| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 1.3.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.2] (no packageset) | 04:46 | |
| LocutusOfBorg | apw, hello, can you please trigger the forget past passes hint for camitk? it is NBS everywhere except amd64 autopkgtest for camitk/4.1.2-4build1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Regression ♻ , armhf: Regression ♻ , i386: Regression ♻ , ppc64el: Regression ♻ , s390x: Regression ♻ | 09:47 |
|---|---|---|
| LocutusOfBorg | # libinsighttoolkit4 is only supported on amd64 now, this triggers | 09:47 |
| LocutusOfBorg | # dependencies on other architectures to remainin DEPWAIT. Hint | 09:47 |
| LocutusOfBorg | # tests as needed. | 09:47 |
| LocutusOfBorg | force-badtest camitk/4.1.2-4/arm64 camitk/4.1.2-4/armhf camitk/4.1.2-4/i386 camitk/4.1.2-4/ppc64el camitk/4.1.2-4/s390x | 09:47 |
| LocutusOfBorg | this can then be removed | 09:47 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pydrive [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.3.1-0ubuntu1] | 12:16 | |
| Laney | sil2100: gonna try the requests thing I think | 12:28 |
| Laney | sorry if proposed-migration dies a bit :-) | 12:28 |
| Laney | (done) | 12:40 |
| Laney | seems to be working | 13:06 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: clevis [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [12-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 14:27 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted clevis [amd64] (focal-proposed) [12-1ubuntu1] | 14:59 | |
| sil2100 | First focal language packs building o/ | 15:01 |
| sil2100 | (will have to re-upload the ckb ones, since they were missing from the packageset again | 15:23 |
| sil2100 | ) | 15:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-ckb to langpack in focal | 15:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-ckb-base to langpack in focal | 15:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-gnome-ckb to langpack in focal | 15:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added language-pack-gnome-ckb-base to langpack in focal | 15:39 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (eoan-proposed/main) [14.2.4-0ubuntu0.19.10.2 => 14.2.8-0ubuntu0.19.10.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) | 16:06 | |
| Eickmeyer | xnox: Who tagged ubuntustudio-installer with bug 1851346? | 16:09 |
| ubot5 | bug 1851346 in ubuntustudio-live (Ubuntu Focal) "Ubuntu Studio 19.10 Installer Causes Wanted Programs to be Removed" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1851346 | 16:09 |
| sforshee | doko: ping on bug 1866882, this is still causing linux autopkgtest failures on s390 | 16:15 |
| ubot5 | bug 1866882 in llvm-toolchain-10 (Ubuntu) "segfault in libllvm-10 when building kernel bpf selftests on s390" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1866882 | 16:15 |
| doko | sforshee: please use LLVM on s390x for now | 16:20 |
| sforshee | doko: do you mean llvm-9? | 16:22 |
| xnox | Eickmeyer: i meant ubuntustudio-live => because i believe the bug might be in the extra studio plugin, rather than in ubiquity itself | 16:27 |
| Eickmeyer | xnox: Well, maybe, but that plugin is part of ubiquity, is it not? | 16:28 |
| xnox | Eickmeyer: no, it is shipped by ubuntustudio-live source code, not in the ubiquity source code. | 16:28 |
| xnox | from ubiquity's point of view it is a 3rd-party plugin which it loads and uses, but has no control if it is working correctly with new ubiquity or is buggy =) | 16:28 |
| Eickmeyer | xnox: Well, it was working properly up to 19.10, and we had no idea we even had control over that. | 16:29 |
| Eickmeyer | Basically, what's happening is the mechanism I described in the bug report. | 16:30 |
| doko | sforshee: yes | 16:31 |
| Eickmeyer | stgraber: Can I enlist your help? Your name is all over the code of https://launchpad.net/ubuntustudio-live, and I have no idea what I'm doing. RE: bug 1851346 | 16:59 |
| ubot5 | bug 1851346 in ubuntustudio-live (Ubuntu Focal) "Ubuntu Studio 19.10 Installer Causes Wanted Programs to be Removed" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1851346 | 16:59 |
| juliank | Eickmeyer: i have that bug in my committed lane fwiw | 17:13 |
| juliank | Eickmeyer: need to figure out if that's a side effect from the autoremove changes in ubiquity or not | 17:14 |
| Eickmeyer | juliank: xnox seems to think it's the plugin's fault, so he put the ball in our court. Feels like a "this is not our problem" issue. | 17:14 |
| juliank | Eickmeyer: I'd expect this to like not happen anymore, but not produce a useful result either (that is, ubiquity now removes autoremovable packages at end of install, so they should not be autoremovable after reboot) | 17:14 |
| juliank | Eickmeyer: maybe don't do a blanket single commit import from bzr, and import it properly? | 17:15 |
| juliank | Eickmeyer: so that commit history is preserved? | 17:15 |
| Eickmeyer | juliank: I tried.... | 17:15 |
| Eickmeyer | It failed. | 17:16 |
| juliank | Eickmeyer: maybe rbalint can help, he likes converting bzr to git repos | 17:16 |
| Eickmeyer | Got a ton of python errors from it. | 17:16 |
| juliank | :D | 17:16 |
| Eickmeyer | I mean, if someone wants to do a --force on it, be my guest. (rbalint, if you're reading this). | 17:17 |
| teward | #bzr-is-pain, convince me otherwise :P | 17:17 |
| Eickmeyer | ^ Agreed. Change my mind. | 17:17 |
| rbalint | Eickmeyer, hi :-) | 17:18 |
| Eickmeyer | rbalint: Hey there! | 17:18 |
| rbalint | Eickmeyer, which repo are we talking about ? | 17:19 |
| Eickmeyer | https://launchpad.net/ubuntustudio-live | 17:20 |
| rbalint | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/MigratingFromBzrToGit | 17:20 |
| rbalint | Eickmeyer, let me check it | 17:20 |
| Eickmeyer | I hate how that ^ didn't come up in a Google search. | 17:20 |
| xnox | Eickmeyer: not quite, it is not trianged | 17:21 |
| rbalint | Eickmeyer, maybe i'm not good at SEO :o) | 17:21 |
| xnox | Eickmeyer: i didn't remove ubiquity task from the bug | 17:21 |
| Eickmeyer | xnox: I realize that, but if it really is the plugin's fault, then the ball is in our court. Ideally, this needs to be resolved before Beta. | 17:21 |
| rbalint | Eickmeyer, would you like to give it a try and maybe convert other repos or would you like me to convert it? | 17:22 |
| * Laney gently redirects you all to #ubuntu-devel | 17:22 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted landscape-client [source] (eoan-proposed) [18.01-0ubuntu9.3] | 20:30 | |
| ahasenack | hi release team | 20:49 |
| ahasenack | I mistakenly uploaded a package without the FFe approval | 20:49 |
| ahasenack | stgraber: ^ | 20:49 |
| ahasenack | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868609 | 20:50 |
| ubot5 | Ubuntu bug 1868609 in libcbor (Ubuntu) "FFe: update to 0.6.0 (MIR requirement)" [Undecided,New] | 20:50 |
| ahasenack | should it be removed? | 20:50 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcbor [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 20:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcbor [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 20:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcbor [i386] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 20:52 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcbor [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 20:52 | |
| ahasenack | ^that one, good that it's stuck because of the new package that resulted from the soname change | 20:53 |
| locutus_ | ahasenack, according to upstream changelog no new features are added? | 20:55 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcbor [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 20:55 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcbor [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist) | 20:55 | |
| locutus_ | but why no debian bug with patch or upload? | 20:55 |
| ahasenack | it's part of a mir, and I was changing the package to conform to the mir requirements | 20:56 |
| ahasenack | I'll submit to debian still, just did the same for libfido, part of the same mir | 20:56 |
| ahasenack | about the release notes, it has the usual "BREAKING" and "WARNING" remarks that triggered my FFe warning | 20:57 |
| locutus_ | yes, but I mean, FFe is for new features, that package seems to be a bugfix update, not a FFe | 20:57 |
| locutus_ | breaking change because a bugfix changed soname, and the old soname was wrongly detected as 0.0, while the new one is "correct" | 20:57 |
| locutus_ | but still a bugfix to me? | 20:57 |
| ahasenack | I usually error on the side of caution | 20:57 |
| ahasenack | and there was this "All cbor_new_ and cbor_build_ functions will now explicitly return NULL | 20:58 |
| ahasenack | when memory allocation fails" | 20:58 |
| ahasenack | part of a fix, one could argue | 20:58 |
| ahasenack | but let's argue in the FFe :) | 20:58 |
| locutus_ | still a bugfix, for a package that has no reverse-dependencies :) | 20:58 |
| ahasenack | it has one, libfido2 | 20:58 |
| ahasenack | also part of the mir | 20:58 |
| locutus_ | so, no even risk of breaking reverse-deps | 20:59 |
| ahasenack | quite the team | 20:59 |
| ahasenack | I'll need an archive admin anyway | 20:59 |
| locutus_ | yep, so just check libfido2 for that api change, and I think we are happy to go? | 20:59 |
| ahasenack | and, if it's really just bug fixes, even easier for the release team (although they might have their hands full) | 20:59 |
| ahasenack | locutus_: wait, are you in the release team? | 20:59 |
| ahasenack | libfido is fine | 20:59 |
| locutus_ | nope, I'm just to avoid giving them too much work :) | 20:59 |
| ahasenack | I actually added tests to both packages (was a MIR requirement) | 21:00 |
| ahasenack | yeah, there is that | 21:00 |
| locutus_ | I would explictly add something to the bug, with references to this conversation | 21:00 |
| ahasenack | but I hope the ffe description, mp, all that, makes an AA feel better when looking at this | 21:00 |
| locutus_ | and upstream changelog, saying that they are bugfixes that changed the API, but no new features | 21:00 |
| locutus_ | doko, ^^ | 21:00 |
| ahasenack | I added these details to the bug (upstream changelog, highlighted what I think are the biggest changes) | 21:01 |
| ahasenack | and also that there is only one rdep | 21:01 |
| locutus_ | nice :) I hope this will make the approval process smooth | 21:12 |
| locutus_ | g night | 21:12 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcbor [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] | 21:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcbor [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] | 21:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcbor [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] | 21:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcbor [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] | 21:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcbor [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] | 21:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcbor [i386] (focal-proposed) [0.6.0-0ubuntu1] | 21:50 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1080.90] (no packageset) | 22:00 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1080.90] | 22:04 | |
| bryce | alright, I think php7.3 can safely be removed now - LP: #1869087 - could an archive admin take a look? | 22:26 |
| ubot5 | Launchpad bug 1869087 in php7.3 (Ubuntu) "Remove "php7.3" from Focal, which has transitioned to php7.4" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1869087 | 22:26 |
| powersj | \o/ | 22:30 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!