[00:00] Maybe? [00:01] Firmware has the distinction that it's often a binary only in the same way that ubuntu-desktop.iso is a binary. [00:01] But, hey! Copyright is weird and a stupid thing to apply to software. [00:01] I'd argue a .cpp library file is the same when xxd is used to encode it. [00:03] That's certainly an argument you could make. I'm not convinced either way. [00:05] Ah. That's where the rest of those things are going. Artwork.cpp is also generated the same way… [00:07] Is it difficult to get filesystem access from lv2 plugins or something? [00:07] It depends. They're basically libraries that exist in a path for digital audio workstations and plugin hosts. [00:12] RAOF: But, basically, yes, plugins don't typically have filesystem access. [00:13] In fact, that's one reason we don't ship any snaps in Ubuntu Studio. [00:13] Hm. Was this originally in Debian? Is there value in including the old changelog entries (from a non-official Debian archive?) [00:14] It wasn't originally in Debian, but a French Debian derivitive. I tried to eliminate the old changelog entries that were in French but the person who put them there (in French) objected vocally. [00:14] So, I translated them, but Lintian didn't like the translated form. [00:14] Heh. Ok. [00:15] You use a debian/copyright generator, don't you. That's why it's so granular? :) [00:16] Actually, I took what was already there and hand-wrote most of it. :D [00:17] I had to take special care to add the dpf/* items since that was a git submodule that had to be repacked. [00:21] Ok. Time to go and renew my license. I think the rest is ok (although it's a little weird that both the dragonfly-reverb metapackage and the packages it depends on Provide: lv2-plugin and vst-plugin) [00:23] RAOF: Have fun. License renewals: I don't envy you. [00:36] RAOF: i was pinged. [00:39] and am playing catchup [01:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: containerd (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.3.3-0ubuntu1~19.10.1 => 1.3.3-0ubuntu1~19.10.2] (no packageset) [03:40] Eickmeyer: Actually, the other thing I'd like to have in there is some documentation as to regenerate the various embedded files would be nice - the various Artwork.cpp files and NotoSans_Regular.ttf.cpp. [03:40] I don't think I'd block on that, but it's the sort of thing that'd be really nice for anyone who actually wanted to take us up on our offer of being able to modify all our source packages :) [04:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-10-cross-mipsen [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [2+c1] (no packageset) [07:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-10-cross-mipsen [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2+c1] (no packageset) [07:20] hi ubuntu-archive geoip geoip-database and python-geoip are listed as "source and binary movement to universe". This is intentional (we switched to v2) and I'd ask if one of you could please do the change? [07:20] ahasenack: ^^ FYI [07:22] cpaelzer, hey, demoted now! [07:22] thanks! [07:31] rbasak: if you are around it would be nice to ack and push https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu/+merge/381289 so that later someone can do the associated demotion and allow the new stable dpdk to migrate [09:11] RikMills[m], valorie: hey! So I have created the FocalUpgrades page on https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FocalUpgrades - could you make sure the Kubuntu upgrade section is good? [09:32] sil2100: thanks for that. yes will get that done soonish [09:34] * sil2100 hugs RikMills [09:34] grr. I guess libreoffice tests don't very much like it migrating from proposed to release half way through an 8 hr test run! [10:14] cpaelzer: done [10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-10-cross-mipsen [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2+c1] [10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-10-cross-mipsen [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [2+c1] [10:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted what-is-python [amd64] (focal-proposed) [3] [10:28] could someone look at bug #1868927? [10:28] bug 1868927 in shared-mime-info (Ubuntu) "FFe: Sync shared-mime-info 1.15-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1868927 [10:29] I'm not convinced a FFe is required, it's mostly bugfixes but still since it's up for one I would rather no by pass r-t [10:35] seb128: you can sync that one [10:37] Laney, thanks [11:06] sil2100, apw: please ignore the ruby2.5 autopkg test triggered by libffi, we are going to remove ruby2.5 before the release [11:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pydoctor [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [19.11.0+git20200303.47424e7-1] (no packageset) [11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pydoctor [amd64] (focal-proposed) [19.11.0+git20200303.47424e7-1] [12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rpmlint [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.11-0.2] (no packageset) [12:35] ubuntu-archive: when someone has some time I requested a removal for ruby2.5 here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby2.5/+bug/1869365 [12:35] Ubuntu bug 1869365 in ruby2.5 (Ubuntu) "[RM] Removal request of ruby2.5/2.5.7-1ubuntu4 from Focal" [Undecided,New] [12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rpmlint [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.11-0.2] [12:45] done [13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: oem-somerville-three-eyed-raven-meta (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04~ubuntu1] [13:42] that ^ is for NEWing to main please, under the exception listed in the referenced bug [13:42] hello, please can someone reject python-pyscss2 and python-django-pyscss2 from the focal new queue? upstream horizon moved back to the original deps so these are no longer needed. [13:49] ubuntu-archive: hiho there is dpdk-doc as "Binary only movements to universe" - as well as as for "libnginx-mod-http-geoip" [13:49] both are intentional and I wanted to ask if someone could do these moves [13:49] dpdk would also free it up in proposed migration to move before the next level of freezes next week [15:07] RAOF: I'll open an issue with upstream about that. [15:13] RAOF: https://github.com/michaelwillis/dragonfly-reverb/issues/66 [15:13] michaelwillis issue 66 in dragonfly-reverb "Packaging for Ubuntu" [Open] [15:56] kanashiro: release team cannot remove packages, normally RM bugs should add ~ubuntu-archive as subscriber [15:56] kanashiro: and AA did that already now [16:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1046.51] (no packageset) [16:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1079.89] (kernel) [16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [0.86.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [i386] (focal-proposed/main) [0.86.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [0.86.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [0.86.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [0.86.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [16:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poppler [armhf] (focal-proposed/main) [0.86.1-0ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) [17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.86.1-0ubuntu1] [17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.86.1-0ubuntu1] [17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.86.1-0ubuntu1] [17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.86.1-0ubuntu1] [17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.86.1-0ubuntu1] [17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poppler [i386] (focal-proposed) [0.86.1-0ubuntu1] [17:09] looks like something is not working right with the iso building today… temporary glitch? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/471010607/buildlog_ubuntu_focal_amd64_lubuntu_BUILDING.txt.gz [17:14] Yes, should be fixed now [17:14] (Rolled back anyway - we haven't completely worked out the underlying cause yet) [17:15] ^ bashfulrobot that affects you, too, so trigger a rebuild on your images [17:15] thanks cjwatson [17:19] wxl I appreciate hte heads up! [17:24] xnox, ok, I did subscribe ~ubuntu-archive [18:58] sil2100: thanks for doing that [18:58] will test shortly [19:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] (20200327.1) has been added [19:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected python-django-pyscss2 [source] (focal-proposed) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1] [19:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected python-pyscss2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.0-0ubuntu1] [19:16] Laney: re: gpaste that came over the sponsors list, I took that up and synced it - it's currently sitting in proposed :) [19:16] since I saw you ID that there's no need for FFe [19:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.525.41 => 2.525.42] (desktop-core) [19:57] kanashiro: ok cool, sorry that i missread things [21:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal Beta] (20200327) has been added [21:17] Huh. I didn't think we were going to start seeing beta builds until after beta freeze, but oh well. [22:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1046.51] [22:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1079.89] [23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mstflint (eoan-proposed/universe) [4.11.0+1-1 => 4.13.3+2-2~ubuntu19.10.1] (no packageset) (sync) [23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mstflint (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.8.0-2 => 4.13.3+2-2~ubuntu18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)