, you mean the 2 new packages, right?
[12:29] <doko> plus ruby-mixlib-log
[12:35] <doko> sforshee, apw: there are bug reports like https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-defaults/+bug/1868169.  I assume that will only change once kernels and drivers are rebuilt with 7.5?  who would take care about that?
[12:37] <kanashiro> thanks doko, I can handle the other packages with rafaeldtinoco
[12:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (focal-proposed/main) [2.12.0-0ubuntu2 => 2.12.0-0ubuntu3] (core)
[12:55] <doko> kanashiro: let's continue, so that we are ready once steve is awake
[12:57] <kanashiro> doko, I am already doing it with rafaeldtinoco
[12:58] <kanashiro> it will be ready on time
[12:59] <doko> ta
[13:24] <sforshee> doko: yes, that's only fixed by having a kernel built with the same compiler version. The kernels in bionic-proposed are built with the new version, but unfortunately are not set to be released until Apr 6
[13:25] <doko> sforshee: good enough for me
[13:25] <sforshee> doko: seems that compiler version bumps ought be coordinated with the kernel team
[13:26] <doko> sforshee: dude, that has been coordinated, since the Paris sprint ... and teward as well
[13:26] <sforshee> the worst case could be much longer with 3-week sru cycles, and having to rebuild kernels mid-cycle is not cheap
[13:27] <teward> doko I was poked?
[13:27] <doko> I'm fine with waiting, so maybe we should leave some comment int the bugs
[13:28] <doko> teward: your OK for 7.5 was not coordinated with the kernel team ;p
[13:28] <teward> E:CONTEXTMISSING
[13:29] <doko> sforshee: otoh, I think these checks are still from the time, when major GCC releases had version bumps in the minor version. Time to fix that?
[13:31] <sforshee> doko: perhaps, I think that specific check comes from the nvidia packages and not the kernel itself
[13:41] <doko> teward: sorry, I meant to ping trudd
[13:50] <teward> All good
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.183.5]
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.173.17]
[14:15] <tjaalton> rafaeldtinoco: hi, your kmod upload(s) have two changes, only one of them has a bug on lp
[14:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (eoan-proposed) [0.8.1-1ubuntu14.4]
[14:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.5-1ubuntu16.9]
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1015.16~18.04.2]
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-43.36~18.04.2]
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-43.36~18.04.2]
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-43.36~18.04.2]
[14:30] <rafaeldtinoco> tjaalton: lemme check
[14:31] <kanashiro> ohai is taking so long to land in proposed
[14:34] <doko> bryce: did you already ask for the demotion of php7.3 in -proposed? php-recode still pulls it into main
[14:34] <rafaeldtinoco> tjaalton: thats because without the second it FTBFS
[14:36] <rafaeldtinoco> I did not create a LP bug as it already has a debian bug and its a clean cherry-pick
[14:36] <rafaeldtinoco> let me know if you want me to change it, i thought it was documented enough
[14:36] <rafaeldtinoco> thanks for reviewing it
[14:42] <tjaalton> ok, guess it's clear enough
[14:42] <rafaeldtinoco> tku!
[14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kmod [source] (eoan-proposed) [26-1ubuntu1.1]
[14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kmod [source] (bionic-proposed) [24-1ubuntu3.3]
[14:53] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, adding it
[14:57] <bdmurray> doko: I'll take care of apport today
[15:08] <ahasenack> hi ubuntu-release, another FFe your way if you please: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1868272
[15:08] <ahasenack> were it not for one change, the FFe wouldn't be required
[15:08] <ahasenack> doko: that's the glibc question I asked yesterday ^
[15:22] <bryce> doko, I've been working on clearing the remaining migration for php-defaults before doing that, but am not sure if that's absolutely required or not.  I can at least get the paperwork started on that.
[15:23] <doko> bryce: there's no paperwork to do. I just don't understand what is pulling that binary package into main
[15:23] <doko> in -proposed
[15:28] <bryce> doko php-defaults?
[15:32] <doko> bryce: 73ubuntu2 drops that package ...
[15:34] <bryce> doko, hasn't finished migration yet
[15:34] <bryce> doko, it's being held back by php-horde-* and a few other things
[15:34] <doko> yeah, and somebody demoted it. now promoting php7.3 again
[15:38] <doko> bryce: if you look at php-horde-*, please also look at php-tijsverkoyen-css-to-inline-styles
[15:39] <doko> bryce: ahh, wait, you don't need to fix the autopkg tests for php7.3, they are ignored
[15:40] <bryce> doko, I can take a look at php-tijsverkoyen-css-to-inline-styles
[15:41] <doko> bryce: no, not needed
[15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: chef [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [15.8.25.3.gcf41df6a2-1] (no packageset)
[16:22] <Eickmeyer> Hey release team: I have a new FFe for you at bug 1868280
[16:24] <bryce> doko, regarding php-horde I think best to remove - lp: #1868281
[17:26] <teward> doko: re: php-horde does it have any rdeps?  If not, I'd remove because orphaned.  my 2 cents
[17:27] <doko> teward: the problem is not to remove it, but to keep it removed if debian uploads new packages. so I assume blacklisting is the way to go ...
[17:28] <teward> yep that'd need a sync blacklist
[17:28] <teward> (same criterion because Orphaned and Removed Here)
[17:36] <cjwatson> Hm?  Packages that have been removed aren't automatically auto-synced again without a human being in the loop
[17:37] <cjwatson> auto-sync explicitly checks for previously Deleted publications if the package isn't currently in the target series
[17:40] <rbasak> We can just remove from the release pocket anyway, can't we?
[17:40] <rbasak> If they later migrate from proposed then that won't be a problem?
[17:40] <rbasak> (I appreciate that technically that probably means a copy _to_ the proposed pocket before a deletion or whatevevr)
[17:40] <doko> it will be a problem, because these are triggering autopkg tests again
[17:54] <vorlon> cjwatson: I'm pretty sure I changed that behavior several years ago
[17:54] <vorlon> to explicitly move the needle on the human cost of removing never-gonna-migrate packages from -proposed that might get fixed later in Debian
[17:55] <cjwatson> vorlon: Huh, so you did
[17:55] <cjwatson> Fair enough
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: chef [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [15.8.25.3.gcf41df6a2-6] (no packageset)
[18:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.12.0-0ubuntu3]
[19:06] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, I no change rebuilt frama-c against new coq, is that enough for the removal process?
[19:06] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/frama-c/20191204+calcium-0ubuntu2
[19:23] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, seems frama-c is safe, because it depends on why3 without coq on the armhf and s390x archs   coq [amd64 arm64 ppc64 ppc64el sh4],
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apr-util [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.6.1-4ubuntu0.1]
[20:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-keyring [source] (eoan-proposed) [18.0.1-1ubuntu1]
[20:52] <kanashiro> I have some removal requests because of ruby 2.7 transition:
[20:52] <kanashiro> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sup-mail/+bug/1868311
[20:53] <kanashiro> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-session/+bug/1868312
[20:53] <kanashiro> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper/+bug/1868313
[20:53] <kanashiro> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-rspec-puppet/+bug/1868314
[20:53] <kanashiro> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-grape/+bug/1868318
[20:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chef [amd64] (focal-proposed) [15.8.25.3.gcf41df6a2-1]
[20:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chef [amd64] (focal-proposed) [15.8.25.3.gcf41df6a2-6]
[21:22] <kanashiro> vorlon, ruby-gnome autopkgtest is failing against ruby2.7 only on ppc64el, but it was failing with the same error log messages when triggered by webkit2gtk and now it is passing for webkit2gtk
[21:22] <kanashiro> here is the upstream bug: https://github.com/ruby-gnome/ruby-gnome/issues/1389
[21:22] <gitbot> ruby-gnome issue 1389 in ruby-gnome "load_uri(TestWebKit2GtkWebView::#load_uri) test failure with newer webkit" [Closed]
[21:23] <kanashiro> could we just badtest it?
[21:23] <vorlon> kanashiro: see changelog, https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/2.28.0-1ubuntu2
[21:23] <vorlon> I've already retried the test
[21:23] <vorlon> it should clear
[21:24] <kanashiro> ah great, thanks