| lubot | <X> Without Qt 5.14 PySide2 will be missing it's tools (uic and rcc). 5.12 ones are not suitable. Although I can not predict how it will affect userbase and how many bug reports will follow. Maybe it's not critical at all | 06:04 |
|---|---|---|
| lubot | <X> https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-5.14.2-released | 07:23 |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: qt5-ukui-platformtheme (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) | 07:26 | |
| -queuebot:#ubuntu-qt- Unapproved: accepted qt5-ukui-platformtheme [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1] | 08:11 | |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @RikMills [So sad as that may be, perhaps that nudges me in the 5.12.8 direction], I'm +1 on going with 5.12.8 | 11:57 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> I think that's the better option for an LTS | 11:58 |
| lubot | <RikMills> It would certainly be less controversial with the RT | 12:01 |
| lubot | <mitya57> Ok. And it should take less time to update, too. | 12:08 |
| lubot | <mitya57> https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qt5/+/295702 is currently integrating, when that is done we should have tarballs. | 12:09 |
| lubot | <mitya57> I will do the core part (bootstrapping docs and so on), if someone wants to help with the remaining Qt modules and rebuilds it would be welcomed. | 12:10 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> @mitya57 [I will do the core part (bootstrapping docs and so on), if someone wants to help …], Do you want an Etherpad/CodiMD doc on one of the million instances? | 12:10 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> We can coordinate there | 12:10 |
| lubot | <mitya57> For me this chat is fine, but Etherpad will work too | 12:11 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Can you edit this? https://notes.lubuntu.me/tg_BplIoS0eAAFoGZILdWQ# | 12:12 |
| lubot | <mitya57> Yes | 12:14 |
| lubot | <tsimonq2> Sounds good | 12:15 |
| lubot | <RikMills> Great :) | 12:21 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!