[07:36] <tjaalton> ahasenack: the mod_ssl patches are now in 2.4.43-1, I hope you'll merge that :)
[08:57] <Laney> It looks like Ubuntu Kylin are looking for sponsorship for a new package of theirs that they're trying to get into the beta: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1869007
[08:57] <Laney> if anyone has some time, that would be a nice thing to look into
[09:40] <juliank> Is it just me, or does anyone else have trouble keeping bitlbee and bumblebee separated in their head?
[09:41] <juliank> bitl... is an IRC -> other gateway thing, bumbl is an nvidia optimus support
[09:41] <juliank> and like their names are far too similar
[09:46] <RikMills> Laney: Looking at the new kylin package now
[09:59] <remix_tj> hello, i'd like to know if is still possible have two packages for fortinet vpn network manager plugin on the next release updated. I'm building it manually on ubuntu 18.04, but as far as i can see the release hasn't changed on next lts
[10:01] <remix_tj> the packages i'm building manually are network-manager-fortisslvpn and network-manager-fortisslvpn-gnome that i see they are still on 1.2.8, but i require 1.2.10 since they have implemented a new field on the gui that has to be passed to the commandline of vpn client
[10:03] <remix_tj> 1.2.10 package has been released a year ago https://github.com/NetworkManager/NetworkManager-fortisslvpn/releases if possible i'd like to have it upgraded on the upcoming ubuntu release
[10:09] <Unit193> Looks like that was never updated in Debian.
[11:22] <remix_tj> Unit193: and there's no way to update in ubuntu?
[11:30] <rbasak> remix_tj: Ubuntu is in feature freeze. A capable developer will need to negotiate Ubuntu's freeze exception processes, and if diverging from Debian, commit to maintaining the Ubuntu package until the divergence is gone.
[11:38] <remix_tj> it's a trivial update, can be updated also in debian, if required. But negotiating an exception maybe it's not worth
[11:38] <remix_tj> since is a very marginal package
[12:36] <doko> tkamppeter: do we need hp-ppd in the distro, or can we remove it?
[12:48] <rbasak> remix_tj: if there are no feature changes then you don't need an exception
[12:50] <remix_tj> the changes from the ubuntu release with respect to the one i'm compiling manually are few, but there are changes like adding a new field in the configuration of vpn
[12:57] <kisak> good day, does anyone know how to get in touch with someone who manages Focal's 32 bit build whitelist? I'm having a hard time finding someone who would evaluate https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-vaapi-driver-shaders/+bug/1864314
[13:00] <rbasak> remix_tj: then that does sound like a feature change. Sorry!
[13:01] <rbasak> kisak: this was recently documented: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/i386#How_to_expand_i386_port_scope
[13:01] <remix_tj> i'd ask a dev from the italian community if he can change, otherwise i'll continue to build by myself
[13:13] <kisak> rbasak: thanks, will see if I can add a note to there without too much pain
[13:46] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, do you think we can make kisak happy above? ^^^
[14:09] <doko> stgraber: can logaricheck be removed from the archive?
[14:12] <Laney> rbalint: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/s/systemd/focal/s390x
[14:12] <Laney> looks like you got broken by a new kernel
[14:13] <Laney> but probably just a non-silenced grep?
[14:16] <rbalint> Laney, scheduled to be fixed in next upload
[14:17] <Laney> GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREAT </tony the tiger>
[14:18] <rbalint> Laney, i'd like to land 245.3, too, and i plan doing it after the beta is out
[14:20] <Laney> ok
[14:27] <gpiccoli> o/ sil2100
[14:28] <gpiccoli> Hoe are you doing? Sorry to annoy, I'd like to ask if libvirt could get releases to xenial-updates. Currently, it's on -proposed for a while, and blocking the UCA release hehe
[14:29] <sil2100> gpiccoli: o/ ah, yeah, so it was previously FTBFS for i386 so I marked LP: #1864918 as incomplete, hence it didn't appear as a valid candidate
[14:30] <sil2100> gpiccoli: but I see now it build successfully again
[14:30] <sil2100> Hoped someone will switch that bug to Fix Committed back after checking on my comment
[14:31] <sil2100> gpiccoli: switched back and released
[14:32] <gpiccoli> Wow, thanks a lot sil2100 =)
[14:33] <gpiccoli> you're fast dude!
[15:45] <niedbalski> RAOF: or bdmurray hey o/, if any of you have a chance to please check lp: 1867398, I've completed the verification at my end.
[15:46] <bdmurray> niedbalski: that has not been in -proposed for 7 days afaict. Is the are reason to rush it?
[15:48] <niedbalski> bdmurray: you are right, i think it can wait for the 7 days cadence.
[15:48] <niedbalski> thanks
[15:49] <bdmurray> niedbalski: okay, feel free to ping again on Thursday
[19:54] <[rg]> I just got the util-linux-dbgsym packacge, but https://bpaste.net/ID7Q gdb doesn't find anything, is a reboot required?
[20:00] <sarnold> $ dpkg -S sbin/fdisk
[20:00] <sarnold> fdisk: /sbin/fdisk
[20:00] <sarnold> [rg]: are you sure you installed the right symbols?
[20:01] <[rg]> not 100%, I did enable the other debug symbol repo as per the wiki
[20:01] <[rg]> my output for that command is the same
[20:01] <[rg]> oh wait...
[20:01] <[rg]> fdisk is it's own package?
[20:06] <[rg]> sarnold: why does fdisk have it's own debug symbols? or, what is the util-linux-dbgsym for?
[20:14] <sarnold> [rg]: that's for debugging the programs in the util-linux package
[20:15] <[rg]> sarnold: yeah but it's fdisk source in util-linux?
[20:15] <[rg]> s/it's/isn't
[20:16] <sarnold> [rg]: hrm. good question. :)
[20:16] <[rg]> yeah I'm new to this :-)
[20:23] <cjwatson> Pretty sure the -dbgsym packages generally correspond to binaries not sources
[20:25] <[rg]> ok, thanks
[20:42] <xevious> bryce: In case my response gets sent to your spam folder, I just replied to your last email.
[20:48] <bryce> xevious, thanks, yeah I whitelisted you :-)
[21:09] <xevious> bryce: I recently switched from amavis/spamassassin to rspamd and it's much more effective with much less configuration