| BluesKaj | Howdy folks | 09:52 |
|---|---|---|
| BluesKaj | !newest | 10:06 |
| ubottu | Packages in Ubuntu may not be the latest. Ubuntu aims for stability, so "latest" may not be a good idea. Post-release updates are only considered if they are fixes for security vulnerabilities, high impact bug fixes, or unintrusive bug fixes with substantial benefit. See also !backports, !sru, and !ppa. | 10:06 |
| mparillo | Testing today's Beta Candidate ISO: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/411/builds/209850/testcases and for the first time I noticed that it seemed to be running a check disk against the ISO's file system. Is that normal? | 13:46 |
| IrcsomeBot | <DarinMiller> I noticed the disk check on the boot disk also. I think one of the known bugs list mentions it. | 13:48 |
| RikMills | mparillo: new and normal | 13:49 |
| mparillo | Thanks to both of you. | 13:49 |
| RikMills | that should cut down the number of bugs reported due to corrupted downloads ;) | 13:49 |
| mparillo | I always md5sum my ISO file, but if I dd it to a USB Thumb Drive, I assume there is a possibility of corruption there, right? | 14:05 |
| RikMills | yep | 14:06 |
| mparillo | Not to mention dd itself can get me in trouble. | 14:07 |
| mparillo | It never has because I stare at it for 30 seconds before hitting enter ;-) | 14:09 |
| === mitya57_ is now known as mitya57 | ||
| mparillo | I tested a live session after selecting Francais as my language. The description under the Installation Icon was Install Kubuntu, and Firefox was all in English. But after the installation, Firefox was on a French Locale, and so was Discover (with a minor miss like after updating, it says a jour in the main window, but at the bottom right it says Up to date. I am calling it a pass. | 15:48 |
| mparillo | Are we likely to stay on the same Beta ISO for a few days? If a new one is coming soon, I would hate to start the OEM test case. | 20:14 |
| RikMills | mparillo: the current ISO (which is not a beta candidate, no matter what it says) will hopefully be replaced in about 24hrs time | 20:17 |
| mparillo | May be sooner. I refreshed http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/411/builds and it says (re-building) So, it is really a daily? So the test results get reset daily? | 20:19 |
| RikMills | mparillo: no, that is a retry build that failed. the tracker oddly doesn't clear the status when build crash and burn like that | 20:21 |
| RikMills | mparillo: any new ISO has to wait on the currently building libreoffice in -proposed | 20:22 |
| RikMills | without that, all flavous ISO builds fail | 20:22 |
| RikMills | libreoffice can take a day to build on some architectures | 20:22 |
| mparillo | Today, immediately after an install, Discover updated LO for me. But, I tend to point potential testers to iso.qa.ubuntu.com so I guess I need to be careful. | 20:23 |
| RikMills | LP: #1869652 | 20:23 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 1869652 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "1:6.4.2-0ubuntu2 breaks universe enabled ISO builds where libreoffice is seeded" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1869652 | 20:23 |
| RikMills | mparillo: it installs ok for users, but germinate and live-build freak out at the deps | 20:24 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!