[00:50] <Eickmeyer> teward: Fixed copyright, give it a whirl.
[00:50] <Eickmeyer> The biggest part was the dpf stuff, which I already had from the dpf-plugins package.
 I'll review but can you get someone on the archive team's assurances they will review?  they need to make sure it will get reviewed before next freezes and such
 I am not on the archive team so I cant JDFI for the guarantee of review
 because src+bin:NEW
[00:55] <Eickmeyer> Sure.
 also NACK - incomplete licensing
 dpf/dgl/[files in directory not recursively] - ISC per licensecheck
 can you verify Eickmeyer?
 you have to document *every* file :P
[01:17] <Eickmeyer> teward: I'm aware, it should've been in what was copied-over from dpf-plugins.
 it's not but eh
 the rest looks OK
[01:18] <Eickmeyer> Also, just FYI: this is the part about debian packaging I absolutely hate. RPM packaging doesn't have this copyright requirement, they trust the upstream.
[01:19] <teward> heh
[01:19] <teward> thats where RPMs can have copyright problems :P
[01:20] <Eickmeyer> And then, if asked, the finger goes to the upstream for being irresponsible.
[01:26] <Eickmeyer> teward: Really, it looks like dpf/* needs to be ISC, but I have it as GPL-2 because dpf-plugins has that. So, that's something I need to fix in dpf-plugins as well.
 well it was OK'd previously so maybe that'll stay the same UNLESS the repack has newer DPF
[01:53] <Eickmeyer> teward: No, I checked the dpf-plugins package and it's wrong there.
 ok then that needs updated next bump
 but not high priority if it's that far off.  (though i'm sure we could sneak it in for policy)
 if you fix it in both places I'll upload both
 NEW will need archive review, the other one I'll state we're fixing an error we just caught
[02:06] <Eickmeyer> Rigght.
 (nobody'll care)
 (and if they do I'll say "I felt it necessary to upload" and handwave lol)
 they can yell at me if they want xD
[02:07] <Eickmeyer> Exactly, it's pretty much a bugfix with an increment to 0ubuntu2 for dpf-plugins.
 yep
[02:10] <Eickmeyer> teward: Both dragonfly-reverb and dpf-plugins changes are pushed, work your magic.
 bleh i lost the git link to dpf-plugins *goes to find*
[02:13] <Eickmeyer> launchpad.net/dpf-plugins (duh)
[02:13] <Eickmeyer> teward: ^
 i already found it ;)
[02:14] <Eickmeyer> haha
 blah this is the one which i have to uscan to get the package >.>
 because pristine-tar has issues >.>
[02:15] <Eickmeyer> OH yes. This one was weird.
 dpf-plugins upload in progress
[02:17] <Eickmeyer> teward: ack
 'cause that's bigger ;P
[02:18] <Eickmeyer> Makes sense. More plugins.
 yep
[02:23] <teward> um
[02:23] <teward> rejected because 0ubuntu2 already exists in the archive
[02:23] <teward> *checks*
[02:23] <Eickmeyer> Wait... whut?
[02:23] <teward> ahhhh it's doko's fault
[02:23] <teward> dpf-plugins (1.3-0ubuntu2) focal; urgency=medium
[02:23] <teward>   * No-change rebuild for libgcc-s1 package name change.
[02:23] <teward> let me fix that
[02:24] <Eickmeyer> Yeah, he did that with most of our packages without bothering to commit to git. smdh
[02:24] <teward> well
[02:24] <teward> he like me
[02:24] <teward> don't update git repos for *upstream* locations for ncrbs
[02:24] <teward> (no change rebuilds)
[02:24] <teward> i'll do the changelog merge
[02:25] <Eickmeyer> I got the vernacular, but the git repo in this case isn't the upstream part.
[02:26] <teward> *shrugs*
[02:27] <teward> unless you're using git-ubuntu and a few other things
[02:27] <teward> it doesn't get autoimports
[02:27] <teward> the repository's versions sit in a different location
[02:27] <teward> so for all intents and purposes
[02:27] <teward> this is the 'source' VCS for the package data
[02:27] <teward> but not the repos' VCS
[02:27] <teward> https://git.launchpad.net/dpf-plugins/tree/debian/changelog - merged
[02:28] <teward> doko literally did this yesterday lol
[02:28] <Eickmeyer> Just pulled locally, looks good.
[02:28] <teward> yep
[02:28] <teward> i'll rebuild and push
[02:28] <Eickmeyer> I really wish he'd tell me for stuff my name is on. I'm not that hard to reach.
[02:29] <teward> so
[02:29] <teward> i'm going to talk to the release team who has the release bot
[02:30] <teward> and try and set up a Python hook equivalent bot to see the uploads by whom, etc.
[02:30] <teward> try and figure out how they do it
[02:30] <teward> and apply one for here
[02:30] <Eickmeyer> Sounds like a plan.
[02:30] <teward> but that's another long-term project
[02:30] <teward> in the mean time i'm just going to slap doko around :p
[02:30] <teward> (not really)
[02:30] <teward> (I need to be in peoples' good graces lol)
[02:30] <teward> Eickmeyer: -0ubuntu3 tagged and upload in progress
[02:31] <teward> thank you `gbp` for teaching me some tagging knowledge/fun
[02:31] <Eickmeyer> teward: Perfect, thanks.
[02:31] <Eickmeyer> hehe
[02:31] <teward> also thank you Debian for showing me `gbp` which is **fun**
[02:31] <teward> makes it real easy to handle the import, etc. I do for my packages
[02:31] <teward> I'd set up NGINX locally for it
[02:31] <teward> but I am a lazy SOB
[02:31] <Eickmeyer> hehe
[02:32] <teward> BUT it's useful for vmfs6-tools and xca
[02:32] <teward> because for xca, it existed already in Debian
[02:32] <teward> and i needed to just gbp import it from debian snapshots
[02:32] <teward> then updated from there
 again, thank you Debian for the assists :P
 you use a hybrid workflow of the tools gbp refers to to do the pristine-tar, etc.
 i just use gbp straight :P
[02:34] <Eickmeyer> Yeah, I guess I do things the hard way.
[02:34] <teward> -0ubuntu3 uploaded and accepted
[02:34] <Eickmeyer> GG
[02:36] <teward> Eickmeyer: typo in d/control of dragonfly-reverb, fixed locally will commit
[02:36] <Eickmeyer> There was bound to be a typo. *facepalm*
[02:38] <teward> i can't force a retag though
[02:38] <teward> lets make a deal
[02:39] <teward> how about we leave the tagging of versions in the repos to me upon upload
[02:39] <Eickmeyer> I can force a retag.
[02:39] <teward> ok
[02:39] <teward> wait what
[02:39] <Eickmeyer> I know why it won't work.
[02:39] <teward> i have no upload rights
[02:39] <teward> *stabs you*
[02:39] <teward> yeah maintainer is you and not Studio Dev
[02:40] <teward> then I can delete push and retag xD
[02:40] <Eickmeyer> Now you can.
[02:40] <teward> apparently not
[02:40] <Eickmeyer> I made that repo 23 hours ago.
[02:40] <teward> still perm denied
[02:41] <Eickmeyer> Wait... whut?
[02:41] <teward> so it may need time to apply
[02:41] <Eickmeyer> Ah.
[02:41] <Eickmeyer> Probably give it 10.
[02:41] <teward> yep
[02:41] <teward> *spends 10 minutes making vanilla hot cocoa*
[02:45] <teward> still permission denied but i'm lazy.  going to wait the full 10
[02:45] <teward> if it still doesn't work
[02:45] <teward> i'll poke #launchpad to see if they need to rejigger things
 nope still getting denied Eickmeyer
[03:06] <Eickmeyer> smdh
 not sure what's up there
[03:06] <Eickmeyer> Very odd.
 ANYWAYS
 you can change it yourself
[03:06] <Eickmeyer> Facts.
 fix the Provies -> Provides in the control file
 and force retag
[03:06] <Eickmeyer> You mean just the tag, right?
 yeah update the tag
 as well as the typos in debian/control
[03:07] <Eickmeyer> Yes, got that.
 and poke #launchpad asking them to take a look at perms
[03:15] <Eickmeyer> teward: pushed and retagged.
 W: dragonfly-reverb source: syntax-error-in-dep5-copyright line 277: Continuation line outside a paragraph (maybe line 276 should be " .").
 debsign failure
 you have a space before a license blurb in this that makes it error
 W: dragonfly-reverb source: missing-license-paragraph-in-dep5-copyright gpl-3 (paragraph at line 6)  <— when that's fixed
 Eickmeyer: ^
[03:19] <Eickmeyer> teward: I see.
[03:26] <teward> Eickmeyer: you want to fix those or do you want me to fix the typo?  I don't ahve the gpl-3 license text at my system right now
[03:28] <Eickmeyer> teward: You don't need the full text since it's in in /usr/share/common-licenses. :P
[03:28] <Eickmeyer> But I've got this.
 ack
 it was a warning I usually just yell at em
 but you should at least make a note the full text is in there (and it at least needs a License: declaration in the copyright file)
[03:31] <Eickmeyer> Take a look (pushed, retagged), teward.
[03:33] <Eickmeyer> " On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General Public  License can be found in `/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-3'." <--standard text
 works for me
 running and letting the system determine if there's any other lintian issues
[03:33] <Eickmeyer> If you've read debian/copyright license files as much as I have you'd recognize the text.
 yep
 yep, i recognize that
 i'm just tired :)
[03:34] <Eickmeyer> hehe
 LGTM going to upload shortly
[03:36] <Eickmeyer> Sweeeeeeet.
 this one is larger heh
 once this is done i'mma start making revisions to my networks
[03:37] <Eickmeyer> It's not as many plugins, but it is fancier in terms of code.
 yep
 uploaded and sitting in NEW now
[03:52] <Eickmeyer> Sweet.
 Eickmeyer: ^
[15:49] <Eickmeyer> teward: Looks like dpf-plugins wasn't the only package doko messed with.
[15:53] <teward> this doesn't surprise me
[15:54] <teward> Eickmeyer: I may end up just tacking a watchdog script/program onto the -changes lists
[15:54] <teward> and then have a grep for the packages we want to monitor and then spit here
[15:54] <teward> but i'm lazy :P
[15:54] <teward> still need the full set of packages though
[15:54] <Eickmeyer> The only ones I've found so far were ardour, lsp-plugins, and carla.
[15:55] <Eickmeyer> Yeah, I might be able to work on that list today.
[16:16] <Eickmeyer> teward: You had previously done a testimonial at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Eickmeyer/PPUApplication2, perhaps you feel like revising it now?
[17:10] <teward> Eickmeyer: I create tesimonials new each time
[17:10] <teward> so :P
[17:10] <teward> you are missing a Testimonials section vs. Coments but meh
[17:10] <teward> *goes to finish some work first*
[17:44] <Eickmeyer> OvenWerks: We still have that bug in -installer where it fails during installation of "python3-rdflib".
[17:46]  * OvenWerks guesses he should dl an other flavour ISO to try. Probably just need an extra " or ' somewhere
[17:47] <Eickmeyer> Probably. I'm filing it as a bug officially so we can get this figured out.
[17:49] <OvenWerks> Eickmeyer: is thgere any particuolar flavour this is known to be a problem on?
[17:49] <Eickmeyer> OvenWerks: All.
[17:49] <Eickmeyer> It happens whenever python3-rdflib is called in as a dependency.
[17:51] <OvenWerks> hm zsync is not multithreaded
[17:52] <Eickmeyer> Bug 1868855 for reference.
[17:54] <OvenWerks> It says I am at 51%
[17:54] <Eickmeyer> Which iso are you zsyncing?
[17:55] <OvenWerks> kubuntu
[17:55] <Eickmeyer> Ah.
[17:55] <OvenWerks> I may move to a Studio over Kubuntu for 20.04
[17:57] <OvenWerks> xfce has a small team and so moves slowly... on the other hand... it is the applications I use, not the desktop :P
[18:08] <Eickmeyer> Yeah. bluesabre knows all about that.
[20:38] <OvenWerks> first thing I notice about the kubuntu ISO live boot: it does a forced media check to make sure the person actually downloaded the whole ISO image (and printed to the media too)
[20:38] <OvenWerks> not a bad idea
[20:46]  * OvenWerks is creating some space on his HD
[20:54] <Eickmeyer> Yeah, I have no freakin' clue how to implement that.
[20:55] <Eickmeyer> The ISO check, that is.
[20:55] <OvenWerks> kubuntu's installer is different in lots of ways...
[20:56] <Eickmeyer> It's just the Qt version of Ubiquity.
[20:56] <Eickmeyer> They're pulling a Lubuntu and switching to Calamares after the LTS. We could do that, but then we'd completely lose the package selection during install.
[20:56] <OvenWerks> but somehow deals with odd size partitions better... that is using a partition with the size it already has does not tell you it will resize
[20:58] <Eickmeyer> Believe it or not, tsimonq2 has told me from the start that Qt desktops are much easier to deal with than GTK ones.
[20:59] <OvenWerks> there only used to be kubuntu that qualified... and at the time plasma had .... issues
[21:00] <Eickmeyer> Plasma 4 was a PITA.
[21:00] <OvenWerks> I may play with lq after lts
[21:01] <Eickmeyer> LXQt?
[21:01] <OvenWerks> Anyway time to get my wife off to work (essensial services)
[21:01] <Eickmeyer> Yep. Stay safe.
[21:05] <teward> Eickmeyer: bother me tomorrow for a testimonial if you need one
[21:05] <teward> i'm not in an awake enough state atm
[21:18] <Eickmeyer> teward: Go to sleep, no hurry.
[22:20] <OvenWerks> kubuntu has Thunderbolt settings.... does that mean linux supports such things? (audio devices?)
[22:21] <OvenWerks> Eickmeyer: where is the "correct" place to DL installer from?
[22:21] <OvenWerks> Is apt up to date for that?
[22:21] <Eickmeyer> OvenWerks: sudo apt install ubuntustudio-installer
[22:21] <Eickmeyer> Yes.
[22:22] <Eickmeyer> apt replaces apt-get for the most part, and is functionally identical.
[22:22] <OvenWerks> Wow it sure has a lot of deps...
[22:24] <Eickmeyer> That has a lot to do with needing ubuntustudio-controls installed for ubuntustudio-system to be available and to bring in jack because we don't have a way to present an apt-initiated dialog box in -installer.
[22:25] <Eickmeyer> This was something we worked on months ago.
[22:25] <OvenWerks> Ya, I remember that part
[22:29] <OvenWerks> I am installing one ittem at a time
[23:16] <OvenWerks> Eickmeyer: this is a pain.... first install problem shows up... add a debug line, remove all packages... works fine.
[23:16] <Eickmeyer> That's disappointing.
[23:25] <OvenWerks> python3-rdflib was not removed
[23:28] <OvenWerks> here is the line: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/rdflib/plugins/memory.py:354: SyntaxWarning: "is" with a literal. Did you mean "=="?
[23:29] <OvenWerks> It appears that the package has an error
[23:29] <OvenWerks> Still we should be able to handle that
[23:30] <OvenWerks> The problem is that the line has many " in it