[09:52] <BluesKaj> Howdy folks
[10:06] <BluesKaj> !newest
[10:06] <ubottu> Packages in Ubuntu may not be the latest. Ubuntu aims for stability, so "latest" may not be a good idea. Post-release updates are only considered if they are fixes for security vulnerabilities, high impact bug fixes, or unintrusive bug fixes with substantial benefit. See also !backports, !sru, and !ppa.
[13:46] <mparillo> Testing today's Beta Candidate ISO: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/411/builds/209850/testcases and for the first time I noticed that it seemed to be running a check disk against the ISO's file system. Is that normal?
[13:48] <IrcsomeBot> <DarinMiller> I noticed the disk check on the boot disk also.  I think one of the known bugs list mentions it.
[13:49] <RikMills> mparillo: new and normal
[13:49] <mparillo> Thanks to both of you.
[13:49] <RikMills> that should cut down the number of bugs reported due to corrupted downloads ;)
[14:05] <mparillo> I always md5sum my ISO file, but if I dd it to a USB Thumb Drive, I assume there is a possibility of corruption there, right?
[14:06] <RikMills> yep
[14:07] <mparillo> Not to mention dd itself can get me in trouble.
[14:09] <mparillo> It never has because I stare at it for 30 seconds before hitting enter ;-)
=== mitya57_ is now known as mitya57
[15:48] <mparillo> I tested a live session after selecting Francais as my language. The description under the Installation Icon was Install Kubuntu, and Firefox was all in English. But after the installation, Firefox was on a French Locale, and so was Discover (with a minor miss like after updating, it says a jour in the main window, but at the bottom right it says Up to date. I am calling it a pass.
[20:14] <mparillo> Are we likely to stay on the same Beta ISO for a few days? If a new one is coming soon, I would hate to start the OEM test case.
[20:17] <RikMills> mparillo: the current ISO (which is not a beta candidate, no matter what it says) will hopefully be replaced in about 24hrs time
[20:19] <mparillo> May be sooner. I refreshed http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/411/builds and it says (re-building) So, it is really a daily? So the test results get reset daily?
[20:21] <RikMills> mparillo: no, that is a retry build that failed. the tracker oddly doesn't clear the status when build crash and burn like that
[20:22] <RikMills> mparillo: any new ISO has to wait on the currently building libreoffice in -proposed
[20:22] <RikMills> without that, all flavous ISO builds fail
[20:22] <RikMills> libreoffice can take a day to build on some architectures
[20:23] <mparillo> Today, immediately after an install, Discover updated LO for me. But, I tend to point potential testers to iso.qa.ubuntu.com so I guess I need to be careful.
[20:23] <RikMills> LP: #1869652
[20:23] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 1869652 in libreoffice (Ubuntu) "1:6.4.2-0ubuntu2 breaks universe enabled ISO builds where libreoffice is seeded" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1869652
[20:24] <RikMills> mparillo: it installs ok for users, but germinate and live-build freak out at the deps