=== mIk3_09 is now known as mIk3_08 [12:55] ddstreet: didrocks: jamespage: doko: sarnold: joeubuntu: pre-MIR meeting ping for awareness [12:55] * cpaelzer lights the campfire [12:55] o/ [12:56] morning cpaelzer ddstreet [12:56] joeubuntu o/ [13:01] ok - one more ping for everyone and then lets kick this off [13:01] ddstreet: didrocks: jamespage: doko: sarnold: joeubuntu: [13:01] #startmeeting Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status [13:01] Meeting started Tue Mar 31 13:01:15 2020 UTC. The chair is cpaelzer. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology. [13:01] Available commands: action commands idea info link nick === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice | Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status Meeting | Current topic: [13:01] #topic Review of previous action items === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice | Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status Meeting | Current topic: Review of previous action items [13:01] the one thing I remember being open was that doko wanted to review (or discuss with sil2100) about https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-firmware-raspi2/+bug/1867813 [13:01] Launchpad bug 1867813 in linux-firmware-raspi2 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] linux-firmware-raspi2 to restricted" [High,New] [13:01] I don't see an update on the bug [13:02] doko: speak up if there are any update on this [13:02] other than that we maybe should do the bug-assignment to you so that this is clear to everyone not reading the meeting logs [13:02] o/ [13:02] sorry I'm a little late [13:03] np [13:03] cpaelzer: no, didn't touch yt [13:03] ok, I updated the bug so it is clear [13:03] you have another week for it (and another, ...) :-) [13:04] Noth further open items I'd know of [13:04] next topic would be the - today very interesting - component mismatches [13:04] #topic current component mismatches === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice | Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status Meeting | Current topic: current component mismatches [13:04] #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches-proposed.svg [13:04] #link https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-mismatches.svg [13:05] This would be empty (what a nice picture this would be) if not for "Ubuntu.Focal supported-maas seed" [13:05] this is due to https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform/commit/?id=eaef590aa2868e98d67c114bbc655be1964ddf6f [13:05] apport depends on terminator? [13:05] jamespage: that is a bad alternative listing [13:05] I was aware of the mismatch for websockify -> python-jwcrypto [13:05] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-jwcrypto/+bug/1869215 [13:05] Launchpad bug 1869215 in python-jwcrypto (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-jwcrypto" [High,New] [13:06] yeah jamespage that one comes later in the "new" cases [13:06] mainly as I did the update and raised the MIR (I know it late) [13:06] ok [13:06] and apport was discussed last week [13:06] yet it isn't clear who is driving this to a conclusion (fixing d/control in apport) [13:06] so what do we need to discuss now about mismatches? [13:06] the maas seed change [13:06] foundations needs to talk with the MAAS team who will maintain these in the archive [13:07] ok is that ongoing doko? [13:07] there are even denied packages in this list (like ipmitool) [13:07] these are used to build the maas snap, however the team doesn't feel responsible to maintain those :-( [13:07] no good sportsmanship that is young padawan [13:07] just skip those for now. [13:08] doko: can we keep it as is and you'll let us know how the discussion continues? [13:08] ok [13:08] yes [13:08] #topic New MIRs === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice | Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status Meeting | Current topic: New MIRs [13:08] #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=NEW&assignee_option=none&field.assignee=&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [13:08] I'm volunteering to take u-boot-rpi [13:09] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-jwcrypto/+bug/1869215 as mentioned by jamespage is up for grabs [13:09] Launchpad bug 1869215 in python-jwcrypto (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-jwcrypto" [High,New] [13:09] anyone? [13:09] this should be a rather easy python package [13:10] i can take it, i suppose [13:10] since doko and I are currently assigned and jamespage filed it I'm looking towards didrocks / ddstreet for this [13:10] ah [13:10] thanks ddstreet [13:10] assigned [13:10] jamespage: I have to admit - milestone 20.03 is a bit intense for this [13:11] given that tomorrow is 20.04 :-) [13:11] #topic Incomplete bugs / questions === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice | Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status Meeting | Current topic: Incomplete bugs / questions [13:11] #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/?field.searchtext=&orderby=-date_last_updated&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITH_RESPONSE&field.status%3Alist=INCOMPLETE_WITHOUT_RESPONSE&field.subscriber=ubuntu-mir [13:11] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/octavia/+bug/1864666 was punted to 20.10 [13:11] Launchpad bug 1864666 in python-octavia-lib (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-octavia-lib, ovn-octavia-provider" [Medium,Incomplete] [13:11] nothing newer than that to work on [13:11] unless anyone of you disagrees [13:12] ok, silence means you are ok I guess :-) [13:12] #topic Any other business? === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice | Weekly Main Inclusion Requests status Meeting | Current topic: Any other business? [13:12] yes, [13:12] i'd like review of my reviews, if possible, either now or later [13:12] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/realmd/+bug/1868154 [13:12] Launchpad bug 1868154 in realmd (Ubuntu) "[MIR] realmd" [Medium,New] [13:12] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adcli/+bug/1868159 [13:12] Launchpad bug 1868159 in adcli (Ubuntu) "[MIR] adcli" [Medium,New] [13:13] I can do those tomorrow morning or late today [13:13] along u-boot-rpi [13:13] cpaelzer one thing i may have missed (thinking about it now) is MIR requires a team to accept ownership of the pkgs, correct? I think that should be added to the TODO checklist [13:13] I think it is in it [13:14] TODO: - The package has a team bug subscriber [13:14] ah, i misinterpreted that then [13:14] as *any* bug subscriber [13:14] my bad [13:14] perhaps that could be clarified, i assume only a limited set of lp teams are acceptible there, not just any team, right? [13:15] anyway, we can discuss after you have time for a more detailed review [13:15] thanks [13:17] ok I can do that in a query with you [13:17] nothing else I guess? [13:17] 10 [13:17] 5 [13:17] 3 [13:17] 2 [13:17] 1 [13:17] #endmeeting === meetingology changed the topic of #ubuntu-meeting to: Ubuntu Meeting Grounds: Please leave swords by the door | Calendar/Scheduled meetings: http://fridge.ubuntu.com/calendars | Logs: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MeetingLogs | Meetingology documentation: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology | be nice [13:17] Meeting ended Tue Mar 31 13:17:30 2020 UTC. [13:17] Minutes: http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2020/ubuntu-meeting.2020-03-31-13.01.moin.txt [13:17] thank you everyone [13:17] thanks cpaelzer [13:24] ddstreet, cpaelzer: soooo... websockify and spice-html5 [13:25] I completely foobar'ed spice-html5 - its still not been updated to the 0.2.x series, although we have tested OK with OpenStack [13:25] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-jwcrypto/+bug/1869215 was a new depends of websockify which has been promoted to main [13:25] Launchpad bug 1869215 in python-jwcrypto (Ubuntu) "[MIR] python-jwcrypto" [High,New] [13:26] but without the spice-html5 adapter we don't have a complete dependency chain under support [13:27] sorry, was lost in grub git rebasing [13:27] just backlog, sounds ok, ut do not hesitate to ping me if anything [13:28] jamespage seems like websockify in ubuntu is already newer than debian, are you saying we need to update spice-html5 to 0.2 series without debian also? [13:28] ddstreet: welcome to openstack in ubuntu :) [13:28] lol [13:28] kinda - I was raising that the three projects are all inter-linked [13:29] i.e. unless I do the spice-html5 updates, the MIR can't complete [13:29] but we're at beta freeze so I'll make myself somewhat unpopular [13:29] so either I make myself (more) unpopular and we go for it for 20.04 [13:29] or we push websockify back to universe and push all three out to 20.10 [13:31] i'll defer to cpaelzer and you as i'm new to MIR, though of course one of those options saves me MIR review work ;) [13:32] jamespage: websockify again [13:32] didn't we have that discussed in the past [13:33] on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/websockify/+bug/1108935 ? [13:33] Launchpad bug 1108935 in spice-html5 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] websockify, spice-html5" [High,Confirmed] [13:39] jamespage: you are talking about the constraints I set in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/websockify/+bug/1108935 I guess [13:39] Launchpad bug 1108935 in spice-html5 (Ubuntu) "[MIR] websockify, spice-html5" [High,Confirmed] [13:40] there even is a 2.2 [13:40] and more fixes [13:40] so yeah I'd still prefer an update beofre promoting that to main [13:40] and while I understand tha no one wants to be (more) unpopular long term you'd be happy you have the newer version [13:42] I agreee to "unpopular and we go for it for 20.04" or "push all three out to 20.10" [13:42] but which of those you pick is your decision jamespage [13:42] as it is your gain (cool features) and your pain (being unpopular) === acheronuk is now known as RikMills