=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
cpaelzer | migth I ask a SRU team member for https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-xenial-pg-update-march-2020/+merge/380811 | 06:18 |
---|---|---|
cpaelzer | that is the only one holding back a xenial update for postgres | 06:18 |
cpaelzer | well it might hold up more than that, but of that I know | 06:18 |
LocutusOfBorg | hello seb128 libhandy sync? | 09:37 |
seb128 | LocutusOfBorg, hey, feel free if you want? | 09:37 |
LocutusOfBorg | ack! I wanted to check the diff with you before | 09:43 |
LocutusOfBorg | I see your changes merged differently in debian | 09:43 |
LocutusOfBorg | lets see if autopkgtests are green | 09:46 |
* Laney eyes icu and eveything a bit | 10:52 | |
jamespage | please can the ceph 14.2.7 updates in eoan UNAPPROVED be rejected - 14.2.8 has been out a while now so not worth putting users through two sets of updates | 11:19 |
rbalint | Laney, could you please eye LP: #1868500, too for systemd? :-) | 11:30 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1868500 in golang-github-prometheus-client-golang (Ubuntu) "Please remove binaries for 0.9.2-0ubuntu3" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1868500 | 11:30 |
Laney | rbalint: would love to, but not in ubuntu-archive | 11:31 |
Laney | :'(! | 11:31 |
rbalint | ah, my bad, doko then? | 11:31 |
sil2100 | jamespage: done | 11:55 |
sil2100 | rbalint: I guess I could take a look | 11:56 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ceph [source] (eoan-proposed) [14.2.7-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] | 11:56 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ceph [source] (eoan-proposed) [14.2.7-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] | 11:56 | |
jamespage | sil2100: ta | 11:57 |
rbalint | sil2100, thanks, please! | 12:00 |
Laney | why does this node-chokidar test work when I run it manually but not when it's triggered by the worker :( | 12:23 |
Laney | even from the same machine | 12:25 |
sil2100 | rbalint: commented on the bug with a question, if you could take a look | 12:36 |
rbalint | sil2100, thanks, checking | 12:46 |
ahasenack | hi release team, I'd like to update bind9 to 9.16.1 (from 9.16.0), here is the FFe bug with details on what changed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1868272 | 13:08 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1868272 in bind9 (Ubuntu) "FFe: bind9 9.16.1 update" [Undecided,New] | 13:08 |
coreycb | hello release team, I'd like to upload python-decorator 4.4.2 (currently 4.3.0). it's mostly bug fixes with one slight new feature that is backward-compatible. here's the delta of commits: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/nkGmDRxjkF/ -- the new version is needed by new versions of python-openstacksdk | 13:54 |
stgraber | can an ubuntu-release team member look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxcfs/+bug/1867541 please? | 14:02 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1867541 in lxcfs (Ubuntu) "[FFe] LXCFS 4.0 LTS" [Undecided,New] | 14:02 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: pydrive (focal-proposed/primary) [1.3.1-0ubuntu1] | 14:25 | |
rbalint | Laney, could you please check the systemd hint review again? | 14:47 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libinih [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [48-1] (no packageset) | 15:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libinih [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [48-1] (no packageset) | 15:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libinih [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [48-1] (no packageset) | 15:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libinih [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [48-1] (no packageset) | 15:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libinih [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [48-1] (no packageset) | 15:11 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinih [amd64] (focal-proposed) [48-1] | 15:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinih [armhf] (focal-proposed) [48-1] | 15:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinih [s390x] (focal-proposed) [48-1] | 15:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinih [arm64] (focal-proposed) [48-1] | 15:17 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libinih [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [48-1] | 15:17 | |
mfo | sil2100, hey Lukasz. If you still have a chance (sorry, I see it's almost 5PM there) the util-linux SRU for bionic has a autopkgtest regression failure on mysql-5.7 that's unrelated to the upload (confirmed by running w/ the version in the updates pocket), so if it's at all possible to release it based on that info, or maybe later this week, that would be nice :) thanks! | 15:32 |
=== siqueira_ is now known as siqueira | ||
sil2100 | mfo: hey! I have a few meetings right now, but I'll look into that once I'm done with those ;) | 15:57 |
=== lool- is now known as lool | ||
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-hibinit-agent (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.0-0ubuntu4~18.04.3 => 1.0.0-0ubuntu4~18.04.4] (no packageset) | 16:14 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ec2-hibinit-agent (eoan-proposed/main) [1.0.0-0ubuntu7 => 1.0.0-0ubuntu7.1] (no packageset) | 16:15 | |
rbalint | sil2100, could you please take a look at these, too? ^ | 16:24 |
Eickmeyer | Hello all. I have a bug 1868280 opened, and teward and I would like some clarification since there seems to be some disagreement from other flavor leads about whether or not a simple theme update even needs a UIFe/FFe since it doesn't contain significant color changes. | 16:26 |
ubot5 | bug 1868280 in materia-gtk-theme (Ubuntu) "[FFe] [UIFe] Please update materia-gtk-theme to 20200320 (latest release)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1868280 | 16:26 |
mfo | sil2100, ack, thanks! | 16:36 |
Eickmeyer | So, if we can get that one question answered, whether or not we even need that FFe/UIFe bug, then that would be nice. It'd be something we can simply take off of the release team's plate. | 16:37 |
teward | Laney: sil2100: ^ re: materia-gtk-theme if one of you gets a minute | 16:40 |
teward | (you were both around recently, hence the ping) | 16:40 |
dannf | does enabling the build of a new utility from a source package require an FFe (adds lib deps)? i filed one at LP: #1868174 in case it does | 16:49 |
ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1868174 in mstflint (Ubuntu) "[FFe] mstflint: enable mstreg command" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1868174 | 16:49 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ceph [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [15.1.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 17:05 | |
sil2100 | Eickmeyer, teward: I'll try looking into that today or tomorrow straight in the morning o/ | 17:16 |
Eickmeyer | sil2100: The question is even if the FFe/UIFe bug is even necessary. There seem to be some disagreements. | 17:17 |
ahasenack | hi release team, python-geoip2 mir is done (https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.html), task is marked "in progress" but there is nothing else to do on my side | 17:19 |
ahasenack | vorlon`: that was part of that seed change | 17:19 |
ahasenack | "that seed change" = https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/+merge/380547 | 17:20 |
Laney | Eickmeyer: If you have a documentation team then you should consult with them. Otherwise, don't bother imho | 17:20 |
Laney | rbalint: Sorry, missed your message, will try to look if possible today | 17:21 |
Eickmeyer | Laney: Yeah, there's no documentation changes whatsoever on that one. | 17:21 |
Eickmeyer | teward: ^ | 17:21 |
teward | ack | 17:22 |
teward | Laney: so JFDI then? | 17:22 |
Laney | Eickmeyer: It doesn't mean 'there is no documentation in the change'. | 17:24 |
Laney | It means that the change doesn't affect the documentation, i.e. if there are screenshots then they would be broken. | 17:24 |
Eickmeyer | Laney: No screenshots are broken by this change. | 17:26 |
Laney | You don't have to answer me on this change, I'm giving you the toolbox to answer for yourself. :-) | 17:27 |
Eickmeyer | Ok, cool. | 17:27 |
Eickmeyer | This does remind me, though, that I need to start working on release notes. ;P | 17:28 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ec2-hibinit-agent [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu7.1] | 17:28 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ec2-hibinit-agent [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu4~18.04.4] | 17:29 | |
Eickmeyer | Laney: so, to reiterate teward's question: JFDI? | 17:38 |
Laney | You can do if you decide it doesn't need an exception | 17:40 |
Eickmeyer | Laney: Thanks. | 17:41 |
teward | Laney: we JFDI and uploaded, it's been accepted and is being processed. | 18:01 |
teward | thanks for peeking at it :) | 18:01 |
teward | OH I need to bother you on other things too :P) | 18:01 |
teward | but that can wait until post-release | 18:01 |
ahasenack | hi release team, I'd like to update bind9 to 9.16.1 (from 9.16.0), here is the FFe bug with details on what changed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1868272 | 18:58 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1868272 in bind9 (Ubuntu) "FFe: bind9 9.16.1 update" [Undecided,New] | 18:58 |
ahasenack | sil2100: ^ if you can | 19:04 |
=== cpaelzer__ is now known as cpaelzer | ||
cpaelzer | an SRU member around to consider merging https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/britney/hints-ubuntu-xenial-pg-update-march-2020/+merge/380811 ? | 19:57 |
ahasenack | stgraber: could you perhaps please take a look at the bind9 ffe above? | 20:13 |
stgraber | ahasenack: yeah, will take a look. You don't have anyone on the server team who's on the release team do you? I'd have some FFEs to trade :) | 20:14 |
ahasenack | hah, there's a thought | 20:14 |
ahasenack | what are the requisites? | 20:14 |
ahasenack | we have MIR, SRU | 20:14 |
ahasenack | not release | 20:14 |
bryce | stgraber, josh mentioned you were available to help with removing php-horde-*? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php-horde/+bug/1868281 Steve made good progress Friday but it's a long list of packages. | 20:15 |
ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1868281 in php-horde (Ubuntu) "Please remove php-horde and php-horde-* from focal" [Undecided,New] | 20:15 |
bryce | stgraber, I am trying to rework my list to just the php-horde items needed to unblock php-defaults, but the whole php-horde-* stack will need to go eventually | 20:16 |
stgraber | ahasenack: granted | 20:16 |
ahasenack | stgraber: as is, without reverting upstream's decision on those pthread locks? | 20:16 |
ahasenack | fwiw debian took the same route | 20:17 |
stgraber | ahasenack: right, focal has the needed glibc bits, so no need to undo upstream's change | 20:17 |
ahasenack | cool, thanks | 20:17 |
stgraber | and I'm not super fond of random userspace having their own implementation of bits like that :) | 20:17 |
ahasenack | that's so true | 20:17 |
ahasenack | I watched a bind9 presentation the other day, where they were talking about this development cycle | 20:17 |
ahasenack | and "code cruft" | 20:17 |
ahasenack | they had many things implemented by themselves, because early OSs didn't have the features they needed | 20:18 |
ahasenack | think, I don't know, vax/vms | 20:18 |
ahasenack | old solaris, that kind of stuff | 20:18 |
ahasenack | and they took this 9.16 cycle to start to get rid of that | 20:18 |
stgraber | bryce: if you can comment with the list of packages that still need to go away, that'd be helpful | 20:18 |
bryce | stgraber, ok will do | 20:20 |
bryce | stgraber, I've posted the updated dependency tree of all php-horde-* packages. | 20:42 |
bryce | stgraber, I'm working on identifying the specific priorities to remove, that should let php-defaults migrate, but the dependency tree is a bit tricky. | 20:43 |
mwhudson | uh should our autopkgtest infra set all of http_proxy, HTTP_PROXY, no_proxy, NO_PROXY etc etc | 20:43 |
stgraber | bryce: that's a lot of packages :) | 20:45 |
bryce | stgraber, indeed :-/ | 20:47 |
bryce | like I said, I'm working on making a narrower list but the dependency network is pretty thick | 20:47 |
bryce | stgraber, also I think there might be a bit of circular dependency with php-horde itself | 20:48 |
stgraber | bryce: since the goal is to remove php-horde and php-horde-* I'm currently checking whether there are any rdepends or r-build-depends outside of that set | 20:48 |
stgraber | bryce: if not, I'd just nuke the entire set | 20:48 |
bryce | stgraber, that would be great | 20:48 |
bryce | I haven't spotted anything outside this set | 20:49 |
stgraber | what we don't want is to cause breakage outside of php-horde* but if there's nothing outside of those that rdepends or build-depends on it, then it should be fine | 20:49 |
bryce | right | 20:49 |
stgraber | just running a loop of reverse-depends and reverse-depends -b to make sure | 20:49 |
stgraber | yeah, nothing outside of that set is going to break | 20:51 |
stgraber | bryce: and you've confirmed that this is all the php-horde-* packages? | 20:51 |
bryce | stgraber, correct | 20:51 |
stgraber | bryce: all in the release pocket or are there some that need nuking from proposed too? | 20:52 |
bryce | stgraber, I believe php-horde-* only has stuff in released, but I wouldn't swear by it. | 20:54 |
bryce | looking... | 20:54 |
stgraber | nuking from release pocket now | 20:54 |
bryce | php-horde-image is in proposed | 20:55 |
stgraber | ah, will need to do a special run for that one then | 20:55 |
bryce | also php-horde-icalendar | 20:56 |
bryce | those two are only ones I'm spotting on update_excuses.html | 20:57 |
stgraber | yeah, the package index agrees with that | 20:58 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-dev-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.175~18.04.1] | 21:45 | |
bryce | stgraber, thanks :-) | 22:02 |
stgraber | np, I just hope I didn't break anything :) getting a bit rusty | 22:03 |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1017.18] (core, kernel) | 23:07 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1017.18~18.04.1] (no packageset) | 23:08 | |
-queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1077.87] (kernel) | 23:08 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!