[00:50] teward: Fixed copyright, give it a whirl. [00:50] The biggest part was the dpf stuff, which I already had from the dpf-plugins package. [00:54] I'll review but can you get someone on the archive team's assurances they will review? they need to make sure it will get reviewed before next freezes and such [00:54] I am not on the archive team so I cant JDFI for the guarantee of review [00:54] because src+bin:NEW [00:55] Sure. [01:16] also NACK - incomplete licensing [01:16] dpf/dgl/[files in directory not recursively] - ISC per licensecheck [01:16] can you verify Eickmeyer? [01:16] you have to document *every* file :P [01:17] teward: I'm aware, it should've been in what was copied-over from dpf-plugins. [01:17] it's not but eh [01:18] the rest looks OK [01:18] Also, just FYI: this is the part about debian packaging I absolutely hate. RPM packaging doesn't have this copyright requirement, they trust the upstream. [01:19] heh [01:19] thats where RPMs can have copyright problems :P [01:20] And then, if asked, the finger goes to the upstream for being irresponsible. [01:26] teward: Really, it looks like dpf/* needs to be ISC, but I have it as GPL-2 because dpf-plugins has that. So, that's something I need to fix in dpf-plugins as well. [01:36] well it was OK'd previously so maybe that'll stay the same UNLESS the repack has newer DPF [01:53] teward: No, I checked the dpf-plugins package and it's wrong there. [02:05] ok then that needs updated next bump [02:05] but not high priority if it's that far off. (though i'm sure we could sneak it in for policy) [02:06] if you fix it in both places I'll upload both [02:06] NEW will need archive review, the other one I'll state we're fixing an error we just caught [02:06] Rigght. [02:07] (nobody'll care) [02:07] (and if they do I'll say "I felt it necessary to upload" and handwave lol) [02:07] they can yell at me if they want xD [02:07] Exactly, it's pretty much a bugfix with an increment to 0ubuntu2 for dpf-plugins. [02:08] yep [02:10] teward: Both dragonfly-reverb and dpf-plugins changes are pushed, work your magic. [02:13] bleh i lost the git link to dpf-plugins *goes to find* [02:13] launchpad.net/dpf-plugins (duh) [02:13] teward: ^ [02:13] i already found it ;) [02:14] haha [02:14] blah this is the one which i have to uscan to get the package >.> [02:14] because pristine-tar has issues >.> [02:15] OH yes. This one was weird. [02:16] dpf-plugins upload in progress [02:17] teward: ack [02:17] 'cause that's bigger ;P [02:18] Makes sense. More plugins. [02:18] yep [02:23] um [02:23] rejected because 0ubuntu2 already exists in the archive [02:23] *checks* [02:23] Wait... whut? [02:23] ahhhh it's doko's fault [02:23] dpf-plugins (1.3-0ubuntu2) focal; urgency=medium [02:23] * No-change rebuild for libgcc-s1 package name change. [02:23] let me fix that [02:24] Yeah, he did that with most of our packages without bothering to commit to git. smdh [02:24] well [02:24] he like me [02:24] don't update git repos for *upstream* locations for ncrbs [02:24] (no change rebuilds) [02:24] i'll do the changelog merge [02:25] I got the vernacular, but the git repo in this case isn't the upstream part. [02:26] *shrugs* [02:27] unless you're using git-ubuntu and a few other things [02:27] it doesn't get autoimports [02:27] the repository's versions sit in a different location [02:27] so for all intents and purposes [02:27] this is the 'source' VCS for the package data [02:27] but not the repos' VCS [02:27] https://git.launchpad.net/dpf-plugins/tree/debian/changelog - merged [02:28] doko literally did this yesterday lol [02:28] Just pulled locally, looks good. [02:28] yep [02:28] i'll rebuild and push [02:28] I really wish he'd tell me for stuff my name is on. I'm not that hard to reach. [02:29] so [02:29] i'm going to talk to the release team who has the release bot [02:30] and try and set up a Python hook equivalent bot to see the uploads by whom, etc. [02:30] try and figure out how they do it [02:30] and apply one for here [02:30] Sounds like a plan. [02:30] but that's another long-term project [02:30] in the mean time i'm just going to slap doko around :p [02:30] (not really) [02:30] (I need to be in peoples' good graces lol) [02:30] Eickmeyer: -0ubuntu3 tagged and upload in progress [02:31] thank you `gbp` for teaching me some tagging knowledge/fun [02:31] teward: Perfect, thanks. [02:31] hehe [02:31] also thank you Debian for showing me `gbp` which is **fun** [02:31] makes it real easy to handle the import, etc. I do for my packages [02:31] I'd set up NGINX locally for it [02:31] but I am a lazy SOB [02:31] hehe [02:32] BUT it's useful for vmfs6-tools and xca [02:32] because for xca, it existed already in Debian [02:32] and i needed to just gbp import it from debian snapshots [02:32] then updated from there [02:33] again, thank you Debian for the assists :P [02:33] you use a hybrid workflow of the tools gbp refers to to do the pristine-tar, etc. [02:33] i just use gbp straight :P [02:34] Yeah, I guess I do things the hard way. [02:34] -0ubuntu3 uploaded and accepted [02:34] GG [02:36] Eickmeyer: typo in d/control of dragonfly-reverb, fixed locally will commit [02:36] There was bound to be a typo. *facepalm* [02:38] i can't force a retag though [02:38] lets make a deal [02:39] how about we leave the tagging of versions in the repos to me upon upload [02:39] I can force a retag. [02:39] ok [02:39] wait what [02:39] I know why it won't work. [02:39] i have no upload rights [02:39] *stabs you* [02:39] yeah maintainer is you and not Studio Dev [02:40] then I can delete push and retag xD [02:40] Now you can. [02:40] apparently not [02:40] I made that repo 23 hours ago. [02:40] still perm denied [02:41] Wait... whut? [02:41] so it may need time to apply [02:41] Ah. [02:41] Probably give it 10. [02:41] yep [02:41] *spends 10 minutes making vanilla hot cocoa* [02:45] still permission denied but i'm lazy. going to wait the full 10 [02:45] if it still doesn't work [02:45] i'll poke #launchpad to see if they need to rejigger things [03:06] nope still getting denied Eickmeyer [03:06] smdh [03:06] not sure what's up there [03:06] Very odd. [03:06] ANYWAYS [03:06] you can change it yourself [03:06] Facts. [03:06] fix the Provies -> Provides in the control file [03:06] and force retag [03:06] You mean just the tag, right? [03:07] yeah update the tag [03:07] as well as the typos in debian/control [03:07] Yes, got that. [03:07] and poke #launchpad asking them to take a look at perms [03:15] teward: pushed and retagged. [03:17] W: dragonfly-reverb source: syntax-error-in-dep5-copyright line 277: Continuation line outside a paragraph (maybe line 276 should be " ."). [03:17] debsign failure [03:18] you have a space before a license blurb in this that makes it error [03:18] W: dragonfly-reverb source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-3 (paragraph at line 6) <— when that's fixed [03:19] Eickmeyer: ^ [03:19] teward: I see. [03:26] Eickmeyer: you want to fix those or do you want me to fix the typo? I don't ahve the gpl-3 license text at my system right now [03:28] teward: You don't need the full text since it's in in /usr/share/common-licenses. :P [03:28] But I've got this. [03:28] ack [03:28] it was a warning I usually just yell at em [03:28] but you should at least make a note the full text is in there (and it at least needs a License: declaration in the copyright file) [03:31] Take a look (pushed, retagged), teward. [03:33] " On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General Public License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-3'." <--standard text [03:33] works for me [03:33] running and letting the system determine if there's any other lintian issues [03:33] If you've read debian/copyright license files as much as I have you'd recognize the text. [03:33] yep [03:34] yep, i recognize that [03:34] i'm just tired :) [03:34] hehe [03:36] LGTM going to upload shortly [03:36] Sweeeeeeet. [03:37] this one is larger heh [03:37] once this is done i'mma start making revisions to my networks [03:37] It's not as many plugins, but it is fancier in terms of code. [03:39] yep [03:51] uploaded and sitting in NEW now [03:52] Sweet. [03:52] Eickmeyer: ^ [15:49] teward: Looks like dpf-plugins wasn't the only package doko messed with. [15:53] this doesn't surprise me [15:54] Eickmeyer: I may end up just tacking a watchdog script/program onto the -changes lists [15:54] and then have a grep for the packages we want to monitor and then spit here [15:54] but i'm lazy :P [15:54] still need the full set of packages though [15:54] The only ones I've found so far were ardour, lsp-plugins, and carla. [15:55] Yeah, I might be able to work on that list today. [16:16] teward: You had previously done a testimonial at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Eickmeyer/PPUApplication2, perhaps you feel like revising it now? [17:10] Eickmeyer: I create tesimonials new each time [17:10] so :P [17:10] you are missing a Testimonials section vs. Coments but meh [17:10] *goes to finish some work first* [17:44] OvenWerks: We still have that bug in -installer where it fails during installation of "python3-rdflib". [17:46] * OvenWerks guesses he should dl an other flavour ISO to try. Probably just need an extra " or ' somewhere [17:47] Probably. I'm filing it as a bug officially so we can get this figured out. [17:49] Eickmeyer: is thgere any particuolar flavour this is known to be a problem on? [17:49] OvenWerks: All. [17:49] It happens whenever python3-rdflib is called in as a dependency. [17:51] hm zsync is not multithreaded [17:52] Bug 1868855 for reference. [17:52] bug 1868855 in ubuntustudio-installer (Ubuntu) "Ubuntu Studio Installer GUI fails during installation of python3-rdflib" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1868855 [17:54] It says I am at 51% [17:54] Which iso are you zsyncing? [17:55] kubuntu [17:55] Ah. [17:55] I may move to a Studio over Kubuntu for 20.04 [17:57] xfce has a small team and so moves slowly... on the other hand... it is the applications I use, not the desktop :P [18:08] Yeah. bluesabre knows all about that. [20:38] first thing I notice about the kubuntu ISO live boot: it does a forced media check to make sure the person actually downloaded the whole ISO image (and printed to the media too) [20:38] not a bad idea [20:46] * OvenWerks is creating some space on his HD [20:54] Yeah, I have no freakin' clue how to implement that. [20:55] The ISO check, that is. [20:55] kubuntu's installer is different in lots of ways... [20:56] It's just the Qt version of Ubiquity. [20:56] They're pulling a Lubuntu and switching to Calamares after the LTS. We could do that, but then we'd completely lose the package selection during install. [20:56] but somehow deals with odd size partitions better... that is using a partition with the size it already has does not tell you it will resize [20:58] Believe it or not, tsimonq2 has told me from the start that Qt desktops are much easier to deal with than GTK ones. [20:59] there only used to be kubuntu that qualified... and at the time plasma had .... issues [21:00] Plasma 4 was a PITA. [21:00] I may play with lq after lts [21:01] LXQt? [21:01] Anyway time to get my wife off to work (essensial services) [21:01] Yep. Stay safe. [21:05] Eickmeyer: bother me tomorrow for a testimonial if you need one [21:05] i'm not in an awake enough state atm [21:18] teward: Go to sleep, no hurry. [22:20] kubuntu has Thunderbolt settings.... does that mean linux supports such things? (audio devices?) [22:21] Eickmeyer: where is the "correct" place to DL installer from? [22:21] Is apt up to date for that? [22:21] OvenWerks: sudo apt install ubuntustudio-installer [22:21] Yes. [22:22] apt replaces apt-get for the most part, and is functionally identical. [22:22] Wow it sure has a lot of deps... [22:24] That has a lot to do with needing ubuntustudio-controls installed for ubuntustudio-system to be available and to bring in jack because we don't have a way to present an apt-initiated dialog box in -installer. [22:25] This was something we worked on months ago. [22:25] Ya, I remember that part [22:29] I am installing one ittem at a time [23:16] Eickmeyer: this is a pain.... first install problem shows up... add a debug line, remove all packages... works fine. [23:16] That's disappointing. [23:25] python3-rdflib was not removed [23:28] here is the line: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/rdflib/plugins/memory.py:354: SyntaxWarning: "is" with a literal. Did you mean "=="? [23:29] It appears that the package has an error [23:29] Still we should be able to handle that [23:30] The problem is that the line has many " in it