/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2020/03/23/#ubuntu-release.txt

=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
cpaelzermigth I ask a SRU team member for https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-xenial-pg-update-march-2020/+merge/38081106:18
cpaelzerthat is the only one holding back a xenial update for postgres06:18
cpaelzerwell it might hold up more than that, but of that I know06:18
LocutusOfBorghello seb128 libhandy sync?09:37
seb128LocutusOfBorg, hey, feel free if you want?09:37
LocutusOfBorgack! I wanted to check the diff with you before09:43
LocutusOfBorgI see your changes merged differently in debian09:43
LocutusOfBorglets see if autopkgtests are green09:46
* Laney eyes icu and eveything a bit10:52
jamespageplease can the ceph 14.2.7 updates in eoan UNAPPROVED be rejected - 14.2.8 has been out a while now so not worth putting users through two sets of updates11:19
rbalintLaney, could you please eye LP: #1868500, too for systemd? :-)11:30
ubot5Launchpad bug 1868500 in golang-github-prometheus-client-golang (Ubuntu) "Please remove binaries for 0.9.2-0ubuntu3" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186850011:30
Laneyrbalint: would love to, but not in ubuntu-archive11:31
Laney:'(!11:31
rbalintah, my bad, doko then?11:31
sil2100jamespage: done11:55
sil2100rbalint: I guess I could take a look11:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ceph [source] (eoan-proposed) [14.2.7-0ubuntu0.19.10.1]11:56
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ceph [source] (eoan-proposed) [14.2.7-0ubuntu0.19.10.1]11:56
jamespagesil2100: ta11:57
rbalintsil2100, thanks, please!12:00
Laneywhy does this node-chokidar test work when I run it manually but not when it's triggered by the worker :(12:23
Laneyeven from the same machine12:25
sil2100rbalint: commented on the bug with a question, if you could take a look12:36
rbalintsil2100, thanks, checking12:46
ahasenackhi release team, I'd like to update bind9 to 9.16.1 (from 9.16.0), here is the FFe bug with details on what changed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/186827213:08
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1868272 in bind9 (Ubuntu) "FFe: bind9 9.16.1 update" [Undecided,New]13:08
coreycbhello release team, I'd like to upload python-decorator 4.4.2 (currently 4.3.0). it's mostly bug fixes with one slight new feature that is backward-compatible. here's the delta of commits: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/nkGmDRxjkF/  -- the new version is needed by new versions of python-openstacksdk13:54
stgrabercan an ubuntu-release team member look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxcfs/+bug/1867541 please?14:02
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1867541 in lxcfs (Ubuntu) "[FFe] LXCFS 4.0 LTS" [Undecided,New]14:02
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: pydrive (focal-proposed/primary) [1.3.1-0ubuntu1]14:25
rbalintLaney, could you please check the systemd hint review again?14:47
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libinih [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [48-1] (no packageset)15:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libinih [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [48-1] (no packageset)15:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libinih [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [48-1] (no packageset)15:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libinih [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [48-1] (no packageset)15:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libinih [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [48-1] (no packageset)15:11
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinih [amd64] (focal-proposed) [48-1]15:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinih [armhf] (focal-proposed) [48-1]15:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinih [s390x] (focal-proposed) [48-1]15:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinih [arm64] (focal-proposed) [48-1]15:17
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinih [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [48-1]15:17
mfosil2100, hey Lukasz.  If you still have a chance (sorry, I see it's almost 5PM there) the util-linux SRU for bionic has a autopkgtest regression failure on mysql-5.7 that's unrelated to the upload (confirmed by running w/ the version in the updates pocket), so if it's at all possible to release it based on that info, or maybe later this week, that would be nice :)  thanks!15:32
=== siqueira_ is now known as siqueira
sil2100mfo: hey! I have a few meetings right now, but I'll look into that once I'm done with those ;)15:57
=== lool- is now known as lool
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-hibinit-agent (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.0-0ubuntu4~18.04.3 => 1.0.0-0ubuntu4~18.04.4] (no packageset)16:14
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-hibinit-agent (eoan-proposed/main) [1.0.0-0ubuntu7 => 1.0.0-0ubuntu7.1] (no packageset)16:15
rbalintsil2100, could you please take a look at these, too? ^16:24
EickmeyerHello all. I have a bug 1868280 opened, and teward and I would like some clarification since there seems to be some disagreement from other flavor leads about whether or not a simple theme update even needs a UIFe/FFe since it doesn't contain significant color changes.16:26
ubot5bug 1868280 in materia-gtk-theme (Ubuntu) "[FFe] [UIFe] Please update materia-gtk-theme to 20200320 (latest release)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186828016:26
mfosil2100, ack, thanks!16:36
EickmeyerSo, if we can get that one question answered, whether or not we even need that FFe/UIFe bug, then that would be nice. It'd be something we can simply take off of the release team's plate.16:37
tewardLaney: sil2100: ^ re: materia-gtk-theme if one of you gets a minute16:40
teward(you were both around recently, hence the ping)16:40
dannfdoes enabling the build of a new utility from a source package require an FFe (adds lib deps)? i filed one at LP: #1868174 in case it does16:49
ubot5Launchpad bug 1868174 in mstflint (Ubuntu) "[FFe] mstflint: enable mstreg command" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/186817416:49
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ceph [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [15.1.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)17:05
sil2100Eickmeyer, teward: I'll try looking into that today or tomorrow straight in the morning o/17:16
Eickmeyersil2100: The question is even if the FFe/UIFe bug is even necessary. There seem to be some disagreements.17:17
ahasenackhi release team, python-geoip2 mir is done (https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.html), task is marked "in progress" but there is nothing else to do on my side17:19
ahasenackvorlon`: that was part of that seed change17:19
ahasenack"that seed change" = https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/+merge/38054717:20
LaneyEickmeyer: If you have a documentation team then you should consult with them. Otherwise, don't bother imho17:20
Laneyrbalint: Sorry, missed your message, will try to look if possible today17:21
EickmeyerLaney: Yeah, there's no documentation changes whatsoever on that one.17:21
Eickmeyerteward: ^17:21
tewardack17:22
tewardLaney: so JFDI then?17:22
LaneyEickmeyer: It doesn't mean 'there is no documentation in the change'.17:24
LaneyIt means that the change doesn't affect the documentation, i.e. if there are screenshots then they would be broken.17:24
EickmeyerLaney: No screenshots are broken by this change.17:26
LaneyYou don't have to answer me on this change, I'm giving you the toolbox to answer for yourself. :-)17:27
EickmeyerOk, cool.17:27
EickmeyerThis does remind me, though, that I need to start working on release notes. ;P17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ec2-hibinit-agent [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu7.1]17:28
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ec2-hibinit-agent [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu4~18.04.4]17:29
EickmeyerLaney: so, to reiterate teward's question: JFDI?17:38
LaneyYou can do if you decide it doesn't need an exception17:40
EickmeyerLaney: Thanks.17:41
tewardLaney: we JFDI and uploaded, it's been accepted and is being processed.18:01
tewardthanks for peeking at it :)18:01
tewardOH I need to bother you on other things too :P)18:01
tewardbut that can wait until post-release18:01
ahasenackhi release team, I'd like to update bind9 to 9.16.1 (from 9.16.0), here is the FFe bug with details on what changed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/186827218:58
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1868272 in bind9 (Ubuntu) "FFe: bind9 9.16.1 update" [Undecided,New]18:58
ahasenacksil2100: ^ if you can19:04
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer
cpaelzeran SRU member around to consider merging https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-xenial-pg-update-march-2020/+merge/380811 ?19:57
ahasenackstgraber: could you perhaps please take a look at the bind9 ffe above?20:13
stgraberahasenack: yeah, will take a look. You don't have anyone on the server team who's on the release team do you? I'd have some FFEs to trade :)20:14
ahasenackhah, there's a thought20:14
ahasenackwhat are the requisites?20:14
ahasenackwe have MIR, SRU20:14
ahasenacknot release20:14
brycestgraber, josh mentioned you were available to help with removing php-horde-*?  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php-horde/+bug/1868281  Steve made good progress Friday but it's a long list of packages.20:15
ubot5Ubuntu bug 1868281 in php-horde (Ubuntu) "Please remove php-horde and php-horde-* from focal" [Undecided,New]20:15
brycestgraber, I am trying to rework my list to just the php-horde items needed to unblock php-defaults, but the whole php-horde-* stack will need to go eventually20:16
stgraberahasenack: granted20:16
ahasenackstgraber: as is, without reverting upstream's decision on those pthread locks?20:16
ahasenackfwiw debian took the same route20:17
stgraberahasenack: right, focal has the needed glibc bits, so no need to undo upstream's change20:17
ahasenackcool, thanks20:17
stgraberand I'm not super fond of random userspace having their own implementation of bits like that :)20:17
ahasenackthat's so true20:17
ahasenackI watched a bind9 presentation the other day, where they were talking about this development cycle20:17
ahasenackand "code cruft"20:17
ahasenackthey had many things implemented by themselves, because early OSs didn't have the features they needed20:18
ahasenackthink, I don't know, vax/vms20:18
ahasenackold solaris, that kind of stuff20:18
ahasenackand they took this 9.16 cycle to start to get rid of that20:18
stgraberbryce: if you can comment with the list of packages that still need to go away, that'd be helpful20:18
brycestgraber, ok will do20:20
brycestgraber, I've posted the updated dependency tree of all php-horde-* packages.20:42
brycestgraber, I'm working on identifying the specific priorities to remove, that should let php-defaults migrate, but the dependency tree is a bit tricky.20:43
mwhudsonuh should our autopkgtest infra set all of http_proxy, HTTP_PROXY, no_proxy, NO_PROXY etc etc20:43
stgraberbryce: that's a lot of packages :)20:45
brycestgraber, indeed :-/20:47
brycelike I said, I'm working on making a narrower list but the dependency network is pretty thick20:47
brycestgraber, also I think there might be a bit of circular dependency with php-horde itself20:48
stgraberbryce: since the goal is to remove php-horde and php-horde-* I'm currently checking whether there are any rdepends or r-build-depends outside of that set20:48
stgraberbryce: if not, I'd just nuke the entire set20:48
brycestgraber, that would be great20:48
bryceI haven't spotted anything outside this set20:49
stgraberwhat we don't want is to cause breakage outside of php-horde* but if there's nothing outside of those that rdepends or build-depends on it, then it should be fine20:49
bryceright20:49
stgraberjust running a loop of reverse-depends and reverse-depends -b to make sure20:49
stgraberyeah, nothing outside of that set is going to break20:51
stgraberbryce: and you've confirmed that this is all the php-horde-* packages?20:51
brycestgraber, correct20:51
stgraberbryce: all in the release pocket or are there some that need nuking from proposed too?20:52
brycestgraber, I believe php-horde-* only has stuff in released, but I wouldn't swear by it.20:54
brycelooking...20:54
stgrabernuking from release pocket now20:54
brycephp-horde-image is in proposed20:55
stgraberah, will need to do a special run for that one then20:55
brycealso php-horde-icalendar20:56
brycethose two are only ones I'm spotting on update_excuses.html20:57
stgraberyeah, the package index agrees with that20:58
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-dev-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.175~18.04.1]21:45
brycestgraber, thanks :-)22:02
stgrabernp, I just hope I didn't break anything :) getting a bit rusty22:03
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1017.18] (core, kernel)23:07
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1017.18~18.04.1] (no packageset)23:08
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1077.87] (kernel)23:08

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!